Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Novel l-Nucleoside Analog Troxacitabine Given as a 30-Minute Infusion Every 21 Days

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2567-2574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Belanger ◽  
Malcolm Moore ◽  
Sharyn D. Baker ◽  
Jeanne Dionne ◽  
Martha Maclean ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Troxacitabine (Troxatyl, BCH-4556; BioChem Pharma Inc, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) is a novel synthetic l-nucleoside analog with activity against a broad range of human tumors in preclinical models. Preclinical toxicity suggested a predictable toxicity profile consistent with an agent of this class, with evidence of interspecies differences. We conducted a phase I study of troxacitabine given as a 30-minute infusion once every 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The starting dose of troxacitabine was 0.025 mg/m2, based on toxicology data from the most sensitive species studied (cynomolgus monkey). Doses were doubled until grade 1 skin or mucosal or grade 2 other toxicity was encountered. A modified Fibonacci scale was used. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were enrolled at 13 dose levels. Most common nonhematologic side effects were skin rash (44%), lethargy (29%), nausea (24%), alopecia, dry skin (18%), anorexia (13%), neurosensory symptoms (13%), and hand-foot syndrome (13%). In patients treated with prednisone 25 mg/d orally for 5 days, starting on day 1, skin rash was less problematic. Two patients at 12.5 mg/m2 experienced dose-limiting (grade 4) granulocytopenia. Confirmed partial responses were documented in one patient with previously untreated renal cell carcinoma with metastatic lung and bone lesions and in one patient with an unknown primary tumor. Eighteen patients had a best response of stable disease with a median duration of 5.1 months (range, 2.1 to 18.7 months). CONCLUSION: When given in this schedule, the maximum-tolerated dose of troxacitabine is 12.5 mg/m2, and the recommended dose for additional phase II studies is 10 mg/m2 once every 21 days with steroid premedication.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14606-e14606
Author(s):  
Yihebali Chi ◽  
Jianliang Yang ◽  
Feng Du ◽  
Sheng Yang ◽  
Yongkun Sun ◽  
...  

e14606 Background: Sorafenib (Sor) is a potent inhibitor of multiple intracellular and cell surface kinases. FOLFOX4 was demonstrated to be an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (AGA). The phase I portion of the phase I/II study is designed to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Sor combined with standard dose FOLFOX4, as well as safety, tolerance, and activity of the combination in patients (pts) with AGA. Methods: Pts with AGA with ECOG 0-1 and without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Three patients per cohort were treated with FOLFOX4 [Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), LV (200mg/m2) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2), followed by 5-FU continuously infusion (1200mg/ m2) for 44h every 2 weeks, up to 8 cycles, along with escalating doses of Sor (200, 400, 600mg) PO BID, continuously. If one patient experienced DLT, three additional patients were entered at the same dose level. Dose escalation continued until DLTs were experienced in two or more out of six patients, which was then defined as the MTD. Radiographic responses were assessed every 6 weeks per RECIST v1.0. Results: Nine pts were enrolled. Median age was 59.3 yr (range 42.6-71.6). M/F: 6/3; ECOG PS 0/1: 2/7. One out of 6 pts experienced DLT (G3 HFSR) in dose level 1 (200 mg BID), and 2 out of 3pts experienced DLT in dose level 2 (400 mg BID). The Sor 200mg BID was therefore identified as the MTD when combined with FOLFOX4. Major toxicity of this combination include neutropenia (G3/4: 7/3), leucopenia (G3/4: 2/0), HFSR (G3/4: 2/0) and incomplete bowel obstruction (G3/4: 1/0). One patient experienced G4 ALT/AST elevation accompanied with G3 GGT/bilirubin elevation, which led to treatment discontinuation. Preliminary efficacy data in 9 evaluable pts included 1 complete response (CR), 6 partial responses (PR) and 1 stable disease (SD) as best response. Median time to progression was 6.6 months. Median overall survival was 12.2 months. Conclusions: The MTD of Sor when used in combination of FOLFOX4 in AGA is 200mg PO BID, and this combination regimen has a manageable toxicity profile and promising activity in AGA. This efficacy and safety profiles need to be confirmed in further phase II studies.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 296-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Kelley ◽  
H. S. Nimeiri ◽  
M. T. Vergo ◽  
K. Chia ◽  
M. F. Mulcahy ◽  
...  

296 Background: SOR prolongs survival in patients (pts) with HCC. In preclinical studies, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (I) impair HCC growth and angiogenesis. Adding mTOR-I to SOR augments antitumor effect. Phase I studies of mTOR-I plus SOR have shown tolerability but did not include cirrhotic pts. We developed a phase I trial of mTOR-I TEM plus SOR to determine safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in pts with HCC. The study was approved and funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Methods: Eligibility: Advanced HCC diagnosed histologically or clinically. No prior systemic therapy (Tx). Prior resection/local Tx permitted if ≥1 measurable site. ECOG score ≤2, Child-Pugh ≤7, bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL, platelets ≥75,000/mcL. Design: 3+3 escalation to MTD with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) window 28 days; 6 pts at MTD for pharmacokinetics (PK). Endpoints: 1°: MTD, RP2D. 2°: Safety, toxicity, PK. Results: 9 pts enrolled to date: 7 at DL1, 2 at DL-1. Toxicity: DL1: 1 DLT of Gr3 thrombocytopenia. 1 pt removed for hypertensive urgency, adjudicated not Tx-related. 1 pt not evaluable due to abscess. 1 pt removed for Gr3 hypersensitivity to TEM in cycle 2. All remaining pts required reduction and/or delay for adverse events (AE). Tx-related AE at DL1 include: fatigue 57%, Gr3 11%; weight loss 22%, all Gr1; anorexia 57%, all Gr1/2; diarrhea 71%, all Gr1/2; rash/hand-foot syndrome 71%, Gr3 11%; thrombocytopenia 57%, Gr3 11%; hypophosphatemia 77%, Gr3 57%, refractory 11%. Study de-escalated to DL-1 due to non-DLT cumulative AE. DL-1: 2 pts enrolled have not had DLT nor dose reduction to date. Response: 4 of 7 pts in DL1 were evaluable. 3 of 4 had stable disease as best response. Conclusions: Tx-limiting, class-related AE occurred at DL1 of this double-biologic regimen. MTD in pts with Child-Pugh Class A cirrhosis appears lower than in pts without liver disease. Tolerability and dose delivery must be achieved to determine efficacy. A phase II study with correlative endpoints is planned at RP2D. Updated accrual and results will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Marret ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Keyvan Rezai ◽  
Jocelyn Gal ◽  
Esma Saada-Bouzid ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase pathway is often altered in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and is involved in the resistance to EGFR inhibitors. ObjectiveWe investigated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of copanlisib, an intravenous, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC patients in a phase I dose-escalation trial. Patients and methodsCopanlisib was given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles at the dose of 45 mg and 30 mg, in combination with standard doses of weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m² loading dose followed by 250 mg/m² on days 8, 15, and 22, and weekly thereafter). ResultsThree patients received copanlisib 45 mg, of whom two experienced grade 3 hyperglycemia during Cycle 1 that met the DLT criteria. Eight patients were then treated with copanlisib at the dose of 30 mg. Because of the occurrence of hyperglycemia, a premedication with metformine was introduced on the day of the injections. No DLTs were reported at this dose level. The trial was stopped early because of the unfavourable toxicity profile of the combination. Among eight evaluable patients for response, four patients (50%) had disease stabilization according to RECIST1.1 as best response.ConclusionCopanlisib combined with cetuximab demonstrated unfavorable toxicity and limited efficacy in heavily pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC patients. NCT02822482, Date of registration: June 2016.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3545-3552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Couteau ◽  
Marie-Laure Risse ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
Florence Lefresne-Soulas ◽  
Alessandro Riva ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m2, 50/175 mg/m2, 60/210 mg/m2, 60/250 mg/m2, 60/275 mg/m2, 60/300 mg/m2, and 70/250 mg/m2. Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m2 and 60/300 mg/m2; the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (23) ◽  
pp. 3986-3992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Eric Raymond ◽  
Sandrine Faivre ◽  
Michel Gatineau ◽  
Kathleen Meely ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: DX-8951f is a totally synthetic derivative of camptothecin with greater cytotoxicity and more potent topoisomerase I inhibition than SN-38, topotecan, and camptothecin in preclinical studies. This phase I study aimed to describe the toxicity and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of DX-8951f given as a 30-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with refractory solid malignancies were treated with DX-8951f at dose levels ranging from 4 to 7.1 mg/m2. All but one patient had received previous chemotherapy, and eight patients were considered heavily pretreated. Total DX-8951f plasma concentrations were assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Thirty-six cycles of DX-8951f were administered. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity, and it was dose-related, reversible, and noncumulative. Other toxicities included nausea and vomiting, alopecia, asthenia, fever, and anemia. Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea was observed in seven patients but was transient and resolved without requiring treatment. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that DX-8951f had a half-life of 7.15 hours and a clearance rate of 1.65 L/h·m2. The DX-8951f area under the plasma-concentration curve increased linearly with the dose. We defined the MTD of DX-8951f administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks as 7.1 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity of DX-8951f is neutropenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 5.33 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in patients previously treated with chemotherapy.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Wasserman ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
François Lokiec ◽  
François Goldwasser ◽  
Salima Kalla ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2. At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
...  

Abstract We have previously reported that a simple, well-tolerated regimen of weekly oral CY (500mg) and alternate day prednisone (50–100mg) produced partial responses (PR) in 40% of 56 patients (pts) in relapse after ASCT; median progression-free survival was 18.6 months (Blood2004; 104[11]: 311b). To build upon these favorable results, we have designed an ongoing phase I–II trial adding Vc to this regimen. CY was given p.o. once weekly on days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle while prednisone was given every other morning. CY was given before Vc on appropriate days. A maximum of 8 cycles was administered. Sixteen pts have been entered so far. Patients characteristics: Median age was 59 (48–74) years; 9 were male. The Ig subtypes were: IgG kappa:lambda = 9:2, IgA kappa:lambda = 1:2; kappa light chain = 2. All had received VAD, i.v. CY (2.5 g/m2) + G-CSF mobilization followed by ASCT and 2 had undergone a second ASCT; other prior regimens included melphalan and prednisone in 5 pts, thalidomide in 10, lenalidomide in 1, α-interferon in 3, vaccine therapy in 1 and oral CY + P in 8. The median pretreament ß2-microglobulin level was 279 (147 – 875) nm/L, albumin 39 (30–42) g/L and creatinine 91 (60–112) umol/L. The dose escalation schedule to date is as follows: Dose Level N P dose CY dose (mg/m2) Vc dose (mg/m2) 1 6 100 150 0.7 d 1,8,15 2 3 100 300 0.7 d 1,8,15 3 3 100 300 1.0 d 1,8,15 4 4 100 300 1.0 d 1,4,8,11 Three further dose escalations to a maximum Vc dose of 1.5 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 are allowed if dose limiting toxicity does not occur. Toxicities during cycle 1: All pts have completed cycle 1. Three episodes of grade (gr) 3 sinopulmonary infection occurred during a community outbreak at dose level 1; levofloxacin prophylaxis during the first cycle was added and no further infections during the initial cycle were observed. One pt at dose level 3 experienced transient gr 4 hypophosphatemia which reversed without therapy. At dose level 4, cycle 1 was interrupted in one pt due to gr 4 leukopenia (gr 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) related to disease, while a second pt developed grade 4 elevation in transaminases which recovered quickly when Vc was held on d 8. Pt accrual continues. Toxicities of subsequent cycles: To date, 47 additional cycles have been given. SAE’s consisted of pneumonia during cycle 2 in the same 3 patients with infection during cycle 1 and one of these with progressive disease had another bout during cycle 3. Gr 3 toxicities included anemia in 2 cycles, leucopenia in 2, neutropenia in 4, hypophosphatemia in 1 and hyperglycemia in 2; reversible gr 4 hypophosphatemia recurred in the pt mentioned above in 1 other cycle. No liver or other organ toxicity was observed. Maximum gr of peripheral neuropathy was 1. Responses: Responses were assessed after cycles 2, 4, 6 and 8. Best response included near CR (1), PR (4), MR (4), stable disease (5), progression (1) and too early (1). Two pts have completed all 8 cycles, while 4 have progressed; 10 remain on study. Preliminary Conclusions: 1) Vc can be added to a continuous program of oral CY + P with acceptable hematologic toxicity; 2) no neurotoxicity > gr 1 has been observed; 3) the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination regimen has not yet been defined; 4) future plans include a randomized National Cancer Institute of Canada trial comparing the the MTD of this combination to Vc in relpased MM pts.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7534-7534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Forero-Torres ◽  
R. R. Furman ◽  
J. D. Rosenblatt ◽  
A. Younes ◽  
K. Harrop ◽  
...  

7534 Background: CD40 is a member of the TNF receptor family and is widely expressed on hematologic malignancies of B-cell origin. SGN-40 is a humanized antibody against CD40 with effector cell function and mild agonistic activity. Preclinical toxicity studies and efficacy data supported initiation of a multi-institutional phase I study to test the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of SGN-40 in patients with relapsed NHL. Methods: Cohorts of 3–6 pts were treated weekly with a maximum dose of 2, 3, or 4 mg/kg/wk SGN-40. A dose escalation schedule is used such that patients receive 1 mg/kg on D1 and D4, 2 mg/kg on D8, and higher doses on weeks 3–5. Responding patients may receive a second cycle. Further dose escalation up to 8 mg/kg is planned. Results: 16 pts have been treated with multiple histologic subtypes: follicular (1), marginal zone (MZL; 1), mantle cell (4), and diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL; 10). One patient (2 mg/kg) developed a reversible Grade 3 unilateral conjunctivitis and ipsilateral loss of visual acuity. No other dose limiting toxicity has been observed up to 4 mg/kg. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data suggest that the antibody has a relatively short half-life, perhaps reflecting a route of elimination or binding that is not saturated at current doses. Two partial responses have been observed at 3 mg/kg (1 MZL, 1 DLBCL) and one partial response has been observed at 4 mg/kg dose (DLBCL relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant with small volume tumor). Conclusions: Using an intra-patient dose escalation schedule, SGN-40 has been well-tolerated at doses up to 4 mg/kg/wk. Further dose-escalation is ongoing to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Three objective responses have been seen, including two in patients with extensively treated aggressive disease. Correlative studies are underway measuring soluble CD40, cytokine release, effect of FcR polymorphisms, and SGN-40-induced immunogenicity. Given the favorable tolerability and activity, phase II studies in NHL are planned. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13048-13048 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Hoff ◽  
A. O. Hoff ◽  
A. T. Phan ◽  
S. I. Sherman ◽  
J. Yao ◽  
...  

13048 Background: MTC is a rare tumor that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy. 5-FU and D are frequently used, with an expected response rate of around 15%. MTC is often associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by a mutation in the RET proto-oncogene which encodes RET, a tyrosine kinase receptor. I is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against c-Kit, PDGF and possibly RET, and we postulated that its addition to chemotherapy would increase its efficacy against this disease. Methods: We designed a phase I/II trial combining escalating doses of oral C, IV D and oral I. Pts with any advanced solid tumors were eligible for the phase I part of the trial. Results: 13 pts were entered and 12 were eligible (7 MTC, 2 adrenocortical, 1 islet-cell, 1 insular thyroid and 1 small cell). 4 pts did not complete one cycle (1 pt withdrew after 5 days and 2 pts progressed in less than 10 days and were replaced for toxicity analysis, 1 had a DLT and is included). 3 patients were entered in dose level 1, without DLT. 2 out of 6 pts developed DLT at the second dose level (1 G 3 fatigue and 1 G3 hypokalemia). Three additional pts are being entered on dose level 1. The first one had PD after 7 days and is being replaced. For the 11 pts who were evaluable, best response was 3 SD (range 3 to 9 + months) and 8 PD. Conclusions: The combination of CDI is feasible but has resulted in an unexpected pattern of toxicity in this patient population, with fatigue and hypokalemia as the DLT. No significant diarrhea or hand-foot syndrome was seen. Only G1 and 2 fluid retention and neutropenia have been encountered. Only minor reduction in tumor size has been seen among these heavily pretreated pts. Once the phase I is complete, the trial will continue in a phase II setting for untreated MTC pts. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document