The role of FDG-PET in low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): Impact of histology
17534 Background: FDG-PET scan was proved important diagnostic and prognostic tool in patients with aggressive (NHL). The objective of this study is to investigate the correlation between the histology subtype in low-grade NHL and the sensitivity of the FDG-PET. Methods: We included all patients who presented to our institution during the period from April 2001 till April 2004 and underwent staging evaluation by FDG-PET during the course of their disease. All patients had histologically confirmed low-grade NHL. Patients with history of active malignancy, other than NHL, within the last five years were excluded. Correlation was made with the CT-scan findings. Results: 53 patients were included. Age (range 30–82, median 54), 57% of them were male. 34 patients had follicular lymphoma (FL), 9 patients had marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and 10 patients had small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). 24/34 patients with FL underwent FDG-PET during the initial evaluation of their disease, and 10/34 patients underwent FDG-PET as part of their restaging assessment. 33 patients had true positive FDG-PET findings when compared to CT-scan results. One patient had negative FDG-PET with CT-scan findings suggestive of pathologic lymphadenopathy (sensitivity 97%). The highest SUV was in the range of 3.5–15 (median = 7). 8/9 patients with MZL had true positive FDG-PET findings and one had false negative FDG-PET result (sensitivity 89%). The highest SUV was in the range of 2–6.30 (median 2.6). Among the ten patients with SLL, 5 had FDG-PET during the initial evaluation and 8 patients during re-staging workup. 13 FDG-PET results were available for analysis. 5 cases were false negative, 1 case was false positive, 5 cases were true positive, and 2 cases were true negative (sensitivity 50%). The highest SUV was in the range of 1.8–6.2 (median of 2.5). Conclusion: Histology in low-grade NHL has a major impact on the sensitivity of the FDG-PET imaging results. Whereas it is a highly sensitive diagnostic method in patients with FL, and to a lesser degree in patients with MZL, it has poor sensitivity in patients with SLL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.