Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with advanced relapsed/refractory NSCLC: Cox regression analysis of a randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7040-7040 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bonomi ◽  
C. Langer ◽  
M. O’Brien ◽  
K. O’Byrne ◽  
B. Bandstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact

7040 Background: A phase III trial compared PPX to docetaxel as 2nd-line treatment in pts with relapsed/refractory advanced NSCLC (STELLAR 2). While overall survival was similar between arms, the need for supportive measures to manage the effects of myelosuppression was significantly reduced in the PPX arm. The current analysis was performed to evaluate determinants of survival in the 2nd-line treatment of NSCLC. Methods: STELLAR 2 enrolled 849 pts, 427 on PPX and 422 on docetaxel; all patients were included in the analysis. Randomization between the study arms was stratified by tumor stage, performance status (PS), start of frontline chemotherapy (< 4 mo vs more than 4 mo), gender, and prior taxane therapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of baseline characteristics on overall survival (OS). Results: At randomization, 29% of pts had received prior taxane, 14% were PS2, 80% had stage IV disease, and 31% had started frontline therapy within the prior 4 months. Risk factors significantly affecting survival as determined by multivariate analysis are listed in the table . These factors were consistent when treatment was added to the model. Prior exposure to taxane was not predictive of survival; tumor stage was a significant univariate predictor (p=0.0349), but had relatively less impact in the multivariate model. Conclusion: These analyses identified several factors associated with reduced survival benefit from standard second line therapy. Consequently, alternative treatment strategies may be necessary in patients with poor prognosis. For example, more tolerable agents may enhance the benefit/toxicity ratio in these patients. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Efficacy of lapatinib in patients with high tumor EGFR expression: Results of a phase III trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4502-4502 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ravaud ◽  
J. Gardner ◽  
R. Hawkins ◽  
H. Von der Maase ◽  
N. Zantl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Reversible Inhibitor ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
Metastatic Sites

4502 Background: Lapatinib is an orally-active, reversible inhibitor of EGFR/ErbB2 tyrosine kinases. In Phase I/II trials, lapatinib has demonstrated activity in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer. We report the first results of a randomized open-label Phase III trial ( EGF20001 ) of lapatinib vs. hormone therapy (HT) in pts with advanced RCC that express EGFR and/or ErbB2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The main endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Pts with advanced RCC of any histology who had failed first-line cytokine therapy were stratified by Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and number of metastatic sites. Pts were randomized to receive oral lapatinib 1250 mg OD or HT. The primary efficacy endpoint was TTP, with 90% power to detect a 50% increase (i.e. 4 vs. 6 months) at a two-sided 5% significance level. All pt scans were interpreted by independent radiologic review. Results: At the time of the TTP analysis, 417 pts were randomized and 298 TTP events were reported. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between both arms; pooled results were: median age: 61 yrs; Stage IV disease: 97%, KPS 90–100: 59%, metastatic sites >2: 49%, prior nephrectomy: 94%, prior interferon therapy: 64%. No unexpected toxicities were observed, and drug-related AE (all grades) for lapatinib vs. HT included rash (44%:3%), diarrhoea (40%:3%). When results from all pts were analysed, median TTP was 15.3 weeks for lapatinib vs. 15.4 weeks for HT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94; p = 0.60), and median OS was 46.9 weeks for lapatinib vs. 43.1 weeks for HT (HR=0.88; p=0.29). In the major subgroup of 241 pts with EGFR overexpressed disease (3+ by IHC), median TTP was 15.1 weeks for lapatinib vs. 10.9 weeks for HT (HR = 0.76; p = 0.06), and median OS was 46.0 weeks for lapatinib vs. 37.9 weeks for HT (HR = 0.69; p = 0.02). These results were confirmed by Cox Regression analysis, and additional biomarker evaluation, including FISH, is underway. Conclusions: The EGFR/ErbB2 dual targeted inhibitor, lapatinib, appears to prolong overall survival compared to hormone therapy in advanced RCC pts with overexpressed EGFR who failed prior therapy. [Table: see text]

Meta-analyses of randomized trials assessing the influence of chemotherapy and prognostic factor in advanced/recurrent gastric cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4550-4550
Author(s):  
C. Pozzo ◽  
Y. Ohashi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

4550 Background: Advanced or recurrent stomach cancer remains an incurable disease. Several drugs and different combinations of chemotherapy have been investigated but very often with small sample sizes making definitive conclusions difficult. The GASTRIC project is an individual-patient-data (IPD) based meta-analysis in the advanced disease setting to quantify the potential benefit of various chemotherapies. We used this large database to study the role of various prognostic factors and potential interactions with chemotherapy. Methods: All randomized clinical trials (RCT) closed to patient accrual at the end of 2004 were eligible. Radiotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, or immunotherapy was excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Baseline variables included sex, age, performance status (PS), diseases status at entry, prior surgery, number of organs involved at entry, location of metastasis, TNM stages, histology, operative procedures, and geographic area. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the multivariate Cox analysis to assess of the prognostic factors for their relationship to OS. Results: Fourty-nine eligible RCTs (7,120 patients) were identified. As of December 2008, IPD from 21 trials (3,619 patients) with a median follow- up of 7.3 months were available for OS. There was no statistically significant difference between 5FU-based, anthracycline-based, platinum-based, taxane-based, or irinotecan-based regimens versus any other CT. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis stratified by trial and treatment arm, PS of 2 (HR, 2.43; 95%CI, 2.02 to 2.94) compared to PS of 0, metastatic (HR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.01 to 1.64) compared to local advanced, many number of organs, and location of metastasis (especially with peritorium; HR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.23 to 2.48) compared to none were strongly associated with lower survival. Conclusions: Our interim results could not show an overall survival benefit in favour of 5FU-, anthracycline-, platinum-, taxane-, or irinotecan-based regimens compared with a regimen without the specific chemotherapy. We confirm the impact of PS, diseases status at entry, number of organs involved, and location of metastasis on OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals 312 Female sex independently predicts adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefit from CTLA4 immune checkpoint inhibition

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A339-A339
Author(s):  
Ahmad Tarhini ◽  
Ni Kang ◽  
Sandra Lee ◽  
F Stephen Hodi ◽  
Gary Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
List Type ◽  
Female Sex ◽  
Interaction Term

BackgroundSex differences in tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy were shown in murine models and descriptive analyses from recent clinical trials. Female sex hormones have been implicated in melanoma development and response to systemic therapy. We hypothesized a gender difference in response to adjuvant immunotherapy with ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg; ipi3 or ipi10) versus high dose IFNα (HDI) as tested in the E1609 trial.MethodsE1609 demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit with ipi3 versus HDI.1 We investigated treatment efficacy between ipi and HDI in the subgroups by sex (female, male), age (< 55 or ≥55), stage at study entry (IIIB, IIIC, M1a/1b), ECOG performance status (PS 0, 1), ulceration (yes, no), primary tumor (known, unknown), number of lymph nodes involved (0, 1, 2–3, 4+). Forest plots were created to compare OS and RFS with ipi3 vs. HDI and ipi10 vs. HDI using the concurrently randomized ITT populations. For the estimated HRs, 95% confidence intervals were created for all subgroups.ResultsThe subgroups of female, stage IIIC, PS=1, ulcerated, in-transit without lymph node involvement demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and/or relapse free survival (RFS) with ipi3 versus HDI as summarized in table 1. Female sex was significant for both OS and RFS and was further explored. In investigating RFS with ipi3 versus HDI, a multivariate Cox regression model including sex, treatment and interaction term of sex*treatment, indicated a significant interaction between sex and treatment (P = 0.026). Including sex, PS (0 vs. 1), age (<55 vs. 55+), ulceration (yes vs. no), stage (IIIB, IIIC, M1a, M1b), treatment and interaction term of sex*treatment, indicated a significant interaction between sex and treatment (P = 0.024). While similar trends were seen, no significant interactions between sex and treatment effect were found in the OS multivariate analysis or in the comparison of ipi10 versus HDI. When exploring age, in the univariate analyses in the ipi3 versus HDI comparison older women appeared to drive most of the difference (age ≥55: OS, P=0.02 and RFS, P=0.08; differences non-significant for women <55). Table 1.Abstract 312 Table 1Treatment efficacy between ipi3 and HDI by subgroupConclusionsFemale sex was independently associated with RFS adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefit from ipi3, supporting a potentially important role for female related factors in the immune response against melanoma, and these warrant further investigation.Trial RegistrationNCT01274338Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of each participating institution and conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation. This study was monitored by the ECOG-ACRIN DataSafety Monitoring Committee and the NCI.ConsentAll patients provided IRB-approved written informed consent.ReferenceTarhini AA, Lee SJ, Hodi FS, Rao UNM, Cohen GI, Hamid O, Hutchins LF, Sosman JA, Kluger HM, Eroglu Z, Koon HB, Lawrence DP, Kendra KL, Minor DR, Lee CB, Albertini MR, Flaherty LE, Petrella TM, Streicher H, Sondak VK, Kirkwood JM. Phase III Study of Adjuvant Ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) Versus High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b for Resected High-Risk Melanoma: North American Intergroup E1609. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):567–575. PMID: 31880964.

The predictive value of MAP2K1/2 mutations for efficiency of immunotherapy in melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21587-e21587
Author(s):  
Ting Ye ◽  
Jieying Zhang ◽  
Xinyi Liu ◽  
Mengmei Yang ◽  
Yuhan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
The Impact

e21587 Background: Immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint receptors have become the cornerstone of systemic treatment options for malignant melanoma. The response to these immunotherapies may correlate with driver mutations. MAP2K1/2 genes are mutated in approximately 10% of melanomas, however, the impact of MAP2K1/2 gene alterations on the efficiency of immunotherapy has not been clarified. Methods: Six metastatic melanoma clinical cohorts treated with ICIs were included to investigate the association between clinical efficacy of immunotherapy and MAP2K1/2 mutations. Survival analyses were conducted in cohorts receiving two kinds of ICB agents, namely anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1. RNA expression profiling from these cohorts and from the TCGA melanoma cohort were used to explore the potential mechanism related to immune activation. Results: In an independent anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort (n = 110), we found that MAP2K1/2 mutations are predictive of high objective response rate (17.6% vs 1.3%, p = 0.0185) and long progression-free survival [median OS, 49.2 months vs 8.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.91; p = 0.0307] and overall survival (median PFS, 19.4 months vs 2.8 months; HR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05–0.83; p = 0.0262). This predictive value was further validated in a pooled anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort (n = 235) in terms of overall survival (median OS, 49.3 months vs 22.0 months; HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.91; p = 0.0255). However, no correlation between MAP2K1/2 mutations and overall survival was observed in the anti-PD-1-treated cohort (n = 285). Subgroup Cox regression analysis indicated that MAP2K-mutated patients receive less benefit from the anti-PD-1 monotherapy than from the anti-CTLA-4 treatment (median OS, 27.0 months vs 49.3 months; HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 1.18–9.02; p = 0.0225), which was contrary to the result obtained for the total population. Furthermore, transcriptome profiling analysis revealed that MAP2K-mutated tumors are enriched in CD8+ T cells, B cells, and neutrophil cells and also express high levels of CD33 and IL10, which might be the underlying mechanism for melanoma patients with MAP2K1/2-mutated benefit more from anti-CTLA-4 treatment. Conclusions: We identified mutations in MAP2K1/2 genes as the independent predictive factors for anti-CTLA-4 therapy in melanoma patients and found that anti-CTLA-4 treatment in patient harbouring MAP2K1/2 mutations might be more effective than the anti-PD-1 therapy.

scholarly journals Distant survival for patients undergoing surgery using volatile versus IV anesthesia for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yan Meng ◽  
Xiu-Ping Zhang ◽  
Zhe Sun ◽  
Hong-Qian Wang ◽  
Wei-Feng Yu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Underlying Pathophysiology

Abstract Background Whether anesthesia type is associated with the surgical outcome of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains to be determined. This study aims to investigate the impact of volatile inhalational anesthesia (INHA) versus total IV anesthesia (TIVA) on the survival outcomes in HCC patients with PVTT. Methods A cohort of in-patients whom were diagnosed of HCC with PVTT in Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China, from January 1, 2008 to December 24, 2012 were identified. Surgical patients receiving the INHA and TIVA were screened out. The overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and several postoperative adverse events were compared according to anesthesia types. Results A total of 1513 patients were included in this study. After exclusions are applied, 263 patients remain in the INHA group and 208 in the TIVA group. Patients receiving INHA have a lower 5-year overall survival rate than that of patients receiving TIVA [12.6% (95% CI, 9.0 to 17.3) vs. 17.7% (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.8), P = 0.024]. Results of multivariable Cox-regression analysis also identify that INHA anesthesia is significantly associated with mortality and cancer recurrence after surgery compare to TIVA, with HR (95%CI) of 1.303 (1.065, 1.595) and 1.265 (1.040, 1.539), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that in more severe cancer patients, the worse outcome related to INHA might be more significant. Conclusion This retrospective analysis identifies that TIVA is associated with better outcomes compared with INHA. Future prospective studies clinical and translational studies are required to verify this difference and investigate underlying pathophysiology.

NF-κB in the Vascular Progression of Melanoma

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Kashani-Sabet ◽  
Ladan Shaikh ◽  
James R. Miller ◽  
Mehdi Nosrati ◽  
Carlos M.M. Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Tissue Array ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Vascular Involvement ◽  
Tumor Vascularity ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To examine a model of melanoma progression based on vascular factors and the role of NF-κB in the vascular progression of melanoma. Patients and Methods A data set of 526 patients from the University of California San Francisco Melanoma Center with 2 years of follow-up or first relapse was studied. The impact of the presence or absence of various prognostic factors on overall survival of melanoma patients was assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. A matched-pair analysis of NF-κB expression was performed in cases with vascular involvement and increased tumor vascularity versus matched controls lacking these factors. Results Cox regression analysis of factors evaluated by the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging Committee reproduced the powerful impact of tumor thickness and ulceration in this data set. With the inclusion of vascular factors such as tumor vascularity and vascular involvement, ulceration was no longer significant in predicting overall survival. By multivariate analysis, vascular involvement and tumor vascularity were the strongest predictors of melanoma outcome. Tumor vascularity seems to be a precursor of both vascular involvement and ulceration. A matched-pair tissue array analysis demonstrated the significant correlation between overexpression of NF-κB–p65 and the development of vascular factors. Conclusion Vascular factors play an important role in the progression of malignant melanoma. Ulceration may be a surrogate marker for the interactions between melanoma and the tumor vasculature. NF-κB seems to play an important role in the development of these factors.

Preliminary results of G versus GViElC: A phase III trial of gemcitabine associated to vindesine or gemcitabine alone in elderly or poor performance patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17083-17083
Author(s):  
A. Santo ◽  
G. Genestreti ◽  
A. Terzi ◽  
P. Azzoni ◽  
O. Caffo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
To Receive

17083 Background: Monochemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) or vinorelbine is considered the standard treatment in elderly or poor performance (PS) patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Many topics report a synergic enhancement of antitumor effect of GEM if associated to Vindesine (VDS). The aim of this study is to evaluate if GEM combined to VDS produces an advantage in terms of overall survival (OS) compared to GEM alone without enhancement of toxicity. Methods: Chemonaive pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, aged ≥ 70 years with PS < 2 or aged < 70 years with PS > 2 were enrolled. Pts were randomized to receive either GEM 1200 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 every 21 days for three cycles (arm 1) or GEM 1000 mg/m2 and VDS 3 mg/m2 (max dose 5 mg) both drugs infused on day 1 and 8 every 21 days for three cycles (arm 2). Pts of both arms received other three cycles in case of responsive or stable disease. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point, secondary end-points were time-to-progression and toxicity. First interim analysis was planned at 120 pts enrolled. Results: From May 2002 to December 2005, 107 pts from 13 Italian institutions were enrolled. Their characteristics are: 24 stage IIIB and 83 stage IV, 79 pts with ≥ 70 years (ECOG PS 0–1) and 28 pts with < 70 years (ECOG PS > 2). In arm 1 there were enrolled 55 pts while 52 pts in arm 2: both arms were well balanced with pts characteristics. Conclusions: The enrollment of this phase III trial is ongoing: we are achieving first step for an interim analysis to assess if GEM associated to VDS produces an advantage in terms of OS compared to standard treatment as GEM in monochemotherapy without toxicity enhancement. (Supported by GIVOP: Gruppo Interdisciplinare Veronese di Oncologia Polmonare). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine (G) versus GV1001 in sequential combination with G in patients with unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4601-4601 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Buanes ◽  
J. Maurel ◽  
W. Liauw ◽  
M. Hebbar ◽  
J. Nemunaitis
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Peptide Vaccine ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Delayed Treatment ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
The Impact

4601 Background: A phase I/II study with GV1001, a telomerase peptide vaccine, showed a median overall survival (OS) of 8.6 months in non-resectable PC (Bernhardt SL et al, Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1474–1482). This phase III trial was conducted to determine the impact on overall survival of G monotherapy vs. GV1001 in sequential combination with G in unresectable and metastatic PC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had chemotherapy-naive, advanced PC and ECOG performance status 0–1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive arm A: G (1,000 mg/m2 30 min i.v.) weekly for 7 weeks (w), 1w off and then 3w during 4-weekly cycles, or arm B: GV1001 0.56 mg s.c. plus GM-CSF as immune adjuvant on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 15, 22, 36, then every 4 weeks. Patients who progressed clinically or radiologically during GV1001 continued on GV1001 and concomitant gemcitabine. CT scans were performed every 8 weeks. The primary end-point was OS. A sample size of 520 patients allowed the detection of a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (B/A), with 2α = 0.05 and 90% power. Results: Between June 2006 and May 2008, 365 pts were enrolled (A / B; 182 / 183). The study was stopped prematurely due to a preliminary analysis with 178 events showing no survival benefit of GV1001. Pts were well balanced for baseline characteristics: male 59.3% / 62.8%; median age 61y / 61y; ECOG PS 0 34.3% / 36.7%; locally advanced 22.4% / 20.7%. As of August 2008, 238 pts (A / B : 114 / 124) had died. Median OS was 7.3 / 5.9 months (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.6–1.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 / 1.9 months (HR 0.5; 95%CI 0.4–0.7). Grade 3–4 AEs: gastrointestinal 6% / 8%, infection 5% / 5%, vascular disorders 2% / 3%, neutropenia 6% / 3%. Conclusions: GV1001 did not show efficacy in sequential combination with G in advanced PC. The advantage of G monotherapy over the sequential combination may be due to the delayed treatment with G in arm B. [Table: see text]

A randomized, phase III study (AGO-OVAR-9, GINECO-TCG, NSGO-OC-0102): Gemcitabine-paclitaxel-carboplatin (TCG) versus paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer (OC): Survival of FIGO stage I-IIA patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5510-LBA5510 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Herrstedt ◽  
J. Huober ◽  
F. Priou ◽  
H. Müller ◽  
M. Baekelandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
First Diagnosis

LBA5510 Background: One option to increase the efficacy of TC in pts with first diagnosis of ovarian cancer is to add a not cross-resistant drug. Methods: We conducted a randomized, prospective, stratified, phase III study comparing therapy with TC to TC plus gemcitabine. From 7/02 to 4/04, pts with a histological verified first diagnosis of epithelial OC, FIGO IC-IV were randomized to either TC (paclitaxel [T] 175 mg/m2 3h iv d1 + carboplatin [C] AUC 5 iv d1) or TCG (TC + gemcitabine [G] 800 mg/m2 iv d1+8) for at least 6 cycles every 21 days starting within 6 weeks post-operatively. The randomization was balanced within three strata: 1) FIGO I-IIA, 2) FIGO IIB-IIIC with residual tumor ≤ 10mm, 3) FIGO IIB-IIIC with residual tumor > 10 mm or FIGO IV. Primary endpoint is overall survival. Results: We enrolled 1,742 pts and administered 5,268 cycles TC and 5,129 cycles TCG. All baseline characteristics of the patients in both arms were well balanced. Most pts received 6+ cycles (87.2% TC, 86.2% TCG). Previous interim analyses has shown that TCG was tolerable but induced more hematological toxicity and final analysis has shown that addition of gemcitabine did not improve overall survival in patients with FIGO stage IIB-IV disease. Approximately 11% of the patients (n = 175) had FIGO stage I-IIA disease (stratum I). Most patients received 6+ cycles (93.3% TC, 86.9% TCG). With a median follow-up of 53.8 (range 0 –75) months, and using the log rank test and Cox regression analysis, no relevant differences in progression free survival (first quartile about 57 months and median ≥ 75 months in both groups, HR = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.47–1.72], p = 0.7500) and a negative trend in overall survival (first quartile ≥ 75 months in both groups, HR = 2.19 [95% CI: 0.75–6.41], p = 0.1419) were seen. Conclusions: Addition of G to TC did not improve efficacy in patients with stage I-IIA ovarian cancer. This was also the case for stratum II-III patients (previously reported). The addition of G to TC in patients with first diagnosis of ovarian cancer cannot be recommended. [Table: see text]

Study of genotypic variations and protein expression of the xCT subunit of cystine/glutamate transporter in pancreatic cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
T. J. Huang ◽  
D. Li ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
S. P. Kar ◽  
S. Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Glutamate Transporter ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

210 Background: The plasma membrane xCT cystine-specific subunit of the cystine/glutamate transporter contributes to chemotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer by regulating intracellular glutathione levels and protecting cancer cells against oxidative stress. We previously noted that the rs7674870 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of xCT correlated with overall survival in pancreatic cancer and may be predictive of platinum resistance. There are no data regarding xCT protein expression in pancreatic cancer or the functional significance of this SNP. Methods: Paraffin-embedded core and surgical biopsy tumor specimens from 49 patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using an xCT specific antibody (Novus Biologicals). xCT protein IHC expression scores (product of intensity and percentage of staining cells) were analyzed in relation to overall survival and genotype of the patients using the one factor ANOVA test, Kaplan-Meier plot, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. Overall survival was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or last follow-up. Results: Positive xCT expression was detected in 38 (78%) of the 49 samples, and 9 (18%) patients had high levels of expression. High xCT expression was associated with lower overall survival as compared with low expression (5.1 months versus 8.8 months; p = 0.119). In a multivariate Cox regression model with adjustment for prognostic parameters of age, sex, performance status and CA19-9 level, high xCT expression was associated with a 2.1-fold increased risk of death (p = 0.096). Performance status also correlated with overall survival (p = 0.027). Preliminary analysis on the genotype-phenotype association (n = 12) indicated that xCT expression was higher with the TT genotype than the TC/CC genotype (p = 0.115), which is consistent with the previous observation that the TT genotype was associated with reduced survival. Conclusions: These data provide supporting evidence for a possible role of cystine/glutamate transporter xCT subunit in pancreatic cancer progression and survival. Further pharmacogenomic and clinicopathologic studies are ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document