Continuous daily administration of sunitinib in patients (pts) with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Updated results

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5040-5040 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Srinivas ◽  
J. Roigas ◽  
S. Gillessen ◽  
U. Harmenberg ◽  
P. H. De Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

5040 Background: Sunitinib malate, an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors, showed significant efficacy in 168 pts with cytokine refractory mRCC, with a 42% objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.2 months at 50 mg/day (4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off) per investigator assessment (Motzer et al. JAMA 2006;295:2516–24). This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sunitinib when administered in a continuous 37.5 mg/day regimen. Methods: Pts with histologically proven mRCC, refractory to a cytokine-based regimen, were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, phase II study. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ function. Pts were randomized to receive sunitinib in the morning (AM) or in the evening (PM) at a dose of 37.5 mg/day, with individual doses subsequently titrated based on tolerability. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined ORR. Secondary endpoints included PFS, adverse events (AEs) and quality of life measures. Results: 107 pts were randomized to AM (54) or PM (53) dosing and have been on study a median of 6.8 months (0.4 to 13.3). As of October 2006, 55 pts have discontinued due to progression (37 pts [35%]), AEs (17 pts [16%]), and 1 consent withdrawal (1%); 47 pts (44%) were dose reduced to 25 mg/day due to grade 2/3 AEs, the most frequent being: asthenia (12%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), and diarrhea (5%). The most commonly reported (=5% of pts) grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension (10%), asthenia (9%), hand-foot syndrome (9%), anorexia (8%), and diarrhea (6%). 31 pts (29%) were maintained on continuous sunitinib at 37.5 mg/day, and 29 (27%) were escalated to 50 mg/day. There were no significant differences between pts who received AM or PM dosing. Quality of life results will be presented. The best response by RECIST per investigator assessment shows an ORR of 19% with 43 pts (40%) with =6 months of stable disease. The median PFS is 8.3 months. Conclusions: Sunitinib 37.5 mg/day continuous dosing has a manageable safety profile and demonstrates promising clinical benefit as second-line therapy in mRCC. This regimen provides alternative sunitinib dosing that can be explored in combination studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

Volasertib Versus Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or -Refractory Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 706-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Pujade-Lauraine ◽  
Frédéric Selle ◽  
Béatrice Weber ◽  
Isabelle-Laure Ray-Coquard ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Volasertib is a potent and selective cell-cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Polo-like kinase. This phase II trial evaluated volasertib or single-agent chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory ovarian cancer who experienced failure after treatment with two or three therapy lines. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either volasertib 300 mg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or an investigator’s choice of single-agent, nonplatinum, cytotoxic chemotherapy. The primary end point was 24-week disease control rate. Secondary end points included best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, quality of life, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results Of the 109 patients receiving treatment, 54 received volasertib and 55 received chemotherapy; demographics were well balanced. The 24-week disease control rates for volasertib and chemotherapy were 30.6% (95% CI, 18.0% to 43.2%) and 43.1% (95% CI, 29.6% to 56.7%), respectively, with partial responses in seven (13.0%) and eight (14.5%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 13.1 weeks and 20.6 weeks for volasertib and chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.53). Six patients (11%) receiving volasertib achieved PFS fore more than 1 year, whereas no patient receiving chemotherapy achieved PFS greater than 1 year. No relationship between the expression of the biomarkers tested and their response was determined. Patients treated with volasertib experienced more grade 3 and 4 drug-related hematologic adverse events (AEs) and fewer nonhematologic AEs than did patients receiving chemotherapy. Discontinuation resulting from AEs occurred in seven (13.0%) and 15 (27.3%) patients in the volasertib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Both arms showed similar effects on quality of life. Conclusion Single-agent volasertib showed antitumor activity in patients with ovarian cancer. AEs in patients receiving volasertib were mainly hematologic and manageable.

Phase Ib/II open-label, randomized evaluation of efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus isatuximab versus regorafenib in MORPHEUS-colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Jayesh Desai ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
Katrina Sophia Pedersen ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Biologic Agent ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Randomized Evaluation ◽  
Best Response

82 Background: The MORPHEUS platform consists of multiple, global, open-label, randomized Phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early efficacy signals and safety of treatment (tx) combinations across tumor types. Isatuximab (isa; anti-CD38) targets CD38 receptors expressed on immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) + isa would induce an anti-tumor response beyond that of regorafenib (rego), a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients (pts) with tx-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This randomized Phase Ib/II trial (NCT03555149) enrolled pts with microsatellite stable/mismatched repair proficient mCRC who had received ≤ 2 prior tx lines (fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing chemotherapy plus a biologic agent). Pts received atezo (1200 mg intravenously [IV] every 3 weeks [q3w]) + isa (10 mg/kg IV q3w) or control tx with rego (160 mg orally days 1–21; dose escalation to 160 mg during Cycle 1 allowed per institutional guidelines). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Data cutoff date was March 3, 2020. Fifteen pts received atezo + isa and 13 pts received rego. Fourteen atezo + isa pts (93.3%) and 11 control arm pts (84.6%) had received 2 prior lines of tx; 9 atezo + isa pts (60.0%) and 9 control pts (69.2%) had liver metastases at enrollment. No responses were seen in either arm; 3 pts receiving atezo + isa (20.0%) and 8 control pts (61.5%) had stable disease as their best response. DCR (response and/or stable disease ≥ 12 weeks) was 6.7% with atezo + isa and 15.4% with control. One pt treated with atezo + isa beyond progression had prolonged disease stabilization. Median PFS was 1.4 mo (95% CI: 1.4, 1.8) with atezo + isa and 2.8 mo (95% CI: 1.6, 3.1) in the control arm; median OS was 5.1 mo (95% CI: 3.1, 7.8) with atezo + isa and 10.2 mo (95% CI: 4.8, not reached) with control. Tx-related adverse events (AEs, Grade 1-4) occurred in 13 atezo + isa pts (86.7%), and 12 control pts (92.3%). The most common tx-related AEs with atezo + isa were infusion-related reaction (73.3%), nausea (26.7%) and fatigue (20.0%). No Grade 5 AEs occurred in the atezo + isa arm, 1 (7.7%) was reported in the control arm (sepsis, considered unrelated to study tx). No atezo + isa pts and 1 control-arm pt (7.7%) withdrew from treatment due to a tx-related AE. Biomarker analyses did not identify any significant trends related to efficacy. Conclusions: In this trial, superior efficacy of atezo + isa vs rego was not shown. However, the atezo + isa combination was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03555149.

Sunitinib (SU) in combination with docetaxel (D) versus D alone for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1010-LBA1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bergh ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
N. Voytko ◽  
A. Makhson ◽  
J. Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recommended Treatment

LBA1010 Background: Taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed HER2-negative metastatic BC (MBC). SU, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (MTKI), demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with D in a phase I/II study in pts with MBC. A randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial in pts with newly diagnosed ABC tested the hypothesis that addition of a MTKI to D improves PFS vs. D alone. Methods: Eligible pts (female; ≥18 yrs) had an ECOG PS ≤1, and newly diagnosed HER2-negative MBC or ABC. If (neo)adjuvant therapy included a taxane, relapse must have occurred ≥12 mos after CT. Pts were randomized (1:1) to treatment (tx) with D 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and SU 37.5 mg/day po from day 2–15 q3w (Schedule 2/1; Arm A), or to D 100 mg/m2 iv 1-hr infusion q3w (Arm B) that could be given until progression. If D was discontinued in Arm A for reasons other than progressive disease (PD), single-agent SU 37.5 mg daily was permitted until PD. Median, independently assessed, PFS (primary endpoint) was compared between tx arms using stratified and unstratified log-rank tests. Overall objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), pt-reported outcomes, and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: As of the data cutoff (February 1, 2010), the ITT population comprised 593 pts (SU+D, n=296; D, n=297). The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS based on the independent radiologic assessment or in prolonging OS. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median relative dose intensity (RDI) was 94.2% and 92.4% for SU+D, and 92.6% for D arms, respectively. Median PFS was 8.6 mos (95% CI 8.2–10.3) in the SU+D arm vs 8.3 mos (95% CI 7.7–9.6) for the D arm (HR 0.922). Median OS was 24.8 mos (95% CI 21.5–33.1) in SU+D arm vs 25.5 mos (95% CI 22.8–27.8) for D arm (HR 1.207). ORR was significantly better for SU+D (51%) vs. D (39%) (p=0.0018). Frequent all causality grade 3/4 adverse events (≥10%) were neutropenia (46%), hand–foot syndrome (17%), and fatigue (12%) in the SU+D arm and neutropenia (44%) in the D arm. Conclusions: Based on these data, SU+D is not a recommended treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed ABC. Strategies using antiangiogenic TKIs that increase RR but not OS may need to be revisited. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of ABT-869 in advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) after sunitinib failure: Efficacy and safety results

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5036-5036
Author(s):  
N. Tannir ◽  
Y. Wong ◽  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
M. S. Ernstoff ◽  
D. J. Perry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Best Response

5036 Background: ABT-869 is a novel, orally active and potent inhibitor of all VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinases. Results from a phase I study suggested antitumor activity in advanced solid tumors including RCC. The recommended dose for phase II investigation was 0.25 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) daily. Methods: We conducted an open-label, multicenter phase II trial of oral ABT-869 in advanced RCC. Eligibility criteria included progressive disease (PD) within 100 days of enrollment after at least 2 cycles of sunitinib, prior nephrectomy, and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST by central imaging. Secondary endpoints were best response, time to progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety was assessed by NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. Results: 53 patients (pts, median age, 61 y [range, 40–80]; clear-cell histology [41 pts]; median number of prior therapies, 2 [range, 1–4]) were enrolled from 8/07 to 10/08. All pts were previously treated with sunitinib, and additional prior treatments included cytokine (19%), sorafenib (15%), temsirolimus (4%), and bevacizumab (4%). Preliminary efficacy data are shown in the Table below. Median TTP was 4.9 mos [95% CI: 3.5–6.8] per central imaging. Median OS is not estimable. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (78%), fatigue (67%), hypertension (53%), nausea (51%) and vomiting (39%). AEs ≥ grade 3 included hypertension (24%), fatigue (18%), diarrhea (14%) and hand-foot syndrome (14%). 39 pts required dose reductions. Of the 20 pts who have discontinued therapy at the time of this analysis, 16 were due to PD, 3 due to AEs (1 hemoptysis, 1 fatigue, 1 fatigue/hypertension) and 1 withdrew consent. The remaining 33 pts continue protocol treatment, and updated results will be presented. Conclusions: ABT-869 has activity in RCC after sunitinib failure. The dose will be optimized for future studies. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

SWOG 0514: A phase II study of sorafenib (BAY 43–9006) as single agent in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinomas

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4639-4639 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
C. Rankin ◽  
H. J. Lenz ◽  
P. Philip ◽  
S. E. Rivkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Probability ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome ◽  
Posterior Leukoencephalopathy ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

4639 Background: There are no standard chemotherapeutic regimens for incurable biliary adenocarcinomas. Gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidine- based chemotherapy results in occasional responses and a median survival approaching 6 months. Given the presence of b- raf mutations and overexpression of VEGF in biliary cancers, we initiated a study to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of c and b-Raf, VEGFR-2/3 and PDGFR, in pts with metastatic biliary cancers. Methods: Pt eligibility included adequate organ function and no prior treatment for metastatic disease. The primary end-point was objective response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). A two-stage design was used to detect a difference in the null hypothesis of 5% response probability and the alternative 20% response probability. If at least one confirmed response occurred after the first 25 pts, another 25 were to be accrued. Sorafenib was administered at 400 mg PO BID continuously. A cycle was defined as 28 days of therapy, and radiological assessment was done every 2 cycles. Results: 36 pts were enrolled during the first stage of accrual. 5 pts were ineligible. 52% were female. Median age was 57.8 years (range 33.8–81.5). Adverse events: 1 pt died with grade 4 supraventricular tachycardia and venous thromboembolism. Grade 3/4 toxicities were noted in 20 pts (66.7%) and included hand-foot syndrome in 4 pts (13%), while thrombosis/embolism, elevated liver transaminases, and abdominal pain were each seen in 3 pts (10% for each). Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, GI perforation, and GI hemorrhage were each seen in 1 pt (3% for each). 2 pts (6%) had an unconfirmed partial response and 9 pts (29%) had stable disease. 27 pts have progressed. Median PFS was 2 months (95% CI: 2–4 months). 14 pts have died, with a median survival estimate of 6 months (95% CI: 4–10 months). Conclusions: Sorafenib did not result in a clinically significant objective RR in pts with gallbladder and cholangiocarcinoma but demonstrated an impact on survival that may be comparable to commonly used chemotherapy regimens. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Response to selpercatinib versus prior systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RET fusion+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Drilon ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Systemic Therapies

9032 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

scholarly journals Apatinib plus camrelizumab (anti-PD1 therapy, SHR-1210) for advanced osteosarcoma (APFAO) progressing after chemotherapy: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000798
Author(s):  
Lu Xie ◽  
Jie Xu ◽  
Xin Sun ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Jin Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
High Grade Osteosarcoma

BackgroundResults of our previous study showed high objective response but short-term activity of apatinib in advanced osteosarcoma. We aimed to investigate the activity of apatinib in combination with camrelizumab in patients with inoperable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after chemotherapy.MethodsThis open-label, phase 2 trial was conducted at Peking University People’s Hospital. We enrolled patients with advanced osteosarcoma progressed after chemotherapy. Patients received 500 mg apatinib orally once daily plus 200 mg camrelizumab by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate at 6 months, which were based on RECIST V.1.1.Results43 patients were enrolled between January 25 and September 4, 2018. With median follow-up time of 48.3 (Q1, Q3, 30.6, 66.6) weeks, 13 (30.23%, 95% CI 17.2%, 40.1%) of 43 patients were progression free at 6 months and the 6-month PFS rate was 50.9% (95% CI 34.6%, 65.0%). Until final follow-up, the objective response rate was 20.9% (9/43) and two patients with durable disease control were observed. Patients with programmed cell death 1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score ≥5% and pulmonary metastases tended to have a longer PFS in comparison to the others (p=0.004 and 0.017, respectively). Toxic effects led to dose reductions, or interruptions, or both in 24 (55.8%) of 43 patients and permanent discontinuation in 4 (9.3%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionsAlthough the combination of apatinib and camrelizumab seemed to prolong PFS in comparison to single agent apatinib in treating advanced osteosarcoma, it did not reach the prespecified target of 6-month PFS of 60% or greater. Overexpression of PD-L1 and the presence of pulmonary metastases only were associated with longer PFS.Trial registration numberNCT03359018.

A phase II study of sunitinib administered in a continuous daily regimen in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4529-4529 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. De Mulder ◽  
J. Roigas ◽  
S. Gillessen ◽  
S. Srinivas ◽  
P. Pisa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Colon Perforation ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

4529 Background: Renal cell carcinomas are known for their vascularity and production of high levels of VEGF. Sunitinib malate (SU11248), an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including VEGFR, PDGFR, KIT, RET, and FLT3, has previously demonstrated significant efficacy in 168 patients (pts) with mRCC, with a 42% objective response rate (ORR) at 50 mg/day in 6-week (wk) cycles of 4 wks on treatment followed by 2 wks off. This study sought to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sunitinib in mRCC when administered in a continuous 37.5 mg/day regimen. Methods: Pts with histologically proven mRCC, refractory to a cytokine-based regimen, were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, phase II study. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ function. Pts were randomized to receive sunitinib in the morning (AM) or in the evening (PM) at a dose of 37.5 mg/day, with individual doses subsequently titrated based on tolerability. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined ORR. Secondary endpoints includedprogression-free survival, adverse events (AEs) and quality of life measures. Results: A total of 88/100 planned pts have been randomized to date: AM (43) and PM (45), and enrollment will be completed by end January 2006. 44 pts have been on continuous sunitinib treatment at 37.5 mg/day for >16 wks (3), >12 wks (9), >8 wks (12), and >4 wks (20). 2 pts (2.3%) discontinued (colon perforation and renal insufficiency) and 9 (10.2%) dose reduced to 25 mg/day due to grade 2/3 AEs: mucositis (2), hand-foot syndrome (2), thrombocytopenia (2), asthenia (1), nausea/diarrhea (1), and neutropenia (1). Preliminary efficacy data show some tumor shrinkage in the majority of patients evaluated at 4 wks, with 3 initial partial responses. There has been no significant difference between pts who received AM or PM doses. The most commonly reported AEs were mucositis, fatigue, hair/skin discoloration, and hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: Sunitinib administered at a continuous dose of 37.5 mg/day was generally well tolerated; only a few patients required treatment breaks and/or dose reduction. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging. Mature data will be presented. [Table: see text]

Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of patients with recurrent high grade gliomas expressing PDGF-R

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1526-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Marosi ◽  
M. Vedadinejad ◽  
C. Haberler ◽  
J. A. Hainfellner ◽  
K. Dieckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Major Response ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Patients Experience

1526 Background: Despite noticeable progress in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG), most patients experience tumor recurrence after standard treatment consisting of surgery, radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. Imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of PDGFR-α, -β, c-kit, abl and arg, has been shown to produce tumor response in patients with recurrent gliomas (Raymond ProcASCO 2004, Dresemann ProcASCO 2004&2005, Reardon Proc ASCO 2005). We treated 34 patients with recurrent HGGs showing immunohistochemical expression of “imatinib targets” in the tumor tissue with imatinib. Methods: 34 patients, 16 women, 18 men, aged from 27 to 72 years, in median 49 years with recurrent HGG (GBM n= 23, AA n=11) were treated with imatinib 400 mg/day as continuous daily oral dosing. MRI was performed every three months or at clinical suspicion of progression. The median interval from diagnosis to the start of imatinib was 12.6 months (range 4.3 to 143 months). Imatinib was the 2nd line therapy in 15 patients, 3rd line in 13 and 4th line in 6 patients. ECOG performance score at start of imatinib was 1 in 9, 2 in 21 and 3 in 4 patients, respectively.Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tumor tissue with antibodies against PDGFR-α, and -β. Results: The median treatment period with imatinib was 4 months (3 weeks to 17 months). The best response achieved was major response in 2 patients, partial remission in 6, stable disease in 12 and progressive disease in 14 patients. Eleven patients were free from tumor progression after 6 months (PFS-6 32,4%). The two patients with major response improved clinically and showed no more evidence of increased metabolism as well in MRI spectroscopy as in C11-methionine PET for 13 and 17 months, respectively. One of them showed widespread PDGF-R-α expression in the tumor tissue. In all patients with objective response to imatinib, a clinical benefit was noted within the first month of treatment. Conclusions: Compared to the results of Raymond et al, we observed a higher percentage of patients with progression free survival at 6 months. Detailed analysis of imatinib targets in tumor tissue of patients treated with imatinib will be helpful to explore the potential of imatinib as treatment option for patients with HGG. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document