Cisplatin (Cis)/etoposide (VP16) compared to cis/irinotecan (CPT11) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (E-SCLC): Pharmacogenomic (PG) and comparative toxicity analysis of JCOG 9511 and SWOG 0124

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7524-7524 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lara ◽  
M. Redman ◽  
H. Lenz ◽  
M. Gordon ◽  
T. Shibata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
North American ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Toxicity Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance

7524 Introduction: J9511 demonstrated a significant survival benefit for Cis/CPT11 over Cis/VP16 in Japanese patients (pts) with E-SCLC (Noda, et al. NEJM 2002). S0124 is the confirmatory North American phase III trial (accrual completed) using the identical J9511 protocol. We hypothesized that toxicities would differ between North American & Japanese pts due in part to differences in the distribution of genetic polymorphisms involved in chemotherapy metabolism. Methods: Toxicity data were compared among 706 pts enrolled in J9511 & S0124 receiving common treatment using a logistic model adjusted for age, sex, and performance status (PS). Select polymorphisms of the UGT1A1, ABCB1, & OATP genes in genomic DNA were evaluated in 142 pts in S0124 only (67 Cis/CPT11; 75 Cis/VP16). Associations between toxicity & genotype within each arm were assessed using logistic regression. Results: Pt demographics for J9511 & S0124 respectively: Mean age − 61 & 62 years; Male sex − 131 (86%) & 315 (57%); PS 0 − 19 (13%) & 173 (31%); PS>0 − 133 (87%) & 372 (68%). Comparative toxicities (≥ grade 3) are summarized ( table ). PG analysis in S0124 pts: ABCB1 (C3435T) T/T was associated with an increased risk of CPT11 grade 3+ diarrhea (p=0.04) versus C/C and C/T. UGT1A1 (G3156A) A/A was associated with increased risk of CPT11 neutropenia (p=0.009) & leukopenia (p=0.05). UGT1A1*28 TA7, typically associated with increased CPT11 toxicity, was seen in only 4 pts (2 Cis/CPT11; 2 Cis/VP16); thus no correlation was done. No gene tested was associated with VP16 toxicity. Conclusions: Significant differences in treatment-related myelosuppression exist between J9511 and S0124 pt populations. Certain polymorphisms in genes involved in CPT11 metabolism are significantly associated with CPT11 toxicities in S0124. Additional analyses are ongoing. These results support the hypothesis that toxicities may be associated with distribution of genetic polymorphisms. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

Everolimus (EVE) exposure as a predictor of toxicity (Tox) in renal cell cancer (RCC) patients (Pts) in the adjuvant setting: Results of a pharmacokinetic analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a phase III study (NCT01120249).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4566-4566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy W. Synold ◽  
Melissa Plets ◽  
Catherine M. Tangen ◽  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
Ganesh S. Palapattu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Trough Levels

4566 Background: S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in RCC pts randomized to receive EVE versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. To date, there has been a higher than expected dropout rate due to bothersome tox. Previous reports have shown an association between EVE trough levels and both tox and disease response in RCC pts. Therefore, we have assessed EVE trough levels to evaluate the relationship between measured exposure and probability of tox. This analysis has been approved by the DSMC. Methods: Patients received 10 mg daily EVE or placebo for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 were analyzed for EVE. Pts with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. When both trough levels were available, results were averaged. Pts were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the following adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor; any grade 3+ tox, grade 2+ triglycerides, grade 2+ hyperglycemia, grade 2+ oral mucositis, grade 2+ rash, and premature stopping of EVE. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status. Results: This study reached its accrual goal and closed on 9/15/2016 with 1545 (775 EVE) randomized patients. A total of 386 pts are included in this preliminary analysis. Median EVE trough was 12.8 ng/mL (range 3.1, 75.6) per 10 mg dose. Event rates for tox were: any grade 3+ tox = 46%, grade 2+ triglycerides = 33%, grade 2+ hyperglycemia = 15%, grade 2+ oral mucositis = 34%, grade 2+ rash = 15%, and premature stopping of EVE = 40%. The risk of grade 2+ triglycerides was increased in Q2 and Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 2.95; p = 0.001 and OR = 3.48; p < 0.001). The risk of grade 2+ rash was increased in Q2 and Q4 vs Q1 (OR = 2.95; p = 0.02 and OR = 3.20; p = 0.01). There was also a trend towards an increased risk of any grade 3+ tox in Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 1.72; p = 0.07). Conclusions: This analysis has identified significant associations between EVE exposure and the probability of tox. EVE analysis is ongoing and the final results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01120249.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 2212-2217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Herrmann ◽  
György Bodoky ◽  
Thomas Ruhstaller ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Emilio Bajetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Good Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeThis phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (GemCap) versus single-agent Gem in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral capecitabine 650 mg/m2twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m2by 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Patients were stratified according to center, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of pain, and disease extent.ResultsA total of 319 patients were enrolled between June 2001 and June 2004. Median overall survival (OS) time, the primary end point, was 8.4 and 7.2 months in the GemCap and Gem arms, respectively (P = .234). Post hoc analysis in patients with good KPS (score of 90 to 100) showed a significant prolongation of median OS time in the GemCap arm compared with the Gem arm (10.1 v 7.4 months, respectively; P = .014). The overall frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in each arm. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both arms.ConclusionGemCap failed to improve OS at a statistically significant level compared with standard Gem treatment. The safety of GemCap and Gem was similar. In the subgroup of patients with good performance status, median OS was improved significantly. GemCap is a practical regimen that may be considered as an alternative to single-agent Gem for the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status.

DREAMseq (Doublet, Randomized Evaluation in Advanced Melanoma Sequencing): A phase III trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA6134.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (36_suppl) ◽  
pp. 356154-356154
Author(s):  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Sandra J. Lee ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Antoni Ribas ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Evaluation ◽  
Alternate Therapy ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

356154 Background: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) blocking PD-1 and CTLA-4 or BRAF/MEK inhibitors have both shown significant antitumor efficacy and overall survival (OS) benefit in patients (pts) with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma (MM), leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exists to guide the choice of one over the other as initial therapy or the preferred treatment sequence in this population. The DREAMseq Trial was designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the sequence of nivolumab/ipilimumab (N/I) followed by dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) to the converse sequence. Methods: Eligible pts with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant MM were stratified by ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1 and LDH level and randomized 1:1 to receive Step 1 with either N/I (Arm A) or D/T (Arm B) and at disease progression (PD) were enrolled in Step 2 receiving the alternate therapy, D/T (Arm C) or N/I (Arm D), respectively. Pts received N (1mg/kg)/I (3 mg/kg) q3 wks x 4 doses followed by N 240 IV q2 wks for up to 72 wks (Arms A and D) or D 150 mg po BID and T 2 mg po qD until PD (Arms B and C). In 2019, investigators were given the option to use alternate induction dosing of N (3mg/kg)/I (1 mg/kg) q3 wks x 4 doses for Arms A and D. Cycles were every 6 wks and imaging was obtained at baseline and q12 wks on each arm. Primary endpoint was 2-year OS. At the 4th Interim Analysis with 59% of pts being 2 yrs from enrollment, the DSMC and NCI CTEP recommended halting accrual and releasing the data. Results: Beginning 7/2015, 265 out of a proposed 300 pts were enrolled (133 Arm A and 132 Arm B). Median age was 61 (25-85) and 63% were male. Demographics for Arm A and B were balanced with 67% PS 0 and 60% with normal LDH. As of 7/16/21, at a median follow-up of 27.7 mos, 27 pts had switched to Arm C and 46 to Arm D. Overall Grade 3+ toxicity was 60% in Arm A and 52% in Arm B. Grade 5 treatment-related AEs included 2 on Arm A and 1 on Arm C. ORR to date is: Arm A 46% (52/113), Arm B 43% (49/114), Arm C 48% (11/23) and Arm D 30% (8/27). 37/42 assessed pts in Arm A and 19/37 in Arm B remain in response. Median DOR: Arm A- Not reached; Arm B-12.7 mos (95% CI: 8.2, -) (p <0.001). There were 100 deaths (Arm A to C- 38/Arm B to D- 62). 2-yr OS rate for those starting with Arm A was 72% (95% CI: 62-81%) and for Arm B 52% (95% CI: 42-62%) (log-rank p= 0.0095). PFS showed a trend in favor of Arm A (log-rank p=0.054). Both the PFS and OS curves show a biphasic pattern with Arm B being above Arm A until 6 and 10 mos, respectively. For the 115 pts with documented progression on Step 1 (Arm A-44/Arm B-71), 60 (52%) had registered for Step 2. The principal reason for not enrolling on Step 2 was death from PD within 6 mos (Arm A:15/23; Arm B: 25/32). Conclusions: For pts with advanced BRAFV600-mutant MM, the treatment sequence beginning with the CPI combination of N/I resulted in superior OS, which became evident at 10 mos, with longer Step 1 DOR and more ongoing responses than the treatment sequence beginning with D/T. Clinical trial information: NCT02224781.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

A randomized comparison of carboplatin/vinorelbine versus carboplatin/gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7033-7033
Author(s):  
N. Helbekkmo ◽  
S. H. Sundtroem ◽  
U. Aaseboe ◽  
P. F. Brunsvig ◽  
C. L. Von Plessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

7033 Background: Carboplatin/vinorelbine (CV) and carboplatin/gemcitabine (CG) are novel 2-drug combinations in the treatment of NSCLC. In a randomized national multicenter phase III study in stage IIIB and IV patients (pts), we compared these regimens with respect to efficacy, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Chemonaive pts with histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, stage IIIB or IV and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2 were eligible. There was no upper age limit. Pts received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, both administered on day 1 and 8, in combination with carboplatin (Chatelut AUC 4) at day 1. Three courses were administered in 3-week cycles. QoL questionnaires were completed at baseline, before each cycle and then every 8 weeks up to one year. Primary endpoints were survival and QoL and secondary endpoints toxicity and time to progression (TTP). Stratification was done for age, stage and PS, and the planned sample size per arm was minimum 200. The analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis Results: From Oct 2003 through Dec 2004, 433 pts from 33 institutions were randomized to CV (n=218) or CG (n=215). Follow-up was minimum one year. There was no difference in overall survival between the two arms (p=0.89). Median survival was 7.3 vs. 6.5 months and 1-year survival 28% and 31% in the CV and CG arm respectively. TTP was significantly longer in the CG arm (p=0.006) with median TTP 4.2 vs. 3.9 months. There was significantly more grade 3–4 anemia and thrombocytopenia in the CG arm (p<0.001) and more grade 3–4 leucopenia in the CV arm (p= 0.001). More pts in the CG arm needed transfusions of blood (p=0.003) or platelets (p=0.001). There was no difference between the arms with respect to neutropenic infections (p=0.87). QoL data are still being analyzed and will be presented at ASCO. Conclusions: Overall survival was similar in the two treatment arms. In the CG arm, the median TTP was longer, but grade 3–4 toxicity requiring interventions, was more frequent when compared to the VC arm. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15501-15501
Author(s):  
J. Chung ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
H. Shin ◽  
G. Choi ◽  
W. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Mild Toxicity

15501 Background: This study was to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of the combination treatment with S-1 and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Methods: Eligible patients were defined as histologically confirmed SCCHN, stage III or IV with no evidence of distant metastasis, evaluable lesions, adequate organ function, age of 20–80 years, and performance status 0,1 or 2. Cisplatin was infused over 1 hour on day 1 (75 mg/m2) and S-1 was administered orally for 14 consecutive days (day 2–15). The dosages of S-1 were assigned according to the patients’ body surface area (BSA): 50 mg twice a day (BSA < 1.5m2), 60 mg twice a day (BSA > 1.5m2). Each course was repeated every 3 weeks. After 2 course, tumor response were evaluated by CT scan and laryngoscopy. If the patients achieved a response (complete response: CR, or partial response: PR), they received one more course of chemotherapy before undergoing the radiotherapy or operation as a definitive local treatment. Results: All 22 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response was 80.9% (CR: 3, PR: 14). The adverse reactions occurred 120 times in 54 courses of 22 cases. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, which occurred in 8 patients. Non-hematological toxicity of grade 3 and 4 included nausea and vomiting in 4 patients, fever in one patient and, fatigue in one patient. Since the observation period is short, the analysis about survival rate is not obtained so far. Conclusions: S-1 plus Cisplatin combination chemotherapy is effective against locally advanced SCCHN with mild toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I trial of TAS-102 administered on a three times a day schedule in patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2053-2053 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Wolff ◽  
P. M. Hoff ◽  
A. Mita ◽  
M. Fukushima ◽  
J. C. Blais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Xenograft ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance

2053 Background: TAS-102 consists of trifluorothymidine (FTD) and an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). FTD, like 5-fluorouracil, is an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. However, when orally administered, FTD is rapidly degraded to an inactive form, primarily by TP. Co-administration of FTD with an inhibitor of TP elevates FTD concentrations. Since tumor xenograft models demonstrated greater anti-tumor activity with divided daily dosing of TAS-102, and a phase I trial of once-daily TAS-102 showed a short FTD half-life, this trial was designed to explore a three times a day dosing schedule. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors having received prior therapy, with adequate organ function, and performance status Zubrod 0–2, were eligible. TAS-102 was administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks, followed by two weeks off. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 15 patients (8 female, age 37–72 years) were enrolled into the study; three at 60 mg/m2/day, 6 each at 70 mg/m2/day and 80 mg/m2/day. Nine patients had colorectal cancer, 2 carcinoma of unknown primary, 2 pancreatic cancer, one each medullary thyroid cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Toxicity was assessed throughout all courses of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were the most common, including 3 episodes of grade 3 neutropenia at 60 mg/m2/day, 5 at 70 mg/m2/day, 5 at 80 mg/m2/day with only 1 instance of grade 3 thrombocytopenia at 80 mg/m2/day. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (1 at 70 mg/m2/day), colitis, gout, and hematuria (1 each at 70 mg/m2/day), and fatigue (1 at 70 mg/m2/day and 2 at 80 mg/m2/day) Two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed at 80 mg/m2/day: grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia. Although there were no objective responses, nine patients (60%) maintained stable disease with a median duration of disease stabilization of 4.3 months (range, 1.9 to 8.6 months). Conclusions: TAS-102 is well tolerated with manageable hematologic toxicity and few non-hematological toxicities. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia. The suggested phase II dose of TAS-102 is 70 mg/m2/day when administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks followed by two weeks off every 4 weeks. [Table: see text]

A phase I/II study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in Japanese patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18152-18152
Author(s):  
K. Gemba ◽  
K. Yamazaki ◽  
H. Kunitoh ◽  
T. Hida ◽  
K. Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vitamin Supplementation ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis ◽  
Level 1

18152 Background: Pemetrexed (pem) is globally used for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma (MPM) in combination with cisplatin (cis). Pharmacokinetic (PK) difference of pem/cis between Western and Asian population (pop) so far remains unknown. To investigate safety/efficacy of pem/cis therapy and PK profiles of pem/cis for Japanese (Jpn) MPM patients (pts), we designed a phase I/II study. Methods: Primary objectives in phase (Ph) I part were to determine a recommended dose (RD), and in Ph II part were to examine the efficacy of the RD and safety. PK profiles were to be analyzed as a secondary objective. A cohort of 6 pts, starting from a dose of pem 500 mg/m2 and cis 75 mg/m2 (level 1: LV1), was used in the dose-escalation Ph I. The efficacy of the RD was to be evaluated in at least 18 pts in the study. Key eligibility criteria were: histologic diagnosis of MPM incurable by surgery, no prior systemic chemotherapy, and a performance status 0–1. Under full vitamin supplementation, pem was administered as a 10-min. infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, followed by cis administration as a 2-hr. infusion 30 min. after pem administration. For comparison of PK profiles, PK data of this study and a Western phase III study were analyzed by pop PK approach. Results: In Ph I, 13 pts were enrolled: 7 in LV1 and 6 in level -1 (LV-1: pem 500 mg/m2 and cis 60 mg/m2). Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed in LV1: pneumonitis and neutropenia. The RD were then determined to be LV1. In Ph II, 12 pts were enrolled in LV1. For safety, one drug-related death was reported among 25 pts due to worsening of underlying pneumonia observed before enrollment. The most common G3/4 toxicities were neutropenia and hemoglobin decrease. For efficacy, a partial response was achieved for 7 of 19 pts who received LV1. Response rate was 36.8% (95% CI: 16.3- 61.6). PK profiles of pem/cis in Jpn pts were similar to those in Western. The results of other secondary objectives, e.g., progression-free survival, QOL, and pulmonary function test, will be presented in the conference. Conclusions: The profiles of efficacy/safety/PK shown in this study are almost comparable to those in Western pts, and indicate that pem/cis therapy will be a promising therapy for Jpn MPM pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Serum cathepsin B (CB) levels are prognostic in chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and performance status (PS) of 2

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18036-18036
Author(s):  
J. W. Singer ◽  
F. B. Oldham ◽  
B. Bandstra ◽  
L. Sandalic ◽  
J. Bianco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Lysosomal Cysteine Protease ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

18036 Background: CB is an estrogen-influenced lysosomal cysteine protease produced by tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages; tumor tissue CB protein levels and proteolytic activity are prognostic in NSCLC (Anticancer Res. 2004; 24:4147–61). The prognostic value of serum CB has not previously been evaluated in NSCLC. Here we evaluate the impact of pretreatment CB levels on survival in pts from 2 phase III trials in advanced NSCLC, STELLAR 3 and 4. These trials compared paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX) against commonly used regimens. As the intratumoral metabolic pathway of PPX is characterized by the CB-mediated release of paclitaxel (P) from a polymeric backbone (Ca Chemother Pharm. 2006. Epub ahead of print), correlation of CB levels with PPX efficacy was assessed as well. Methods: Pretreatment serum samples from 450 chemo-naive pts with advanced NSCLC and PS 2 enrolled in STELLAR 3 (P + carboplatin (C) v. PPX + C) (N=315) and STELLAR 4 (vinorelbine or gemcitabine v. PPX) (N=135) were assayed for CB by ELISA (ICON Labs). Values were assessed by quartiles and there was a clear breakpoint at the median. Pts were categorized as high or low CB based on values above or below the median (64 ng/ml). The effect of CB levels on survival was evaluated by log rank for pooled pts from the studies. Results: As detailed in the table , median survival for non-PPX-treated pts was worse if CB was high; in contrast, median survival for PPX-treated pts did not differ by CB level. Pts with high CB receiving PPX showed a trend towards better survival compared to those receiving control regimens. Conclusions: The data suggest that serum CB may be prognostic biomarker for NSCLC. Retrospective analysis suggests a trend towards improved survival in patients with high CB receiving PPX; prospective studies are required to confirm this observation. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document