scholarly journals Phase III, Double-Blind Study of Depot Octreotide Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Acute Diarrhea in Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy: Results of North Central Cancer Treatment Group N00CA

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (32) ◽  
pp. 5248-5253 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Martenson ◽  
Michele Y. Halyard ◽  
Jeff A. Sloan ◽  
Gary M. Proulx ◽  
Robert C. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
North Central ◽  
Pelvic Radiation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
To Receive

PurposeTo assess the effectiveness of depot octreotide for the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy.Patients and MethodsPatients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (planned minimum dose, 45 Gy; 1.7 to 2.1 Gy daily) were eligible for the study. From May 10, 2002, through October 14, 2005, 125 patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive octreotide (100 μg, administered subcutaneously on day 1, followed by depot octreotide, 20 mg, administered intramuscularly on days 2 and 29; n = 62) or to receive a placebo (n = 63).ResultsGrade 0, 1, 2, and 3 diarrhea were observed in 18%, 31%, 31%, and 21% of patients in the octreotide arm, respectively, and in 25%, 32%, 22%, and 21% of patients in the placebo arm, respectively (P = .64). Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 abdominal cramps were observed in 32%, 45%, 21%, and 2% of patients receiving octreotide, respectively, and in 51%, 24%, 21%, and 5% of patients receiving the placebo, respectively (P = .053). Some patient-reported symptoms were worse in the octreotide group, including nocturnal bowel movements (70% v 45%; P = .004), clustering of bowel movements (90% v 69%; P = .004), and bleeding with bowel movements (57% v 35%; P = .01).ConclusionAs administered in this study, octreotide did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Some gastrointestinal symptoms were worse in patients treated with octreotide. Octreotide is not indicated for prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy.

Sucralfate in the Prevention of Treatment-Induced Diarrhea in Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1239-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Martenson ◽  
John W. Bollinger ◽  
Jeff A. Sloan ◽  
Paul J. Novotny ◽  
Rodolfo E. Urias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
North Central ◽  
Pelvic Radiation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE: Randomized studies have suggested that sucralfate is effective in mitigating diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to confirm the antidiarrheal effect of sucralfate. Several other measures of bowel function were also assessed.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving pelvic RT to a minimum of 45 Gy at 1.7 to 2.1 Gy/d were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned randomly, in double-blind fashion, to receive sucralfate (1.5 g orally every 6 hours) or an identical looking placebo during pelvic RT.RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were randomly assigned and found assessable. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient characteristics between those receiving sucralfate and those receiving placebo. Moderate or worse diarrhea was observed in 53% of patients receiving sucralfate versus 41% of those receiving placebo. Compared with patients receiving placebo, more sucralfate-treated patients reported fecal incontinence (16% v 34%, respectively; P = .04) and need for protective clothing (8% v 23%, respectively; P = .04). The incidence and severity of nausea were worse among those taking sucralfate (P = .03). Analysis of patient-reported symptoms 10 to 12 months after RT showed a nonsignificant trend toward more problems in patients taking sucralfate than in those taking placebo (average, 2.3 v 1.9 problems, respectively; P = .34).CONCLUSION: Sucralfate did not decrease pelvic RT-related bowel toxicity by any of the end points measured and seems to have aggravated some gastrointestinal symptoms.

Phase III double-blind study of depot octreotide versus placebo in the prevention of acute diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy: Results of North Central Cancer Treatment Group protocol N00CA

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8506-8506 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Martenson ◽  
J. A. Sloan ◽  
R. L. Deming ◽  
D. B. Wender ◽  
K. J. Stien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
North Central ◽  
Pelvic Radiation

8506 Background: A randomized study (Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 54:195–202, 2002) demonstrated a beneficial effect for octreotide in the treatment of diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy. This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of depot octreotide in the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Methods: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy, with a planned minimum dose of 45 Gy at 1.70–2.1 Gy per day, were eligible for this study. The study was designed for a Wilcoxon test, with 112 evaluable patients, to have 85% power to detect a further one grade decrease in diarrhea over and above that experienced by patients treated with placebo. Between June 13, 2002 and October 28, 2005, 120 evaluable patients were randomly allocated, in double blind fashion, to receive octreotide (62 patients) or placebo (58 patients), prior to the fourth radiation therapy fraction. Octreotide dosing: Octreotide, 100 micrograms subcutaneously on day 1 followed by depot octreotide, 20 milligrams intramuscularly on days 2 and 29. Results: Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 diarrhea was observed in 17%, 32%, 26% and 26% of patients treated with octreotide and 18%, 34%, 22%, and 26% of patients treated with placebo (P=0.86). Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 tenesmus was observed in 55%, 30%, 11% and 4% of patients treated with octreotide and 76%, 16%, 4%, and 4% of patients treated with placebo (P=0.04). No other statistically significant differences in toxicity were observed. Conclusions: Octreotide, as administered in this study, did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. [Table: see text]

Phase III Double-Blind Study of Glutamine Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Acute Diarrhea in Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1669-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy F. Kozelsky ◽  
Gregory E. Meyers ◽  
Jeff A. Sloan ◽  
Thomas G. Shanahan ◽  
Stephen J. Dick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Acute Diarrhea ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Quality ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pelvic Radiation ◽  
The North

Purpose: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study was conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group to determine the efficacy and toxicity of oral glutamine for the prevention of acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (RT). Patients and Methods: All 129 patients enrolled from 14 institutions between February 1998 and October 1999 were eligible. Patients received 4 g of glutamine or placebo orally, twice a day, beginning with the first or second day of RT and continuing for 2 weeks after RT. During treatment, patients were assessed weekly for toxicity, and a bowel function questionnaire was administered. The primary measures of treatment efficacy were diarrhea levels measured by maximum grade of diarrhea, incidence of diarrhea, and average diarrhea score. After completion of RT, the bowel function questionnaire was administered weekly for 4 weeks and at 12 and 24 months. Toxicity was measured by National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Results: The median age of patients was 69 years (range, 34 to 86 years). The two treatment arms were balanced with respect to all baseline factors. There were no significant differences in toxicity by treatment. Quality-of-life scores and the mean number of problems reported on the bowel function questionnaire were virtually identical for both treatment groups. The incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea was 20% for the glutamine arm and 19% for the placebo arm (P = .99). The maximum number of stools per day was 5.1 for the glutamine arm and 5.2 for the placebo arm (P = .99). Conclusion: There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of glutamine during pelvic RT.

A phase III, randomized, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation therapy (RT) in patients (pts) with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10084-TPS10084
Author(s):  
Danny Rischin ◽  
Matthew G. Fury ◽  
Israel Lowy ◽  
Elizabeth Stankevich ◽  
Hyunsil Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Extracapsular Extension ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
To Receive

TPS10084 Background: CSCC is the second most common skin cancer. While the surgical cure rate for CSCC is > 95%, a proportion of pts are considered to have high risk for recurrence as assessed by immune status, primary disease stage, extent of nodal involvement, presence of extracapsular extension, and prior treatment. Post-operative RT is recommended for pts with high-risk features, but relapse with locoregional recurrence or distant metastases may still occur. This study evaluates the efficacy of cemiplimab, a human anti‒PD-1 monoclonal antibody, as an adjuvant therapy for pts with CSCC with high-risk features, after surgery and RT. Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, Phase 3 study will evaluate cemiplimab as an adjuvant treatment for pts with high-risk CSCC, based on surgical and clinicopathologic findings, who have completed surgery and post-operative RT (NCT03969004). Immunocompromised pts were excluded. The trial will enrol 412 pts from about 100 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions. Pts with at least one of the following high-risk features are eligible: a) nodal disease with extracapsular extension b) in-transit metastases c) T4 lesion d) perineural invasion, and e) recurrent CSCC with at least one other risk factor. In Part 1 (blinded), pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive cemiplimab 350 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 48 weeks. In optional Part 2 (unblinded), pts in the placebo arm who experience disease recurrence or pts in the cemiplimab arm who experience disease recurrence ≥3 months after completion of 48-week treatment in Part 1 will be eligible to receive open-label cemiplimab 350 mg Q3W for up to 96 weeks. Key objectives are to compare disease-free survival (primary) as well as overall survival, freedom from locoregional relapse, and distant relapse (secondary) of adjuvant cemiplimab vs placebo in pts with high-risk CSCC. This study is currently open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004.

A phase III trial of ganitumab (GAN, AMG 479) with gemcitabine (G) as first-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC): An analysis of safety from the GAMMA trial (GEM and AMG 479 in Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4042-4042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Gyorgy Bodoky ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Shinichi Ohkawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

4042 Background: GAN is an investigational, fully human, monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IGF1R. GAMMA is assessing the safety and efficacy of GAN plus G as first-line tx in MPC pts (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01231347). Methods: This is an ongoing, global, phase III, double-blind study. Pts are randomized 2:2:1 to receive placebo, GAN 12 mg/kg, or GAN 20 mg/kg (IV; days 1 and 15 Q28D) with G 1000 mg/m2 (IV; days 1, 8, and 15 Q28D). The planned sample size is 825. Primary endpoint: overall survival. Key secondary endpoints: progression-free survival, 1-year survival rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. This study includes multiple planned safety analyses conducted by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). The current predefined safety analyses occurred when 150pts received ≥ 1 cycle of tx. Results: As of Sep 16, 2011, 207 pts are included in this aggregate analysis: 50% male; median age, 63 yrs (range 36-83); ECOG PS 0/1, 50%/50%. Of the 207 pts, 204 pts received study tx, and 61 pts ended study tx. Most frequent adverse events (AE) are shown (table). Ten pts (5%) died during or within 30 days of the end of tx. Seven events were attributed to or associated with disease progression. One event of cardiac failure was reported to be possibly tx related. Pulmonary embolism was suspected but not confirmed. Conclusions: The GAMMA study continues per protocol. The only grade 3/4 AE occurring in more than 5% of patients to date is neutropenia. [Table: see text]

Patient assessment of measures of bowel function during and after pelvic radiation therapy: An ancillary study of North Central Cancer Treatment Group study N00CA.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16572-e16572
Author(s):  
Pamela J. Atherton ◽  
Michele Y. Halyard ◽  
Jeff A. Sloan ◽  
Robert C. Miller ◽  
Richard L. Deming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Protective Clothing ◽  
Bowel Movement ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Pelvic Radiation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Bowel Movements

e16572 Background: The Bowel Function Questionnaire (BFQ) has been used in clinical trials to document patient-reported symptoms following pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This study evaluated the importance patients placed on the symptoms included in the BFQ as measured by a Content Validity Questionnaire (CVQ). Methods: Patients treated with pelvic RT assessed symptoms and importance at baseline, after completion of RT (4 weeks), and 12 and 24 months. BFQ measured quality of life (QOL) and symptoms of: nocturnal bowel movements, incontinence, greater than one bowel movement in 30 minutes, need for protective clothing, inability to differentiate stool and gas, liquid bowel movements, urgency, cramping, and bleeding. Bowel movement frequency was also assessed. Symptoms were rated via the CVQ as “not very important,” “moderately unimportant,” “neutral,” “moderately important,” or “very important." Summary statistics were compiled. Fisher Exact, Chi-Square and Wilcoxon methodology compared BFQ and CVQ results. Results: 125 patients participated. All symptoms were rated as moderately important or very important by most patients.Measures of bowel function of greatest importance (moderately or very important) at baseline were ability to control bowel movements (94%), not having to wear protective clothing (90%), and not having rectal bleeding (93%). In general, patients gave similar ratings of symptom importance at all time points in the study and ratings were independent of whether the symptom was experienced. With the exception of the need for protective clothing, the presence of a symptom at 4 weeks was associated with significantly worse QOL (p-values < 0.001 to 0.005). Conclusions: The BFQ has excellent content validity. Patients rated most symptoms measured by the BFQ as moderately important or very important, indicating the BFQ is an appropriate tool for symptom assessment during and after pelvic RT. With the exception of the need for protective clothing, the presence of every symptom measured by the BFQ was associated with worse QOL. These criteria make them appropriate targets for future research to mitigate radiation-related bowel dysfunction.

A phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing the investigational agent orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone (P) with placebo plus P in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed during or following docetaxel-based therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4693-TPS4693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Dreicer ◽  
David B. Agus ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
Johann Sebastian De Bono ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
To Receive

TPS4693 Background: The investigational agent orteronel is a selective inhibitor of 17,20-lyase, a key enzyme in the testosterone synthesis pathway. In a phase 1/2 study in men with mCRPC, orteronel reduced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and inhibited testosterone and DHEA-S consistent with potent 17,20-lyase inhibition (Agus D, et al. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:s5 abst 98). Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is an effective but noncurative therapy for mCRPC that has progressed on hormonal therapy; new therapeutic options are needed. Methods: This double-blind, multicenter study is assessing orteronel + P vs placebo + P in men with mCRPC (NCT01193257; C21005). Patients must have evidence of disease progression during or after receiving a total of ≥360 mg/m2 docetaxel within a 6-mo period. Patients who are clearly intolerant to docetaxel or have progressive disease before receiving ≥360 mg/m2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m2 of docetaxel within a 6-mo period and meet the other inclusion criteria. Other eligibility criteria include radiographically documented metastatic disease and baseline testosterone <50 ng/dL following surgical or medical castration. Prior adrenal-targeted therapies are not permitted. Men may have opioid-requiring bone pain. The planned sample size is 1083; men will be randomized 2:1 to receive orteronel 400 mg twice daily (BID) plus P 5 mg BID or placebo plus P. The primary endpoint is overall survival; other endpoints are radiographic progression-free survival, PSA decrease of ≥50% at 12 wks, pain response at 12 wks, safety, time to PSA progression, objective response by RECIST, circulating tumor cell and endocrine marker changes, and patient-reported outcomes. After disease progression, men may continue to receive study drug. Tumor specimens will be analyzed for biomarkers that may predict orteronel antitumor activity, including the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene. The same regimens are being evaluated in a concurrent phase 3 study in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC (NCT01193244).

A randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase III study of palbociclib (PD-0332991), an oral CDK 4/6 inhibitor, plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole for the treatment of postmenopausal women with ER(+), HER2(–) breast cancer who have not received any prior systemic anticancer treatment for advanced disease.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS652-TPS652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Veronique Dieras ◽  
Karen A. Gelmon ◽  
Nadia Harbeck ◽  
Stephen E. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
To Receive

TPS652 Background: Palbociclib (PD-0332991) is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of CDK4/6 that prevents DNA synthesis by prohibiting progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase. In a randomized phase II trial comparing palbociclib (PD-0332991) plus letrozole (P + L) to letrozole (L) in postmenopausal women with ER(+), HER2(–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who had not received any prior systemic anticancer therapy for their advanced disease, P + L demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) vs L (26.1 vs 7.5 mo; HR = 0.37, P < .001) and was generally well tolerated, with uncomplicated neutropenia as the most frequent adverse event (Finn et al SABCS 2012). Methods: Based on phase II data, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial was designed to demonstrate that P + L provides superior clinical benefit compared with L + placebo in postmenopausal women with ER(+), HER2(–) ABC who have not received any prior systemic therapy for their advanced disease. The study aims to assess whether P + L improves median PFS over L at HR of at least 0.7. Approximately 450 eligible patients with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic, pathologically confirmed ABC who are candidates to receive L as first-line treatment for their advanced disease will be randomized 2:1 to receive either P (125 mg QD 3 wk on, 1 wk off) + L (2.5 mg QD) or L (2.5 mg QD) + placebo. Patients who received anastrozole or letrozole as part of their (neo)adjuvant regimen are eligible if their disease progressed more than 12 months from completion of adjuvant therapy. Tumor tissue is required for participation. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response, duration of response, clinical benefit, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes of health-related quality of life and disease- or treatment-related symptoms. Clinical trial information: NCT01740427.

Time to sustained improvement in bowel movement frequency with telotristat ethyl: Analysis of the phase III telecast study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 395-395
Author(s):  
Joseph Dillon ◽  
Pablo Lapuerta ◽  
Chad McKee
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Sustained Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Frequency Change ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sustained Improvement ◽  
Treatment Groups

395 Background: Telotristat ethyl (TE) is approved to treat inadequately controlled carcinoid syndrome (CS) diarrhea in combination with somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy. Understanding the time to onset of sustained BM frequency improvement is important when considering the use of TE in patients with CS diarrhea. We present data on time to sustained improvement and worsening in BM frequency during the double-blind treatment (DBT) period of TELECAST, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in patients with CS that required additional treatment, primarily due to gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods: Stable dose SSA was not required. Patients were treated with TE 250 mg 3 times per day (tid), TE 500 mg tid, or placebo tid. Sustained response was defined as the time from the first double-blind dose date to the first day of 2 consecutive weeks with BM frequency change of at least 30% from baseline. The time to the first sustained response in the TELECAST study was examined among treatment groups and analyzed using Cox regression. Results: There were 26 patients on placebo and 25 patients on either 250 mg or 500 mg telotristat groups. Sustained improvement in BM frequency over the 12-week DBT period was achieved in 6, 16, and 16 patients on placebo, TE 250 mg, and TE 500 mg treatment groups. Median time to sustained ≥ 30% improvement was 4-5 weeks with TE at both dosing levels, with no median reached on placebo. First occurrence of sustained improvements in BM frequency occurred within 4-68 days. Time to sustained worsening was delayed on the 500-mg dose of TE (no percentile reached) and is statistically significant (p = 0.021, HR: 0.25) Conclusions: Treatment with telotristat ethyl may provide sustained BM frequency reduction within 4-5 weeks (median) of initiating therapy. No median was reached on placebo due to fewer patients with sustained improvement. Additionally, TE 500 mg tid may also offer additional clinical benefit by reducing sustained BM worsening. Clinical trial information: NCT02063659.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document