Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Codon 132 Mutation Is an Important Prognostic Biomarker in Gliomas

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (25) ◽  
pp. 4150-4154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Sanson ◽  
Yannick Marie ◽  
Sophie Paris ◽  
Ahmed Idbaih ◽  
Julien Laffaire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Prognostic Biomarker ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Genomic Profile ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Egfr Amplification ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Unexpected mutations affecting the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) gene at codon 132 have been found in 12% of glioblastomas. Patients and Methods IDH1 codon 132 sequencing was performed in a series of 404 patients with glioma (100 grade 2, 121 grade 3, and 183 grade 4 gliomas) and correlated with histology, genomic profile, methylguanyl methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and outcome. Results A total of 155 codon 132 mutations were found, of which 131 were Arg132His (88.5%). The IDH1 mutation was inversely correlated with grade, affecting 77% of grade 2, 55% of grade 3, and 6% of grade 4 gliomas (P < 10−15). The IDH1 mutation was tightly associated with a 1p19q codeleted genotype (P < 10−14) and an MGMT methylated status (P < .001) but mutually exclusive with EGFR amplification (P < 10−15) and loss of chromosome 10 (P < 10−15). The presence (v absence) of IDH1 mutation was associated with a better outcome in grade 2 (150.9 v 60.1 months, respectively; P = .01), grade 3 (81.1 v 19.4 months, respectively; P < .001), and grade 4 gliomas (27.4 v 14 months, respectively; P < .01). After adjustment for grade, age, MGMT status, genomic profile, and treatment, multivariate analysis confirmed that IDH1 mutation was an independent favorable prognostic marker (hazard ratio = 0.297; 95% CI, 0.157 to 0.564, P = .00021). Conclusion This study indicates that IDH1 codon 132 mutation is closely linked to the genomic profile of the tumor and constitutes an important prognostic marker in grade 2 to 4 gliomas.

scholarly journals Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib in Combination With Azacitidine for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Anthony S. Stein ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Qt Prolongation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE Ivosidenib is an oral inhibitor of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) enzyme, approved for treatment of IDH1-mutant (m IDH1) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical work suggested that addition of azacitidine to ivosidenib enhances mIDH1 inhibition–related differentiation and apoptosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib trial comprising dose-finding and expansion stages to evaluate safety and efficacy of combining oral ivosidenib 500 mg once daily continuously with subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on days 1-7 in 28-day cycles in patients with newly diagnosed m IDH1 AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02677922 ). RESULTS Twenty-three patients received ivosidenib plus azacitidine (median age, 76 years; range, 61-88 years). Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring in > 10% of patients were neutropenia (22%), anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and electrocardiogram QT prolongation (13%). Adverse events of special interest included all-grade IDH differentiation syndrome (17%), all-grade electrocardiogram QT prolongation (26%), and grade ≥ 3 leukocytosis (9%). Median treatment duration was 15.1 months (range, 0.3-32.2 months); 10 patients remained on treatment as of February 19, 2019. The overall response rate was 78.3% (18/23 patients; 95% CI, 56.3% to 92.5%), and the complete remission rate was 60.9% (14/23 patients; 95% CI, 38.5% to 80.3%). With median follow-up of 16 months, median duration of response in responders had not been reached. The 12-month survival estimate was 82.0% (95% CI, 58.8% to 92.8%). m IDH1 clearance in bone marrow mononuclear cells by BEAMing (beads, emulsion, amplification, magnetics) digital polymerase chain reaction was seen in 10/14 patients (71.4%) achieving complete remission. CONCLUSION Ivosidenib plus azacitidine was well tolerated, with an expected safety profile consistent with monotherapy with each agent. Responses were deep and durable, with most complete responders achieving m IDH1 mutation clearance.

scholarly journals Assessment of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Mutation by Immunohistochemistry in Egyptian Patients with High-grade Gliomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (A) ◽  
pp. 157-163
Author(s):  
Essam Ayad ◽  
Sylvia Mikhael Ghattas ◽  
Rabab Abdel Moneim ◽  
Azzam Ismail ◽  
Rasha A. Khairy
Keyword(s):  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade Iii

BACKGROUND: At present, the classification of central nervous system tumors relies on molecular factors in addition to histologic features to identify many tumor types. This should subsequently results in more accurate diagnosis as well as addressing specific markers of potential prognostic and predictive value. AIM: This study was conducted to emphasize the importance of including isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) evaluation as a crucial part of the diagnosis and categorization of high-grade glioma cases. This also may help to individualize the treatment of high-grade glioma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study included 60 cases of high-grade gliomas, studied histologically and immunohistochemically for the detection of IDH1 mutation. The results were correlated with different clinicopathologic variables and course of the disease. RESULTS: IDH1 immunohistochemical expression was positive in 46.67% of the studied high-grade glioma cases. A statistically significant relationship was detected between IDH1 expression and tumor histologic grade as 100% of Grade III anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases and 80% of the Grade III anaplastic astrocytoma cases were IDH1 positive while only 40.4% of Grade IV glioblastoma cases were IDH1 positive (p = 0.03). In addition, patients who were IDH1 mutant were in a better category of response to radiotherapy (p = 0.019) and also to chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients who expressed IDH1 had prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival than those who showed negative IDH1expression (p < 0.001). On the other hand, no statistically significant relationship was detected between IDH1 expression and patients age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, motor symptoms, sensory symptoms, and increased intracranial tension (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that IDH1 is a good prognostic marker for gliomas and is a good predictive marker for response to treatment. IDH1 is a promising target for therapy in high-grade gliomas through the emerging IDH1 inhibitors. Immunohistochemical testing for IDH1 is a practical and cost-effective method that should be applied in all glioma cases. Further study on a larger sample size is recommended to validate the current results. Moreover, applying molecular analysis to detect IDH1 mutation is recommended to be able to precisely detect the IDH1 wild-type tumor

scholarly journals NCOG-29. O6-METHYLGUANINE DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE (MGMT) PROMOTER METHYLATION STATUS AND THE INCIDENCE OF TEMOZOLOMIDE-INDUCED HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY: AN ASSOCIATION STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii135-ii135
Author(s):  
Alyssa Strohbusch ◽  
Heather Pound ◽  
Patrick Regis ◽  
Robert Cavaliere
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite the growing body of evidence demonstrating an increased clinical benefit of alkylating agents in glioblastoma patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, little is known regarding the effect of MGMT status on toxicity. The purpose of this investigation is to provide insight into the potential association between MGMT promoter methylation and the development of Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities in patients receiving temozolomide. METHODS A total of 63 patients with documented glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma diagnoses were evaluated retrospectively. A chi-square test of independence was utilized to evaluate the incidence of hematologic toxicities and patient overall survival was determined by univariate analysis estimated through use of Kaplan-Meier curves. Relative frequencies of treatment discontinuation secondary to myelosuppression were also compared. RESULTS At the time of study completion, 71.4% of patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation had survived compared with 50% of patients with hypomethylation (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05; P&gt;0.05). The percentage of patients who experienced Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities during concurrent treatment was 20% and 5.1% within the hypermethylated and hypomethylated groups, respectively, and 26.7% and 17.9% throughout standard therapy. While a statistical difference was not found between the cumulative incidences of Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity events throughout both phases of treatment, a statistical difference was noted in the incidence of Grade 4 occurrences with ten events occurring in the hypermethylated group and zero in those with hypomethylated promoter regions (P&lt; 0.01). Furthermore, use of temozolomide in hypermethylated patients resulted in fewer completed cycles of standard therapy and higher rates of treatment delays and drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS This study showed marked differences in the frequency of temozolomide-induced hematologic toxicities and treatment discontinuation based on tumor MGMT promoter methylation status. Further research is warranted in larger patient populations to both validate and determine the clinical significance of these findings.

scholarly journals Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1 ) Mutation in Breast Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Elevated Levels of Serum and Urine 2‐Hydroxyglutarate

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
Hossein Sadrzadeh ◽  
Amy H. Comander ◽  
Michaela J. Higgins ◽  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
Breast Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Serum And Urine

scholarly journals Microfluidics for rapid detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation for intraoperative application

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1611-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abudumijiti Aibaidula ◽  
Wang Zhao ◽  
Jin-song Wu ◽  
Hong Chen ◽  
Zhi-feng Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequencing ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Soft Lithography ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
Fluorescence Signal ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
New Approach

OBJECT Conventional methods for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) detection, such as DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry, are time- and labor-consuming and cannot be applied for intraoperative analysis. To develop a new approach for rapid analysis of IDH1 mutation from tiny tumor samples, this study used microfluidics as a method for IDH1 mutation detection. METHODS Forty-seven glioma tumor samples were used; IDH1 mutation status was investigated by immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. The microfluidic device was fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane following standard soft lithography. The immunoanalysis was conducted in the microfluidic chip. Fluorescence images of the on-chip microcolumn taken by the charge-coupled device camera were collected as the analytical results readout. Fluorescence signals were analyzed by NIS-Elements software to gather detailed information about the IDH1 concentration in the tissue samples. RESULTS DNA sequencing identified IDH1 R132H mutation in 33 of 47 tumor samples. The fluorescence signal for IDH1-mutant samples was 5.49 ± 1.87 compared with 3.90 ± 1.33 for wild type (p = 0.005). Thus, microfluidics was capable of distinguishing IDH1-mutant tumor samples from wild-type samples. When the cutoff value was 4.11, the sensitivity of microfluidics was 87.9% and the specificity was 64.3%. CONCLUSIONS This new approach was capable of analyzing IDH1 mutation status of tiny tissue samples within 30 minutes using intraoperative microsampling. This approach might also be applied for rapid pathological diagnosis of diffuse gliomas, thus guiding personalized resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document