scholarly journals Conditional Survival and the Choice of Conditioning Set for Patients With Colon Cancer: An Analysis of NSABP Trials C-03 Through C-07

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 2544-2548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Zamboni ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Mehee Choi ◽  
Clifton D. Fuller ◽  
James J. Dignam ◽  
...  

PurposeColon cancer overall survival (OS) is usually computed from the time of diagnosis. Survival gives the initial prognosis but does not reflect how prognosis changes with changing hazard rates over time. Conditional survival (probability of surviving y additional years given they have survived x years [CS or OS|OS]) is an alternative measure that accounts for elapsed time since diagnosis, providing more relevant prognostic information. We extend the concept of CS to condition on the set of patients alive, recurrence-free, and second primary cancer-free (disease-free survival [OS|DFS]).Patients and MethodsUsing data from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials C-03 through C-07, 5-year OS|DFS was calculated on patients who were disease free up to 5 years after diagnosis, stratified by age, stage, nodal status, and performance status (PS).ResultsFor stage II, OS|DFS improved from 87% to 92% at 5 years. For stage III, OS|DFS improved from 69% to 88%. Patients younger than 50 years showed OS|DFS improvement from 79% to 95%; those older than 70 years showed no sustained increase in OS|DFS. Node-negative patients with ≥ 12 nodes resected showed little change (89% to 94%); those with more than four positive nodes showed an improvement (57% to 86%). Patients with a PS of 0 or 1 demonstrated a small improvement; those with a PS of 2 did not (64% to 58%).ConclusionPrognosis improves over time for almost all groups of patients with colon cancer, especially those with positive nodes. OS|DFS is a more relevant measure of prognosis for those who have already survived disease free a period of time after diagnosis.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6005-6005 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Wang ◽  
B. A. Zamboni ◽  
H. S. Wieand ◽  
G. Yothers ◽  
J. J. Dignam ◽  
...  

6005 Background: Survival for cancer patients is usually only reported as survival from time of diagnosis to some time landmark (e.g., 5 yrs). For pts surviving one or more years after diagnosis, however, their survival probability changes, and is more accurately depicted by conditional survival (CS), defined as the probability of surviving for an additional fixed time interval given that the pt has already survived a period of time. The purpose of this study was to determine the 5-yr CS of colon cancer pts in 4 NSABP trials. Methods: We analyzed long-term overall survival data from the 5587 colon cancer pts who were enrolled in fluorouracil (or equivalent) arms of NSABP trials C-03 through C-06. We computed observed 5-yr overall CS for pts who had already survived without disease from 0 to 5 yrs after diagnosis, and stratified the results by age, sex, race, stage, number of positive nodes, number of nodes resected, tumor location, and performance status. Results: The Table below shows the 5-yr overall CS for all pts and for selected subgroups for different survival times since diagnosis. As disease-free survival time since diagnosis increased, 5-yr observed overall CS increased from 76% to 90% at 5 yrs. For pts under age 50, CS increased from 78% to 95% at 5 yrs, but for pts > 70 yrs, CS remained fairly constant (71–82%). For pts with > 10 positive nodes, CS increased from 37% to 81% at 5 yrs, but did not change appreciably for node-negative pts (87–92%). Dukes’ C pts saw an increase in CS from 68% to 88% at 5 yrs, while CS for Dukes’ B pts did not change appreciably. Conclusion: Projected survival probability generally increases with time for colon cancer pts who remain disease-free for a period of time after diagnosis, and conditional survival can provide more informative prognostic information for these pts. An additional effect is that prognostic factors that are important at baseline become less important for conditional survival as the disease-free period increases. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4012-4012 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Bertagnolli ◽  
D. Niedzwiecki ◽  
M. Hall ◽  
S. D. Jewell ◽  
R. J. Mayer ◽  
...  

4012 Background: LOH at 18q is associated with poorer overall survival in patients with colon cancer; however available studies are retrospective and vary in analysis methods. We recently completed an 18qLOH assay method validation study, and after standardizing technique, this prospective study investigated the role of 18qLOH among patients with low-risk stage II colon cancer. Methods: In Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 9581, we randomized 1738 stage II patients to post-operative treatment with a 500 mg loading dose of monoclonal antibody 17–1A followed by four infusions of 100 mg every 28 days or observation. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); disease free survival (DFS) was a secondary endpoint. Status of 18qLOH was assessed in patients with available tissue and interpretable PCR results. Patients were excluded if their tumors were uninformative for 18qLOH or if their tumors displayed microsatellite instability. Results: We report 18qLOH data on 156 patients. Patient characteristics including treatment, age, gender, performance status, site and grade of tumor, were similar between all patients enrolled and the subset of patients with tumor samples analyzed. The DFS and OS for treated and observed patients were no different (5-yr DFS: 0.81 and 0.80, p= 0.96; 5-yr OS: 0.88 and 0.86, p=0.44 at a median of 6.8 yrs of follow-up) and the data were pooled across the study's arms. Of the tumors examined, 101 (65%) were positive for 18qLOH. A significantly lower proportion of patients with 18qLOH-positive tumors had proximal tumors (46.5% vs 65.5%; p=0.02). Significantly decreased DFS and OS were observed in patients with 18qLOH-positive tumors. Five-year DFS among patients with 18qLOH-positive tumors was 0.78 vs 0.93 among patients with 18qLOH-negative tumors [HR 0.39; 95% CI (0.16, 0.94); logrank p=0.03 based on 33 events]. Five-year OS among patients with 18qLOH-positive tumors was 0.85 vs 0.98 among patients with 18qLOH-negative tumors [HR 0.25; 95% CI (0.07, 0.83); logrank p=0.01 based on 24 events]. Conclusions LOH at 18q was prognostic for DFS and OS among patients with available tissue for analysis after resection of low-risk stage II colon cancer who were not treated with chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (36) ◽  
pp. 4102-4112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Kurta ◽  
Robert P. Edwards ◽  
Kirsten B. Moysich ◽  
Kathleen McDonough ◽  
Marnie Bertolet ◽  
...  

Purpose Traditional disease-free survival (DFS) does not reflect changes in prognosis over time. Conditional DFS accounts for elapsed time since achieving remission and may provide more relevant prognostic information for patients and clinicians. This study aimed to estimate conditional DFS among patients with ovarian cancer and to evaluate the impact of patient characteristics. Patients and Methods Patients were recruited as part of the Hormones and Ovarian Cancer Prediction case-control study and were included in the current study if they had achieved remission after a diagnosis of cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum (N = 404). Demographic and lifestyle information was collected at enrollment; disease, treatment, and outcome information was abstracted from medical records. DFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Conditional DFS estimates were computed using cumulative DFS estimates. Results Median DFS was 2.54 years (range, 0.03-9.96 years) and 3-year DFS was 48.2%. The probability of surviving an additional 3 years without recurrence, conditioned on having already survived 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after remission, was 63.8%, 80.5%, 90.4%, 97.0%, and 97.7%, respectively. Initial differences in 3-year DFS at time of remission between age, stage, histology, and grade groups decreased over time. Conclusion DFS estimates for patients with ovarian cancer improved dramatically over time, in particular among those with poorer initial prognoses. Conditional DFS is a more relevant measure of prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer who have already achieved a period of remission, and time elapsed since remission should be taken into account when making follow-up care decisions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 5938-5943 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Chang ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Cathy Eng ◽  
John M. Skibber ◽  
Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas

Purpose Conditional survival (CS) estimates provide important prognostic information for clinicians and patients who have survived a period after diagnosis. In this study we performed a contemporary evaluation of conditional survival among colon cancer patients and created a browser-based tool for real-time determination of conditional survival expectancies. Patients and Methods Patients with colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1988 and 2000 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) registry. Conditional survival estimates were calculated by using the multiplicative law of probability after adjustment for age; sex; ethnicity; grade; and American Joint Commission on Cancer, sixth edition stage. A browser-based calculator was constructed. Results A total of 83,419 patients were analyzed. As the time alive after initial treatment increased from 0 to 5 years, significant improvements in CS were observed for patients in all stages except stage I, which was associated with good CS even at diagnosis and which reflected the high likelihood of cure. Notably, adjusted 5-year CS rates improved from 42% to 80% for stage IIIC cancers and from 5% to 48% for stage IV cancers during the first 5 years. Differences in cancer-related CS at diagnosis were identified on the basis of age, ethnicity, and grade, but these differences decreased over time. A browser-based CS calculator was implemented by using the multivariate survival model (concordance index, 0.81). Conclusion For patients with colon cancer who survive over time, 5-year, cancer-specific CS improved dramatically, and the greatest improvements were among patients with poorer initial prognoses. These prognostic data are critical to inform patients for non–treatment-related life decisions and to inform treating physicians for planning of follow-up and surveillance strategies.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Yao ◽  
Caixia Sun ◽  
Fei Xiong ◽  
Xinyu Zhang ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jun Yin ◽  
Mohamed E Salem ◽  
Jesse G Dixon ◽  
Zhaohui Jin ◽  
Romain Cohen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Disease-free survival with a 3-year median follow-up (3-year DFS) was validated as a surrogate for overall survival with a 5-year median follow-up (5-year OS) in adjuvant chemotherapy colon cancer (CC) trials. Recent data show further improvements in OS and survival after recurrence, in patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX. Hence, re-evaluation of the association between DFS and OS and determination of the optimal follow-up duration of OS to aid its utility in future adjuvant trials are needed. Methods Individual patient data from nine randomized studies conducted between 1998 and 2009 were included; three trials tested biologics. Trial-level surrogacy examining the correlation of treatment effect estimates of 3-year DFS with 5 to 6.5-year OS was evaluated using both linear regression (R2WLS) and Copula bivariate (R2Copula) models and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For R2, a value closer to 1 indicates a stronger correlation. Results Data from a total of 18,396 patients were analyzed (median age = 59 years; 54.0% male), with 54.1% having low-risk tumors (pT1-3 & pN1), 31.6% KRAS mutated, 12.3% BRAF mutated, and 12.4% microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair tumors. Trial level correlation between 3-year DFS and 5-year OS remained strong (R2 =0.82, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.98; R2 =0.92, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.00) and increased as the median follow-up of OS extended. Analyses limited to trials that tested biologics showed consistent results. Conclusion Three-year DFS remains a validated surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS in adjuvant CC trials. The correlation was likely strengthened with 6 years of follow-up for OS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 246-246
Author(s):  
Marieke Pape ◽  
Pauline A.J. Vissers ◽  
Laurens Beerepoot ◽  
Mark I. Van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Sjoerd Lagarde ◽  
...  

246 Background: Among patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer (EC) or gastroesophageal junctional cancer (GEJC) treated with curative intent, survival remains poor and around half of these patients have disease recurrence within a few years. This study addresses the need for real-world data on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with EC or GEJC who underwent potentially curative treatment. Methods: Patients selected from the nationwide Netherlands cancer registry (NCR) had received a primary diagnosis of non-metastatic EC or GEJC (excluding patients with T4b tumors) in 2015 or 2016 and received treatment with curative intent. Curative intent was defined as receiving resection (with or without [neo]adjuvant therapy) or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) without surgery. DFS and OS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves with Log-Rank test from resection date or end of dCRT. A sub-analysis was performed for NCR patients selected to align with the population of the CheckMate-577 phase 3 study of adjuvant nivolumab, i.e. patients with non-cervical stage II/III disease, R0 resection and residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) and surgery. Results: We identified 1916 patients of median age of 67 years and predominantly male (76%). The majority (79%) received surgery and 21% of patients received dCRT. In resected patients, 83% received nCRT, 10% neoadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without adjuvant CRT) and 7% received no (neo)adjuvant treatment. Compared to the resected group, the population receiving dCRT had significantly fewer males (65% vs 78%), a higher median age (72 vs 65 years) and worse performance status. Patients receiving dCRT significantly shorter median DFS (14.2 months) and OS (20.9 months) compared to resected patients (DFS: 26.4 months, p < 0.001; OS: 40.5 months, p < 0.001). The 1- and 3-year DFS probabilities were 68% and 44%, respectively, in resected patients, and 56% and 24%, respectively, in patients receiving dCRT. In patients receiving nCRT followed by surgery, the median DFS and OS were 25.2 and 38.0 months, respectively, and 1- and 3-year DFS probabilities were 67% and 43%, respectively. In the sub-analysis (n = 725) the median DFS and OS were 19.2 and 29.4 months, respectively, and the 1- and 3-year DFS rates were 62% and 36%, respectively. Conclusions: Although patients are treated with curative intent, a considerable amount of patients with non-metastatic EC or GEJC experienced recurrence within two years. Resected patients had a higher DFS and OS compared to patients receiving dCRT.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 675-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Bower ◽  
Charles R. Scoggins ◽  
Robert C. G. Martin ◽  
Michael P. Mays ◽  
Michael J. Edwards ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of multiple primary melanomas (MPM) and other cancers types among patients with melanoma. Factors associated with development of MPM were assessed in a post hoc analysis of the database from a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial of patients with melanoma aged 18 to 70 years with Breslow thickness 1 mm or greater. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forty-eight (1.9%) of 2506 patients with melanoma developed additional primary melanomas. Median follow-up was 66 months. Except in one patient, the subsequent melanomas were thinner (median, 0.32 mm vs 1.50 mm; P < 0.0001). Compared with patients without MPM, patients with MPM were more likely to be older (median age, 54.5 vs 51.0 years; P = 0.048), to have superficially spreading melanomas (SSM) ( P = 0.025), to have negative sentinel lymph nodes ( P = 0.021), or to lack lymphovascular invasion (LVI) ( P = 0.008) with the initial tumor. On multivariate analysis, age ( P = 0.028), LVI ( P = 0.010), and SSM subtype of the original melanoma ( P = 0.024) were associated with MPM. Patients with MPM and patients with single primary melanoma had similar DFS (5-year DFS 88.7 vs 81.3%, P = 0.380), but patients with MPM had better OS (5-year OS 95.3 vs 80.0%, P = 0.005). Nonmelanoma malignancies occurred in 152 patients (6.1%). Ongoing surveillance of patients with melanoma is important given that a significant number will develop additional melanoma and nonmelanoma tumors. With close follow-up, second primary melanomas are usually detected at an early stage.


1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 941-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L McMaster ◽  
J P Greer ◽  
F A Greco ◽  
D H Johnson ◽  
S N Wolff ◽  
...  

Small-noncleaved-cell (SNC) lymphoma is a high-grade, biologically aggressive neoplasm notable for poor response to therapy, high relapse rate, and less than a 20% long-term survival. We treated 20 patients with SNC lymphoma with a novel chemotherapeutic regimen using intensive doses of chemotherapy at frequent intervals in the inpatient setting. All patients were previously untreated. Sixteen patients (80%) had stage IV disease. Most patients (95%) had at least one other characteristic associated with poor prognosis (bulky [greater than 10 cm] disease, multiple extranodal sites, poor performance status), and 85% had two or more characteristics associated with poor prognosis. Seventeen patients (85%) achieved a complete response (CR) to therapy, including all three patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated disease. There have been three relapses, all occurring less than 18 months after treatment, and two of three relapses occurred in patients who were unable to complete therapy. At a median follow-up of 29 months, 13 patients (65%) remain disease-free; the calculated 5-year actuarial disease-free survival is 60%. Toxicity, chiefly myelosuppression, was severe but manageable. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in elderly patients with poor performance status and advanced-stage disease. These data suggest that such a dose-intensive approach improves the response and survival of patients with SNC lymphoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document