Impact of older age on the efficacy of newer adjuvant therapies in >12,500 patients (pts) with stage II/III colon cancer: Findings from the ACCENT Database

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4010-4010 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Jackson McCleary ◽  
J. Meyerhardt ◽  
E. Green ◽  
G. Yothers ◽  
A. de Gramont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Clinically Meaningful Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

4010 Background: Prior studies suggested that older and younger pts with colon cancer receive similar benefit from IV fluoropyrimidine (FU) adjuvant (adj) therapy (rx). Combination and/or oral FU rx are increasingly given as adj rx. We sought to determine the impact of pts age <70 v ≥70 yrs on colon cancer recurrence and mortality from adj rx with these newer options. Methods: We used data from 10,499 pts <70 yrs and 2,170 pts ≥70 yrs in 6 phase III adj rx trials comparing IV FU to combinations with irinotecan, oxaliplatin or oral FU (capecitabine and UFT/LV) in stage II/III colon cancer from the ACCENT database. Endpoints were overall survival (OS; time to death), disease-free survival (DFS; time to recurrence or death), and time to recurrence (TTR; censoring at last follow-up). Cox models were stratified by age and adjusted for gender and stage; interaction testing was used to explore the differential benefit by age. Results: Approximately 75% of pts had stage III disease (74% age<70, 77% age≥70). OS, DFS, and TTR were statistically significantly improved for those in the experimental v control arms among pts <70 but not those >70 ( table ); the interaction between age and rx was statistically significant for all endpoints (p=0.01 for OS, DFS, and TTR). These results were consistent whether experimental rx was oxaliplatin-based, irinotecan-based or oral FU. Deaths in first 6 month of adj rx were not statistically significantly different between experimental and control arm. Conclusions: Our results show conclusively that pts >70 do not receive the same benefit from combination and/or oral FU as those <70. Any benefit, if present, compared to IV FU/LV would not be clinically meaningful. Outcomes of experimental (combination or oral FU) vs control (IV 5-FU) by treatment and age [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Impact of Age on the Efficacy of Newer Adjuvant Therapies in Patients With Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Findings From the ACCENT Database

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2600-2606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine J. McCleary ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
Erin Green ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Aimery de Gramont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidines ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Prior studies have suggested that patients with stage II/III colon cancer receive similar benefit from intravenous (IV) fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy regardless of age. Combination regimens and oral fluorouracil (FU) therapy are now standard. We examined the impact of age on colon cancer recurrence and mortality after adjuvant therapy with these newer options. Patients and Methods We analyzed 11,953 patients age < 70 and 2,575 age ≥ 70 years from seven adjuvant therapy trials comparing IV FU with oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine, uracil, or tegafur) or combinations of fluoropyrimidines with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in stage II/III colon cancer. End points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence (TTR). Results In three studies comparing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with IV FU, statistically significant interactions were not observed between treatment arm and age (P interaction = .09 for DFS, .05 for OS, and .36 for TTR), although the stratified point estimates suggested limited benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin in elderly patients (DFS hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.13; OS HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.27). No significant interactions by age were detected with oral fluoropyrimidine therapy compared with IV FU; noninferiority was supported in both age populations. Conclusion Patients age ≥ 70 years seemed to experience reduced benefit from adding oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines in the adjuvant setting, although statistically, there was not a significant effect modification by age, whereas oral fluoropyrimidines retained their efficacy.

Oxaliplatin Combined With Weekly Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin As Surgical Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Results From NSABP C-07

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 2198-2204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Philip Kuebler ◽  
H. Samuel Wieand ◽  
Michael J. O'Connell ◽  
Roy E. Smith ◽  
Linda H. Colangelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wall Thickening ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose This phase III clinical trial evaluated the impact on disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to bolus weekly fluorouracil (FU) combined with leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer. Patients and Methods Patients who had undergone a potentially curative resection were randomly assigned to either FU 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) bolus weekly for 6 weeks plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV weekly for 6 weeks during each 8-week cycle for three cycles (FULV), or the same FULV regimen with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV administered on weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week cycle for three cycles (FLOX). Results A total of 2,407 patients (96.6%) of the 2,492 patients randomly assigned were eligible. Median follow-up for patients still alive is 42.5 months. The hazard ratio (FLOX v FULV) is 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93), a 20% risk reduction in favor of FLOX (P < .004). The 3- and 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 71.8% and 67.0% for FULV and 76.1% and 73.2% for FLOX, respectively. Grade 3 neurosensory toxicity was noted in 8.2% of patients receiving FLOX and in 0.7% of those receiving FULV (P < .001). Hospitalization for diarrhea associated with bowel wall thickening occurred in 5.5% of the patients receiving FLOX and in 3.0% of the patients receiving FULV (P < .01). A total of 1.2% of patients died as a result of any cause within 60 days of receiving chemotherapy, with no significant difference between regimens. Conclusion The addition of oxaliplatin to weekly FULV significantly improved DFS in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. FLOX can be recommended as an effective option in clinical practice.

KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Stage II/III Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Formica ◽  
Francesco Sera ◽  
Chiara Cremolini ◽  
Silvia Riondino ◽  
Cristina Morelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background KRAS and BRAF mutations are well-established predictive and prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer, however their impact in the adjuvant setting has not yet been established. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of adjuvant phase III trials in patients with stage II and III colon cancer with available data on the impact of KRAS/BRAF mutations on both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Trials were subgrouped based on whether adjustment for microsatellite instability (MSI) was performed and the subgroup effect was analyzed through a meta-regression. To increase the precision of the estimates, a joint DFS/OS (so-called ‘multivariate’) meta-analysis was performed. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Nine trials were selected (QUASAR 2, PETACC-8, N0147, CALGB-89803, NSABP-C07, NSABP-C08, PETACC-3, QUASAR, MOSAIC) including a total of 10893 patients. In the primary meta-analysis, KRAS mutation was associated with poor DFS (pooled HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15–1.61, P &lt; .001) and OS (pooled HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03–1.55, P = .03) and BRAF mutation was also associated with poor DFS (pooled HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.00–1.78, P = .05) and OS (pooled HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.31–1.70, P &lt; .001). MSI adjustment enhanced the effect of the mutations on outcome in the MSI-adjusted subgroup for both the KRAS mutation (pooled HR for DFS = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.15–1.79, P = .001; and pooled HR for OS = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03–1.71, P = .03) and the BRAF mutation (pooled HR for DFS = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.22–2.07, P = .001; and pooled HR for OS = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.37–2.04, P &lt; .001). The interaction between BRAF and MSI adjustment was statistically significant for DFS (P interaction = 0.02). This interaction was even more pronounced in the DFS/OS multivariate meta-analysis. Conclusions Both KRAS and BRAF mutations were statistically significantly associated with both DFS and OS, with the mutation effect being enhanced by MSI adjustment. Effective adjuvant treatment for microsatellite stable BRAF or KRAS-mutated colon cancer represents an unmet clinical need and exploring the use of recently available BRAF and KRAS inhibitors in this setting would be highly desirable.

Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance, and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated on CALGB 80203

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4038-4038 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Meyerhardt ◽  
N. Jackson McCleary ◽  
D. Niedzwiecki ◽  
D. Hollis ◽  
A. Venook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Early Closure ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Diet And Lifestyle

4038 Background: Little is known regarding the interaction of comorbid conditions (CC) and age when treating pts for mCRC. We sought to determine the impact of CC and age (<70 and ≥70 yrs) on survival and toxicity in these pts. Methods: We utilized a cohort of 238 pts with mCRC enrolled in CALGB 80203, a curtailed, multicenter 2x2 phase III trial of fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) ± cetuximab. Endpoints were overall survival (OS; time to death), progression-free survival (PFS; time to recurrence or death), and grade 3/4 toxicity. Pts completed a self-administered questionnaire on diet and lifestyle that included a modified Charlson's comorbidity survey. Cox models were adjusted for treatment (rx) arm, gender, and prior rx. Results: In CALGB 80203, 77% were < 70 and 23% ≥70. Thirty-five percent of pts had at least one CC (34% < 70 yrs; 41% ≥ 70 yrs). At least one grade 3/4 toxicity was experienced by 87% of pts ≥70 v 66% <70 (p=0.002), primarily hematologic (56% v 31%, p=0.003). Amongst 238 pts, 94% and 84% experienced a PFS event and OS event, respectively. No pts are censored prior to 3 yrs. Median follow-up was 23 mos. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for ≥70 v <70 of PFS was 1.0 (0.7–1.4) and of OS was 1.1 (0.8–1.6). Similarly, there were no significant differences in HR for PFS and OS by # CC. The table demonstrates no evidence of interaction between CC and age. Conclusions: While the early closure of CALGB 80203 presents sample size limitations for subset analyses, we did not observe an impact on PFS or OS by age and/or CC. Older pts did experience more toxicity from rx. Further studies with larger datasets are warranted. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Outcomes in white (W) patients (pts) and those of African (A) descent receiving adjuvant therapy for colon cancer (CC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4017-4017 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Yothers ◽  
W. Blackstock ◽  
N. Wolmark ◽  
R. M. Goldberg ◽  
M. J. O’Connell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Treatment Type

4017 Background: Published reports suggest that CC pts of A descent have inferior survival compared to W pts. Whether these differences are explained by clinical factors at diagnosis, socioeconomic factors impacting access to care, or intrinsic differences in the biology of the tumors or the response to therapy is unclear. Pts in clinical trials have data collected for important baseline clinical factors and should receive comparable oncologic care regardless of socioeconomic factors. Methods: We analyzed data from 13,435 individual pts on 11 phase III adjuvant CC trials accrued from 1977 to 2002. Analysis was restricted to stage II and III pts, with race reported as black or white. Endpoints were overall survival (OS - time to death), recurrence-free survival (RFS - time to recurrence or death), and recurrence-free interval (RFI - time to recurrence censoring for death). Cox models stratified by study controlled for gender, stage, age, and treatment type (rx) to determine the effect of race. Kaplan-Meier estimates (KM) were adjusted (adj) by the Xie-Liu method for study, gender, stage, age, and rx. Results: A pts (n=1134, 8.4%) were younger than W (median 58 vs 61, p<0.001) and more likely female (55 vs 45%, p<0.001). A pts had poorer OS than W pts ( table ). OS results were consistent in subsets defined by gender, stage, and age. RFS results were attenuated compared to OS, but still favored improved RFS in W pts ( table ). RFI results were further attenuated and not significantly different by race ( table ). Conclusions: Even with identical rx for CC in controlled clinical trials, A pts have poorer OS and RFS than W pts. The OS deficit was consistent across subgroups, and neither deficit was explained by differences in gender, stage, age, or rx. RFI was similar for both races, suggesting that the OS and RFS differences may be largely due to deaths unrelated to CC. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Evaluation of the prognostic value of guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) lymph node (LN) classification in patients with stage II colon cancer: A pooled analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 443-443
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Sargent ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Murray B. Resnick ◽  
Stephen Lyle ◽  
Michael O. Meyers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
Cox Models

443 Background: Identification of a sensitive and specific prognostic marker would aid in the management of patients (pts) with standard histopathology node negative colon cancer (CC). We conducted a pooled individual pt data analysis to confirm the prognostic value of GCC for disease recurrence in untreated stage II CC. Methods: GCC mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using formalin-fixed LN from 310 stage II pts diagnosed from 1991-2006 enrolled in two studies (Sargent 2011 [study1] and Haince 2009 [study2]). Patients were classified by GCC LN ratio (LNR) (high risk: LNR ≥ 0.1; low risk: LNR < 0.1), with LNR defined as number of GCC positive LN divided by number of informative LNs. Clinical outcomes included time to recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Stratified log-rank tests and multivariate Cox models assessed the association between clinical outcomes and GCC LN status. Results: The 5-year recurrence rate in study 1 (n=241) was 15.8%, 24.9% in study 2 (n=69). GCC LNR high risk pts had significantly higher risk of TTR, OS, DSS and DFS, which remained after adjusting for age, T stage, grade, number of LNs examined, and presence of lymphovascular invasion ( Table ). In a secondary analysis of low risk stage II pts (T3, ≥12 LNs examined, and negative surgical margins, n=241), a strong relationship between GCC LNR and each endpoint remained (TTR HR=4.34, 95% CI=2.07 – 9.13, p<0.001). Conclusions: Pts with GCC LNR high risk status have significantly poorer outcomes compared to pts with low risk status, particularly among those traditionally considered to be low risk. [Table: see text]

Outcomes over time (1998-2009) of stage II colon cancer patients (pts) receiving adjuvant FOLFOX: Pooled analysis of 1,122 pts in the ACCENT database.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 728-728
Author(s):  
Mohamed E. Salem ◽  
Jun Yin ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Levi Pederson ◽  
Norman Wolmark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
New Era ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Over Time

728 Background: Adjuvant FOLFOX therapy for stage II patients remains controversial, and selection criteria are imprecise. We examined the trend of disease-free survival (DFS: time to recurrence or death, whichever occurs first); time to recurrence (TTR: time to recurrence, censored at death without recurrence); survival after recurrence (SAR); and overall survival (OS) of pts treated with FOLFOX over a ten-year period. Methods: Outcomes of pts with stage II colon cancer enrolled in 6 adjuvant trials receiving FOLFOX alone were analyzed. Pt enrollment period was dichotomized as old (1998 – 2003) vs. new era (2004 – 2009) based on the FDA approval date of bevacizumab. 3/5yr event-free rates were estimated using adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods. Outcomes were compared between the two eras by multivariate Cox model. To control for potential confounding effects, all analyses were adjusted for age, gender, performance score, T stage, number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined, tumor side, and histologic grade. Results: In total, 1,122 pts with stage II were identified; 71% and 29% were treated in the old and new era, respectively. Pts enrolled in the new era were significantly younger and more likely to have higher tumor-grade and right-sided tumors compared to old era. More pts in the new era (71%) had ≥12 LNs examined compared to the old era (53%). After adjusting for potential confounding effects, no difference in DFS, TTR, SAR or OS between old and new eras was found (Table). Although median SAR increased from 13.6 to 26 months over time, this was not statistically significant, likely due to lack of power. An increased TTR over time (HRadj. 0.41, padj.= 0.002) was observed in pts with ≥12 LNs examined (3-yr TTR: 92% in old era vs. 96% in new era), but not pts with <12 LNs examined (pinteraction = 0.04). Conclusions: In stage II colon cancer pts who received adjuvant FOLFOX, no significant increase of DFS or OS was observed over time. However TTR was longer only in pts with ≥12 LNs examined. [Table: see text]

Neurotoxicity From Oxaliplatin Combined With Weekly Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin As Surgical Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: NSABP C-07

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 2205-2211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie R. Land ◽  
Jacek A. Kopec ◽  
Reena S. Cecchini ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz ◽  
H. Samuel Wieand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Group V ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Assessment Time

Purpose The randomized, multicenter, phase III protocol C-07 compared the efficacy of adjuvant bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FULV) versus FULV with oxaliplatin (FLOX) in stage II or III colon cancer. Definitive analysis revealed an increase in 4-year disease-free survival from 67.0% to 73.2% in favor of FLOX. This study compares neurotoxicity between the treatments. Patients and Methods Neurotoxicity was recorded for all patients using standard adverse event reporting. Patients at select institutions completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire through 18 months of follow-up. Results A total of 2,492 patients enrolled onto C-07 and 400 patients enrolled onto the patient-reported substudy. Mean patient-reported neurotoxicity was higher with oxaliplatin throughout the 18 months of study (P < .0001). During therapy, patients receiving oxaliplatin experienced significantly more hand/foot toxicity (eg, “quite a bit” of cold-induced hand/foot pain 26% FLOX v 2.6% FULV) and overall weakness (eg, moderate weakness in 27.4% FLOX v 16.2% FULV). At 18 months, hand neuropathy had diminished, but patients who received oxaliplatin experienced continued foot discomfort (eg, moderate foot numbness and tingling for 22.1% FLOX v 4.6% FULV). Observer-reported neurotoxicity was low grade and primarily neurosensory rather than neuromotor. Sixty-eight percent in the FLOX group v 8% in the FULV group had neurotoxicity at their first on-treatment assessment. Time to resolution was significantly longer for those receiving oxaliplatin, and continued beyond 2 years for more than 10% in the oxaliplatin group. Conclusion Oxaliplatin causes significant neurotoxicity. It is experienced primarily in the hands during therapy and in the feet during follow-up. In a minority of patients the neurotoxicity is long lasting.

Phase III Study Comparing a Semimonthly With a Monthly Regimen of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin As Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II and III Colon Cancer Patients: Final Results of GERCOR C96.1

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 3732-3738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Emmanuel Quinaux ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Philippe Colin ◽  
Erik Gamelin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
International Study ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Metastatic Relapse ◽  
Significant Difference

PurposeThis randomized, 2 × 2 factorial study compared a semimonthly regimen (fluorouracil [FU] and leucovorin [LV] semi-monthly is LV5FU2) with a monthly regimen of FU and LV (mFU/LV) as well as 24 weeks versus 36 weeks of each regimen as adjuvant treatment of stage II and III colon cancer.Patients and MethodsLV5FU2 was administered semimonthly for 2 days as racemate (dl) or levogyre (l-; 200 or 100 mg/m2) as a 2-hour infusion, followed by 400 mg/m2FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2FU 22-hour continuous infusion. FU and LV were administered monthly (mFU/LV) for 5 days as dl- or l-LV 15-minute infusion, followed by a 400 mg/m2FU 15-minute infusion. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsBetween September 1996 and November 1999, 905 patients with stage II (43%) and III (57%) colon cancer were enrolled. The median follow-up was 6 years. There was no statistically significant difference between mFU/LV and LV5FU2 in terms of DFS (150 v 148 events; hazard ratio [HR],1.01; 95% CI, 0.806 to 1.269; P = .94) and overall survival (OS; 104 v 103 events; HR,1.02; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.34; P = .91). No statistical difference was observed between 24 or 36 weeks of chemotherapy. Median survival from metastatic relapse was 24 months. The survival of patients with metastatic relapse (n = 243) was significantly longer for patients with a longer time from random assignment to relapse (< 1, 1 to 2, ≥ 2 years; log-rank test for trend P, .0497).ConclusionDFS and OS were not statistically different between treatment groups and treatment durations. These data confirm the value of LV5FU2 as control arm in the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer and Pan-European Trials in Adjuvant Colon Cancer studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document