Clinical and pathological characteristics of elderly colorectal cancer patients over 70 years old and comparison with patients under 50 years old.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14174-e14174
Author(s):  
Betul Erismis ◽  
Nadire Kucukoztas ◽  
Samed Rahatli ◽  
Selim Yalcin ◽  
Omer Dizdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Pathological Characteristics ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

e14174 Background: Incidence of colon cancer increases with age and generally is diagnosed at the age of between 60-75. Because of comorbidities in elderly patients who are older 70 years of age, lower doses of adjuvant or metastatic therapy is given them or the other option can be the chemotherapeutics which had less side effects. Methods: We aim to identify clinical and pathological characteristics of elderly colorectal cancer patients over 70 years of age who were followed at Baskent University Hospital and compare with CRC patients under the 50 years of age. Results: 182 CRC patients were assigned to the study who were followed between 1998-2011. We classified the patients into two categories according to the age. 91 participants were over 70 years of age and 91 participants were under 50 years of age. There were no significant differences between two groups for gender and percentage of patients having surgery (p=0.65/0.732). History of having systemic disease was significantly higher in the elderly group (p<0.001). Adjvuvant chemotherapy was given to the 38 (53.5%) patients aged over 70 and 66 (91.7%) patients aged under 50 (p<0.001). We compared the both groups for progression free and overall survival time for all stages. However, there were no statistically significant differences between two groups. Conclusions: Our study confirms that elderly CRC patients get benefit from the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment as the same as patients under 50 years of age. Therefore, physcians should consider about performance status and systemic disease in elderly patients and give an individual treatment to them.

5-fluorouracil (5FU) pharmacokinetic and hormonal status in female colorectal cancer patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13576-13576
Author(s):  
A. Bononi ◽  
M. Gusella ◽  
G. Crepaldi ◽  
R. Padrini ◽  
E. Ferrazzi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Elderly Women ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Hormonal Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

13576 Background: It is well known that females present a significantly reduced clearance of 5FU compared to males treated with the same doses.We tested the hypothesis that it may depend on the hormonal status, so that pre-menopausal women would have different 5FU pharmacokinetics compared with both postmenopausal women and elderly women. Methods: 48 colorectal cancer patients were prospectively studied: all of them were on adjuvant treatment based on 5FU repeated boluses. On the second day of the first cycle peripheral blood was drawn after drug administration. Plasma level were detected by HPLC analysis and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated trough a one phase exponential decay model. Results: All patients had 100–90 Karnosky Performance status score. 12 were in pre-menopausal phase (age range : 40–55 years); among the others we distinguished a younger 19 people group (age lower than 70 years old) and an elderly 17 patient group (age equal or higher than 70 years old). They received a 5FU mean dose of 406 ± 15 mg/mq, not significantly different among the three groups. After intravenous bolus injection a high interindividual variability of 5-FU pharmacokinetics was detected: AUC0-∞ (area under the curve of drug plasma levels versus time) ranged between 368 and 1236 mg × min/L and the highest values (>1000) were found in two elderly patients, considered fit; anyway there was no significant difference among AUC of the three groups. 5FU total clearance ranged between 0.53 and 1.9 L/min and means were 1.07 ± 0.3, 1.02 ± 0.3 and 0.98 ± 0.3 L/min in pre-menopausal, postmenopausal and elderly women respectively; again 5FU clearance/ BSA (body surface area), half live elimination times and peak concentration plasma levels were not significantly different among the three groups. Conclusions: It seems that sexual hormonal status do not influence 5FU total body elimination capability, and that pharmacokinetic differences between genders should be related to other factors,as for example Body Composition. Funded by AIRC-Veneto No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The role of oophorectomy for colon cancer with ovarian metastasis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15113-e15113
Author(s):  
S. Lee ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
H. Ahn ◽  
J. Park ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Ovarian Metastasis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Ovarian Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

e15113 Background: A recent study demonstrated that colorectal cancer with ovarian metastases were less responsive to chemotherapy compared to extraovarian metastases. Hence, the ovary may actually represent a “sanctuary” for metastatic cells from CRC. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of oophorectomy on survival of colorectal cancer patients with ovarian metastasis. Methods: Between 1996 and 2008, 83 colorectal cancer patients underwent oophorectomy. For the historical control, 47 colorectal cancer patients without oophorectomy were included in the analysis. Survival and its associated factors were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox-regression analysis. Results: The median age was younger (48 years) in the oophorectomy group when compared to the historical control (54 years) (P =.012). The proportion of synchronous metastasis was higher in the oophorectomy than the control group (57% vs 30%, respectively; P=.003). After a median follow-up duration of 60.8 months (range, 7.4 - 169.7 months), the median OS was significantly longer in the oophorectomy group (28.1 vs 21.2 months, oophorectomy vs non-oophoreectomy; P=.038). For ovary-specific survival (date of ovarian metastasis diagnosis to death), colorectal cancer patients with oophorectomy showed significantly favorable survival than the control group (20.8 vs 10.9 months, respectively; P<.001). At univariate analyses, no oophorectomy (P=.038), bilaterality of ovarian metastasis (P=0.032), the presence of extraovarian metastasis (P<0.001), elevated CEA (p<0.001), poor performance status (p=0.001), no palliative chemotherapy(p=0.001), no primary disease resection(p=0.005) were identified as significantly poor prognostic factors for overall survival. The no oophorectomy, no chemotherapy, extraovarian metastasis, elevated CEA, poor performance status retained statistical significance at multivariate level. (p=0.003, p=0.004, p=0.005, p=0.015, p=0.029, respectively). Conclusions: Based on this retrospective analysis, the oophorectomy significantly prolonged survival in colorectal cancer patients with ovarian metastases. A potential role of oophorectomy in the management of colorectal cancer should be prospectively studied. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The correlation of thrombin-activated fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) levels and clinicopathologic factors in advanced colorectal cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22217-e22217
Author(s):  
T. Salman ◽  
A. Bilici ◽  
B. O. Ustaalioglu ◽  
M. Seker ◽  
B. Sonmez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Blood Levels ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Fibrinolysis Inhibitor ◽  
Clinicopathologic Factors ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

e22217 Background: There are many ongoing researchs for novel prognostic factors in colorectal cancers. Increased thromboembolic events were associated with poor prognosis and survival in cancer patients. Thrombin-activated fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), which has inhibitory effects on fibrinolysis, was proven to play a major role in hypercoagulopathy and was reported to reach high blood levels in cancer patients compared to those in the general population. Methods: TAFI levels were measured. The correlation between those levels and clinicopathologic features were analyzed in 82 patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer receiving treatment in our clinic. Results: Eighty-two patients were evaluated. Patients characteristics included 54 males (65.9%), 28 females (34.1%); median age 56.4 (range:24–76). The mean TAFI levels was 198,36±70,01 Ğer yazali and TAFI levels were found to be high in 70% of patients. High levels of TAFI were more common in rectum cancer patients compared with colon cancer patients. There was no significant correlation between TAFI levels and clinicopathologic factors, such as age, sex, body mass index, performance status, number of metastases, grade, vascular invasion, perineural invasion and CEA levels. The TAFI levels of patients receiving bevacizumab (202.1±66.6) were more higher than those no receiving (191,83±76,21), but this association was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusions: Although the statistical analysis proved insignificant in our study, the effect of thromboembolic events on prognosis and survival is well established. Thus, large scale prospective studies are required to determine prognostic factors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Defining mild, moderate, and severe fatigue in cancer patients and survivors: E2Z02, a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9099-9099
Author(s):  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
Fengmin Zhao ◽  
Michael Fisch ◽  
Tito R. Mendoza ◽  
Ann M. O'Mara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Fatigue Management ◽  
Severe Fatigue ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Fatigue Severity ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

9099 Background: Although mild, moderate and severe categories have been used in clinical guidelines for fatigue management in cancer patients, the optimal cutpoints on a 0-10 scale for delineating these categories have not been replicated. Methods: A multicenter ECOG study (E2Z02) enrolled breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancer patients with any treatment status. Fatigue and symptom interference were measured on the 0-10 numerical rating scale of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). The optimal boundaries for categorizing fatigue severity were determined by the largest F ratios from MANOVA (Serlin’s criteria, 1995). Logistic regression with robust standard errors was used to identify risk factors for moderate/severe fatigue for cancer survivors (defined as patients with no evidence of disease and receiving no cancer treatment). Results: The optimal cutpoints that identified 3 distinct levels of fatigue severity for the 2341 patients were: ratings of 1-3 as mild, 4-6 as moderate, and 7-10 as severe. Known-group validity for these cutpoints was established by significant differences of fatigue severity by ECOG performance status and patient-reported quality of life (all P<0.001). Using these cutpoints, 45% (983/2177) of patients undergoing active therapy had moderate/severe fatigue, with significant more mild fatigue in breast and colorectal cancer patients, while more severe fatigue in lung cancer patients (p<.001). Among cancer survivors, 29% (150/515) had moderate/severe fatigue (breast 31%, colorectal 27%, prostate 22%, lung 33%). Younger age (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95-0.99) and poor performance status (OR=4.21, 95% CI=2.36-7.51) were associated with more moderate/severe fatigue in cancer survivors. Survivor time was also associated with moderate/severe fatigue in breast and colorectal cancer survivors (>=5yrs vs. <5yrs: OR=0.23, P<0.01 for breast, OR=9.3, P=0.03 for colorectal). Conclusions: This multicenter study confirmed the standard cutpoints for fatigue severity used in NCCN fatigue management guidelines. It also provides a profile of moderate to severe fatigue prevalence for actively treated cancer patients and for cancer survivors.

Feasibility of the combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in metastatic gastric or colorectal cancer patients more than age of 80.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
Kyu-Hyoung Lim ◽  
Hui-Young Lee ◽  
Sung Bae Park ◽  
Seo-Young Song
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

136 Background: The combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Oxaliplatin is usually used in gastric cancer (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). The safety and efficacy of the combination chemotherapy in patients over 80-years old has not been established yet. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and tolerability in the combination with 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in extremely elderly patients with GC or CRC. Methods: Eligibility included: 1) more than 80-years old, 2) metastatic gastric or colorectal cancer 3) chemotherapy-naive, 4) ECOG PS 0-1, 5) adequate organ function. Patients received the combination chemotherapy of 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin. Response evaluation was done every 8 weeks with RECIST criteria and toxicity was evaluated with NCI-CTCAE. Results: Between Sep 2008 and Nov 2014, 28 patients were reviewed and composed of equal numbers of GC and CRC. The median age was 82.2 years (80.0-85.6yrs) in GC and 81.1 years (80.0-89.3) in CRC, respectively. Total administrated cycles were 89 with median cycles of 5 in GC and 112 with median cycles of 11 in CRC. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in GC were 5.4 months and 6.6 months, as compared with 7.3 months and 8.1 months, respectively. There were no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.94) and OS (p = 0.28) between GC and CRC. Overall survival rates at 1 year were 35.7% and 42.9%, respectively. After disease progression, salvage chemotherapy in GC and CRC was administrated in 1 and 7 patients, respectively. Common grade 3/4 hematology toxicities in both group were neutropenia, anemia. Frequent non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (60%), neuropathy (40%) and mucositis (25%), which were grade 1/2. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Oxaliplatin has limited effect on improvement of OS in metastatic gastric or colorectal cancer patients more than age of 80. Further studies on the role of chemotherapy in these extremely elderly patients are needed.

Targeted agents: review of toxicity in the elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Kyriakou ◽  
Panteleimon Kountourakis ◽  
Demetris Papamichael
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Health professionals’ perceptions of colorectal cancer patients’ treatment burden and their supportive work to ameliorate the burden

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Lunde Husebø ◽  
Bjørg Karlsen ◽  
Sissel I. Eikeland Husebø
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Treatment Burden ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Abstract Background. Support is pivotal for patients in managing colorectal cancer treatment, as they might be overwhelmed by the burden of treatment. There is scarce knowledge regarding health professionals’ perceptions of colorectal cancer patients’ burdens and supportive needs. The study aims to describe health professionals’ perspectives on treatment burden among patients receiving curative surgical treatment for colorectal cancer during the hospital stay and how they support patients to ameliorate the burden.Methods: This study has a descriptive and explorative qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews with nine health professionals recruited from a gastrointestinal-surgery ward at a university hospital in Norway. Data were analysed by using systematic text condensation. Results: Data analysis identified the themes “capturing patients’ burdens of colorectal cancer treatment” and “health professionals’ support to ameliorate the burden”. Patients with colorectal cancer had to face burdens related to a challenging emotional situation, treatment complications and side effects, and an extensive need for information. A trusting patient-carer relationship was therefore perceived as the essence of health professionals’ support. Health professionals focused their support on safeguarding patients, motivating patients to self-manage, and involving family and peers as supporters. Patients’ journey characteristics and illness severity challenged health professionals’ supportive work. Conclusion: Support from health professionals includes providing patients emotional support and relevant treatment-related information and motivating patients for early post-surgical mobilisation. Health professionals should be aware of identifying colorectal cancer patients’ information needs according to the specific treatment stages, which may ameliorate the burden of colorectal cancer treatment and enable patients to self-manage.

Adjuvant or Palliative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer in Patients 70 Years or Older

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 2412-2412 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Popescu ◽  
A. Norman ◽  
P. J. Ross ◽  
B. Parikh ◽  
D. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Royal Marsden Hospital

PURPOSE: The surgical treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients (age 70 years or older) has improved, but data on adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy tolerability and benefits in this growing population remain scarce. Elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, and results for older patients are seldom reported separately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a prospective database, we analyzed demographics, chemotherapy toxicity, response rates, failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients receiving chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The cutoff age was 70 years. RESULTS: A total of 844 patients received first-line chemotherapy with various fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing regimens or raltitrexed for advanced disease, and 543 patients were administered adjuvant, protracted venous infusion 5-FU or bolus 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) chemotherapy. Of the 1,387 patients, 310 were 70 years or older. There was no difference in overall or severe (Common Toxicity Criteria III to IV) toxicity between the two age groups, with the exception of more frequent severe mucositis in older patients receiving adjuvant bolus 5-FU/FA. For patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, no difference in response rates (24% v 29%, P = .19) and median FFS (164 v 168 days) were detected when the elderly were compared with younger patients. Median OS was 292 days for the elderly group and 350 days for the younger patients (P = .04), and 1-year survival was 44% and 48%, respectively. The length of inpatient hospital stay was identical. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with good performance status tolerated adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy for CRC as well as did younger patients and had similar benefits from palliative chemotherapy.

Adjuvant treatment in extreme elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 784-784
Author(s):  
Marta Llopis Cuquerella ◽  
Maria del Carmen Ors Castaño ◽  
María Ballester Espinosa ◽  
Alejandra Magdaleno Cremades ◽  
Vicente Boix Aracil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Complementary Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

784 Background: Surgical and adjuvant treatment in extreme elderly ( > 80 years) patients with localized colorectal cancer is an unresolved issue. Owing to the lack of available neither clinical practice nor investigational data in this field we present our experience in this scenario. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data regarding surgical and complementary treatment for colorectal cancer patients aged more than 80 consecutively attended by General Surgery Department in Vega Baja Hospital between 2008 and 2013. Results: A total number of 115 colorectal cancer patients were registered. 95 patients diagnosed of localized disease were selected for analysis. Colon vs rectal cancer ratio was 4:1. Median age was 83.6 years (80-94). Male sex was predominant (60 patients, 63.2%). Emergency surgery was performed in 15 patients (15.8%). Complementary treatment to surgery was advised, according to international guidelines, in 53 patients (55.8%). 10 patients (18.9%) with an advise of adjuvant treatment finally received it. More patients with rectal cancer received recommended treatment (41.7% rectal vs 12.2% colon cancer). Patients with stage III disease were more frequently finally treated according to guidelines (22.2 % stage III vs 11.8% stage II). More patients with stage II rectal cancer were advised and received treatment (recommendation: 66.7% rectal vs 36.1% colon cancer; administration: 25% rectal vs 7.7% colon cancer). Treatment was also more frequently administered to stage III rectal cancer (50% rectal vs 14.3% rectal cancer) (Table). Conclusions: Our experience in localized colorectal cancer in extreme elderly patients ( > 80 years) showed that, although advised according to guidelines, most of them did not receive adjuvant treatment to surgery. Complementary treatment administration was more common in rectal cancer patients and with more advanced disease. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document