Sequential TKI treatments for iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinomas.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6092-6092
Author(s):  
Christelle de la Fouchardiere ◽  
Marie-Helene Massicotte ◽  
Isabelle Borget ◽  
Maryse Brassard ◽  
Mederic Claude-Desroches ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

6092 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are currently used to treat patients with advanced iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) but none has been approved by the FDA or the EMA until now. Sometimes, patients are treated with off-label TKI when a clinical trial is not available or in second- and third-line therapy. Methods: We hereby report the efficacy of “off-label” sorafenib and sunitinib treatments as first-, second- and third-line therapy in metastatic DTC patients from the French TUTHYREF (TUmeurs THYroïdiennes REFractaires) network. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and tumor response according to sequential TKI treatment. Secondary endpoint was organ-specific metastatic site analysis. Results: 45 patients with advanced iodine-refractory DTC treated with off-label TKI were included in this study (26 men, mean age: 62 years). 22 had papillary, 10 had follicular and 13 had poorly DTC. 24/45 patients were treated with two and 3/45 with three lines of TKIs. Sorafenib was the most frequently used (57%) followed by sunitinib (21.5%) and vandetanib (21.5%). Partial response (PR) rate was of 29% in the 21 patients who received first-line sorafenib therapy whereas PR was observed in 57% of the 7 first-line sunitinib patients. There was no PR with second- (n=24) and third-line (n=3) treatments. However, median progression free survival (PFS) was similar in second- as compared to first-line sorafenib or sunitinib treatment (6.7 vs. 7.6 months, HR 0.85 (95CI 0.45-1.61) p=0.6). Liver metastases were the most responsive to treatment (n=7; mean of -30%), followed by lung (n=57; mean of -19%) and lymph node (n=43; mean of -13%) metastases. Bone (n=14) and pleural (n=9) lesions were the most refractory to treatment (mean of -1% and -5%, respectively). Conclusions: Due to the small number of patients, we could not recommend a specific treatment sequence (sorafenib then sunitinib) over another (sunitinib then sorafenib). But TKI therapy appears to be beneficial in refractory DTC patients even in second- and third-line therapy, with similar PFS and stable disease as best response. Bone and pleural metastases were the most refractory and liver lesions the most responsive to treatment.

scholarly journals Molecular subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne ten Hoorn ◽  
Dirkje W. Sommeijer ◽  
Faye Elliott ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
Tim R. de Back ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumour Location ◽  
Selection For

Abstract Background Patient selection for addition of anti-EGFR therapy to chemotherapy for patients with RAS and BRAF wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer can still be optimised. Here we investigate the effect of anti-EGFR therapy on survival in different consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and stratified by primary tumour location. Methods Retrospective analyses, using the immunohistochemistry-based CMS classifier, were performed in the COIN (first-line oxaliplatin backbone with or without cetuximab) and PICCOLO trial (second-line irinotecan with or without panitumumab). Tumour tissue was available for 323 patients (20%) and 349 (41%), respectively. Results When using an irinotecan backbone, anti-EGFR therapy is effective in both CMS2/3 and CMS4 in left-sided primary tumours (progression-free survival (PFS): HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.75, P = 0.003 and HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.36, P < 0.001, respectively) and in CMS4 right-sided tumours (PFS HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.71, P = 0.02). Efficacy using an oxaliplatin backbone was restricted to left-sided CMS2/3 tumours (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.96, P = 0.034). Conclusions The subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone. This may provide the possibility of subtype-specific treatment strategies for a more optimal use of anti-EGFR therapy.

scholarly journals Better Progression-Free Survival in Elderly Patients with Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Treated with the First-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Ju Tsai ◽  
Jen-Yu Hung ◽  
Mei-Hsuan Lee ◽  
Chia-Yu Kuo ◽  
Yu-Chen Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations usually have a good response rate (RR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the treatment efficacy to uncommon EGFR mutations remains controversial. We, therefore, performed a retrospective study, screening 2958 patients. A total of 67 patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR mutations were enrolled and 57 patients with stage IV diseases receiving a first-line EGFR TKI were included for further analyses. The patients were classified into 27 (47%) “a single sensitizing uncommon mutation”, 7 (12%) “multiple sensitizing mutations”, 5 (9%) “a sensitizing mutation and a resistant uncommon mutation”, and 18 (32%) “other resistant uncommon mutations”. No significant difference was noted in PFS or overall survival (OS) between groups. Patients receiving different first-line EGFR TKIs had similar PFS and OS. The elder patients had a significantly poorer performance status than the younger patients but a significantly longer PFS than the younger patients (median PFS: 10.5 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.0320). In conclusion, this is the first study to identify that elderly patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR mutation might have a longer PFS. Large-scale prospective studies are mandatory to prove our findings.

scholarly journals The benefits and risks of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized control trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiangyun Liu ◽  
Yixuan Zhang ◽  
Miaowen Liu ◽  
Ruoxin Xu ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background Although pembrolizumab has shown clinical benefit in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), its actual efficacy in combination with a conventional chemotherapy drug has not been determined. We performed this study to discern the efficacy and risk of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in SCLC patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results We identified 2980 articles and included 6 studies (5 were noncomparative open-label studies and 1 was a randomized controlled trial [RCT]) involving 396 patients in our meta-analysis. The pooled median OS (mOS) was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0-11.2), and the pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.1). The 1-year overall survival rate (OSR-1y) and 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR-6m) were 45.1% (95% CI, 33-57.2%) and 41.6% (95% CI, 24.3-59%), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 38.8% (95% CI, 11.9-65.67%), disease control rate (DCR) was 69.30% (95% CI, 51.6-87.0%), complete response (CR) was 2.20% (95% CI, 0.8-3.7%), partial response (PR) was 34.70% (95% CI, 7.8-61.5%), and stable disease (SD) was 20.90% (95% CI, 9.1-32.6%). The grade 3-4 adverse effect (AE) rate was 20.88% (95% CI, 1.22-54.85%). The most common AEs were neutropenia (90.16%), anemia (53.21%), dysphagia (41.96%), platelet count decrease (34.87%), and esophagitis (32.89%); severe AEs included neutropenia, respiratory failure, pneumonitis, acute coronary syndrome, and colitis/intestinal ischemia. Conclusions The combination of pembrolizumab with conventional chemotherapy is an effective therapeutic schedule with acceptable and manageable efficacy and toxicity in patients with SCLC. More high-quality and well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are warranted to further validate our findings.

scholarly journals Fresh look on the urticaria problem.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Alla O. Litovkina ◽  
Eugenii V. Smolnikov ◽  
Olga G. Elisyutina ◽  
Elena S. Fedenko
Keyword(s):  
Biological Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
H1 Antihistamines ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Urticaria Treatment ◽  
Selection Of

Introduction. Nowadays urticaria is one of the most common diseases. According to the International Guidelines for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria, 2nd-generation H1-antihistamines are recommended to be used as the first-line and second-line therapy. Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, is assumed to be the third-line therapy in urticaria treatment. Summary. In this review we discuss the latest data on pathogenetic mechanisms of urticaria, focusing on the search of the new targets for the therapy. We represent the latest clinical trials of the new biological treatment for urticaria. Safety and efficiency of 4-folds higher therapeutical dose of the 2nd generation H1-antihistamines, and criteria for personalized selection of the antihistamines are discussed.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of nilotinib as third-line therapy in an elderly patient with CML

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2S) ◽  
pp. 15-18
Author(s):  
Giovanni Caocci ◽  
Sandra Atzeni ◽  
Giorgio La Nasa
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

This case report describes a 74 year old male patient with low Sokal risk chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Treatment was started four years ago with imatinib, 400 mg/day. The patient achieved complete hematologic response but, after 3 months of treatment, developed grade 3 skin toxicity. Imatinib was stopped and the patient was started on dasatinib, achieving complete cytogenetic and molecular response. Two months later, physical examination revealed bilateral gynecomastia. After 2 years of treatment the patient presented with pleural effusion and the drug dose was reduced but, following relapse of CML, therapy was switched to nilotinib, 800 mg/day. Treatment with nilotinib is currently ongoing and is well tolerated by the patient who is again in complete molecular response, with no signs of pleural effusion. Considering the growing availability of new and more potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) it is important for the clinician to be aware of the possible inhibitory effects of these molecules against other members of the tyrosine kinase family. Safety of TKI in frail and elderly patients with CML is a fundamental goal. The results achieved in our patient show that nilotinib is safe and effective even when used as third line therapy.

Prognostic impact of prior local therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.

scholarly journals Protocol of the EFFORT study: a prospective study of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept as second-line treatment after progression on FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or during maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Mototsugu Shimokawa ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations for second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab combination. Here, we describe our planning for the EFFORT study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Methods EFFORT is an open-label, multicenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether a FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy will receive aflibercept and FOLFIRI (aflibercept 4 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV over 90 min, with levofolinate 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 h, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h) every 2 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). To achieve 80% power to show a significant response benefit with a one-sided alpha level of 0.10, assuming a threshold progression-free survival of 3 months and an expected value of at least 5.4 months, we estimated that 32 patients are necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis for differentiating anti-VEGF drug in 2nd-line chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Discussion This is the first study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Switching to a different type of anti-VEGF drug in second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab appears to be an attractive treatment strategy when considering survival benefit. It is expected that this phase II study will prove the efficacy of this strategy and that a biomarker for drug selection will be discovered. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071190003. Registered April 18, 2019.

Clinical Evidence for Topotecan-Paclitaxel Non–Cross-Resistance in Ovarian Cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1893-1900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Gore ◽  
Wim ten Bokkel Huinink ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alan Gordon ◽  
Neville Davidson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Similar Activity ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Alternative Drug ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

PURPOSE: A large, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of topotecan versus paclitaxel in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer showed that these two compounds have similar activity. In this study, a number of patients crossed over to the alternative drug as third-line therapy, ie, from paclitaxel to topotecan and vice versa. We therefore were able to assess the degree of non–cross-resistance between these two compounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had progressed after one platinum-based regimen were randomized to either topotecan (1.5 mg/m2/d) × 5 every 21 days (n = 112) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) every 21 days (n = 114). A total of 110 patients received cross-over therapy with the alternative drug (61 topotecan, 49 paclitaxel) as third-line therapy. RESULTS: Response rates to third-line cross-over therapy were 13.1% (8 of 61 topotecan) and 10.2% (5 of 49 paclitaxel; P = .638). Seven patients who responded to third-line topotecan and four patients who responded to paclitaxel had failed to respond to their second-line treatment. Median time to progression (from the start of third-line therapy) was 9 weeks in both groups, and median survival was 40 and 48 weeks for patients who were receiving topotecan or paclitaxel, respectively. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with topotecan (81.4% of patients) than with paclitaxel (22.9% of patients). CONCLUSION: Topotecan and paclitaxel have similar activity as second-line therapies with regard to response rates and progression-free and overall survival. We demonstrated that the two drugs have a degree of non–cross-resistance. Thus, there is a good rationale for incorporating these drugs into future first-line regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document