Expression III: Final results of an international survey in eight European countries with 1,830 patients—What are the differences in expectations from their doctors and therapy management of patients with primary and recurrent ovarian cancer? (NOGGO/ENGOT-ov4 study).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5579-5579
Author(s):  
Gülten Oskay-Özcelik ◽  
Maren Keller ◽  
Domenica Lorusso ◽  
Sandro Pignata ◽  
Florence Joly ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5569-5569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gülten Oskay-Özcelik ◽  
Maren Keller ◽  
Sandro Pignata ◽  
Domenica Lorusso ◽  
Florence Joly ◽  
...  

5569 Background: The primary aim of this study was to investigate information needs and preferences among patients with ovarian cancer, focusing especially on doctor-patient relationships and therapy management in different European countries. Methods: A questionnaire was developed based on the experiences of expression II, a German survey, and then provided to primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients via internet (online) or as a print-version in 8 countries in Europe (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Rumania, Spain). In the first part basic data (age, tumour status, therapy) were requested from the patient. In the second part, most of the questions tried to evaluate the expectations and needs concerning their therapy management and doctor-patient communication. Results: From December 2009 to October 2012, a total of 1743 patients with ovarian cancer from 8 European countries participated in the survey.The median age was 58 years (range 16-89). Nearly all patients (96,3%) had a primary surgery and a first-line chemotherapy (91,5%). About 423 (25,7%) patients were included in another clinical trial.Most of the patients in each country were pleased with the completeness and understandability of the explanations about the therapies from their doctors. About 68% of patients would be interested in having the opportunity to have a second opinion. The three most important aspects, which were proposed by patients to improve therapy against ovarian cancer were: “the therapy should not induce alopecia” (42%), “there must be more done to counter fatigue” (34%), and “the therapy should be more effective” (29%). Conclusions: This study underlines the high need of ovarian cancer patients to discuss all details concerning treatment options and clinical management with only minor difference between the countries. Patients also need more information about side effects of cancer therapies and second opinion opportunities. Besides effectiveness of therapy, alopecia and fatigue are the most important side effects bothering the patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5044-5044
Author(s):  
Gülten Oskay-Özcelik ◽  
Radoslav Chekerov ◽  
Sylvia Neubert ◽  
Karsten Münstedt ◽  
Hans-Joachim Hindenburg ◽  
...  

5044 Background: The primary aim of this study was to investigate information needs and preferences among patients with ovarian cancer, focusing especially on doctor-patient relationships and therapy management. Methods: A 42-item questionnaire was developed and validated in a mono-centre phase I study and was then provided to primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients via internet (online) or as a print-version. In the first part basic data (age, tumour status, therapy) were requested. In the second part, most of the questions try to evaluate the expectations and needs concerning their therapy management and doctor-patients communication. Results: From January to November 2009, a total of 676 (201 online; 475 print version) patients with ovarian cancer from 44 German centres took part in the survey.The median age of the online group was 49 years (range 19-84), for the print group 62 years (26-92). Nearly all patients (98.7%) had a primary surgery and a primary chemotherapy (89%). Asked for side effects during therapy, the most frequent answers were alopecia, paraesthesia/dysaesthesia and fatigue. Most of the patients were content with the completeness and understandability of the explanations about the therapies from their doctors . The three most important aspects, which were proposed by patients to improve therapy against ovarian cancer were: “Doctors should have more time for explanations”, “The therapy should not lead to any loss of hair”, and “The therapy should be more effective”. Conclusions: This study underlines the high need of ovarian cancer patients to discuss all details concerning treatment options and clinical management. As matter of fact, the physician involved in the treatment is the most important source of information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Harrow ◽  
Karin Travers ◽  
Brian M Davis ◽  
Paula Smith ◽  
Adrienne M Gilligan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31
Author(s):  
M. Alisherova ◽  
◽  
M. Ismailova

Currently, there are no standard approaches to monitoring patients with ovarian cancer (OC). While the role of ultrasound (US) has been identified in the primary diagnosis of OS, it is still controversial during the subsequent surgical treatment of OC. In world statistics, ovarian cancer is consistently among the four main localizations of malignant tumors of the female reproductive system, along with tumors of the breast, body and cervix.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document