Knowledge and perceptions of palliative care among oncology outpatients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
Gillian McKie
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Educational Strategies ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Perceived Needs ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Oncology Care

118 Background: Palliative care is emerging as an integral component of oncology care. There is growing evidence of its benefits but providers struggle with how to integrate specialist palliative services for the oncology population. The purpose of this study was to measure patients’ knowledge and perceptions, and their intention to seek palliative services. This study helps inform and guide oncology and palliative providers in their efforts to bridge the gap for oncology patients. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design. A convenience sample of adult oncology patients using ambulatory cancer services at a community hospital was surveyed using the Knowledge of Care Options (KOCO) and Perceptions of Palliative Care Instrument (PPCI). Clinical information was abstracted from their health records retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to describe all variables. The association between knowledge, perceptions, and intention was analyzed using Pearson’s r correlation and multivariate regression analysis. Results: The majority of the 139 participants enrolled were female (61.9%), white (76.7%), and had good functional status with ECOG of 0 or 1 (87.1%). Mean age was 63.4 years. The mean KOCO score was 84.4% although several items scored less than 70%. Overall intention to seek palliative care was low at 2.53 on a seven point scale; a majority of patients indicated that they were unlikely to seek palliative care. There was a positive correlation between overall perception and intention to seek palliative care in the next three months (r = 0.212, p = 0.02).In addition, patients with higher scores on perceived needs for palliative care were more likely to report an intention to seek palliative care (r = 0.308, p = 0.001). Conclusions: There remains a knowledge deficit about palliative care in the oncology population. Participants did not experience negative emotional or cognitive reactions in response to information about palliative care. Perceived needs were associated with intention to seek palliative care services. Routine screening for needs and effective educational strategies are needed to better integrate palliative and oncology care.

scholarly journals Poor Sleep during the First Peak of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 306
Author(s):  
Stefania Costi ◽  
Sara Paltrinieri ◽  
Barbara Bressi ◽  
Stefania Fugazzaro ◽  
Paolo Giorgi Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Italian Population ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Financial Problems ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

The restrictions enacted during lockdown to limit the spread of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) have led to changes in people’s lifestyle habits. In Italy, these restrictions have dramatically changed the way people work and spend their leisure time, also with repercussions on diet and physical activity. An anonymous survey was disseminated via websites and social media to a convenience sample of the Italian population during and immediately after the first lockdown (10 March–18 May 2020). Data collected on 1826 individuals show that lockdown might have worsened the quality of sleep of almost half of the participants in this cross-sectional study. This worsening was associated with a deterioration in crucial determinants of health, such as physical activity and diet (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.18–2.40 and OR 4.19; 95% CI 2.51–6.96, respectively), with symptoms of psychological distress, such as tension (OR 3.88; 95% CI 2.74–5.52) and loneliness (OR 3.27; 95% CI 2.23–4.79), and with the presence of financial problems (some OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.27–2.72; many OR 7.27; 95% CI 3.59–14.73). The multivariate regression analysis models confirmed these associations. This impact on sleep quality was seen especially among females, those with low education level, and those who experienced financial problems.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: The Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 880-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Smith ◽  
Sarah Temin ◽  
Erin R. Alesi ◽  
Amy P. Abernethy ◽  
Tracy A. Balboni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
American Society

Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This PCO addresses the integration of palliative care services into standard oncology practice at the time a person is diagnosed with metastatic or advanced cancer. Clinical Context Palliative care is frequently misconstrued as synonymous with end-of-life care. Palliative care is focused on the relief of suffering, in all of its dimensions, throughout the course of a patient's illness. Although the use of hospice and other palliative care services at the end of life has increased, many patients are enrolled in hospice less than 3 weeks before their death, which limits the benefit they may gain from these services. By potentially improving quality of life (QOL), cost of care, and even survival in patients with metastatic cancer, palliative care has increasing relevance for the care of patients with cancer. Until recently, data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating the benefits of palliative care in patients with metastatic cancer who are also receiving standard oncology care have not been available. Recent Data Seven published RCTs form the basis of this PCO. Provisional Clinical Opinion Based on strong evidence from a phase III RCT, patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer should be offered concurrent palliative care and standard oncologic care at initial diagnosis. While a survival benefit from early involvement of palliative care has not yet been demonstrated in other oncology settings, substantial evidence demonstrates that palliative care—when combined with standard cancer care or as the main focus of care—leads to better patient and caregiver outcomes. These include improvement in symptoms, QOL, and patient satisfaction, with reduced caregiver burden. Earlier involvement of palliative care also leads to more appropriate referral to and use of hospice, and reduced use of futile intensive care. While evidence clarifying optimal delivery of palliative care to improve patient outcomes is evolving, no trials to date have demonstrated harm to patients and caregivers, or excessive costs, from early involvement of palliative care. Therefore, it is the Panel's expert consensus that combined standard oncology care and palliative care should be considered early in the course of illness for any patient with metastatic cancer and/or high symptom burden. Strategies to optimize concurrent palliative care and standard oncology care, with evaluation of its impact on important patient and caregiver outcomes (eg, QOL, survival, health care services utilization, and costs) and on society, should be an area of intense research. NOTE. ASCO's provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) reflect expert consensus based on clinical evidence and literature available at the time they are written and are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision making and identify questions and settings for further research. Because of the rapid flow of scientific information in oncology, new evidence may have emerged since the time a PCO was submitted for publication. PCOs are not continually updated and may not reflect the most recent evidence. PCOs cannot account for individual variation among patients and cannot be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other treatments. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or other health care provider, relying on independent experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine the best course of treatment for the patient. Accordingly, adherence to any PCO is voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding its application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances. ASCO PCOs describe the use of procedures and therapies in clinical trials and cannot be assumed to apply to the use of these interventions in the context of clinical practice. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property arising out of or related to any use of ASCO's PCOs, or for any errors or omissions.

Providing Data-Driven Equitable Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Structurally Vulnerable Populations: A Pilot Survey of Information Management Strategies

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-249
Author(s):  
Akshay Rajaram ◽  
Trevor Morey ◽  
Sonam Shah ◽  
Naheed Dosani ◽  
Muhammad Mamdani
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
North America ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Information Management ◽  
Vulnerable Populations ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Data Infrastructure

Background: Considerable gains are being made in data-driven efforts to advance quality improvement in health care. However, organizations providing hospice-oriented palliative care for structurally vulnerable persons with terminal illnesses may not have the enabling data infrastructure or framework to derive such benefits. Methods: We conducted a pilot cross-sectional qualitative study involving a convenience sample of hospice organizations across North America providing palliative care services for structurally vulnerable patients. Through semistructured interviews, we surveyed organizations on the types of data collected, the information systems used, and the challenges they faced. Results: We contacted 13 organizations across North America and interviewed 9. All organizations served structurally vulnerable populations, including the homeless and vulnerably housed, socially isolated, and HIV-positive patients. Common examples of collected data included the number of referrals, the number of admissions, length of stay, and diagnosis. More than half of the organizations (n = 5) used an electronic medical record, although none of the record systems were specifically designed for palliative care. All (n = 9) the organizations used the built-in reporting capacity of their information management systems and more than half (n = 6) augmented this capacity with chart reviews. Discussion: A number of themes emerged from our discussions. Present data collection is heterogeneous, and storage of these data is highly fragmented within and across organizations. Funding appeared to be a key enabler of more robust data collection and use. Future work should address these gaps and examine opportunities for innovative ways of analysis and reporting to improve care for structurally vulnerable populations.

Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Use in an Outpatient Palliative Medicine Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 589-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget H. Highet ◽  
Elizabeth R. Lesser ◽  
Patrick W. Johnson ◽  
Judith S. Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Chronic Illness ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Palliative Medicine ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample

Background: Palliative medicine physicians are challenged by lack of guidance regarding effectiveness and dosing of cannabis products in the setting of their emerging popularity. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe early patterns of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) use in Florida following passage of the state’s first medical marijuana law. We describe here the perceived benefits, side effects, and beliefs expressed by patients in a single outpatient academic palliative medicine practice. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed of a sequential convenience sample of patients who presented to an outpatient academic palliative medicine clinic over a 3-month period. Results: In all, 24% (14/58) of respondents reported THC use, with half using THC on a daily basis. Patients reported improvements in pain, appetite, and nausea. In all, 71% (10/14) began using THC after the diagnosis of their chronic illness, and the most common form of usage was vaping. In all, 24% (14/58) of patients reported CBD use. Patients reported improvements in pain, and the most common form of usage was topical application. None of the patients had used CBD prior to the onset of their chronic illness. In all, 21% (3/14) of THC users and 21% (3/14) of CBD users thought that their substance was helping to cure their illness. Individual reported side effects in both groups were minimal. Conclusions: Approximately a quarter of outpatient palliative care patients use THC or CBD, often on a daily basis. Palliative care providers should be aware of the frequency, diverse usage, and beliefs behind cannabis product use in this patient population.

How will the cost of biosimilars affect patients’ willingness to receive them?

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18338-e18338
Author(s):  
R Donald Harvey ◽  
Megan McGrath ◽  
John W. Cook ◽  
Margie D Dixon ◽  
Rebecca D. Pentz
Keyword(s):  
Financial Burden ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Drug Market ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Negative Perceptions ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Patients Experience

e18338 Background: The cost of oncology care is increasing. The NIH projects that the oncology drug market will reach $111.9 billion by 2020. Studies show that oncology patients experience considerable financial burden, regardless of insurance status and in general believe that oncology medications are too expensive. However, there is some evidence outside of oncology that suggests patients may not trust generics or cheaper medications. Therefore, there is a need to assess oncology patients’ views of a biosimilars and their potential to reduce costs. Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of 79 oncology patients in clinics and the infusion center. The survey consisted of five questions on cost and patient participation in decision making. Results: Of 79 patients approached, 75 (95%) completed the survey. Fifty (66%) believed that expensive medications do not work better than less costly ones for the same disease; yet only 30 of those 50 (60%) and 44% overall (33/75) would prefer that their doctor prescribe them the cheaper version of their anti-cancer medication. Of the 20 respondents who believed that expensive drugs do not work better but still wanted the more expensive drugs for themselves, 8 believed cancer was too serious of an illness to take any chances with a cheaper medication, 5 wanted the most expensive that insurance would cover and 2 wanted the best possible medication. 90.67% respondents (68/75) wanted to know if their physician was prescribing a cheaper version of their drug. Conclusions: Our results show that, overall, oncology patients agree that cheaper medications work as well as more expensive ones, but there are definite concerns among some patients that drug price may be a proxy for quality, particularly in cancer. Overcoming these negative perceptions among patients will be important if optimal cost savings are going to be realized with expanded biosimilar use.

scholarly journals Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and experience of palliative care amongst South African physiotherapists

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda M. Morrow ◽  
Charlotte Barnard ◽  
Zimkhitha Luhlaza ◽  
Kelisha Naidoo ◽  
Sarah Pitt
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
South African ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Holistic Management ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Care Training ◽  
Descriptive Survey

Background: Palliative care encompasses holistic management of patients and families facing life-threatening and life-limiting conditions. There is currently little known about South African physiotherapists’ palliative care knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, experience and training needs.Objectives: To describe the amount and adequacy of palliative care training received by South African physiotherapists, and their interest, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and experiences of palliative care.Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study of a convenience sample of physiotherapists, using an adapted Physical Therapy in Palliative Care-Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Experiences Scale (PTiPC-KABE Scale). Likert scale scores were converted to continuous data for analysis, presented as median (IQR). Seven universities were contacted to determine undergraduate palliative care curriculum content.Results: A total of 303 participants (8.4% response rate) completed the questionnaire, and 289 responses were included (5.35% margin of error with 95% CI). Participants had 16 (6–27) years of experience, with 85.5% in private practice. About 66.7% and 79% of participants reported not receiving any training at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, respectively, with more than 80% expressing that training was inadequate at both levels. Universities (n = 4/7; 57.1%) reported a maximum 3 hours undergraduate palliative care training. Seventy-nine percent of respondents had clinical experience in providing palliative care; however ‘knowledge’ was the lowest scoring domain (56.3% (43.8%–62.5%). The ‘beliefs’ domain scored highest at 82.6% (69.6%–91.3%).Conclusion: Many South African physiotherapists manage patients requiring palliative care, despite inadequate training and limited knowledge in this field. More under- and postgraduate learning opportunities should be made available for physiotherapists in the area of palliative care.

scholarly journals Family carer support in home and hospital: a cross-sectional survey of specialised palliative care

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e33-e33
Author(s):  
Maarten Vermorgen ◽  
Aline De Vleminck ◽  
Kathleen Leemans ◽  
Lieve Van den Block ◽  
Chantal Van Audenhove ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services

ObjectivesTo evaluate: (1) to what extent family carers of people supported by specialised palliative care services felt they had been provided with information, support and aftercare and (2) how this varied by type of palliative care service, length of enrolment and characteristics of deceased.MethodsA cross-sectional postal survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire with nine items on information, support and aftercare provided by specialised palliative care services to family carers. Flemish family carers of people who had made use of specialised palliative care services at home or in hospital were contacted.ResultsOf all primary family carers (response rate of 53.5% resulting in n=1504), 77.7% indicated they were asked frequently by professionals how they were feeling. Around 75% indicated they had been informed about specific end-of-life topics and around 90% felt sufficiently supported before and immediately after the death. Family carers of people who had died in a palliative care unit, compared with other types of specialised palliative care services, indicated having received more information, support and aftercare.ConclusionsFamily carers evaluate the professional assistance provided more positively when death occurred in a palliative care unit. Policy changes might be needed to reach the same level of care across all specialised palliative care services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document