Analysis of the GERCOR index in KRAS Exon2 WT patients with mCRC treated with salvage-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy: HGCSG0901.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 781-781
Author(s):  
Ayumu Hosokawa ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽  
Yasushi Tsuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Significant Difference

781 Background: The GERCOR index (GI) based on performance status and serum LDH was reported to be useful to predict survival for patients with previously untreated mCRC. However, in the salvage setting, the validity of the GI has not been reported in patients treated with cetuximab (Cmab)-based chemotherapy. Methods: 269 patients with mCRC treated with Cmab contained chemotherapy were retrospectively registered from 27 centers in Japan. This analysis was included in the KRAS Exon2 wild type patients who were refractory to or intolerant of 5-FU / irinotecan/ oxaliplatin and were never administered anti-EGFR-antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) were performed using patient characteristics. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. The analysis was also designed to determine whether the GERCOR index could be extended to progression-free survival (PFS). Results: All data were available for prognostic categorization in 132 patients. Median OS and PFS were 9.8 and 4.3 months. The distribution and median OS / PFS for GI were as follows: low risk (L)(n = 28; 17.9/3.8 months), intermediate risk (I)(n = 52; 12.2/5.0 months), and high risk (H)(n = 52; 7.5/4.1 months). For OS, there was significant difference between L and H (p < 0.001) and between I and H (p < 0.001), but not between L and I (p = 0.076). For PFS, there was significant difference between I and H (p = 0.017), but not between L and I (p = 0.407), and between L and H (p = 0.222). In the Cox multivariate analysis, GI showed an independent prognostic impact (L vs. I ; HR 2.195, p=0.003 / L vs. H ; HR 4.028, p<0.001), but not predictive impact (L vs. I ; HR 0.987, p=0.958 / L vs. H ; HR 1.314, p=0.268). Conclusions: In this analysis, GI might be a prognostic factor in salvage treatment with Cmab-based chemotherapy.

Treatment of metastatic disease with immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab: Effect of performance status on clinical outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18689-e18689
Author(s):  
Leah Wells ◽  
Michael Cerniglia ◽  
Audrey C. Jost ◽  
Gregory Joseph Britt
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Of Therapy

e18689 Background: While guidelines exist for appropriate use of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting based on performance status, such recommendations are less readily available for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We sought to determine if there is a relationship between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and outcomes on immunotherapy in patients treated for metastatic disease at our community-based oncology practice. Methods: 253 patients were identified as receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab for stage IV malignancy at Cancer Centers of Colorado-SCL Health, between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients initiated on therapy after May 2020 were excluded from analysis, due to insufficient (less than 6 months) follow-up time. The remaining 183 patients were included in a retrospective cohort study comparing patients with ECOG 0, ECOG 1, and ECOG 2-4. Sex, age, type of cancer, and line of therapy were collected. Time on therapy was also calculated. Best response to therapy was determined (disease control or progressive disease). These baseline factors and outcomes were compared using ANOVA for numeric variables and chi-square tests of association for categorical variables. Time from initiation of ICI to death or hospice was also investigated and compared using a log-rank test. In addition, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was developed for the outcome, time to death/hospice, versus the predictors ECOG status, age, gender, and line of therapy. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results: Of the 183 patients included in analysis, 31.7% had an ECOG of 0, 48.6% an ECOG of 1, and 19.7% an ECOG of 2-4. Non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma represented the majority of patients in each group. Gender and line of therapy did not differ between groups. There was a significant difference in age (p = 0.02) with mean age 62, 66, and 70 in ECOG 0,1, and 2-4, respectively. 54.6% of patients remained on therapy for at least 6 months (182 days), and there was no significant difference between groups in ability to complete 6 months of therapy (p = 0.32). For ECOG 0, 1, and 2-4, disease control was achieved in 67.2%, 59.6 %, and 41.7%, respectively (p = 0.048). Analysis of time to death/hospice with a log rank test and Kaplan Meier plot showed a significant difference between groups (p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that patients with ECOG 0 had significantly longer time to death/hospice compared to patients in both other groups, after controlling for age, gender, and line of therapy (ECOG 1 vs. 0: HR 2.5, CI 1.27-4.9; ECOG 2-4 vs. 0: HR 2.83, CI 1.31-6.13). Conclusions: In this single institution retrospective study of patients receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab for metastatic cancer, ECOG 0 was associated with disease control and increased time before death or transition to hospice.

Observational cohort study of 1st line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (HGCSG0802): Sub-group analysis by the GERCOR index.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 743-743
Author(s):  
Osamu Muto ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Tetsuhito Muranaka ◽  
Takashi Kato ◽  
Takashi Meguro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

743 Background: The GERCOR index based on performance status and serum LDH was reported to be useful to predict survival for patients with previously untreated mCRC. However, the validity of the GERCOR index has not been reported in patients treated with bevacizumab (Bev)-based first line chemotherapy. Methods: 115 patients with mCRC treated with Bev contained first line chemotherapy were registered from 15 centers in Japan. Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) were performed using patient characteristics. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. The analysis was also designed to determine whether the GERCOR index could be extended to progression-free survival (PFS). Results: All data were available for prognostic categorization in 108 patients. Patients with the GERCOR index of low, intermediate and high risk were 45, 57, and 6, respectively. The pts characteristics between low risk (L) and intermediate/high risk (I/H) were generally balanced except for prior colorectomy (75.6% in L, 54.0% in I/H; p = 0.027), based cytotoxic agent (oxaliplatin) (80.0% in L, 93.7% in I/H; p = 0.039), liver metastasis (53.3% in L, 79.4% in I/H; p = 0.006) and median number of metastatic organ (1 in L, 2 in I/H; p = 0.024). The distribution and median OS / PFS for the GERCOR index were as follows: L (n = 45; 29.9/10.0 months), I/H (n = 63; 17.0/8.5 months). For OS, there was significant difference between L and I/H (p = 0.003). For PFS, there was not significant difference between L and I/H (p = 0.522). In the Cox multivariate analysis, GI did not show an independent prognostic impact (L vs I/H ; HR 1.499, p = 0.120) and predictive impact (L vs I/H ; HR 0.922, p = 0.733). Conclusions: In this analysis, the GERCOR index might be neither the predictive nor prognostic factor in the bevacizumab combined first line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.

Prognostic factors for overall survival with sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5042-5042
Author(s):  
S. Patil ◽  
R. A. Figlin ◽  
T. E. Hutson ◽  
M. D. Michaelson ◽  
S. Négrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line

5042 Background: Sunitinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS; the primary endpoint) over interferon-alfa (IFN-α) as first-line mRCC therapy (NEJM 2007;356:115). Median overall survival (OS) with sunitinib compared to IFN-α was: 26.4 vs. 21.8 months (HR=0.821; P=0.051 by unstratified log-rank test; Proc ASCO 2008;26, May 20 suppl; abstr 5024). An analysis of prognostic factors for OS was performed on data from this trial. Methods: 750 treatment-naïve mRCC patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sunitinib or IFN-α. By Cox proportional hazards model, selected pretreatment variables were evaluated univariately and in a multivariate model for each treatment arm. Multivariate models for each treatment arm were based on a stepwise algorithm with a type I error of 0.25 for entry and 0.15 for elimination. Further elimination was applied to identify variables significant at P<0.05. Results: In multivariate analysis of sunitinib patients, factors associated with longer OS include: interval from diagnosis to treatment ≥1 yr, ECOG PS of 0, lower corrected calcium, absence of bone metastases, lower lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), and higher hemoglobin (Hgb) ( table ). For the IFN-α treatment arm, male gender, absence of bone or lymph node metastases, lower LDH, higher Hgb, lower corrected calcium, higher neutrophil count, and interval from diagnosis to treatment ≥1 yr were associated with longer OS. Conclusions: For patients in the sunitinib treatment arm, prognostic factors identified were similar to the factors previously identified in the MSKCC risk groups (J Clin Oncol 2002;20:289). Additional prognostic factors were identified for the IFN-α arm. Further studies are warranted to independently validate these findings as well as to identify tumor-specific prognostic factors. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Association of morphologic response with progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy: HGCSG0802.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 743-743
Author(s):  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
Hideyuki Hayashi ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Takashi Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Morphologic Response

743 Background: It was reported that an optimal morphologic response to preoperative chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We investigated association of morphologic response with progression free survival (PFS) in pts with unresectable CLM from HGCSG0802 observational cohort study in pts with mCRC treated with first-line bevacizumab (BV)-based chemotherapy. Methods: The objective of HGCSG0802 was to evaluate PFS, OS, time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR), safety, etc. The key eligibility criteria were evaluable lesions, older than 20 years old, ECOG PS 0-2. Pts with CLM underwent contrast-enhanced CT at the start and every 8-weeks of BV-based chemotherapy. In this analysis, three blinded, independent radiologists evaluated images for morphologic response, based on metastases changing from heterogeneous masses with ill-defined margins into homogeneous hypoattenuating lesions with sharp borders. Association of morphologic response and pts characteristics, RR, and PFS were evaluated. PFS was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 108 pts (the full analysis set), 73 pts with CLM were evaluable for morphologic criteria. Eighteen pts (24.7%) had optimal morphologic response (OR), 31 (42.5%) had incomplete (IR), and 24 (32.9%) had no response (NR). The pts characteristics between those with OR, IR and NR were generally balanced. The median TTF was 7.2 months in NR versus 7.2 months in IR versus 6.8 months in OR (HR (OR/NR) = 0.91, HR (OR/IR) = 0.90; p = 0.93). RR was 77.8% in OR versus 64.5% in IR and 58.3% in NR (p = 0.528). The median PFS was 8.3 months in NR versus 8.5 months in IR versus 9.1 months in OR (HR (OR/NR) = 0.72, HR (OR/IR) = 1.04; p = 0.420). Conclusions: In this analysis, morphologic response might not be a prognostic marker in first-line BV-based chemotherapy in pts with CLM.

Early carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) dynamics to predict fruquintinib efficacy in FRESCO, a 3+ line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16001-e16001
Author(s):  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Radiological Evaluation

e16001 Background: The FRESCO phase 3 trial demonstrated a significant survival benefit with fruquintinib vs. placebo in the third-line or later therapy of mCRC patients. CEA levels are widely used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in patients with mCRC. Herein, we undertook post-hoc analyses of FRESCO patient data to investigate the early changes in CEA during treatment, as well as potential relationships with efficacy parameters. Methods: Patients were included if baseline CEA was abnormal according to local lab reference range. Serum CEA levels were measured at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle (except for Cycle 1). Early CEA change was analyzed at first radiological evaluation (C3D1, Week 8), CEA response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline, and CEA progression was defined as ≥ 100% increase from baseline. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio (HR) was estimated through Cox proportional hazards model; p-value was generated from log rank test. Results: 88.4% (245/277) and 94.9% (130/137) of patients had an abnormal baseline CEA in the fruquintinib group and placebo group, respectively. Median baseline CEA values were similar between treatment groups. After 2 cycles of treatment, the proportion of patients had CEA response was significantly higher in the fruquintinib group than placebo group (30.0% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). In the fruquintinib group, patients with early CEA response (n = 63) had longer median OS (12.8 vs. 7.8 months, HR = 0.45, p < 0.001) and median PFS (5.6 vs. 3.7 months, HR = 0.49, p < 0.001) than patients without (n = 147). 66.7% (140/210) of patients in fruquintinib group had stable disease (SD), and fruquintinib in those patients with concomitant CEA response exhibited a significantly greater OS benefit than with CEA progression (14.4 vs. 8.7 months, HR = 0.38, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Fruquintinib increased early CEA response. CEA response at first radiological evaluation after cycle 2 could be considered as a predictor for better OS and PFS. Among patients with SD at first evaluation, those with CEA response seems benefit more from fruquintinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02314819 .

Comparison of cetuximab (Cmab) with panitumumab (Pmab) monotherapy in salvage line against KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of HGCSG0901 and 1002.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 663-663
Author(s):  
Akira Ueda ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Takahide Sasaki ◽  
Yoshimitsu Kobayashi ◽  
Ayumu Hosokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Significant Difference

663 Background: Monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) such as Cmab and Pmab have antitumor activity and acceptable safety profiles in patients (pts) with mCRC. Monotherapy with Cmab or Pmab demonstrated the effectiveness in salvage-line, and the direct comparison was reported in ESMO 2013 (ASPECCT trial). Methods: Data of 31 pts with mCRC treated by monotherapy with Cmab (HGCSG0901) and 51 pts by monotherapy with Pmab (HGCSG1002) registered from 27 institutions in Japan. Comparison of Cmab with Pmab was retrospectively analyzed. All patients with KRAS wild type were refractory to or intolerant for 5-FU/irinotecan/oxaliplatin and also were never administered anti-EGFR-antibodies. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Patient characteristics were as below (Cmab vs. Pmab); male/female 20/11 vs. 27/24, median age (range) 65(44-76) vs. 64(44-81), PS 0-1/2-3 21/10 vs. 46/5, number of metastatic organs 1-2/3- 22/9 vs. 25/16. Skin toxicity was common adverse events and was generally similar in two groups. MST was 8.4 months in the Cmab and 8.1 months in the Pmab (p = 0.32). PFS was 3.8 months in the Cmab, as compared with 3.1 months in the Pmab (p = 0.60); the corresponding response rate was 19.4% and 13.7% (p = 0.54). After adjusting other prognostic factors with Cox proportional hazard model, the administration of Cmab/Pmab made significant difference neither for OS (HR 0.939, 95% CI 0.783-1.128, p = 0.503), nor PFS (HR 0.972, 95% CI 0.823-1.148, p = 0.735). Conclusions: In this integration analysis of two studies, there were no significant difference in efficacy between Cmab and Pmab monotherapy in the salvage-line treatment of pts with mCRC.

Analysis of Kohne's prognostic index in KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with salvage-line cetuximab-based regimen: HGCSG0901.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 634-634
Author(s):  
Ayako Doi ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Yasushi Tsuji ◽  
Takahide Sasaki ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

634 Background: In the treatment for mCRC, it is essential for understanding the prognosis of each individual patient. Köhne’s index (KI) based on performance status, white blood cell count, alkaline phosphatase and number of metastatic sites has been previously proposed. However, in the salvage setting, the validity of KI has not been reported in patients treated by cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Methods: 269 patients with mCRC treated by cetuximab contained chemotherapy were retrospectively registered from 27 centers in Japan. This analysis was included in the KRAS wild-type patients who were refractory to or intolerant for 5-FU/irinotecan/oxaliplatin and were never administered anti-EGFR-antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival were performed using patient characteristics. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. The analysis was also designed to determine whether the Köhne’s classification could be extended to other endpoints such as progression-free survival. Results: All data were available for prognostic categorization in 127 patients. Median overall and progression-free survival was 9.8 and 4.2 months. The distribution and median survival / progression-free survival for KI were as follows: low risk (L) (n = 40; 13.1/5.1 months), intermediate risk (I) (n = 17; 9.6/3.5 months), and high risk (H) (n = 70; 7.6/4.1 months). For overall survival, there was significant difference between L and H (p = 0.004), but not between L and I (p = 0.213), and between I and H (p = 0.321). For progression-free survival, there was tended to difference between L and H (p = 0.083), but not between L and I (p = 0.392), and between I and H (p = 0.630). In Cox multivariate analysis, KI showed an independent prognostic impact (HR 1.370, p = 0.010), but not predictive impact (HR 1.147, p = 0.212). Conclusions: In this analysis, KI might be a prognostic factor in salvage treatment with cetuximab-based regimen, but no effect predicted impact. Moreover, the prospective evaluation is needed for the further validation.

Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) dynamics during first-line FOLFOXIRI in advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15754-e15754
Author(s):  
Irene Pecora ◽  
Gianna Musettini ◽  
Silvia Catanese ◽  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
Giulia Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
First Line ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

e15754 Background: Elevated pre-treatment NLR is a well-known poor prognostic factor in several tumours, including aPC. However, the role of NLR changes during first-line chemotherapy is less investigated. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated aPC patients (pts) treated with FOLFOXIRI (infusional 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan). NLR was calculated before the first (NLR-0) and the fourth (NLR-3) cycle, high NLR being defined as > 4. We evaluated the correlation between NLR change and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease-control-rate (DCR). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and chi-square tests were applied. Multivariate analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Ninety-four pts were evaluable. Median age was 62 years; at diagnosis, 38 (40.4%) pts had unresectable stage III and 56 (59.6%) had stage IV disease. In the overall population, median PFS (mPFS) and OS (mOS) were 8.0 and 12.9 months, respectively. NLR-0 was significantly associated with poor prognosis: among the 12 pts with NLR-0 > 4 mOS was 5.1 months compared with 13.5 months for the 82 pts with NLR-0 ≤4 (p < 0.001). As regards NLR dynamics, NLR-3 remained high or was increased (H/I) in 5 pts (5.3%) while was stably low or decreased (L/D) in 89 pts (94.7%). mOS was 5.1 months (95%CI 0.4-9.8) in H/I and 13.5 months (95%CI 10.9-16.1) in L/D (p < 0.001) pts. The same association was found for PFS, with 4.7 (95%CI 2.1-7.3) vs 8.3 months (95%CI 6.2-10.4, p = 0.004), respectively, but not for RR and DCR. At multivariate analysis, NLR change was confirmed as independent predictor of OS (HR 6.854, 95%CI 2.109-22.269, p = 0.001) and, when added to performance status, liver metastases and NLR-0, allowed a better risk stratification in good (no negative factors), intermediate (1-2 factors) and poor (3-4 factors) risk groups, with mOS of 18.0, 10.0 and 5.1 months, respectively (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Not only NLR-0, but also changes after 3 cycles of first-line FOLFOXIRI could predict OS in aPC pts. Early variations in NLR might be a cheap, reproducible and useful factor to predict prognosis and to better refine treatment strategy.

Effect of concomitant medications on overall survival in patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Spakowicz ◽  
Marium Husain ◽  
Gabriel Tinoco ◽  
Sandip H. Patel ◽  
Jarred Thomas Burkart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Medication History ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Concomitant Medications

94 Background: The response to Immunotherapy (IO) is known to be affected by concomitant medications including corticosteroids and antibiotics. We evaluated the medication history of patients undergoing IO to explore other medications that affect overall survival and to estimate the relative impact of each medication when given in combination. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with advanced cancer who received IO from 2011 to 2017 at the Ohio State University was performed with IRB approval. Data were extracted from the medical record, including medication history 180 days around the start of IO therapy. Data were collected in a REDCap database. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated from the initiation of IO. Cox Proportional-Hazards models were used and evaluated by log-rank test at alpha = 0.05. All calculations were performed using the survival and survminer packages in R. Results: Patients who received antibiotics or corticosteroids had decreased OS (p = 0.019 and p = 0.043, respectively) across several cancer types. Medications that were not significantly associated with OS included statins (p = 0.38), proton pump inhibitors (p = 0.94), H2 blockers (p = 0.27) and NSAIDS (p = 0.46). A total of 159 patients had complete data for all medications suitable for modeling relative effects. 149 (94%) of patients received antibiotics within 180 days of IO and 19 (12%) received both corticosteroids and antibiotics. The combination of corticosteroids and antibiotics had lower median OS than antibiotics alone or neither medication (p < 0.0018). A Cox Proportional Hazards model of antibiotics and corticosteroids, controlling for age, BMI and ECOG performance status, showed antibiotics, age and BMI to be significant predictors. Conclusions: Antibiotics and corticosteroids near the start of IO reduced overall survival, and the combination reduced the median overall survival further. However, a combined model that controlled for age, BMI and ECOG showed antibiotics, age and BMI to have a significant effect on OS. Though preliminary, these results suggest that antibiotics and corticosteroids may be affecting OS in the context of IO through overlapping pathways.

Comparison of adding cetuximab (Cmab) or panitumumab (Pmab) to irinotecan (IRI)-based chemotherapy in salvage line against KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of HGCSG0901 and 1002.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598
Author(s):  
Koshi Fujikawa ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Takahide Sasaki ◽  
Yasuo Takahashi ◽  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

598 Background: Cmab and Pmab have antitumor activity and acceptable safety profiles in patients (pts) with mCRC. Although IRI-based chemotherapy combined with Cmab or Pmab has demonstrated the effectiveness in salvage-line, there has been no reported trials comparing these antibodies directly. Methods: Data of 96 pts with mCRC treated by Cmab plus IRI-based chemotherapy (Cmab/IRI) from HGCSG 0901 and 27 pts treated by Pmab plus IRI-based chemotherapy (Pmab/IRI) from HGCSG1002 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with KRAS wild type were refractory to or intolerant for 5-FU/ irinotecan/ oxaliplatin and also were never administered anti-EGFR-antibodies. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Patient characteristics were as below (Cmab/IRI vs. Pmab/IRI); male/female 58/38 vs. 16/11, median age (range) 63(38-80) vs. 64(49-81), PS 0/1/2 52/35/9 vs. 21/6/0, number of metastatic organs 1/2/3- 29/37/30 vs. 6/12/7, prior bevacizumab administration 62.5% vs. 92.6% (p = 0.002). MST was 9.9 months in the Cmab/IRI and 14.9 months in the Pmab/IRI (p = 0.196). PFS was 4.8 months in the Cmab/IRI, as compared with 5.4 months in the Pmab (p = 0.083); the corresponding RR was 25.0 % and 18.5% (p = 0.611). After adjusting other prognostic factors with Cox proportional hazard model, the administration of Cmab/Pmab made significant difference neither for OS (HR 0.908, 95% CI 0.513-1.610, p = 0.742), nor PFS (HR 0.732, 95% CI 0.447-1.199, p = 0.732). Conclusions: In this integration analysis of two studies, there were no significant difference in efficacy between Cmab and Pmab with IRI-based chemotherapy in the salvage-line treatment of pts with mCRC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document