scholarly journals Immune-Related Adverse Events, Need for Systemic Immunosuppression, and Effects on Survival and Time to Treatment Failure in Patients With Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28) ◽  
pp. 3193-3198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy Z. Horvat ◽  
Nelly G. Adel ◽  
Thu-Oanh Dang ◽  
Parisa Momtaz ◽  
Michael A. Postow ◽  
...  

Purpose Ipilimumab is a standard treatment for metastatic melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common and can be severe. We reviewed our large, contemporary experience with ipilimumab treatment outside of clinical trials to determine the frequency of use of systemic corticosteroid or anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy and the effect of these therapies on overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF). Patients and Methods We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of patients with melanoma who had received treatment between April 2011 and July 2013 with ipilimumab at the standard dose of 3 mg/kg. We collected data on patient demographics, previous and subsequent treatments, number of ipilimumab doses, irAEs and how they were treated, and overall survival. Results Of the 298 patients, 254 (85%) experienced an irAE of any grade. Fifty-six patients (19%) discontinued therapy because of an irAE, most commonly diarrhea. Overall, 103 patients (35%) required systemic corticosteroid treatment for an irAE; 29 (10%) also required anti-TNFα therapy. Defining TTF as either starting a new treatment or death, estimated median TTF was 5.7 months. Twelve percent of patients experienced long-term disease control without receiving additional antimelanoma therapy. OS and TTF were not affected by the occurrence of irAEs or the need for systemic corticosteroids. Conclusion IrAEs are common in patients treated with ipilimumab. In our experience, approximately one-third of ipilimumab-treated patients required systemic corticosteroids, and almost one-third of those required further immune suppression with anti-TNFα therapy. Practitioners and patients should be prepared to treat irAEs and should understand that such treatment does not affect OS or TTF.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4940-4940
Author(s):  
Sean Warsch ◽  
Peter Hosein ◽  
Lauren S. Maeda ◽  
Ash A Alizadeh ◽  
Izidore S Lossos

Abstract Abstract 4940 Background: Bendamustine has evolved as an increasingly used chemotherapeutic agent for diverse lymphomas in the United States (US) and Europe. It is an alkylating agent that was approved in the US for use as a first line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) in 2008. However, the two pivotal studies that established bendamustine for this indication included only few patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate efficacy of bendamustine in MCL. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all MCL patients who were treated with bendamustine at Jackson Memorial Hospital and the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (both in Miami, FL) and the Stanford Cancer Center (in Stanford, CA). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety. Results: Thirty MCL patients received bendamustine, 28 in combination with rituximab and 2 as monotherapy. Nineteen of these patients were treated at the University of Miami and 11 at Stanford. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years and 77% of the patients were male. The most common extranodal site of involvement at diagnosis was the bone marrow (57%), followed by the GI tract (33%). Most patients presented with advanced disease, with 69% and 28% of the patients having stage IV and III disease at diagnosis, respectively. Seven patients (23%) were diagnosed with the blastic variant of MCL. Five patients received bendamustine as initial therapy and 25 for relapsed disease. Five of these patients had relapsed MCL after an autologous HSCT The most common schedule was bendamustine 100mg/m2 on days one and two and rituximab 375mg/m2 on day one of a 28 day cycle, for a median of six cycles. Of the 30 patients, there were fifteen complete responses (CR) and ten partial responses (PR), for an ORR of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70–97%). With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 0.3–29.5 months), the median overall survival (OS) was not reached; the one-year OS rate was 73%; the two year OS rate was 67%. When OS and time to treatment failure (TTF) were stratified by response (using a 2-month landmark as the starting point for analysis), patients achieving a CR had a significantly longer OS and TTF compared to patients who did not achieve a CR (log rank p < 0.001). The TTF and OS were significantly worse for patients with the blastic variant versus the diffuse variant. In 5 patients with relapse post autologous HSCT, bendamustine induced a CR in three and a PR in one other patient. The majority of serious adverse events associated with bendamustine were hematological. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23%, 3%, and 20%, respectively. Common non-hematologic grade 1 or 2 toxicities were fatigue (27%), edema (20%), erythematous rash (20%), and nausea (13%). Two patients developed neurological sequelae during or after treatment with bendamustine. The first patient developed left sided weakness and dysmetria ten months after completing therapy. A brain biopsy revealed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. A second patient developed ataxia and incontinence while on rituximab plus bendamustine therapy and expired before a definitive diagnosis could be established. Conclusions: Bendamustine appears to have a favorable profile as a second-line agent for patients with relapsed MCL. The response rate is at least comparable to other therapies, especially when examined in light of the toxicity profile seen with other regimens. This study supports the need for continued investigation of bendamustine as a therapy for MCL patients both in the frontline and relapsed settings in prospective clinical trials, some of which are presently ongoing. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3049-3049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Michael Unterhalt ◽  
Bernhard Wörmann ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
Bernd Metzner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy (R-CHOP) has been shown to improve response rates in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but prolongation of response duration or overall survival was not observed (Lenz et al., JCO 2005). In a similar randomized comparison of 90 patients, again the addition of rituximab to MCP showed a tendency towards higher CR rates, but no improvement of overall response rate, progression free, or overall survival (Herold et al., ICML-10, 2008). Methods: We present an update of a previously published trial randomly comparing efficacy and safety of R-CHOP to CHOP induction in previously untreated patients with advanced stage MCL. Results: Of the 123 evaluable patients, 63 patients were randomized to R-CHOP. Median age was 62 years, and risk profiles of the two treatment arms were comparable. Overall response rates were 92% vs. 75% for R-CHOP vs. CHOP (p = 0.0139) and complete remission rates 33% vs. 8% (p = 0.0008). After a median follow-up of 65 months, median time to treatment failure was prolonged from 14 months for CHOP to 28 months for R-CHOP (p = 0.0003). Similarly, median response duration was prolonged from 18 (CHOP) to 29 months (R-CHOP, p = 0.0052). So far, no significant improvement of overall survival has been observed with median not reached vs. 59 months and 5-years OS rates of 59% and 46% (p = 0.27) after R-CHOP and CHOP, respectively. Toxicity was not significantly higher for R-CHOP treated patients. Conclusions: After longer follow-up, superior remission rates, time to treatment failure, and response duration of combined immuno-chemotherapy were confirmed. However, in contrast to other lymphoma entities, improvement of overall survival has not yet been proven in MCL patients. Therefore new therapeutic options are urgently warranted to further improve the long term outcome in this otherwise dismal disease.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14008-14008
Author(s):  
Y. Bang ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
H. C. Chung ◽  
W. Kang ◽  
S. Park ◽  
...  

14008 Background: Pemetrexed is a novel folate antimetabolite, and it inhibits a number of folate-dependent enzymes. This agent has demonstrated activity in a variety of tumor types including AGC. This study was performed to evaluate the combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin in the treatment of AGC. The primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were duration of response, time to progressive disease, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and toxicity. Methods: Patients with stage IV AGC not to be amendable to curative surgery and measurable disease were eligible. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 were given on day 1, every 21 days. Treatment was supplemented with folic acid, vitamin B12, and dexamethasone. Response was assessed by RECIST, and toxicity was assessed by NCI-CTC v 2.0. Results: From October 2003 to September 2004, 51 patients were enrolled, but 1 did not meet the eligibility criteria. There were 37 men and 13 women with a median age of 56 years (range, 24–69) and an ECOG PS 0/1 for 14/36 patients; all had metastatic disease. Of 50 evaluable patients, there were no complete responses, and 13 had confirmed partial responses (26%; 95% CI, 14.6%-40.3%). Fifteen patients (30%) had stable disease, and 21 (42%) progressed, and 1 (2%) was unknown. Among 13 responders, the median durarion of response was 3.60 months (95% CI, 2.80–9.40). Median time to progressive disease was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.20–4.40), and median overall survival was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.80–10.40). The median time to treatment failure was 2.10 months (95% CI, 1.00–2.80). Survival estimates were 32.0% at 3 months and 7.0% at 6 months. A total of 212 cycles were administered to 51 patients (median 4 [range, 1–13]). Based on 51 patients, most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (49.0%), leukopenia (19.7%), and anemia (13.7%); the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were hyponatremia (15.7%), anorexia (9.8%), nausea (7.8%), and vomiting (7.8%). Conclusions: : The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin in the current dose and schedule has a modest activity and a mild toxicity profile in patients with AGC. Further study is warranted using a different dose and treatment schedule. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14536-e14536
Author(s):  
Jay-Jiguang Zhu ◽  
Robert O'Donnell ◽  
Zvi Ram

e14536 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are an anti-mitotic non-invasive therapy of low intensity alternating electric fields delivered to the tumor via a portable medical device. In phase 3 studies that led to FDA approvals, TTFields plus maintenance temozolomide significantly extended survival in newly diagnosed GBM, and achieved comparable survival outcome to best standard of care (BSC) as monotherapy in recurrent GBM (rGBM). The EF-19 study aimed to confirm efficacy of TTFields vs BSC in rGBM in post-approval real-life setting. Methods: This non-inferiority, prospective, non-randomized, post approval registry trial enrolled 192 rGBM patients (>21 yrs, KPS > 70). Patients were treated with TTFields (200 kHz, > 18h/day). Eligibility criteria: histologic GBM, past treatment per Stupp protocol for primary disease and radiological evidence of progression in the supratentorial region. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were OS in the per protocol (PP) population ( > 1 course of TTFields or BSC in each respective arm), time to treatment failure and adverse events. The TTFields patient registry data were compared to OS of all 117 rGBM patients in the BSC group of the EF-11 trial (Stupp R, EJC 2012). The sample size of 192 patients (10% loss to follow up) was based on non-inferiority log-rank test with a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, comparing time to event (i.e., death) between patients treated with TTFields and BSC. The analysis was based on true hazard ratio (HR) of 1.0 comparing TTFields to control with an upper one-sided 95% confidence bound of HR not exceeding 1.375. Results: Median OS with TTFields versus EF-11 BSC was 7.4 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.053; HR = 0.64 (95%CI 0.46-0.91, Cox-test P = 0.012). Median OS (PP population) with TTFields versus EF-11 BSC was 8.1 months vs. 6.5 months; p = 0.045; HR 0.65. The results showed a significant superiority in HR of OS between the 2 groups, as the 95% confident interval upper limit of the HR was lower than the pre-defined threshold for non-inferiority for interval bound of 1.375. The overall incidence of adverse event was lower with TTFields than EF-11 BSC (67% vs. 95%). The median time to treatment failure was longer in the TTFields arm (3.3 months (95% CI 2.6, 3.9) versus BSC arm (1.6 months; 95% CI 1.1, 1.9); HR = 0.53 (95% CI 0.41, 0.68, p < 0.0001). Skin AE was the most frequently reported AEs in TTFields arm; no unexpected adverse events were reported with TTFields. Conclusions: The results of the EF-19 registry study confirm the effectiveness and safety of TTFields monotherapy in rGBM.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 482-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Buske ◽  
Michael Kneba ◽  
Eva Lengfelder ◽  
Michael Pfreundschuh ◽  
Wolf-Dieter Ludwig ◽  
...  

Abstract Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent disease of the advanced age with more than 40 % of the patients being older than 60 years at diagnosis and an age-specific incidence peaking above 75 years. We now analyzed the treatment outcome of elderly patients in the GLSG multicenter phase III study comprising a prospective randomized comparison of R-CHOP versus CHOP alone in patients with advanced stage FL. 221 patients &gt; 60 years with untreated FL were randomized for therapy with R-CHOP (R-CHOP: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 d0–1; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 d1; doxorubicine 50 mg/m2 d1; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 d1; prednisone 100 mg/m2 d1–5) (n=109) or CHOP alone (n=112). Patient characteristics were well balanced between the treatment groups, also with regard to the distribution of the FLIPI risk groups (≥ 3 adverse factors 73% and 66 % in the R-CHOP and CHOP arm, respectively). R-CHOP induced higher overall response rates and significantly prolonged the time to treatment failure (TTF)(median 5.0 years versus 2.1 years, respectively; logrank test: p&lt;0.0001) compared to CHOP in the elderly patient group. Furthermore, the estimated 4-years progression free survival was 62.2% for R-CHOP versus 27.9 % after CHOP (logrank: p&lt; 0.0001). Importantly, R-CHOP was able to prolong the overall survival in elderly patients compared to CHOP with an estimated 4-years overall survival of 90% after immunochemotherapy versus 81 % after CHOP alone (logrank test: p=0.039). In the multivariate analysis individual FLIPI risk factors such as elevated serum LDH level, a hemoglobin level below 12 g/dl, the number of nodal areas (&gt; 4) as well as application of CHOP alone were independently associated with a shorter TTF. Treatment related side effects were similar in both patient groups and comprised predominantly myelosuppression. In summary, the addition of Rituximab to CHOP significantly improves the outcome of elderly patients with previously untreated advanced stage FL without adding major side effects.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (23) ◽  
pp. 2736-2742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Enzinger ◽  
Barbara Ann Burtness ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Xing Ye ◽  
Kathe Douglas ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine the optimal chemotherapy backbone for testing in future US cooperative group studies for metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Cetuximab was added to each treatment arm based on promising preclinical data. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (ECF), irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC), or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus and infusional fluorouracil). All treatment programs included cetuximab once per week. The primary end point was response rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and safety. As prespecified, primary and secondary analyses were conducted only among patients with adenocarcinoma. Results This study randomly assigned 245 patients, including 222 with adenocarcinoma. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, response rate was 60.9% (95% CI, 47.9 to 72.8) for ECF plus cetuximab, 45.0% (95% CI, 33.0 to 57.0) for IC plus cetuximab, and 54.3% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.2) for FOLFOX plus cetuximab. Median overall survival was 11.6, 8.6, and 11.8 months; median progression-free survival was 7.1, 4.9, and 6.8 months; and median time to treatment failure was 5.6, 4.3, and 6.7 months for each of these arms, respectively. FOLFOX plus cetuximab required fewer treatment modifications compared with ECF plus cetuximab and IC plus cetuximab (P = .013), and fewer patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event or experienced treatment-related death. Conclusion In combination with cetuximab, ECF and FOLFOX had similar efficacy, but FOLFOX was better tolerated. Although differences were nonsignificant, IC plus cetuximab seemed to be the least effective and most toxic of the three regimens tested.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 918-918
Author(s):  
Max J Gordon ◽  
Stephen M Amrock ◽  
Xavier Issac Rivera ◽  
Spencer James ◽  
Sudhir Manda ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) present with comorbidities, commensurate with the median age at diagnosis of 71 years. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) is a widely used index which has been incorporated into clinical research in CLL. CIRS consists of 14 categories related to different body systems and scores the severity of each condition from 0-4. We have previously reported in a single-center study that CIRS predicted outcomes in patients with CLL treated with chemo-immunotherapy (CIT). However, to date it is not yet known how comorbidities impact outcomes in the era of novel agents. We tested a hypothesis that CIRS and severe organ dysfunction would retain prognostic significance. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with CLL who underwent treatment at three academic medical centers between 2000 and 2016. CIRS score was calculated as in Salvi et al, 2008. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for performance status (PS), age group, and chemotherapy regimen. Survival analysis in patients treated with ibrutinib was adjusted for age, PS, Rai stage, del17p and prior treatment. In addition, the impact of severe organ dysfunction (CIRS-3+, i.e. CIRS score ≥3 in single organ system) was assessed. Results: Median age in patients receiving CIT was 65 years (N=233). The most common comorbidities were hypertension, endocrine (e.g. diabetes mellitus) and vascular (e.g. deep vein thrombosis). Fludarabine-Rituximab (N=61), Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (N=67), Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide-Vincristine-Prednisone (N=35), Bendamustine-Rituximab (N=38) and chlorambucil (N=47) were the most commonly used regimens. 79.5% of treatments were administered in a frontline setting. Average total CIRS was 6.6 and 47% had CIRS-3+. Median OS among all patients receiving CIT was 112 months (95% CI: 105 - 128 months). CIRS≥7 and CIRS3+ were associated with inferior OS compared to patients without significant comorbidities (87, 92 and 129 months, respectively, p&lt;0.05). In multivariate analysis, OS and PFS both decreased with each increase in total CIRS by one point (HR=1.09; p=0.006 and HR=1.05; p = 0.02), while CIRS-3+ was associated with inferior OS among patients treated with CIT (HR=1.50, p=0.01). In patients treated with ibrutinib the median age was 71 years (N=83), which was significantly older than in the CIT cohort (p&lt;0.001). The most common comorbidities were musculoskeletal (e.g., osteoarthritis), and gastrointestinal (e.g., acid reflux). Median follow up was 12 months (range, 1-39 months). Contrary to patients receiving CIT, 86% of patients had relapsed/refractory disease, with a median of 2 prior treatments (range 0-6). 35% had received prior fludarabine and 54% had received an alkylating agent. Average CIRS was 8.6 and 67% had CIRS-3+. Patients treated with ibrutinib who required dose reductions had higher CIRS (mean score 11.6 vs 7.6; p&lt;0.0003). CIRS-3+ was also associated with dose reduction (RR=4.6, p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, time to treatment failure, defined as ibrutinib discontinuation due to either disease progression or intolerable side effects, shortened with each increase in total CIRS score by one point (HR=1.23; p&lt;0.001). CIRS-3+ was similarly associated with increased risk of treatment failure in multivariable analysis (HR=3.80; p=0.02). In univariate analysis comparing low vs high CIRS (CIRS &lt;7 vs CIRS≥7), median time to treatment failure was 37 vs 23 months (p=0.01; Fig. 1A). OS at 24 months was 100% vs 79% (p=0.02; Fig 1B). Conclusion: In this multicenter retrospective analysis we show that CIRS has prognostic significance in patients with CLL treated with either CIT or ibrutinib, where increased comorbidities correlate with shortened progression-free and overall survival. CIRS appears to carry prognostic value in both upfront and relapsed settings, including patients whose disease can be salvaged with ibrutinib. Larger prospective studies of patients with lymphoid malignancies who have comorbidities are necessary to better define the prognostic value of CIRS in the era of targeted agents and determine the optimal approach to therapy of such patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Persky: Genentech: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committee member ; Verastem: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1640-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian L. Burnette ◽  
Gregory Wiseman ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Luis F. Porrata ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1640 Background: The introduction of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) into clinical practice for the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) occurred at a time at which many patients did not have prior exposure to rituximab. Clinical trials in the relapsed/refractory setting, as well as consolidation in the upfront setting have included a small number of patients that had been previously treated with rituximab or a rituximab containing treatment regimen. We evaluated the effect of prior rituximab therapy on the efficacy of RIT. METHODS: The prospective lymphoma database was queried for all patients having received a single dose of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan for relapsed/refractory FL which had previously been treated with systemic therapy (patients receiving only prior external beam radiation therapy were excluded). The database includes all consecutive adult patients diagnosed with lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester. The diagnosis of follicular lymphoma was as by WHO classification and centrally reviewed. Patients with evidence of histologic transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma prior to RIT were excluded. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the time from RIT to next anti-lymphoma therapy. RESULTS: 111 patients were identified. 57 (51%) were male. Median age at time of RIT was 58 (19–88). Median time from diagnosis to RIT was 35 (6–281) months in patients having received prior treatment with rituximab and 47 (12–272) months in those who had not (p=0.19). 63 (57%) of patients received prior treatment with rituximab or rituximab containing chemotherapy. Median number of prior therapies was 2 (1–10), which was not different between the rituximab treated or untreated groups [2(1–6) vs 2(1–10) p=0.12]. Median TTF was 10.0 months in the patients having received prior rituximab and 10.1 months in those that had not (p=0.29). Figure 1. The median overall survival from RIT was not reached, but appeared similar (Kaplan-Meier estimate 125 months without prior rituximab exposure vs 95 months with prior rituximab exposure; p=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Prior rituximab exposure does not seem to adversely impact the time to treatment failure or overall survival in those patients treated with RIT. While the data leading to the approval of RIT were accrued prior to the routine clinical use of rituximab, our data demonstrate similar clinical benefit of RIT in patients with prior exposure to rituximab or rituximab containing therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 764-764
Author(s):  
Talita Gonzaga Costa ◽  
Tiago Cordeiro Felismino ◽  
Leonardo de Azevedo Boente ◽  
Celso Lopes Mello

764 Background: Colorectal cancer has high incidence and mortality rates. Treatment of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma has evolved since the approval of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and monoclonal antibodies with survival surpassing 30 months in contemporary trials. Nevertheless there is paucity of effective options after failure of these protocols. Thus re-exposure to previously used drugs became a treatment strategy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of retreatment with oxaliplatin in mCRC and its correlation with clinicopathological features. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with mCRC who underwent REOX treated at a single cancer center in Brazil. REOX was defined as a second trial of an oxaliplatin containing regimen after a previous failure. Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) after REOX. Results: Median age of our cohort was 53.5y. Female/Male: 51.8%/48.2%. Primary colon was found in 67.5% while 32.5% had primary rectal adenocarcinoma. KRAS status was wild type in 57.8% and mutated in 39.8%. Exclusive hepatic metastasis was found in 19.3%. Median follow-up after REOX was 31m. Main chemotherapy regimen was mFOLFOX6 (84.3%). Bevacizumab and Cetuximab were used in 42.2% and 6% respectively. Most patients underwent REOX in third and fourth lines, 48.2% and 25.3% respectively. Median time to treatment failure (mTTF) after REOX was 6.04m. Overall survival was 10.04m. Disease control (CR + PR + SD) was observed in 56.6%, while 42.2% had progressive disease (PD). Reasons for interruption were as follows: PD (68.7%), toxicity (19.3%) and metastasectomy (2.4%). Patients who attained disease control had better OS (14.5m) compared with patients who had PD (14.5m versus 6.24m, p < 0.0001). Patients with exclusive hepatic metastasis had a trend to a better TTF compared to other metastasis sites (8.96m X 6.01m, p = 0.2). Regarding KRAS status, there was no difference in mTTF (wt 6.68m, mut 6.04m, p = 0.14). Conclusions: In the setting of pretreated mCRC patients where there are few options available, REOX remains an effective treatment, with mTTF of 6.04m in our cohort. This could be related to progression of cell clones sensitive to the drug after a time lapse since the previous exposure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document