Second-line drug regimens in metastatic melanoma patients based on BRAF mutation status: A Canadian real-world retrospective study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21054-e21054
Author(s):  
Samantha Bremner ◽  
Marc Lapierre ◽  
Arushi Fraelic ◽  
Dave Stewart
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10024-10024
Author(s):  
Vincent The-Luc Ma ◽  
Stephanie Daignault ◽  
Jessica Waninger ◽  
Leslie Anne Fecher ◽  
Michael Green ◽  
...  

10024 Background: Nearly half of all metastatic melanoma patients possess the BRAF V600 mutation. Several therapies are approved for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma, but it is unclear if there is a differential outcome to various immunotherapy regimens. Our aim was to better assess if BRAF mutation status has any impact on survival to combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) versus single-agent PD-1 inhibitor (PD-1i). Methods: We performed a single center, retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients diagnosed with metastatic or unresectable melanoma from 2012 to 2019 at the University of Michigan who were treated with standard I/N or PD-1i (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). A univariate analysis of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was stratified by treatment type and BRAF mutation status. A multivariate Cox regression of survival was used to compare the effects of the treatment groups adjusted by BRAF status, age, gender, pre-treatment LDH level, prior treatment status, and brain metastases status. Results: 323 patients were identified. 132 had BRAF V600 mutation and 191 had BRAF wildtype (WT) status. 138 patients received I/N and 185 patients received PD-1i. In our univariate analysis, there was no difference in PFS [HR: 0.72, 95% CI, 0.46 – 1.13] or OS [HR: 0.78, 0.44 – 1.38] with I/N versus PD-1i in the BRAF mutant cohort, but there was improved PFS [HR: 0.55, 0.35 – 0.88) and OS [HR: 0.52, 0.28 – 0.95] with I/N compared to PD-1i in the BRAF WT group. In the multivariate analysis, the BRAF WT group continued to show PFS benefit with I/N compared to PD-1i [HR: 0.57, 95% CI, 0.35 – 0.95], but the OS benefit no longer achieved statistical significance [HR: 0.54, 0.28 – 1.03]. Conclusions: Our study results were discordant with the observation in the landmark CheckMate 067 trial, which noted improved PFS and OS with I/N compared to nivolumab alone in the BRAF mutant group and no difference in the BRAF WT group. In our real-world retrospective analysis, I/N over PD-1i should be considered as initial immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma patients regardless of BRAF mutation status, but even more favorably in BRAF WT.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne C. Knol ◽  
Audrey Vallée ◽  
Guillaume Herbreteau ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
Emilie Varey ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591984887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Incorvaia ◽  
Giuseppe Badalamenti ◽  
Gaetana Rinaldi ◽  
Juan Lucio Iovanna ◽  
Daniel Olive ◽  
...  

Background: The immune response in melanoma patients is locally affected by presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), generally divided into brisk, nonbrisk, and absent. Several studies have shown that a greater presence of TILs, especially brisk, in primary melanoma is associated with a better prognosis and higher survival rate. Patients and Methods: We investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) the correlation between PD-1 levels in plasma and the presence/absence of TILs in 28 patients with metastatic melanoma. Results: Low plasma PD-1 levels were correlated with brisk TILs in primary melanoma, whereas intermediate values correlated with the nonbrisk TILs, and high PD-1 levels with absent TILs. Although the low number of samples did not allow us to obtain a statistically significant correlation between the plasma PD-1 levels and the patients’ overall survival depending on the absence/presence of TILs, the median survival of patients having brisk type TILs was 5 months higher than that of patients with absent and nonbrisk TILs. Conclusions: This work highlights the ability of measuring the plasma PD-1 levels in order to predict the prognosis of patients with untreated metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation at the time of diagnosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Byrne ◽  
P. Hallworth ◽  
A. Abbas Tahami Monfared ◽  
A. Moshyk ◽  
J. W. Shaw

Background In the present study, we examined real-world treatment patterns for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (scchn) in Canada, which are largely unknown.Methods Oncologists across Canada provided data for disease history, characteristics, and treatment patterns during May–July 2016 for 6–8 consecutive patients receiving first-line or second-line drug treatment for scchn (including locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic disease).Results Information from 16 physicians for 109 patients receiving drug treatment for scchn was provided; 1 patient was excluded from the treatment-pattern analysis. Median age in the cohort was 63 years [interquartile range (iqr): 57–68 years], and 24% were current smokers, with a mean exposure of 26.2 ± 12.7 pack–years. The most common tumour site was the oropharynx (48%). Most patients (84%) received platinum-based regimens as first-line treatment (44% received cisplatin monotherapy). Use of cetuximab-based regimens as first-line treatment was limited (17%). Of 53 patients receiving second-line treatment, 87% received a first-line platinum-based regimen. Median time between first-line treatment with a platinum-based regimen and initiation of second-line treatment was 55 days (iqr: 20–146 days). The most common second-line regimen was cetuximab monotherapy (43%); platinum-based regimens were markedly infrequent (13%).Conclusions Our analysis provides real-world insight into scchn clinical practice patterns in Canada, which could inform reimbursement decision-making. High use of platinum-based regimens in first-line drug treatment was generally reflective of treatment guidelines; cetuximab use in the second-line was higher than anticipated. Additional real-world studies are needed to understand the effect of novel therapies such as immuno-oncology agents on clinical practice and outcomes, particularly for recurrent or metastatic scchn.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9030-9030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Hersh ◽  
Michele Del Vecchio ◽  
Michael Paul Brown ◽  
Richard Kefford ◽  
Carmen Loquai ◽  
...  

9030 Background: Activating mutations of BRAF V600 can be found in 40%-50% of melanomas and are related to poor prognosis. In a phase 3 trial for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) in chemotherapy-naive patients, nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) vs dacarbazine (DTIC) demonstrated a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by independent radiological review (IRR), and a trend toward prolonged overall survival (OS) at the interim survival analysis. The study also explored the effect of BRAF status on the efficacy parameters. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV melanoma (M1c stage 65%; elevated LDH 28%) and ECOG performance status 0-1 were randomized to nab-P 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (n = 264) or DTIC 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n = 265) independent of BRAF status. Prespecified subgroup analyses of final PFS and interim OS in subgroups by BRAF status (V600E mutant, wild-type, or unknown) were performed. Results: BRAF mutation status was balanced between the treatment arms, with 36% and 38% of patients with known BRAF mutation status in the nab-P and DTIC arms, respectively. Patient characteristics were also balanced within BRAF subgroups. As shown in the Table, advantage in the nab-P arm vs DTIC arm was observed for both PFS and interim OS regardless of BRAFmutation status. Poststudy BRAF inhibitor treatment was also balanced. Conclusions: In this phase III trial, treatment effect was independent of BRAF mutation status, benefiting all patients who received nab-P vs DTIC. Therefore nab-P should be considered in the armamentarium for all chemotherapy-naive patients with MM. Clinical trial information: NCT00864253. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
L. V. Bolotina ◽  
A. D. Kaprin

The most effective first-and subsequent line drug regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) suggest the inclusion of targeted drugs (TD). The choice of TD for the second-line therapy takes into account not only the biological features of the tumor and the general condition of the patient, but also the option of the previous line therapy, its effectiveness and toxicity. Treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies (AT) did not significant improve overall survival (OS) in comparison with chemotherapy in the secondline regimens, in contrast to antiangiogenic drugs. Among this group of MAT, aflibercept provides the best results in a selected group of patients (the highly effective group) and a controlled toxicity profile.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9561-9561
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Buchanan ◽  
Swaminathan Murugappan ◽  
Rebecca Moon ◽  
Adam Roughley ◽  
Alex Rider

9561 Background: To assess melanoma specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health states in patients with earlier stage metastatic (IIIb/c-IVM1a) versus late stage metastatic (IVM1b/c) melanoma. Methods: Data were collected from the Adelphi Real World Advanced Melanoma Disease-Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of 112 physicians and their patients (N = 666). Data were collected between March and July 2016 in the US. A subset of 183 patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Melanoma (FACT-M) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) one time. Patients were classified by stage of melanoma at time of consultation. Descriptive analyses of HRQoL scores between earlier and late stage metastatic melanoma were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The mean age of the earlier stage and late stage metastatic patients was 62 and 64 respectively. More earlier stage metastatic patients had an ECOG status of 0 or 1 versus late stage metastatic patients (85%, 75% respectively). A total of 31% of late stage metastatic patients required caregiver support and had a median time since primary diagnosis of 5.0 months whereas earlier stage metastatic patients reported 14% and 5.2 months respectively. Patients with earlier stage metastatic melanoma had better mean EQ-5D index scores versus late stage metastatic melanoma patients (0.81 (n = 84), 0.76 (n = 93); p = 0.0103). Higher scores indicating better HRQoL were observed between earlier stage metastatic versus late stage metastatic melanoma patients for the FACT-M (120.7 (n = 81), 107.4 (n = 91); p = 0.0017) and subscales (except Social Well Being). Clinically meaningful differences between groups using published minimal important differences (MIDs) were observed in in 6/7 FACT-M subscales and EQ-5D VAS. Conclusions: Differences in HRQoL and health states were observed between earlier stage metastatic and late stage metastatic melanoma populations, highlighting the detrimental effect of developing metastatic disease. These results suggest that treatments that delay progression of the disease are important to conserve patients HRQoL


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document