Results of the phase Ib portion of a phase I/II trial of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase pathway (IDO) inhibitor indoximod plus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 452-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Bahary ◽  
Ignacio Garrido-Laguna ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Asha Nyak-Kapoor ◽  
Eugene Kennedy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Grade 3

452 Background: IDO is a tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme that plays a key role in the normal regulation of peripheral immune tolerance. Tumors also employ this mechanism to induce a state of immunosuppression. In cancer, IDO mediates an acquired immune tolerance towards tumors, allowing evasion of immune mediated destruction. Indoximod is a broad IDO pathway inhibitor, as it has been shown to potentially interfere with multiple targets within the IDO pathway. Pre-clinical models have demonstrated synergy between indoximod and chemotherapy. The combination of gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (Nab) is a current SOC for first line treatment of metastatic pancreas cancer. This trial is designed to determine the potential for benefit of combination therapy with indoximod and Gem / Nab for to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Indoximod was escalated (600mg/1000mg/1200mg PO twice daily continuous dosing) in combination with Gem / Nab (1000mg/m2 / 125mg/m2 q week x 3 per 4 week cycle) in a 3+3 design. Patients were first line metastatic pancreatic cancer or minimum 6 months from adjuvant chemo and / or radiation following previous resection. Treatment continues until progression or toxicity. Primary endpoints for Phase 1 include safety, toxicity, and determination of a Phase 2 dose. The prospective collection of tumor samples for exploration of biomarkers is built into the trial. Results: 15 patients were required to successfully dose escalate the Phase 1 study to 1200 mg twice daily. Two patients were replaced in the lowest dose cohort after rapid deterioration due to underlying disease during the regimen limiting toxicity (RLT) window. One RLT was observed during the study (ascites Grade 3) at the highest dose cohort. The most common AE’s (all Grade 1 or 2) occurring in ≥ 4 subjects, regardless of attribution, were nausea, fatigue, peripheral edema, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia. Conclusions: Indoximod and Gem / Nab were well tolerated in a clinical trial setting. The Phase 2 dose was set at 1200 mg twice daily and Phase 2 enrollment (target 80 patients) is ongoing. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02077881.

Necuparanib combined with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Phase 2 results.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 370-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Mary O'Reilly ◽  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
James M. Roach ◽  
Paul Justin Miller ◽  
Molly E. Rosano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Target Number ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

370 Background: The Phase 1 portion of a Phase 1/2 trial of Necuparanib (“Necu”) combined with nab-paclitaxel (nabP) + gemcitabine (gem) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01621243) showed acceptable safety and tolerability and encouraging signals of activity and established a dose for the randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase 2 portion. Methods: In Phase 2, patients received daily s.c. injections of either 5 mg/kg Necu daily or PBO, combined with i.v. 125 mg/m2 nabP and 1000 mg/m2 gem (Days 1, 8, 15 of each 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, safety, and CA19.9 levels. An interim futility analysis was conducted in July 2016 once 57 deaths (50% of the target number of 114 events required for trial completion) had occurred. Results: The analysis was conducted on data from 120 randomized patients (62 Necu, 58 PBO). The Z-score for futility was -0.42 (prespecified boundary of -0.148 was crossed as actual score was lower). Median OS was Necu = 10.71 and PBO = 9.99 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12 (favoring PBO); OS curves were intertwined. PFS was Necu = 5.52 and PBO = 6.93 months; HR = 0.97. RECIST response rates were comparable between arms: complete response, Necu = 0%, PBO = 3%; partial response, Necu = 26%, PBO = 26%; stable disease, Necu = 31%, PBO = 34%; disease control rate, Necu = 56%, PBO = 64%. The most common Grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (Necu = 33%, PBO = 33%), thrombocytopenia (Necu = 27%, PBO = 5%), and anemia (Necu = 22%, PBO = 11%). There were lower rate of serious AEs with Necu (48%) vs. PBO (60%). Modest increases in APTT, AST, and ALT were noted following Necu relative to PBO. 23% of Necu and 5% of PBO patients were IgG positive with an anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titer of ≥ 0.4 at any time. There were no treatment differences for decreases in CA19.9. Conclusions: No new safety signals were observed and the toxicity profile was considered manageable; however, Necu in combination with nabP and gem did not show a sufficient level of efficacy in metastatic pancreatic cancer to warrant continued enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT01621243.

FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 313-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Edward Faris ◽  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Shaunagh McDermott ◽  
Alexander R Guimaraes ◽  
Dushyant Sahani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial Setting ◽  
Locally Advanced Disease ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Trial Setting

313 Background: The recently published Phase III trial of 5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) demonstrated improved survival compared to gemcitabine in good performance status (PS) patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (Conroy et al, NEJM 2011). Less is known about the efficacy and tolerability with FOLFIRINOX in the non-clinical trial setting. In this retrospective analysis, we report our institutional experience with FOLFIRINOX. Methods: 29 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and April 2011 were used for this analysis. Clinical characteristics, and gradeable toxicities were tabulated, and formal radiographic review performed to determine best overall response rates (ORR). Results: 17 patients received FOLFIRINOX for metastatic disease and 12 patients for locally advanced disease. The median age of patients was 60 (range 39-76). 22/29 patients were men. 18/29 patients had received no prior chemotherapy. There was one patient with PS 2; all others had PS 0 or 1. 8/29 patients had biliary stents. Overall, 11 partial responses (PR) were observed (ORR 38%); 10/11 partial responses were in chemo-naïve patients, who had an ORR of 56%. In the metastatic setting, there were 6 PR, for an ORR of 35%, and 7 patients with stable disease (SD). In the locally advanced setting, there were 5 PR (ORR 42%), and 7 patients with SD. Following treatment with FOLFIRINOX, one patient with locally advanced disease has subsequently undergone R0 resection. The median number of cycles performed was 8 in both the locally advanced and metastatic settings. 12/29 patients required an ED visit or hospitalization during treatment. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 10 patients; 7/10 had not received prophylactic growth factor treatment from the start of FOLFIRINOX. 4 patients developed febrile neutropenia, 4 patients developed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 patient developed grade 4 anemia. Conclusions: In a non-clinical trial setting, FOLFIRINOX demonstrated activity in both the metastatic and locally-advanced settings. FOLFIRINOX appears to be associated with manageable, but significant toxicities, with over 40% of patients requiring hospitalization.

Activity and safety of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (phase II NabucCO study).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 351-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Giommoni ◽  
Evaristo Maiello ◽  
Vanja Vaccaro ◽  
Ermanno Rondini ◽  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

351 Background: FOLFIRINOX is an approved regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). We performed a modification in FOLFIRINOX schedule, using nab-paclitaxel (nab-p) to obtain two regimens that could be as effective and less toxic than the original triplet. NabucCO study was a randomized phase II trial to assess activity and toxicity of nab-p instead of either oxaliplatin (Nab-FOLFIRI) or irinotecan (Nab-FOLFOX) in first line setting. Previous dose–finding NabucCO study defined that maximum tolerated dose of nab-p with FOLFIRI is 120 mg/m2, and with FOLFOX is 160 mg/m2. Methods: The study was a 1:1 parallel arm, open label, not comparative one to assess overall response rate (ORR) of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX as primary end-point. Patients (pts) with PS 0-1, untreated for mPC were randomized to receive leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5FU 48h ci 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 plus nab-p 120 mg/m2 (arm A) or leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5FU 48h ci 2400 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 iv plus nab-p 160 mg/m2 (arm B) every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Secondary end points were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From November 2015 to January 2017, 84 pts were treated (42 for each arm). Median age was 60 years (29-65) in arm A and 64 years (47-64) in arm B. The ORR was 31 % for both schedules, with a CBR of 69% and 71%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 11.4 months for arm A and 14.5 months for arm B (censored on august, 31th 2017), 1-year survival is 41% and 50%, respectively. For Nab-FOLFIRI PFS and mOS were 6 months (90% CI: 4.9-8.0) and 13.2 months (90% CI: 8.3-14.8), while in Nab-FOLFOX were 5.6 months (90% CI:4.9-7.2) and 10.8 months (90% CI: 8.4-12.8). Grade ≥3 toxicities in arm A were neutropenia (19%) and febrile neutropenia (12%). In arm B, main grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (29%), fatigue (14%), peripheral neuropathy (7%). No toxic death were registered. Conclusions: Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab–FOLFOX demonstrated a similar activity to FOLFIRINOX, with better safety profile in terms of neutropenia, fatigue and neuropathy. These results could justify a future phase III evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02109341.

Tumor infiltration and cytokine biomarkers of prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA)-directed GOCAR-T cells in patients with advanced pancreatic tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
Joanne Shaw ◽  
Brandon Ballard ◽  
Xiaohui Yi ◽  
Aditya Malankar ◽  
Matthew R. Collinson-Pautz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Serum Cytokines

734 Background: PSCA is a cell surface protein overexpressed in approximately 60% of pancreatic cancers. BPX-601 is an autologous GOCAR-T cell therapy engineered to express a PSCA-CD3ζ CAR and the MyD88/CD40 (iMC) costimulatory domain activated by rimiducid (Rim), designed to boost CAR-T performance in solid tumors. The safety and activity of BPX-601 activated with Rim in PSCA+ metastatic pancreatic cancer is being assessed in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial, BP-012 (NCT02744287). Methods: Phase 1 of BP-012 is a 3+3 dose escalation of BPX-601 (1.25-5 x106/kg) administered on Day 0 with a single, fixed-dose of Rim (0.4 mg/kg) on Day 7 in subjects with previously treated PSCA+ metastatic pancreatic cancer. All 5 subjects in cohort 5B received Flu/Cy lymphodepletion followed by BPX-601 (5 x106/kg) and Rim. BPX-601 kinetics, PBMC phenotype, and serum cytokines were assayed by qPCR, flow cytometry, and cytokine multiplex, respectively. Baseline and on-treatment biopsies were evaluated by RNAscope in situ hybridization. Results: BPX-601 cells expanded in all subjects and persisted up to 9 months (median 42 days). Transient reduction in BPX-601 vector copy number and total T cell count concurrent with Rim infusion, supports margination of activated BPX-601 cells. Increased serum cytokines, such as IFN-γ and GM-CSF, were observed following BPX-601 infusion with further elevation after Rim activation. All subjects with evaluable on-treatment biopsies had infiltration of BPX-601 cells (n = 3) proximal to tumor cells 7-15 days after Rim, but not in an end of treatment biopsy > 200 days after Rim (n = 1). Stratification by best response (RECIST 1.1) revealed stable disease in 3 subjects and progressive disease in 2 subjects was potentially associated with distinct cytokine signatures. Conclusions: BPX-601 GOCAR-T cells expand and persist in patients with PSCA+ metastatic pancreatic cancer and infiltrate metastatic lesions. A peripheral cytokine signature was observed following BPX-601 infusion. Select cytokines were enhanced after GOCAR-T cell activation and may correlate with clinical response. A cohort of subjects exploring serial administration of Rim is open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT02744287.

scholarly journals Association between neutropenia and survival to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Monica Ramello ◽  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Toxicity Criteria

Abstract Neutropenia is a common side effect associated with nab-paclitaxel gemcitabine (Nab-Gem) therapy. We retrospectively investigated the association between neutropenia induced by first-line Nab-Gem and survival in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma patients. Metastatic pancreatic patients treated with first-line Nab-Gem were included in this retrospective analysis. Neutropenia was categorized using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. 115 patients were analyzed. Median PFS was 7 months (95% CI 5–8) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 6 months (95% CI 5–6) for patients with grade < 3 neutropenia [p = 0.08; hazard ratio (HR 0.68)]. Median OS was 13 months (95% CI 10–18) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 10 months (95% CI 8–13) for patients with grade < 3 neutropenia (p = 0.04; HR 0.44). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia showed a statistically significant association with OS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.09–0.86; p = 0.05). Nab-Gem-induced neutropenia is associated with longer survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in the First-Line Setting of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Pusceddu ◽  
Michele Ghidini ◽  
Martina Torchio ◽  
Francesca Corti ◽  
Gianluca Tomasello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Line ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting

Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) and the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) are valid first-line options for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, no randomized trials comparing the two schemes have been performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX in terms of safety and effectiveness, taking into account data from real-life studies on mPC. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library up to November 2018 to identify retrospective or cohort studies on mPC comparing GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX. We included 16 retrospective studies, including 3813 patients (2123 treated with GEM-NAB and 1690 treated with FOLFIRINOX). Despite a median weighted overall survival (OS) difference in favor of FOLFIRINOX (mean difference: 1.15, 95% confidence interval CI 0.08–2.22, p = 0.03), in whole population OS was similar (hazard ratio (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.84–1.16; p = 0.9). PFS was also not different between the two arms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71–1.1; p = 0.26). The overall response rate was similar (25 vs. 24% with GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX). Among grade 3–4 toxicities, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were lower with GEM-NAB, while neurotoxicity and anemia were lower with FOLFIRINOX. In conclusion, despite a numerically longer median OS with FOLFIRINOX as compared to GEM-NAB, the overall risk of death and progression were similar. Their toxicity was different with less nausea, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia with GEM-NAB, as compared to less neurotoxicity and anemia with FOLFIRINOX. Therefore, analysis of non-randomized “real world” studies to date has not provided evidence of a major benefit of one regimen over the other.

SAINT: Results of a phase 1/2 study of safety/efficacy using safe amounts of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and trabectedin as first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11016-11016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlinda Maria Gordon ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
Seiya Liu ◽  
Nicole Angel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

11016 Background: Sarcoma cells are most immunogenic earlier in the disease course and prior to treatment when the immune system can recognize and destroy them. Hypothesis: Immune checkpoint inhibitors would be most effective when given as first line therapy. Methods: This is an IRB-approved dose-seeking Phase 1/2 protocol using defined doses of I (1 mg/kg i.v. q 12 weeks), N (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks) and escalating doses of T (1.0, 1.2, 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks), employing the “Cohort of Three” design, followed by a Phase 2 using the MTD of trabectedin. Results: Nine subjects were treated in Phase 1 of the study, and 31 subjects in Phase 2. Safety analysis: at Dose 1: Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included fatigue (n = 1), increased TSH (n = 1). At Dose 2, Grade 4 TRAEs included thrombocytopenia with bleeding, DLT (n = 1), increased CK (n = 1); Grade 3 TRAEs included anemia (n = 1), myalgia (n = 1), increased TSH (n = 1), decreased TSH (n = 1), increased AST (n = 1). Efficacy analysis (evaluable patients): At Dose 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR = CR, PR, SD) was 67%, median PFS, 18 weeks; median OS, 50 weeks; At Dose 2: PR (n-1), DCR 60%, median PFS, 24 weeks; median OS, > 46 weeks. At Phase 2, MTD Dose 2 (PUPs): Safety analysis (n = 31): Grade 3 TRAEs included fatigue (n = 2), increased ALT (n = 6), increased AST (n = 4), hypernatremia (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 1), dehydration (n = 1), rash (n = 1), port cellulitis (n = 1), psoriasis exacerbation (n = 1), increased TSH (n = 1), decreased hemoglobin (n = 2), neutropenia (n = 1). Efficacy analysis (N = 23 evaluable): PR (n-5; 2 UPS, 1 synovial sarcoma, 1 liposarcoma, 1 leiomyosarcoma,), BORR 22%, DCR 96%. Median PFS and OS not yet reached. After 4 treatment cycles, one resected tumor showed 80% necrosis and a greater number (30%) of CD8+ killer T cells, in the TME compared to archived pre-treatment tumor. Conclusions: These data suggest that the SAINT protocol (1) is safe with manageable adverse events, with no additive toxicity, and (2) may control tumor growth. Phase 2 of the study is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT03138161.

scholarly journals Equivalent Efficacy but Different Safety Profiles of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 780
Author(s):  
Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli ◽  
Andrea Casadei-Gardini ◽  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
Giulia Bartolini ◽  
Laura Bernardini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Equivalent Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GN) are the most common chemotherapy regimens in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). They have not been compared each other in a prospective trial, but only in retrospective studies, which can thus be affected by several biases. In order to overcome these biases, we took advantage of matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), that allows an indirect comparison by reducing cross-trial differences, and compared data from 268 patients treated with GN in a real-world setting with data from the 171 patients included in the FFX arm of the PRODIGE trial. Survival outcomes did not differ between the two populations. Overall survival was 11.1 months for both treatments (hazard ratio (HR) of FFX 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–1.49; p = 0.527). Progression-free survival was 6.0 months with GN and 6.4 months with FFX (HR of FFX 1.11, 95% CI 0.82–1.50; p = 0.520). On the other hand, we observed a difference in the toxicity profiles: grade 3/4 anemia was more frequent with GN, whereas a higher occurrence of grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhea was reported with FFX. FFX and GN show an equivalent efficacy but different safety profiles in the first-line therapy of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Searching for reliable predictive biomarkers is advised in order to improve therapeutic strategy in metastatic PC.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Regimens Used in the First-Line Setting in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Real-Life Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadiye Akdeniz ◽  
Muhammet Ali Kaplan ◽  
Mevlüde İnanç ◽  
Doğan Uncu ◽  
Yakup Ergün ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Life Study ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting

Abstract Purpose: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of three different chemotherapy regimens used as first-line treatments in the real-life management of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Methods: A total of 218 patients diagnosed with mPC at the time of initial admission were included in this multicenter study. Gemcitabine (Gem, n=71), Gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem-Cis, n=91) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX, n=56) treatments were compared in terms of efficacy and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Overall response rate was significantly higher in the FFX group (50.0%) than in the Gem (28.2%) and Gem-Cis (27.5%) groups (p=0.010).Median progression-free survival (8.4 vs. 4.6 and 5.5 months, respectively, p<0.001) and overall survival (16.4 vs. 8.1 and 8.7 months, respectively, p=0.002) were significantly longer in theFFX group than in the Gem and Gem-Cis groups. Toxicity of any grade was noted in 46(64.8%), 56(61.5%) and 49(87.5%) patients in the Gem, Gem-Cis and FFX groups, respectively (p=0.003).Of the grade 3-4 toxicities, weakness/fatigue and mucositis were reported only in the FFX group (5.4% and 3.6%, respectively). Grade 3-4 diarrhea (10.7%, 0.0%, 2.2%, respectively) and neutropenia (25%, 4.2% and 5.5%, respectively) were more common in the FFX group than in the Gem and Gem-Cis groups. Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings indicate that FFX regimen provides a significant advantage over the other treatment regimens in terms of response rates and survival. Treatment toxicity was more frequent but manageable with the FFX regimen.FFX seems to be a preferable regimen in the first-line treatment of the younger and fit patients diagnosed with mPC.

FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14615-e14615
Author(s):  
Jason Edward Faris ◽  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Shaunagh McDermott ◽  
Darrell R. Borger ◽  
Alexander R Guimaraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Molecular Genotyping ◽  
Clinical Trial Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Trial Setting

e14615 Background: The phase III trial of 5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) demonstrated improved survival compared to gemcitabine in good performance status (PS) patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (Conroy et al, NEJM 2011). Less is known about the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFIRINOX in the non-clinical trial setting. In this retrospective analysis, we report our institutional experience with FOLFIRINOX. Methods: 38 pts with locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) who began treatment with FOLFIRINOX between 7/2010 and 6/2011 were identified. Clinical characteristics, gradable toxicities, and molecular genotyping results were tabulated. Formal radiographic review was performed to determine best overall response rates (ORR). All pts receiving FOLFIRINOX were assessed for toxicities, while pts receiving ≥2 cycles were assessed for response. Results: 26 pts received FOLFIRINOX for MPC and 12 pts for LAPC. The median age was 60 (range 39-76). 29/38 pts were men, 26/38 had received no prior chemotherapy, and 11/38 had biliary stents. Overall, 12 partial responses (PR) were observed in 33 evaluable pts (ORR 36%); 11/12 partial responses were in chemo-naïve pts. In evaluable pts with MPC, there were 7 PR (ORR 33%), and 11 pts with stable disease (SD). In LAPC, there were 5 PR (ORR 42%), and 7 pts with SD. Following FOLFIRINOX, two pts with LAPC have subsequently undergone R0 resection. 18/38 pts required an ED visit or hospitalization during treatment. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 12 pts; 8/12 had not received prophylactic growth factor from the start of FOLFIRINOX. There were 6 pts with febrile neutropenia, 6 pts with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and 5 pts with grade 3/4 anemia. 1 pt died with bacteremia in the setting of febrile neutropenia. 22 pts had molecular genotyping at multiple loci performed: 17/22 were KRAS mutation positive, and 3 pts with KRAS mutations also had TP53 mutations. 4 pts were wild-type at all loci tested, and 3 of these pts had a PR on FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: In a non-clinical trial setting, FOLFIRINOX demonstrated activity in both LAPC and MPC, but is associated with significant toxicities, with nearly half of pts requiring an ED visit or hospitalization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document