Activity of a novel immunotherapy combination of intralesional Coxsackievirus A21 and systemic ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients previously treated with anti-PD1 blockade therapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3014-3014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
Jon M. Richards ◽  
Sigrun Hallmeyer ◽  
Mark B. Faries ◽  
Robert Hans Ingemar Andtbacka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Coxsackievirus A21 ◽  
Melanoma Patients

3014 Background: CAVATAK is a novel bio-selected oncolytic and immunotherapeutic strain of Coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21) that when injected into melanoma lesions can increase immune-cell infiltration, up-regulation of γ-INF response and immune-checkpoint genes, including CD122, which may be a potential marker for enhanced anti-tumor activity by anti-CTLA-4 blockade. Intratumoral replication of CVA21 may act as a strong “immune-sequestration signal” to circulating activated T-cells following CTLA-4 blockade. A large unmet need exists for active therapies in melanoma patients (pts) following treatment (tx) with anti-PD1 therapies. We present in a Phase 1 study, the clinical activity of a CVA21/ ipilimumab (ipi) combination following anti–PD1 therapy in advanced melanoma pts. Methods: The Phase Ib MITCI study (NCT02307149) investigated the efficacy and safety of i.t. CVA21 and i.v. ipi in 26 pts with unresectable Stage IIIB/C-IVM1c melanoma with 13 pts previously treated with anti-PD1 therapies. Pts received up to 3 x 108 TCID50CVA21 i.t. on study days 1, 3, 5, 8 and 22, and then q3w for a further 6 series of injections. Ipi (3 mg/kg) q3w was given as 4 i.v. infusions starting at Day 22. Results: Analysis of the prior anti–PD1 treated pts (n=13) revealed that the combination tx was generally well-tolerated with one case of Gr 3 ipi-related liver toxicity observed. Of the tx population, 54% (7/13) had received prior ipi tx in addition to anti-PD1, 85% (11/13) of pts were stage IV M1b/c, with the median time between the last anti-PD1 and first CVA21 and ipi doses being 5.7 and 8.7 weeks, respectively. The mean number of prior systemic therapies including anti-PD1 tx was 2.6. For all pts completing at least the first investigator response assessment (irWHO criteria at Day 106) we observed a confirmed BORR of 38.0% (3/8) and a DCR (CR+PR+SD) of 88% (7/8). Conclusions: Intratumoral CVA21 + ipilimumab treatment in anti–PD1 treated pts has displayed promising clinical activity together with low adverse toxicity and as such this regimen may represent a valuable tx option for pts that have been administered previous lines of immune checkpoint therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02307149.

scholarly journals 673 Precision microbiome mapping identifies a microbiome signature predictive of Immune checkpoint inhibitor response across multiple research study cohorts

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A711-A711
Author(s):  
Matthew Robinson ◽  
Kevin Vervier ◽  
Simon Harris ◽  
David Adams ◽  
Doreen Milne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiome ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
List Type ◽  
Metagenomic Sequencing ◽  
Genome Database ◽  
Sequencing Platform ◽  
Melanoma Patients

BackgroundThe gut microbiome of cancer patients appears to be associated with response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICIs) treatment.1–4 However, the bacteria linked to response differ between published studies.MethodsLongitudinal stool samples were collected from 69 patients with advanced melanoma receiving approved ICIs in the Cambridge (UK) MELRESIST study. Pretreatment samples were analysed by Microbiotica, using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Microbiotica’s sequencing platform comprises the world’s leading Reference Genome Database and advanced Microbiome Bioinformatics to give the most comprehensive and precise mapping of the gut microbiome. This has enabled us to identify gut bacteria associated with ICI response missed using public reference genomes. Published microbiome studies in advanced melanoma,1–3renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)4 were reanalysed with the same platform.ResultsAnalysis of the MELRESIST samples showed an overall change in the microbiome composition between advanced melanoma patients and a panel of healthy donor samples, but not between patients who subsequently responded or did not respond to ICIs. However, we did identify a discrete microbiome signature which correlated with response. This signature predicted response with an accuracy of 93% in the MELRESIST cohort, but was less predictive in the published melanoma cohorts.1–3 Therefore, we developed a bioinformatic analytical model, incorporating an interactive random forest model and the MELRESIST dataset, to identify a microbiome signature which was consistent across all published melanoma studies. This model was validated three times by accurately predicting the outcome of an independent cohort. A final microbiome signature was defined using the validated model on MELRESIST and the three published melanoma cohorts. This was very accurate at predicting response in all four studies combined (91%), or individually (82–100%). This signature was also predictive of response in a NSCLC study and to a lesser extent in RCC. The core of this signature is nine bacteria significantly increased in abundance in responders.ConclusionsAnalysis of the MELRESIST study samples, precision microbiome profiling by the Microbiotica Platform and a validated bioinformatic analysis, have enabled us to identify a unique microbiome signature predictive of response to ICI therapy in four independent melanoma studies. This removes the challenge to the field of different bacteria apparently being associated with response in different studies, and could represent a new microbiome biomarker with clinical application. Nine core bacteria may be driving response and hold potential for co-therapy with ICIs.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee, approval number 11/NE/0312.ReferencesMatson V, Fessler J, Bao R, et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science 2018;359(6371):104–108.Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 2018;359(6371):97–103.Frankel AE, Coughlin LA, Kim J, et al. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing and unbiased metabolomic profiling identify specific human gut microbiota and metabolites associated with immune checkpoint therapy efficacy in melanoma patients. Neoplasia 2017;19(10):848–855.Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 2018;359(6371):91–97.

Clinical activity of fianlimab (REGN3767), a human anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, combined with cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9515-9515
Author(s):  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Ding Wang ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

9515 Background: Fianlimab and cemiplimab are two high-affinity, fully human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies. In a Phase 1 dose escalation study, fianlimab combined with cemiplimab showed an acceptable safety profile and some clinical activity in pts with advanced malignancies. Here, we present safety and clinical activity data from two expansion cohorts of pts with advanced melanoma (anti–programmed cell death/ligand-1 [anti–PD-(L)1] naïve or experienced) who were treated with fianlimab + cemiplimab and had an opportunity for first on-treatment tumor assessment (cut-off date: Jan 4, 2021). Methods: Pts with advanced melanoma who had no prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment (naïve) or prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment within 3 months of screening (experienced) received fianlimab 1600 mg + cemiplimab 350 mg by IV infusion every 3 weeks. Tumor measurements were performed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and subsequently every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: 48 pts with advanced melanoma were treated with the combination therapy: 33 were anti–PD-(L)1 naïve and 15 were anti–PD-(L)1 experienced (median age: 69 years vs 59 years; male: 66.7% vs 46.7%; Caucasian: 87.9% vs 60%). The safety profile (including immune-related adverse events [AEs]) of fianlimab + cemiplimab combination therapy was similar to that of anti–PD-1 monotherapy with one exception. The rate of adrenal insufficiency, 8.3% (4/48) of pts, is similar to the rate previously observed with anti–PD-1 + anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) combination therapy but higher than that observed with anti–PD-1 monotherapy. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 35.4% (17/48) of patients; Grade ≥3 serious TEAEs occurred in 22.9% (11/48) of patients; 8.3% (4/48) of patients discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. The most common TEAEs were fatigue (n = 15, 31.3%) and rash (n = 11, 22.9%). By investigator assessment, objective response rate (includes unconfirmed complete [CR] and partial responses [PR]) was 63.6% (3 CRs and 18 PRs) for anti–PD-(L)1 naïve pts and 13.3% (1 CR and 1 PR) for anti–PD-(L)1 experienced pts. Median progression-free survival and median duration of response for the anti–PD-(L)1 treatment naïve cohort have not been reached. Prognostic clinical markers and tumor biomarkers such as expression of LAG-3, PD-L1, and major histocompatibility complex II are being evaluated. Recruitment is ongoing. Conclusions: The safety profile of fianlimab + cemiplimab is similar to that observed with cemiplimab monotherapy and other anti–PD-1s, with the exception of higher rate of adrenal insufficiency. Fianlimab + cemiplimab combination has shown clinical activity for pts with advanced melanoma that is similar to anti–PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination therapy, but with lower demonstrated rates of TEAEs. Clinical trial information: NCT03005782.

Phase 1 dose escalation study of MGC018, an anti-B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2631-2631
Author(s):  
Sekwon Jang ◽  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Alexander I. Spira ◽  
Ouiam Bakkacha ◽  
Deryk Loo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Tumor Types

2631 Background: MGC018 is an investigational ADC with a duocarmycin payload linked to an anti-B7-H3 monoclonal antibody (mAb). B7-H3 is expressed on multiple solid tumors with limited normal tissue expression. It is hypothesized that MGC018 may exert activity against B7-H3-expressing tumors with an acceptable safety profile. Studies demonstrate that B7-H3 is a significant factor in progression and events of metastasis of multiple tumor types, including melanoma. Methods: This phase 1 study characterizes safety, maximum tolerated or maximum administered dose, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and tumor response per RECIST v1.1 of MGC018 in a 3+3+3 dose escalation design in patients with advanced solid tumors. MGC018 was administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 29 patients of multiple tumor types, which included 3 melanoma patients refractory to ≥2 prior lines of checkpoint therapy. The study completed 5 of 6 planned dose cohorts (0.5 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg) as of the data cutoff of 21 January 2021. The final cohort of 4 mg/kg has 3 patients with ongoing treatment and follow-up at the date of submission. Dosing MGC018 IV every 3 weeks resulted in minimal serum accumulation. At least 1 treatment emergent adverse event occurred in 29 patients (100.0%); most common (≥25%) were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hyperpigmentation, infusion related reaction, nausea, and palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred; one grade 4 neutropenia (2 mg/kg) and one grade 3 fatigue lasting 7 days (4 mg/kg). No febrile neutropenia was reported. The 3 melanoma patients had reductions in target lesion sum of 24.4%, 27.5%, and 35% (unconfirmed partial response) and remain on treatment as of the data cutoff. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 3 mg/kg. Conclusions: Results to date demonstrate a manageable safety profile, with early evidence of clinical activity in pretreated metastatic melanoma. Cohort expansion is ongoing using a recommended phase 2 dose of 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. The planned enrollment includes advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03729596.

scholarly journals Biomarkers for Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-351
Author(s):  
Shridar Ganesan ◽  
Janice Mehnert
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Host Immune System ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Expression Evaluation ◽  
Distinct Features

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has significant clinical activity in diverse cancer classes and can induce durable remissions in even refractory advanced disease. However, only a minority of cancer patients treated with ICB have long-term benefits, and ICB treatment is associated with significant, potentially life-threatening, autoimmune side effects. There is a great need to develop biomarkers of response to guide patient selection to maximize the chance of benefit and prevent unnecessary toxicity, and current biomarkers do not have optimal positive or negative predictive value. A variety of potential biomarkers are currently being developed, including those based on assessment of checkpoint protein expression, evaluation of tumor-intrinsic features including mutation burden and viral infection, evaluation of features of the tumor immune microenvironment including nature of immune cell infiltration, and features of the host such as composition of the gut microbiome. Better understanding of the underlying fundamental mechanisms of immune response and resistance to ICB, along with the use of complementary assays that interrogate distinct features of the tumor, the tumor microenvironment, and host immune system, will allow more precise use of these therapies to optimize patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Antibiotics are associated with decreased progression-free survival of advanced melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e1568812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arielle Elkrief ◽  
Layal El Raichani ◽  
Corentin Richard ◽  
Meriem Messaoudene ◽  
Wiam Belkaid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Melanoma Patients

Dynamics of tumor response in advanced melanoma patients treated with Coxsackievirus A21.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9553-9553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hans Ingemar Andtbacka ◽  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
Howard Kaufman ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Gregory A. Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Coxsackievirus A21 ◽  
Melanoma Patients

Nivolumab in combination with daratumumab, with or without pomalidomide and dexamethasone, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: 2 cohorts of the phase 1 CheckMate 039 safety study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3102-TPS3102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Lesokhin ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Mihaela A. Popa McKiver ◽  
Lili Zhu ◽  
Benedetto Farsaci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspiration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Safety Study ◽  
Myeloma Cells

TPS3102 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is largely incurable despite available therapies, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). As most MM patients (pts) eventually have relapsed/refractory (RR) disease, there is an unmet need. Myeloma cells upregulate PD-L1 [Liu et al, 2007]. Nivolumab (nivo), an immuno-oncology mAb, binds PD-1 on T cells and natural killer cells and inhibits signaling by PD-L1–expressing tumor cells, thus augmenting antitumor immunity. Nivo monotherapy has shown acceptable safety and modest clinical activity in RRMM [Lesokhin et al 2016]. Daratumumab (dara) is a cytolytic mAb that targets CD38+ myeloma cells, inducing antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and apoptosis, and may have an immunomodulatory role via depletion of CD38+ immune-suppressor cells [Dimopoulos et al 2016]. Dara is approved as monotherapy (US: after ≥3 prior lines of therapy; EU: after a prior PI and IMiD and progression on last therapy), and with lenalidomide/dexamethasone (dex) or bortezomib/dex (US: after ≥1 prior line of therapy for both combinations). Combining PD-1 and CD38 mAbs, immunotherapies with different mechanisms of action, may overcome resistance and improve outcomes. This phase 1 safety study (NCT01592370) includes multiple cohorts of nivo as monotherapy or in combination regimens across RR hematologic malignancies; 2 MM cohorts will evaluate nivo plus dara, with or without pomalidomide and dex. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 y, with RRMM after ≥2 prior therapies. Pts are RR to their last regimen, RR to prior IMiD and PI therapy, and agreed to bone marrow aspiration. Primary outcome of safety/tolerability will be measured by incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and laboratory test abnormalities. Secondary endpoints include minimal residual disease, overall response rates and duration of response, and progression-free survival. Study funding: BMS. Writing support: C Tomas, Caudex, funded by BMS. Clinical trial information: NCT01592370.

A phase I study of neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy in locally/regionally advanced melanoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9586-9586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yana Najjar ◽  
Dustin McCurry ◽  
Huang Lin ◽  
Yan Lin ◽  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Cell ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Definitive Surgery

9586 Background: A trial of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (P) in combination with high dose interferon-α (HDI) in high-risk patients (pts) with locoregionally advanced melanoma (mel) has completed enrollment. Methods: Primary endpoint: safety of combination P-HDI. Pts were treated with P x 2 doses followed by definitive surgery, then x1 year. HDI was given concurrently, and both agents were per standard regimen. Tumor and blood samples were obtained at baseline and at surgery (wk 6-8), blood at 6 wks, 3,6,12 months (mos). Results: 30 pts were treated (22 male, 8 female, age 26-83). 16 had cutaneous primary, 3 mucosal, 11 unknown. At enrollment, 16 had recurrent disease, 6 received prior adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab (4) or HDI (2). 16 had AJCC 7 stage IIIB, 9 IIIC, 5 IV. 332 P cycles have been delivered (median 13), 496 doses of HDI induction (median 17), 1329 doses of HDI maintenance (median 44). HDI was dose reduced in 20 pts, discontinued in 27, P discontinued in 8. Radiologic preoperative RR was 77% (95% CI, 59-88) (6 CR, 17 PR). 20% (6) had SD and 1 had PD. All pts underwent definitive surgery. The pathologic complete response (pCR) of 26 pts was 32% (95% CI, 18-51). 6 pts recurred and 3 died. No pt with pCR has recurred. Median f/u time is 17.4 mos, median PFS/OS not reached. Most common grade (Gr) 3 toxicities: hypophosphatemia (10; 33%), fatigue (10; 33%), ↑CPK (6; 20%), ↑lipase (4; 13%). 3 Gr 4 events (↑CPK, hyperglycemia, lymphocyte count decreased). 1 suspected grade 5 event occurred 6 months after completion of therapy. PD-L1 expression at baseline did not correlate with clinical outcomes. In 8 pts with pre and post treatment tumor samples, IHC expression of PD-1, PD-L1, CD11b, CD8, Foxp3 and CD25 increased post-treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant P-HDI has promising clinical activity, although treatment is limited by HDI toxicity. Treatment increases the immune cell infiltrate, and outcomes do not correlate with baseline expression of PD-L1. Longer follow up and further mechanistic studies are underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02339324.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document