BBI608-503-103HCC: A phase Ib/II clinical study of napabucasin (BBI608) in combination with sorafenib or amcasertib (BBI503) in combination with sorafenib (Sor) in adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassel F. El-Rayes ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Stephen Lane Richey ◽  
Trevor Feinstein ◽  
...  

4077 Background: Napabucasin, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting STAT3-driven gene transcription. Amcasertib targets multiple serine threonine stemness kinases and inhibits Nanog and other cancer stemness pathways. Preclinically, potent and broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, alone and in combination with sorafenib. Methods: A phase Ib/II open-label, multi-center study in adult patients with advanced HCC who have not received prior systemic chemotherapy was performed to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) ,according to the criteria for DLT and for dose-escalation of Napabucasin (Arm 1), administered at 160 mg BID (dose level I) and at 240 mg BID (dose level II) in combination with sorafenib and of Amcasertib (Arm 2), administered at 100 mg QD (dose level I) and at 200 mg QD (dose level II) in combination with sorafenib. Results: 20 pts were enrolled, 10 in Arm 1 and 10 in Arm 2. 12 patients were evaluable for DLT determination; 2 pts d/c prior to starting protocol treatment; 11 pts received evaluation by RECIST, 6 pts in Arm 1 and 5 pts in Arm 2. The safety profile was consistent with that of each agent as monotherapy and most common AEs were attributed to (Sor) and included rash, PPE, grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. No signs of drug-drug interactions were observed in pharmacokinetics. Among all patients who received RECIST evaluation, Disease Control Rate (DCR=CR+PR+SD) for Arm 1 was 100% (6/6pts) and 100% (5/5pts) for Arm 2. DCR in ITT Arm 1 population was 67% and 50% in Arm 2. Median OS is not yet reached. Conclusions: In this phase Ib study, RP2D were determined for napabucasin and amcasertib to be safely combined with sorafenib at full dose, showing encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with HCC who have not received prior systemic chemotherapy. A randomized phase II is schedule to start. Clinical trial information: NCD02279719. [Table: see text]

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 569-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joleen Marie Hubbard ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Derek J. Jonker ◽  
Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson ◽  
Alexander Starodub ◽  
...  

569 Background: BBI-608 is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that blocks STAT3-mediated transcription of cancer stemness genes. Potent anti-CSC activity was observed in vitro and in vivo,in mono and combination therapy. In phase I studies, BBI-608 was generally well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity. Methods: A phase Ib open label, multi-center study in pts with advanced CRC was undertaken to confirm the RP2D of BBI-608 in combination with FOLFIRI with or without BEV. BBI-608 was administered at 240 mg BID in combination with FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2infusion) with or without BEV 5 mg/kg, administered bi-weekly until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion was met. Results: 18 heavily pretreated pts with an average of > 3 prior lines of therapy of which 10 pts (56%) previously progressed on FOLFIRI were enrolled. Of the 17 pts evaluable for response, 8 pts received FOLFIRI and 9 pts received FOLFIRI with BEV in combination with BBI-608. Most common adverse events included grade 1 and 2 diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. No dose limiting toxicity or new adverse events were seen, and the safety profile was similar to that of each regimen as monotherapy. Grade 3 events related to protocol therapy included diarrhea occurring in 3 pts, fatigue in 2 pts and dehydration in 1 pt. All events resolved after dose reduction and/or start of anti-diarrheal medications. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 16 of 17 evaluable pts (94%) with 2 PR (per RECIST 1.1 criteria: 44% and 33% regression) and 14 SD (of which 13 (93%) had tumor regression < 25%). In the evaluable pts, median progression free survival was 5.54 months. Of 17 pts, 7 (41%) had prolonged SD of > 6 months. Conclusions: This phase Ib study confirmed that BBI-608 at 240 mg bid can be safely combined with FOLFIRI with and without BEV, and shows encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated CRC pts, even in pts with prior progression on FOLFIRI-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13525-e13525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren P. Mason ◽  
Paula de Robles ◽  
Laura Borodyansky ◽  
Matthew Hitron ◽  
Waldo Feliu Ortuzar ◽  
...  

e13525 Background: Napabucasin, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting STAT3-driven gene transcription. Pre-clinically, potent and broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, alone and in combination with other agents. PK studies demonstrated napabucasin penetration in the murine orthotopic GBM model. Methods: A phase Ib/II open-label, multi-center study in pts with GBM at first recurrence who have not received bevacizumab, was performed to determine safety and preliminary activity of napabucasin administered orally at 480mg BID po in combination with TMZ 150mg/m²/day po; days 1 through 5 of each 28 day cycle, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A 6-patient safety cohort was planned to evaluate the occurrence of DLT during the first 28 days of combination treatment with napabucasin and TMZ. 4 additional patients have been enrolled under the RP2D expansion phase. Results: 11 pts have been enrolled to date; no DLT was observed in the safety cohort and the RP2D of the combination is 480 mg BID for napabucasin. The safety profile was consistent with that of each agent as monotherapy and most common AEs included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Two patients requested to withdraw treatment due to concurrent conditions and AE s. 9 patients were evaluable by RANO; Disease Control Rate was observed in 5 patients (55.5%) of which 4 achieved PR (44.4%) and 1 achieved SD (11.1%). The Overall response rate was 44.4% in the evaluable patients. Conclusions: This phase Ib/II study demonstrated that napabucasin at 480 mg BID can be safely combined with temozolomide at full dose and showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02315534. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 677-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Larson ◽  
Waldo Feliu Ortuzar ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
Kristen Keon Ciombor ◽  
...  

677 Background: Napabucasin a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinically, potent and broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, alone and in combination with other agents. In a phase 1 study, napabucasin monotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity at the RP2D of 500 mg BID. Methods: The current open-label, multi-center study includes phase II expansion in pts with refractory, K- Raswt mCRC to confirm safety and anti-tumor activity of napabucasin administered orally at 480mg BID in combination with panitumumab (6mg/kg bi-weekly). Results: 72 pts were enrolled, 48 pts were evaluable by RECIST of which 7 (15%) and 41 (85%) had 2 or >3 prior treatment lines, respectively. Of the 48 evaluable pts, 64.6% (31/48) were previously treated with an anti-EGFR agent. No new adverse events (AEs) were observed and most common AEs included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Among 48 pts enrolled who received RECIST evaluation, Disease Control Rate (DCR) was observed in 25 pts (52.1%) of which 3 pts achieved PR (6%) and 22 pts achieved SD (45%). Among 31 pts previously treated with anti-EGFR therapy, DCR was observed in 15 pts (48%) compared with DCR of 59% observed in 10 out of 17 anti-EGFR naïve pts receiving a scan. Conclusions: This phase II study confirmed that napabucasin can be safely combined with panitumumab at full dose and shows encouraging anti-tumor activity in pts with K- Ras wt mCRC, regardless of prior anti-EGFR exposure, suggesting that napabucasin may sensitize pts to repeat anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01776307. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin van den Bent ◽  
Analia Azaro ◽  
Filip De Vos ◽  
Juan Sepulveda ◽  
W. K. Alfred Yung ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or identify the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) for combined INC280 and buparlisib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma with homozygous phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) deletion, mutation or protein loss. Methods This multicenter, open-label, Phase Ib/II study included adult patients with glioblastoma with mesenchymal-epithelial transcription factor (c-Met) amplification. In Phase Ib, patients received INC280 as capsules or tablets in combination with buparlisib. In Phase II, patients received INC280 only. Response was assessed centrally using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology response criteria for high-grade gliomas. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded. Results 33 patients entered Phase Ib, 32 with altered PTEN. RP2D was not declared due to potential drug–drug interactions, which may have resulted in lack of efficacy; thus, Phase II, including 10 patients, was continued with INC280 monotherapy only. Best response was stable disease in 30% of patients. In the selected patient population, enrollment was halted due to limited activity with INC280 monotherapy. In Phase Ib, the most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (36.4%), nausea (30.3%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (30.3%). MTD was identified at INC280 Tab 300 mg twice daily + buparlisib 80 mg once daily. In Phase II, the most common AEs were headache (40.0%), constipation (30.0%), fatigue (30.0%) and increased lipase (30.0%). Conclusion The combination of INC280/buparlisib resulted in no clear activity in patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma. More stringent molecular selection strategies might produce better outcomes. Trial registration: NCT01870726.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 284-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safi Shahda ◽  
Bassel F. El-Rayes ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Alexander Starodub ◽  
Wahid Tewfik Hanna ◽  
...  

284 Background: BBI-608 is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that works by blocking STAT3-mediated transcription of cancer stemness genes. Potent anti-CSC activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, in mono- and combination therapy. In phase I studies, BBI-608 was generally well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity. Methods: A phase Ib open label, multi-center study in pts with mPDAC was performed to determine RP2D, safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-cancer activity of BBI-608 in combination with Gemcitabine and nab-PTX. BBI-608 was administered at 240 mg BID in combination with Gemcitabine 125 mg/m2 and nab-PTX 1000 mg/m2administered weekly for 3 out every 4 weeks until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion was met. Results: 31 pts were enrolled and received BBI-608 in combination with Gemcitabine and nab-PTX for a total sum of 83 study cycles. 25 of 31 pts (80.6%) were treatment-naïve and 6 pts (19.4%) received 1 prior line of systemic therapy. Most common adverse events included grade 1 diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and fatigue. Combination treatment was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity observed and safety profile similar to that of each agent individually. One patient experienced grade 3 event of dehydration related to protocol therapy which resolved with hydration. Of the 8 pts enrolled in the RP2D determination portion of the study, 7 pts were evaluable for response with disease control (PR + SD) was observed in 7/7 pts (100%). Tumor regression was observed in 6/7 (85.7%) with 3 PR (41.3%, 37.6% and 33.3% regression) and 3 SD (25.8%, 21.1%, and 19.9% regression). The median progression free survival was 7.8 months with PR or SD of > 6 months in 6/8 pts (75%). Conclusions: This phase Ib study demonstrated that BBI-608 at 240 mg BID can be safely combined with Gemcitabine and nab-PTX. Encouraging anti-tumor activity with durable response was observed in pts with mPDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02231723.


1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-472
Author(s):  
Tsong-Mei Tsai ◽  
Brian F Shea ◽  
Paul F Souney ◽  
Fred G Volinsky ◽  
Joseph M Scavone ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: TO study the effects of ofloxacin on the reliability of urine glucose testing. DESIGN: Open-label, nonrandomized. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary care hospital, ambulatory clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy volunteers (8 men and 2 women) aged 22-39 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Phase I (in vitro) involved the addition of selected amounts of ofloxacin to a set of standard 50-mL urine samples prepared to simulate glycosuria. Phase II (in vivo) involved the oral administration of ofloxacin 400 mg to 10 subjects. Urine was collected: (1) immediately predose, (2) pooled 0–4 hours postdose, and (3) pooled 4–8 hours postdose. Known glucose concentrations were then added to these samples. Clinitest and Diastix tests were performed on all samples. The accuracy of these tests in determining glucose concentrations was compared among urine samples taken before and after ofloxacin dosing. RESULTS: None of the ofloxacin concentrations in phase I (0,25,50, 100, 200,400, and 800 μg/mL) influenced these testing methods at the urine glucose concentrations of 0.0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2%. Likewise, the accuracy of these two tests was unaffected by ofloxacin administration in phase II. CONCLUSIONS: In single-dose administration, ofloxacin does not interfere with Clinitest or Diastix for determining urine glucose concentrations. Supported by a grant from the RW Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute. Presented in abstract form at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy 1994 Winter Practice and Research Forum, February 6–9, 1994, San Diego. CA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
Li-Yuan Bai ◽  
Ming-Huang Chen ◽  
Joleen M. Hubbard ◽  
Kabir Mody ◽  
...  

312 Background: Silmitasertib (CX-4945), an oral small molecule inhibitor of casein kinase 2 (CK2), has exhibited preclinical antitumor activity and strong synergism with gemcitabine + cisplatin. We investigated the safety and efficacy of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: S4-13-001 is a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. The phase Ib portion included dose-escalation, expansion, and exploratory cohorts of silmitasertib with doses ranging from 200 to 1000 mg bid (6 days for the escalation/expansion cohorts and 10 and 21 days’ continuous dosing for the exploratory cohorts). In the phase II portion patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg bid for 10 days in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin on days 1 & 8 over a 21-day cycle. In this interim analysis, we present findings from the combined population of patients from the phase Ib and II portions of the study. Response to treatment was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02128282). Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled and received silmitasertib in the phase Ib (n=50) and phase II (n=37) portions of the study. Of these, 55 patients were evaluable for efficacy with details as follows: median PFS 11.1 (95% CI 7.6–14.7) months; median overall survival (OS) 17.4 (95% CI 13.4–25.7) months; overall response rate (ORR) 32.1%; and disease control rate (DCR) 79.3%. Almost all patients (79/87; 90.8%) evaluable for safety reported ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib were diarrhea (65.5%), nausea (50.6%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), and anemia (21.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were diarrhea (13.8%), neutropenia (11.5%), nausea (9.2%), anemia (8.0%), and thrombocytopenia (8.0%). Eleven patients (12.6%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin yields promising preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. Based on these data a randomized phase III trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi9-vi10
Author(s):  
Sylvia Kurz ◽  
Joshua S Silverman ◽  
Tsivia Hochman ◽  
Lakshmi Nayak ◽  
Isabel Arrillaga-Romany ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND There is no effective therapy for patients (pts) with IDH-mutant gliomas that progress after RT and chemotherapy. At time of progression, these tumors have often transformed to glioblastoma (GBM) and have increased numbers of somatic mutations, i.e. have a “hypermutator phenotype”. We hypothesized that there is synergistic efficacy of Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with HFRT in pts with secondarily transformed IDH-mutant GBMs. Safety-lead-in results will be presented. METHODS This is a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of Avelumab with HFRT in adults with transformed IDH-mutant GBM who previously received RT and TMZ and/or PCV. All pts received Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV followed at Day 8 by HFRT (25 Gy in 5 daily 5-Gy fractions) and then Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. A 3 + 3 design was used for a 6-patient safety-lead-in cohort. Adverse events were recorded according to CTCAE. RESULTS Six pts (F=4, M=2) with a median age= 45.5 yrs (range 31.5–54.4 yrs) were enrolled in the safety-lead-in cohort. No DLT was observed. Grade ≥ 3 AEs included increased cerebral edema (3 pts), hyponatremia (1 pt) and worsening hemiparesis (3 pts). Grade ≤ 2 AEs included nausea, hypothyroidism, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, transaminase elevation, and fever/chills. Median follow-up time was 8.9 mo. Best treatment response was SD in 1 patient. At time of last follow-up all pts have discontinued treatment for PD. Median PFS was 4.2 mo (range 1.4–5.7). Median OS was 10.1 (range 6.8–21+) mo. 4 pts (67%) died, 2 pts remain alive in follow-up at 6.9 and 21.6 months after treatment initiation. The study was closed after the safety lead-in completed enrollment due to slow accrual. CONCLUSIONS Avelumab combined with HFRT was tolerable without dose-limiting toxicity in this safety-lead-in cohort of adult patients with transformed IDH-mutant GBM. Further studies are necessary to determine efficacy of this treatment regimen.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v907 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jespersen ◽  
R. Olofsson Bagge ◽  
G. Ullenhag ◽  
A. Carneiro ◽  
H. Helgadottir ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5556-5556 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Belau ◽  
J. Pfisterer ◽  
P. Wimberger ◽  
C. Kurzeder ◽  
A. Du Bois ◽  
...  

5556 Background: The trifunctional antibody catumaxomab specifically binds EpCAM+ tumor cells, CD3+ T lymphocytes and accessory cells via the Fcγ RI/III thereby inducing a tumor specific cell mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. This study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of two different regimens of catumaxomab. Methods: Women with platinum-refractory (progressing during or ≤ 6 mos. after the last platinum containing regimen) epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable recurrent disease were randomized to receive either 10 -10 -10 - 10 μg or 10–20–50–100 μg of catumaxomab over 6h i.p on days 0, 3, 7 and 10. Results: 45 pts. were entered (22 high dose (HD)-arm, 23 low dose (LD)-arm). Both groups were well balanced concerning ECOG-perfomance score, with a median age of 65.6y in the HD- and 57.6y in the LD-arm and with a median diameter of measurable lesions of 90mm in the HD- and 104mm in the LD-arm. Based on the AEs, changes in laboratory parameters and other safety variables observed in the safety population in the course of this study, the accumulated safety experience is consistent with the key features of the mode of action of catumaxomab. Their intensity on median level was mostly mild to moderate. A clinical benefit was detectable in 27.3% of pts. for the HD- (1PR/5SD) and 8.7% of pts. for the LD-arm (2SD). After a median follow-up of 4.96 months, the median overall survival time was 182 d for the HD- and 114 d for the LD-arm. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that catumaxomab is safe with acceptable toxicity when administered as a sequence of 4 IP infusions at 10, 20, 50 and 100 μg. A modest dose effect is observed for the higher doses of catumaxomab. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document