Updated results of single-agent ibrutinib in recurrent/refractory primary (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7515-7515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Igor T. Gavrilovic ◽  
Thomas Joseph Kaley ◽  
Craig Nolan ◽  
Antonio Marcilio Padula Omuro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Best Response

7515 Background: PCNSL is an aggressive primary brain tumor with median progression free survival (PFS) after upfront methotrexate-based chemotherapy of 2-3 years. Outcome and treatment options are poor for recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease. Ibrutinib has shown promising clinical response in Mantle cell lymphoma, CLL, Marginal Zone, and Waldenström. This trial investigates Ibrutinib in patients with r/r PCNSL and SCNSL. Methods: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL or SCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and unrestricted number of CNS directed prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL disease, systemic disease needed to be absent. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled (3 at 560 mg; 22 at 840 mg). Median age was 68 (range 21-85); 15 were women. Median ECOG was 1 (0: 2, 1: 15, 2: 8). 64% had PCNSL and 36% SCNSL; 68% had recurrent disease. Seventeen had parenchymal disease, 3 isolated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement and 5 both. Seven grade 4 adverse events were observed in 7 patients neutropenia (in 3 patients), lymphopenia (2), sepsis (1), and ALT elevation (1). Fourteen patients developed 20 grade 3 toxicities, including lymphopenia in 5 patients, hyperglycemia in 3, ALT elevation in 2, thrombocytopenia in 2, lung infection in 2, AST elevation in 1, neutropenia in 1, urinary tract infection in 1, colitis in 1, febrile neutropenia in 1 and fungal encephalitis in 1. The most common toxicities at any grade were hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia and anemia of which most were grade 1/2. No grade 5 events have been observed. After a median follow-up of 414 days (range 289-674), 22/25 patients were evaluated for response (3 did not complete at least 15 days of drug treatment). Over all response was 68% (17/22; 77% (17/22) in patient that completed at least 15 days of drug treatment) with 10 CR, 7 PR, 2 SD and 3 PD as best response. The median PFS is 4.6 months (5.4 months in patients that completed at least 15 days of drug treatment; longest: 15.3 months). The median overall survival has not been reached. Conclusions: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate Ibrutinib with manageable adverse events. Clinical response was seen in 68% of CNS lymphoma patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02315326.

scholarly journals Phase Ib of Copanlisib in Combination with Ibrutinib in Recurrent/Refractory Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1598-1598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Igor Gavrilovic ◽  
Alexandra M Miller ◽  
Jacqueline B Stone ◽  
Thomas Kaley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Pi3k Inhibitor ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Best Response

BACKGROUND: PCNSL is an aggressive primary brain tumor with median progression free survival (PFS) after upfront methotrexate-based chemotherapy of 2-3 years. Outcome and treatment options are poor for recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease. This trial combines the pan-PI3K inhibitor copanlisib with Ibrutinib in patients with r/r PCNSL. METHODS: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and an unrestricted number of CNS directed prior therapies. Ibrutinib was given orally daily; copanlisib intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Six patients have been enrolled so far and received copanlisib at 60 mg and ibrutinib at 560 mg. Median age was 68 (range 50-77); 3 were women. Median ECOG was 1 (0: 2, 1: 3, 2: 1). All had recurrent parenchymal disease. Three had additional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement. Two had received prior single-agent ibrutinib. Initially, no prophylactic antimicrobial treatment was required. PCP prophylaxis was made mandatory after one patient developed PCP pneumonia leading to a grade 5 lung infection. Four patients are still on trial and one withdrew due to personal choice. Two grade 4 adverse events were observed in 2 patients (LFT elevation, lymphopenia); four grade 3 events in 3 patients (rash, lymphopenia, LFT elevation). The most common toxicities at any grade were transient, infusion-related hyperglycemia and hypertension. No Aspergillus infections have been observed. Enrollment into the next dose level (copanlisib 60 mg, ibrutinib 840 mg) is ongoing. After a median follow-up of 180 days (range 46-249), all patients were evaluated for response with an overall response rate of 67% with 1 CR, 3 PR, 1 SD and 1 PD as best response. CONCLUSION: Treatment with copanlisib and ibrutinib in patients with PCNSL has manageable adverse events after initiation of mandatory PCP prophylaxis. Clinical response was seen in 67% of patients. Disclosures Grommes: Squipps: Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; BTG: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: The combination of the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and the pan PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in recurrent PCNSL will be discussed

scholarly journals Phase II of Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Recurrent/Refractory Primary (PCNSL) and Secondary CNS Lymphoma (SCNSL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2965-2965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Julia Wolfe ◽  
Igor Gavrilovic ◽  
Thomas Kaley ◽  
Jacqueline Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: PCNSL is an aggressive primary brain tumor with median progression free survival (PFS) after upfront methotrexate-based chemotherapy of 2-3 years. Outcome and treatment options are poor for recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease. Ibrutinib has shown promising clinical response in various B-cell malignancies. This trial investigates Ibrutinib in patients with r/r PCNSL and SCNSL. METHODS: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL or SCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and unrestricted number of CNS directed prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL, systemic disease needed to be absent. All patients needed to have at least one prior CNS directed therapy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled; 3 received ibrutinib at 560mg and 41 at 840mg. Median age was 68 years (range 21-90); 20 were women. Median ECOG was 1 (0: 11, 1: 22, 2: 11); 29 had PCNSL and 15 SCNSL; 61% had recurrent disease. Twenty-four had isolated parenchymal disease, 4 isolated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement and 16 both. No grade 5 event has been observed. Eleven patients experienced 12 grade 4 adverse events: neutropenia (in 5 patients), lymphopenia (2), ALT elevation (1), combined ALT/AST elevation (1), sepsis (1), and pneumonitis (1). Seventeen patients experienced 35 grade 3 adverse events (most common: lymphopenia in 4, ALT elevation (3), hyperglycemia (3), urinary tract infection (3), decreased WBC (2), lung infection (2), and thrombocytopenia (2)). Treatment was stopped due to adverse events in 3 patients (grade 4 pulmonitis, grade 4 liver toxicity, grade 3 infectious encephalitis). Twenty-four patients did not experience ≥3 grade adverse events. The most common toxicities at any grade were thrombocytopenia (73%), hyperglycemia (55%), anemia (43%), hypercholesterolemia (43%) and hypertriglyceridemia (43%) of which most were grade 1/2. Only 1 Aspergillus infection has been observed in a patient with chronic steroid use. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1.5-39), 40/44 patients were evaluated for response (4 did not complete at least 15 days of drug treatment due to deteriorating clinical status or withdrawal from study). Overall response was 78% (31/40; 81% (22/27) in PCNSL; 69% (9/13) in SCNSL) with 17 CR, 14 PR, 4 SD and 5 PD as best response. The median PFS is 4 months (5.4 months in patients that completed at least 15 days of drug treatment; longest: 16.5 months). The median overall survival is 19.5 months. CONCLUSION: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate Ibrutinib with manageable adverse events. Clinical response was seen in 78% of CNS lymphoma patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase 1B of ibrutinib and high-dose methotrexate for recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7533-7533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Jacqueline Stone ◽  
Craig Nolan ◽  
Elina Tsyvkin ◽  
Julia Wolfe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Phase 1B

7533 Background: Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Outcome and treatment options for patients with recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease are poor. We have observed promising efficacy of single agent ibrutinib in r/r PCNSL and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL). In this phase 1B trial, we investigate the toxicity of ibrutinib in combination with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in r/r PCNSL/SCNSL. Methods: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL/SCNSL or newly diagnosed SCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and with any number and type of prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL disease, systemic disease needed to be absent. HD-MTX was given at 3.5g/m2 every 2 weeks for a total of 8 doses. To minimize adverse events, ibrutinib was stopped on days of HD-MTX infusion and was restarted 5 days after MTX infusion or after completion of MTX-clearance, if clearance of MTX required more than 5 days. Ibrutinib was continued daily after completion of 8 doses of MTX. Results: Six patients have been enrolled; 3 received 560mg and 3 received 840mg ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX. Median age was 62 (range 43-74); median ECOG 1 (0:2; 1:3; 2:1). Two had r/r PCNSL and 4 SCNSL. Three had brain disease, one isolated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement and two parenchymal and CSF involvement. Three patients had recurrent (2 PCNSL; 1 SCNSL), two refractory (both SCNSL), and one newly diagnosed disease (SCNSL). There were no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 events were observed in 5 patients (lymphopenia in 3, ALT elevation in 2, diarrhea in 1, electrolyte changes in 1, hypertension in 1). The most common adverse events were hypokalemia, low WBC, hyperglycemia, ALT and AST elevation. There was no dose reduction of methotrexate or ibrutinib in any patient. After a median follow-up of 130 days, all patients were evaluated for response after 4 doses of HD-MTX, with 4/6 (67%) showing a response: 2 CR, 2 PR, and 1 SD, 1 PD; both non-responders were refractory SCNSL. Ibrutinib concentrations were measured in plasma and CSF. Conclusions: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate the combination of HD-MTX and Ibrutinib (at 560 and 840mg) well. Continued enrollment into a combination arm that includes rituximab, methotrexate and ibrutinib is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02315326.

Safety and activity of nivolumab monotherapy in advanced and metastatic (A/M) gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEC): Results from the CheckMate-032 study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung T. Le ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Response

6 Background: Patients (pts) with GC/GEC often present with A/M disease, which has a poor prognosis, with 1-year survival < 30%, and few treatment options. Nivolumab is a fully human anti-PD-1 IgG4 monoclonal antibody with a favorable safety profile and efficacy in melanoma, non–small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. The phase I/II, open-label CheckMate-032 study evaluated nivolumab ± ipilimumab in pts with solid tumors. Here, we report initial results for pts with GEC/GC receiving nivolumab monotherapy. Methods: Pts with A/M histologically confirmed GC/GEC, irrespective of PD-L1 status, were assigned to receive nivolumab alone (3 mg/kg IV Q2W) and treated until disease progression (PD) or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); other endpoints included safety, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker status. Results: 59 pts were enrolled and treated with single-agent nivolumab. Median age was 60 y (range 29–80), and 83% of pts received ≥ 2 prior regimens. At database lock, 10 pts were on active treatment; 49 pts discontinued (PD, n = 40; unrelated adverse events, n = 4; treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs], n = 2; other, n = 3). Pts received a median of 4 doses (range 1–25). ORR was 12% (n = 7/58; 1 complete response, 6 partial responses); 12 pts (21%) had stable disease. Among responders, median duration of response was 7.1 mo (95% CI, 3.0–13.2). Median OS was 6.8 mo (95% CI, 3.3–12.4); 12-mo OS rate was 38% (95% CI, 23.2–52.7). 39% of tumor samples were PD-L1 positive ( ≥ 1% cutoff). ORRs in pts with PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors were 18% and 12%, respectively. TRAEs occurred in 66% of pts; most were Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 14% of pts and included pneumonitis, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, hypothyroidism, and increased aspartate and alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Nivolumab monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with GC/GEC. Objective responses occurred in pts with PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT01928394.

A phase Ib/II study of selinexor in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): SeliGIST/GEIS-41 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11534-11534
Author(s):  
Cesar Serrano ◽  
Claudia Valverde ◽  
Josefina Cruz Jurado ◽  
Javier Martinez-Trufero ◽  
Xavier Guri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antitumoral Activity ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

11534 Background: KIT or PDGFRA oncogenic activation drives GIST progression throughout the disease course. Accordingly, currently approved agents in metastatic GIST focus on the therapeutic suppression of these receptors. However, the clinical benefit after imatinib (IM) progression is still modest, suggesting the co-operation of KIT/PDGFRA-independent mechanisms in GIST cell survival. Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export, and preclinical studies evidenced antitumoral activity in GIST as single agent and in combination with IM in both IM-sensitive and IM-resistant models. Methods: The phase Ib portion studied IM 400 mg daily plus weekly selinexor in patients (pts) with IM-resistant, advanced GIST. Prior intolerance to IM was not allowed. A standard 3+3 dosing schema was utilized to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of this combination. Investigator-assessed response was evaluated every 8 weeks using RECIST 1.1. Results: At data cutoff of Sep 25, 2020, 12 pts were enrolled and received treatment with IM 400 mg and selinexor once weekly at dose levels (DL) 1 (60 mg), DL2 (80 mg) and DL3 (100 mg). Median age 57 (range 46-77), 42% female, median prior therapies 4 (range 2-7). Although only 1/6 pts developed a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at DL3, the RP2D was defined at DL2 (IM 400 mg daily and selinexor 80 mg once weekly) based on activity data in the DL2 and the need for dose reductions in 5/6 pts at DL3 after the DLT window. All pts were evaluable for toxicity and response. One DLT occurred at DL3 (G3 nausea). Non-DLT G3/4 toxicities were anemia (1/12 pts), neutropenia (1/12 pts), vomiting (1/12 pts) and fatigue (2/12 pts). Common G1/2 toxicities were nausea (11/12 pts), vomiting (10/12 pts), neutropenia (5/12 pts) and anemia, fatigue, diarrhea, and periorbital edema (4/12 pts each). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Overall response rate in the 12 pts evaluable for response was 67% (95% CI 0.349-0.901), with 2 pts achieving PR (17%) and 6 pts SD (50%) as the best response. Clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR, PR, SD) ≥ 16 weeks was 42% (95% CI 0.157-0.723). Median progression free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.7-7.3). Four pts remain on trial at data cutoff. Conclusions: IM and selinexor combination is well-tolerated and has clinical activity in heavily pretreated GIST pts. The trial is currently exploring selinexor as single agent in the IM-resistant GIST population. Clinical trial information: NCT04138381.

Phase I Trial of Intravenous Administration of PV701, an Oncolytic Virus, in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2251-2266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Pecora ◽  
Naiyer Rizvi ◽  
Gary I. Cohen ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Daniel Sterman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Intravenous Administration ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Repeat Dose ◽  
Tumor Cell Membrane ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Higher Doses

PURPOSE: PV701, a replication-competent strain of Newcastle disease virus, causes regression of tumor xenografts after intravenous administration. This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of single and multiple intravenous doses of PV701 as a single agent in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with advanced solid cancers that were unresponsive to standard therapy were enrolled. Four PV701 intravenous dosing regimens were evaluated: (1) single dose: one dose every 28 days; (2) repeat dose: three doses in 1 week every 28 days; (3) desensitizing: one lower dose followed by two higher doses in 1 week every 28 days; and (4) two week: one lower dose followed by five higher doses over 2 weeks every 21 days. RESULTS: A 100-fold dose intensification was achieved over 195 cycles. A first-dose MTD of 12 × 109 plaque-forming units (PFU)/m2 was established for outpatient dosing. After an initial dose of 12 × 109 PFU/m2, patients tolerated an MTD for subsequent doses of 120 × 109 PFU/m2. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms that occurred principally after the first dose and were decreased in number and severity with each subsequent dose. Tumor site–specific adverse events and acute dosing reactions were also observed but not cumulative toxicity. Objective responses occurred at higher dose levels, and progression-free survival ranged from 4 to 31 months. Tumor tissue from one patient was obtained after 11 months of therapy and showed evidence of PV701 particles budding from the tumor cell membrane by electron microscopy and a pronounced lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate by histologic examination. CONCLUSION: PV701 warrants further study as a novel therapeutic agent for cancer patients.

A phase 1b multicenter study of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEC) after at least one line of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum (FP) containing regimen.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16006-e16006
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Kit Wah Tam ◽  
Edward Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Samuel Ejadi ◽  
Fa Chyi Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B

e16006 Background: FTD/TPI, an antimetabolite, is approved for treatment of refractory mGEC. This study sought to determine whether the combination of FTD/TPI with IRI (“TASIRI”) was safe and effective in mGEC previously treated with FP. Methods: This investigator‐initiated, multicenter, open‐label, single-dose level, single‐arm phase 1b study enrolled pts with mGEC previously treated with at least one line of FP containing regimen. FTD/TPI was given at 25 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 5 with 180 mg/m2 IRI on day 1 of a 14‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at six months (mo) (PFS-6). The aim was to show an improvement of PFS-6 from 15% to at least 30% based on historical controls. Results: At the time of data-cutoff (03Feb2021), 23 pts were screened and ultimately 20 pts were treated. The study met its primary endpoint. With a median follow-up of 9.8 mo (range 0.7 – 17), 8 pts are still on treatment and 4 pts have died. PFS-6 is 53.9% (lower limit of 95% CI: 28%). Median PFS and overall survival are 6.9 mo and not reached, respectively. At the time of data-cutoff, data were available for 13 pts with measurable disease by RECIST criteria and at least 1 on-treatment scan. Of those, 11 had stable disease and 2 had progressive disease as best response (5 pts had tumor shrinkage < 30%), therefore the disease control rate was 84.6%. The most common any grade (G) treatment related adverse events (TRAE) were nausea (n = 14, 70%), diarrhea (n = 9, 45%), and fatigue (n = 8, 40%). G3-4 TRAE in > 5% of pts were anemia (17%) and neutropenia (9%). 2 serious TRAE were reported: G4 febrile neutropenia (n = 1) and G3 hypotension (n = 1). There was no G5 TRAE. Conclusions: The combination of TASIRI showed encouraging clinical activity with a meaningful improvement in PFS-6 compared to historic controls. TASIRI was well tolerated and no new safety signals were seen. TASIRI warrants further investigation for patients with refractory mGEC and limited treatment options. Updated results with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04074343.

scholarly journals Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With Gemcitabine-Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Aram F. Hezel ◽  
Thomas Abrams ◽  
Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Gemcitabine Refractory

PurposeThe PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is activated in the majority of pancreatic cancers, and inhibition of this pathway has antitumor effects in preclinical studies. We performed a multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II study of RAD001(everolimus), an oral inhibitor of mTOR, in patients who experienced treatment failure on first-line therapy with gemcitabine.Patients and MethodsThirty-three patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated continuously with RAD001 at 10 mg daily. Prior treatment with fluorouracil in the perioperative setting was allowed. Patients were observed for toxicity, treatment response, and survival.ResultsTreatment with single-agent RAD001 was well-tolerated; the most common adverse events were mild hyperglycemia and thrombocytopenia. No patients were removed from the study because of drug-related adverse events. No complete or partial treatment responses were noted, and only seven patients (21%) had stable disease at the first restaging scans performed at 2 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. One patient (3%) had a biochemical response, defined as ≥ 50% reduction in serum CA19-9.ConclusionAlthough well-tolerated, RAD001 administered as a single-agent had minimal clinical activity in patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer. Future studies in metastatic pancreatic cancer should assess the combination of mTOR inhibitors with other agents and/or examine inhibitors of other components of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.

Phase I Study of Single Agent Ibrutinib in Recurrent/Refractory Primary and Secondary CNS Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3960-3960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grommes Christian ◽  
Kaley Thomas ◽  
Omar Abdel-Wahab ◽  
Antonio M. Omuro ◽  
Mellinghoff Ingo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Level 2

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Standard treatment of PCNSL may include radiation, methotrexate-based therapy, and anti-CD20 antibody therapy (rituximab) and is associated with substantial morbidity and treatment recurrence. Outcome and treatment options for patients with recurrent/refractory disease are poor. There is only limited use of targeted agents in this patient population. Ibrutinib has shown promising clinical response in some B-cell malignancies. This phase I trial investigates the maximal tolerated dose of ibrutinib in patients with recurrent/refractory PCNSL and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL). METHODS: Eligible patients had a recurrent or refractory PCNSL or SCNSL, age≥18, KPS≥50, normal end-organ function, and unrestricted number and type of prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL disease, systemic disease needed to be absent or not requiring any active treatment. RESULTS: Three patients have been enrolled at dose level 1 (560 mg daily) and one patient at dose level 2 (840mg daily) of whom three were women with a median age of 70 years (range 21-80). Three had recurrent PCNSL and 1 recurrent SCNSL. Two patients presented with parenchymal and two with leptomeningeal relapse. Treatment was generally well tolerated. There was one drug-related grade 4 toxicity (neutropenia) that resolved after the drug was held for 4 days. No drug related grade 3 toxicities have been observed to date. Most common grade 2 toxicities were decreased neutrophil count and hyperglycemia. All patients continue on study at a median follow up of 87 days. Three out of four patient were evaluated for response so far. There were two responses: one complete (in the CSF) and one partial, both in recurrent/refractory PCNSL as well as one stable disease in the patient with recurrent SCNSL. The patient with partial response had failed multiple prior treatment regimens including methotrexate-based chemotherapy, radiation, and rituximab/temozolomide. Serum and CSF pharmacokinetic analysis is initiated. Dose level 2 (840mg) is accruing. CONCLUSION: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate Ibrutinib at 560 and 840mg well. Dose escalation will continue. Targeted agents might be an alternative therapeutic approach to be investigated for refractory/recurrent CNS lymphoma patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase II study of the combination of thalidomide and irinotecan in patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas not on enzyme inducing anticonvulsants

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1564-1564 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Puduvalli ◽  
P. Giglio ◽  
M. D. Groves ◽  
K. R. Hess ◽  
M. Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mr Perfusion Imaging ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Anaplastic Gliomas ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

1564 Background: Patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) have few treatment options after initial alkylating agent therapy. In this study, the efficacy of thalidomide and irinotecan against recurrent AG was tested to assess if synergistic activity of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents could affect clinical outcome. Methods: Patients with recurrent AG with a KPS≥70 not on enzyme inducing anticonvulsants and with fewer than three relapses after radiation therapy and chemotherapies were eligible; the total planned enrollment is 39 patients. Irinotecan is administered at 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest; thalidomide is initiated at 100 mg daily and escalated weekly up to 400 mg daily. Warfarin (1 mg) is given for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients undergo clinical and radiologic evaluations every 6-weeks. The primary endpoint is progression free survival at 6 months (PFS-6). To determine possible radiologic correlates to treatment effects, DCE- MR perfusion-imaging studies are obtained at baseline and subsequent follow up visits. Results: 17 are evaluable for response; the remainder were inevaluable. All evaluable patients had previously failed temozolomide and 9 had also failed nitrosourea therapy. The median age is 44 yrs and median KPS is 90. Four patients are alive and progression free at 6-months whereas 9 have progressed; the median progression free survival is 23 weeks and the PFS-6 is 34%. The best response was a CR in one patient, PR in 2 and stable disease in 9. Two patients have died of unspecified causes probably related to treatment. Median overall survival has not been reached; the 12-month and 18 month survivals by Kaplan Meier analysis are 73% and 26% respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included fatigue (29%), leukopenia (29%), nausea/vomitting (24%), and diarrhea (18%) requiring dose reductions. Two patients had VTE. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this ongoing study suggest that the combination of irinotecan and thalidomide has activity in patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas; the ongoing assessment of this combination in patients with AG will more definitively define whether the combination can be an effective second line therapy for this population. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document