Real world experience with exemestane and everolimus for advanced HR-positive breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12538-e12538
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Dan Le ◽  
Pierre Camateros ◽  
Caroline A. Lohrisch
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
World Population ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
Dose Reductions ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

e12538 Background: BOLERO-2 demonstrated a significant progression free survival (PFS) advantage for EvEx compared to Ex alone in the treatment of metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer (HP-MBC) following failure with aromatase inhibitor (AI) in menopausal patients. Benefits and harms reported in clinical trials do not always mirror real life, thus we examined the frequency of dose modifications for toxicity and PFS in a real-world population. Methods: Women with HP-MBC started on EvEx between Dec. 2, 2013 and Nov. 1, 2015 in any one of five cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada were identified via the provincial pharmacy database. Clinical and prior treatment details, adverse events, and outcomes were compared to those of the BOLERO-2 study participants. Results: We identified151 patients treated with EvEx: median age was 53 (range 25 – 85), and 60 (40%) were ≤49. ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 122 (81%) and 2-3 in 29 (19%). 135 (89%) received prior treatment for MBC, which included non-steroidal AI in 117 (87%) and chemotherapy in 74 (55%). 94 (62%) received EvEx as 3rd line treatment and beyond. Median follow-up was 714 days (range 10 – 1127); 66 (44%) were alive at time of analysis. Dose reductions, interruptions and discontinuations of everolimus due to toxicity occurred in 32%, 31%, and 30%, respectively, higher than reported in BOLERO-2. Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.9 – 7.7) in our cohort, similar to that of the investigator assessed EvEx arm of BOLERO-2. Majority, 52%, of dose reductions/interruptions occurred within the first month of treatment initiation. Conclusions: We observed similar PFS forEvEx in a real world population compared with BOLERO-2. Dose interruptions and reductions were frequent, but may have enabled patients to tolerate therapy for longer. Discontinuation rates for toxicity were high and may limit the efficacy of the combination in the real world. Recent findings of primary prophylaxis against mucositis may help enhance continuation and dose maintenance (Beck et al. JCO 2016). Alternately, starting at a lower dose of Ev and increasing to tolerance may be worth exploring, as despite higher rates of dose modifications, our PFS rate was similar to that in BOLERO-2.

scholarly journals Real-world efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a study by the Korean Cancer Study Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591987112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Kyu-pyo Kim ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy in the global NAPOLI-1 trial. Real-world data may further clarify the outcomes and safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine-based therapy under a Managed Access Program in Korea. Results: From January 2017 to April 2018, 86 patients across 10 institutions received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (median age, 61 years; 60% male; ECOG performance status, 0–1). A total of 35 (41%) and 51 (59%) patients had received less than two and two or more lines of chemotherapy before inclusion, respectively. At a median follow up of 6.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.4–11.4) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3–5.7). Six-month OS and PFS rates were 65.1% and 37.5%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 10% and 55%, respectively. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37.2%), nausea (10.5%), vomiting (9.3%), anorexia (8.1%) and diarrhoea (4.7%). Conclusion: Real-life data for Korean patients indicate that, consistent with NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and well-tolerated in patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

Fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: A UK retrospective multicenter study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12525-e12525
Author(s):  
Karim Keshwani ◽  
anna lerner ◽  
Benjamin Sanderson ◽  
Ruth E. Board ◽  
Michael Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

e12525 Background: Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor (ER) down regulator used to treat hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. It is used at various time points in treatment. However, variations in funding across the UK limit universal patient access to fulvestrant. We sought to investigate its use and efficacy in UK clinical practice. Methods: Medical records of 458 patients with ER positive advanced breast cancer treated with fulvestrant between August 2011 and November 2018 at ten UK centres were reviewed. Demographics and treatment responses were recorded. Efficacy was analysed by progression free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and overall survival (OS) with alive patients censored to December 2018. Results: Of the 445 patients with analysable data, median age was 70 (range 21-95). ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 70% (n = 285). Bone was most commonly involved (73%, n = 323), 307 (69%) had visceral involvement and 228 (51%) had nodal metastases. Both locally advanced and metastatic patients had received a median 2 (range 0 – 5 for all patients) prior endocrine therapy lines and 0 (range 0 – 6) prior chemotherapy lines. Fulvestrant was the first line treatment in 49 (11%). Median duration of fulvestrant use was 5 months (range 1-88). Overall, median PFS was 6 months. This increased to 7 months in absence of visceral disease, in whom 22% of patients achieved a prolonged PFS extending to 30 months. Fulvestrant produced a CBR of 41% in 355 patients assessed, of which 16% partially responded. First radiological assessment occurred at median 3 months (range 1-37). Progressive disease accounted for 82% of discontinuation compared to 4% owing solely to adverse events in 341 assessed patients. Median OS for the whole cohort was 23 months. Conclusions: This is one of the largest studied patient cohorts treated with fulvestrant. This heavily pre-treated population reflects real life fulvestrant use. Reassuringly the results confirm its clinical benefit in maintaining disease response. Given its potential synergistic action with other systemic agents, fair access to this highly active drug for all patients is as important now as ever before.

scholarly journals Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib Versus Clinical Trial Results in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer That Progressed on Previous Endocrine Therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117822341882323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tam Binh V Bui ◽  
Desirée MT Burgers ◽  
Mariette J Agterof ◽  
Ewoudt MW van de Garde
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
Dose Reductions

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-negative), advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy, and to compare these results with the outcomes of the PALOMA-3 clinical trial. Methods: This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including all patients who started with palbociclib in the St. Antonius Hospital between September 1, 2016 and April 1, 2018 for the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Individual patient data were collected from electronic medical records. Primary study outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the number of permanent treatment discontinuations before disease progression due to adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes were the frequency of all (serious) AEs and the frequency of and reasons for dose reductions, -interruptions and cycle delays. Results: A total of 46 patients were studied with a median follow-up of 13.0 months. Overall, the median PFS in real-world clinical practice was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-15.1), compared with 9.5 months in PALOMA-3 (95% CI 9.2-11.0). Two patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 AE, but with no febrile neutropenia events. Most AEs were managed with palbociclib dose modifications. Regarding these modifications, more cycle delays, less dose reductions, and less dose interruptions occurred in clinical practice compared with PALOMA-3 (59 vs 36%, 22 vs 34%, and 9 vs 54%, respectively). Patients who did not meet the PALOMA-3 study eligibility criteria (n = 16) showed a lower median PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI 4.7-6.4). Conclusions: The effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib in real-world clinical practice corresponded well with the results obtained in the PALOMA-3 clinical trial. Despite the differences in dose modifications, this study suggests that there is no efficacy-effectiveness gap in this patient population.

Randomized clinical trials and real life studies: Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients in oral target therapies for renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110055
Author(s):  
Ruggero Lasala ◽  
Fiorenzo Santoleri ◽  
Alessia Romagnoli ◽  
Felice Musicco ◽  
Paolo Abrate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Target Therapies ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Introduction Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) constitute scientific evidence in support of therapeutic choices when a drug is authorized in the market. In RCTs, patients are selected in a rigorous manner, in order to avoid bias that may influence efficacy assessments. Therefore, patients who take the drug in Real Life Studies (RLSs) are not the same as those participating in RCTs, which, in turn, leads to low data transferability from RCTs to RLS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between RCTs and RLS, in terms of patient baseline characteristics. Materials and Methods Our study includes all oral target therapies for RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma) marketed in Europe before March 31, 2019. For each treatment, we considered both RCTs and RLSs, the former gathered from Summary of Product Characteristics published on the European Medicine Agency (EMA) website, and the latter yielded by our search in relevant literature. For each drug considered, we then compared the baseline characteristics of patients included in the RCT samples with those of the samples included in the RLSs using the Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests. Results We considered six medicines, for a total of 9 pivotal RCTs and 31 RLSs. RCTs reported the same type of patient baseline characteristics, whereas RLSs are more varied in reporting. Some patient baseline characteristics (metastases, previous treatments, etc.) were significantly different between RCTs and RLs. Other characteristics, such as ECOG Performance Status, brain metastases, and comorbidities, liver and kidney failure, are comprised in exclusion criteria of RCTs, though are included in RLS. Discussion and Conclusion: While evaluating equal treatments for the same indications, RCTs and RLSs do not always assess patients with the same characteristics. It would be necessary to produce evidence from RLSs so as to have an idea of treatment effectiveness in patients groups that are not eligible or underrepresented in RCTs.

scholarly journals Real-world effectiveness of post-trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective observational study (KBCSG-TR 1917)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Nakayama ◽  
Tetsuhiro Yoshinami ◽  
Hiroyuki Yasojima ◽  
Nobuyoshi Kittaka ◽  
Masato Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Trastuzumab Emtansine ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
The Real ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Abstract Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a second-line standard therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Evidence regarding post–T-DM1 treatments is currently lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness of post–T-DM1 drug therapy in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study, real-world clinical data of female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who had a history of T-DM1 treatment were consecutively collected from five sites in Japan. We investigated the effectiveness of post–T-DM1 therapy by evaluating the real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Tumor response was assessed by investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) guidelines. Subgroup and exploratory analyses according to background factors were also undertaken. Results Of the 205 patients who received T-DM1 treatment between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018, 128 were included in this study. Among the 128 patients analyzed, 105 (82%) patients received anti-HER2 therapy and 23 (18%) patients received regimens without anti-HER2 therapy. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS, TTF, and OS were 5.7 (4.8–6.9) months, 5.6 (4.6–6.4) months, and 22.8 (18.2–32.4) months, respectively. CBR and ORR (95% CI) were 48% (38.8–56.7) and 23% (15.1–31.4), respectively. Cox-regression analysis showed that an ECOG PS score of 0, a HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 3+, recurrent type, ≥12 month duration of T-DM1 therapy, and anti-HER2 therapy were independent variables for rwPFS. An exploratory subgroup analysis of regimens after T-DM1 showed that those with anti-HER2 therapy had a median rwPFS of 6.3 and those without anti-HER2 therapy had a median rwPFS of 4.8 months. Conclusions In the real-world setting in Japan, several post–T-DM1 regimens for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, including continuation of anti-HER2 therapy, showed some effectiveness; however, this effectiveness was insufficient. Novel therapeutic options are still needed for further improvement of PFS and OS in later treatment settings. Trial registration UMIN000038296; registered on 15 October 2019.

PALOMAGE, a French real-world cohort of elderly women beyond age 70 with advanced breast cancer receiving palbociclib: Baseline characteristics and safety evaluation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1012-1012
Author(s):  
Philippe Caillet ◽  
Marina Pulido ◽  
Etienne Brain ◽  
Claire Falandry ◽  
Isabelle Desmoulins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3

1012 Background: Advanced breast cancer (ABC) is common in older patients, resulting from the high incidence of breast cancer beyond age 70. This population is often limited in clinical trials. Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the standard of care in ABC overexpressing hormonal receptors (HR+). Data specific to older patients are scarce in the literature, deserving further research. Methods: PALOMAGE is an ongoing French prospective study evaluating palbociclib (PAL) + ET in real life setting in women aged ≥70 with HR+ HER2- ABC, split in 2 cohorts: ET sensitive patients with no prior systemic treatment for ABC (cohort A), and ET resistant patients and/or with prior systemic treatment for ABC (cohort B). Data collected include clinical characteristics, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD14) and geriatric description [G8 and Geriatric-COre DatasEt (G-CODE)]. This analysis reports on baseline characteristics and safety data for the whole population. Results: From 10/2018 to 10/2020, 400 and 407 patients were included in cohort A and B, respectively. The median age was 79 years (69-98), 15.1% with an age > 85. ECOG performance status (PS) was ≥2 in 17.9% patients, 68.3% had a G8 score ≤14 suggesting frailty, 32.1% had bone only metastasis, and 44% had visceral disease. 35.8% of patients in cohort B had no prior treatment for ABC. Safety data were available for 787 patients. The median follow-up was 6.7 months (IC95% = 6.1-7.6). At start of treatment, full dose of PAL (125 mg) was used in 76% of the patients: 62.6%, 68.7% and 71.6% of patients aged ≥ 80, those with ECOG PS ≥2 and those with a G8 score ≤14, respectively. In the safety population, 70% had ≥1 adverse event (AE), including 43.1% grade 3/4 AE, and 22.9% ≥ 1 serious AE. Most frequent AE reported were neutropenia (43.2%), anemia (17.5%), asthenia (16.3%) and thrombocytopenia (13.6%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 32.3% of patients, with febrile neutropenia in 1.1%. Grade 3/4 AE PAL-related were reported in 40.1%, 31.4% of patients aged < 80, ≥80, respectively. Regarding PAL, 23.4% of patients had a dose reduction and 41.8% had a temporary or permanent discontinuation due to AE. Safety data were similar in both cohorts. Geriatric data and impact on safety will be presented. Conclusions: PALOMAGE is a unique large real-world cohort focusing on older patients treated with PAL in France. These preliminary data do not suggest any new safety signal, matching data derived from PALOMA trials. The occurrence of less grade3/4 AE related to PAL in patients aged 80 and beyond might reflect the 30% decrease of PAL dose upfront. Effectiveness analyses are eagerly awaited. Clinical trial information: EUPAS23012 .

Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Azim Jalali ◽  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Lucy Gately ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Number Of Patients

71 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. In Australia, TAS-102 was initially made available locally through patients self-funding, later via an industry sponsored Medicine Access Program (MAP) and then via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in real world Australian population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to all TRACC patients and those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Results: Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102 (non-PBS n = 27, PBS n = 80), The median number of patients per site was 7 (range: 1-17). The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 67 for all TRACC patients and 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102 and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 39% vs 49% were RAS wild type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median clinician assessed progression-free survival was 3.3 compared to RECIST defined PFS of 2 months in RECOURSE study, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths in the real-world series, where TAS102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion. In the RECOURSE study there was a 4% febrile neutropenia rate and one treatment-related death. Conclusions: TRACC registry patients treated with TAS102 were younger than both TRACC patients overall and those from the RECOURSE trial. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS. However overall survival outcomes achieved with TAS102 in real world patients were comparable to findings from this pivotal trial with an acceptable rate of major adverse events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document