Prognostic awareness and illness understanding in patients with malignant glioma and their caregivers.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Sophia Landay ◽  
Maya V. Anand ◽  
Katharine M. Quain ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Joseph Greer ◽  
...  

33 Background: Malignant gliomas (MG) are rapidly progressive, incurable tumors. Patients with glioblastoma, the most common MG, have a median survival of approximately 14 months when treated aggressively. Despite this poor prognosis, data is lacking on patients’ and caregivers’ (CGs’) understanding of patients’ prognosis and treatment goals and their communication preferences. We assessed prognostic awareness (PA) in patients with MG and their CGs three months following diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in patients with newly diagnosed MG and their CGs. At three months post-diagnosis, we administered to patients and CGs the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, which assesses illness understanding, goals of treatment, and likelihood of cure. Results: At three months after diagnosis, 82.9% (68/82) of patients and 81.3% (52/64) of CGs reported that knowing prognosis is “extremely” or “very” important, yet only 42.6% (35/82) of patients and 60.9% (39/64) of CGs reported accurate PA, defined as responses of “unlikely,” “very unlikely,” or “no” chance of cure. 46.3% (38/82) of patients and 46.9% (30/64) of CGs reported that their oncologist’s primary goal was to “extend life as long as possible,” while 25.6% (21/82) of patients and 10.9% (7/64) of CGs stated that their oncologist’s goal was to cure their cancer. Patients’ primary goal was most frequently “to cure my cancer” [40.2% (33/82)], while CGs most often presumed that their loved ones’ treatment goal was to “extend life as long as possible” [43.8% (28/64)]. Conclusions: Patients with MG and their CGs report that PA is important, but most patients, and to a lesser degree their CGs, have inaccurate PA. Additionally, patients’ treatment goals differ from CGs’ perceptions of patients’ goals and oncologists’ presumed goals. Patients’ primary goal is often curative, while CGs frequently presume that their loved one’s goal is to prolong life without aiming for cure. Patients and CGs most often presume that their oncologists are primarily aiming to extend survival rather than cure their disease. Further investigation of interventions to improve conversations about prognosis among patients with MG, their CGs and their oncologists is warranted.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 490-497
Author(s):  
Deborah A Forst ◽  
Kit Quain ◽  
Sophia L Landay ◽  
Maya Anand ◽  
Emilia Kaslow-Zieve ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with malignant gliomas have a poor prognosis. However, little is known about patients’ and caregivers’ understanding of the prognosis and the primary treatment goal. Methods We conducted a prospective study in patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas (N = 72) and their caregivers (N = 55). At 12 weeks after diagnosis, we administered the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire to assess understanding of prognosis and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to evaluate mood. We used multivariable regression analyses to explore associations between prognostic understanding and mood and McNemar tests to compare prognostic perceptions among patient-caregiver dyads (N = 48). Results A total of 87.1% (61/70) of patients and 79.6% (43/54) of caregivers reported that it was “very” or “extremely” important to know about the patient’s prognosis. The majority of patients (72.7%, [48/66]) reported that their cancer was curable. Patients who reported that their illness was incurable had greater depressive symptoms (B = 3.01, 95% CI, 0.89-5.14, P = .01). There was no association between caregivers’ prognostic understanding and mood. Among patient-caregiver dyads, patients were more likely than caregivers to report that their primary treatment goal was cure (43.8% [21/48] vs 25.0% [12/48], P = .04) and that the oncologist’s primary goal was cure (29.2% [14/48] vs 8.3% [4/48], P = .02). Conclusions Patients with malignant gliomas frequently hold inaccurate perceptions of the prognosis and treatment goal. Although caregivers more often report an accurate assessment of these metrics, many still report an overly optimistic perception of prognosis. Interventions are needed to enhance prognostic communication and to help patients cope with the associated distress.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi185-vi185
Author(s):  
John Rhee ◽  
Michelle Mesa ◽  
Emilia Kaslow-Zieve ◽  
Lara Traeger ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Malignant gliomas (MG) are incurable tumors with limited survival. Prognostic awareness is essential for informed decision making, but patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions about their illness and prognosis are not well understood. METHODS We conducted a prospective, single-institution study in patients with newly diagnosed MG and their caregivers, following the outpatient visit in which their neuro-oncologist disclosed pathology results and discussed treatment options. Participants (patients and caregivers) completed the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire to assess information preferences, treatment goals and prognostic understanding. RESULTS Of patients approached, 82% (14/17) were eligible and enrolled in the study. The majority of patients were male (9/14, 64%), median age 60 years (range 26-76) and had a glioblastoma (11/14, 79%). Most caregivers were female (8/11, 73%) and married to the patient (7/11, 64%). The majority of patients said their cancer was curable (10/13, 77%, one patient did not answer), while only 3/11 caregivers (27%) said the patient’s cancer was curable. Furthermore, 7/13 patients (54%) and 8/11 caregivers (73%) reported that their oncologist said their cancer was not curable, and the remainder (6/13 patients, 46% and 3/11 caregivers, 27%) said the oncologist “did not say” whether it was curable. Most patients (10/14, 71%) and caregivers (8/11, 73%) expressed a tendency to focus on the best-case scenario in response to information from their oncology team about their cancer. CONCLUSION Although most patients with MG and their caregivers acknowledged being told that their cancer was incurable, the majority of patients reported that their cancer was curable. Patients and caregivers often reported focusing on the best-case scenario regarding their cancer. Further investigation is warranted to explore strategies to support patients and caregivers learning about their incurable cancer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-83
Author(s):  
Asmaa Abo Agag ◽  
Mohammed S ◽  
Al Sayed Hassan ◽  
Magdy Abdel Majid ◽  
Mohmed Gaber

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 435-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila H. Ridner ◽  
Mary S. Dietrich ◽  
Kandace Spotanski ◽  
Jennifer K. Doersam ◽  
Michael S. Cowher ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. ix109
Author(s):  
W. Ben Kridis ◽  
W. Karray ◽  
G. Marrekechi ◽  
A. Khanfir ◽  
M. Frikha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document