Regorafenib tolerance and outcomes in inner-city minority colorectal cancer population.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 722-722
Author(s):  
Ahmed Tarig Ahmed ◽  
Sindhu Janarthanam Malapati ◽  
Barbara Yim ◽  
Sunny R K Singh ◽  
Shweta Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cook County ◽  
Cook County Hospital ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Correct Trial ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
The Us

722 Background: Regorafenib (REG) is an oral multikinase inhibitor used for treatment of metastatic colon cancer after progression on fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy. The FDA approval was based on CORRECT trial showing improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Another trial (CONCUR) showed similar results. However, these trials included predominantly Whites and Asians. Our study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in the underserved, mainly African Americans and Hispanics. Methods: Cook County hospital is the 3rd largest public hospital in the US. All patients with an order for REG were identified from our pharmacy database. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for cancer stage, age, ethnicity, previous treatments, PFS and OS. Patients with non-colorectal cancer, incomplete data, no evidence of REG usage were excluded. Statistical analysis was done by t-test on subgroups. Results: A total of 42 patients were screened and 30 were included in the study. A comparison of outcomes with CORRECT and CONCUR trials is presented in Table 1. Our study patients, despite being less heavily pre-treated, had a worse OS compared to the clinical trials, with similar PFS. There was a trend towards better PFS and OS in women in our study of 4.3 and 4.8 months compared to men with 1.9 and 3.3 months respectively (p = NS). Six (20%) patients discontinued REG due to intolerance within a median of 1.2 months. The intolerant patients had a significantly higher median BMI of 31 compared to 24.9 for patients who continued the medication to progression (p = 0.019). Conclusions: Compared to CORRECT and CONCUR trials, population of predominantly AA and Hispanics showed a trend towards worse OS despite being less heavily pre-treated indicating worse outcomes in minorities treated with REG. Women showed better PFS and OS compared to men in our study. Patients unable to tolerate REG had significantly higher BMI, indicating a need to study dosing in this subgroup. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Aflibercept in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMO.S7432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Albert Craig Lockhart
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Third ◽  
Common Cancer ◽  
The Us

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the US. In recent decades, an improved understanding of the role of the angiogenesis pathway in colorectal cancer has led to advancements in treatment. Bevacizumab has been shown to improve the progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and at present is the only antiangiogenesis agent approved for the treatment of this cancer. Aflibercept is a novel angiogenesis-targeting agent, and has demonstrated efficacy in treating metastatic colorectal cancer in a recent randomized Phase III trial. Here we review the role of angiogenesis in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer, strategies for targeting angiogenesis, and the clinical development of aflibercept.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Hak Bang ◽  
Jeong Eun Kim ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
Sun Young Kim ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Significant Disease

AbstractThere is an unmet medical need for later-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Considering that, beyond progression, co-treatment with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy showed less toxicity and a significant disease control rate, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and bevacizumab. This single-center retrospective study included 157 patients between May 2011 and February 2018, who received bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line chemotherapy after progressing with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. The study treatment consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 orally (PO) twice daily on day 1 to 14, repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9–5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.3–11.1). The overall response rate was 14% (22/157). Patients who had not received prior targeted agents showed better survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.82, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.85, P = 0.004). Bevacizumab plus capecitabine could be a considerably efficacious option for patients with mCRC refractory to prior standard treatments.

scholarly journals Transarterial Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver-Dominant Hepatic Colorectal Cancer Metastases, and Cholangiocarcinoma Using Yttrium90 Microspheres: Eight-Year Single-Center Real-Life Experience

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Julie Pellegrinelli ◽  
Olivier Chevallier ◽  
Sylvain Manfredi ◽  
Inna Dygai-Cochet ◽  
Claire Tabouret-Viaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Transarterial Radioembolization ◽  
Cancer Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Metastases

Liver tumors are common and may be unamenable to surgery or ablative treatments. Consequently, other treatments have been devised. To assess the safety and efficacy of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver-dominant hepatic colorectal cancer metastases (mCRC), and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), performed according to current recommendations, we conducted a single-center retrospective study in 70 patients treated with TARE (HCC, n = 44; mCRC, n = 20; CCA, n = 6). Safety and toxicity were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria. Treatment response was evaluated every 3 months on imaging studies using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or mRECIST criteria. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median delivered dose was 1.6 GBq, with SIR-Spheres® or TheraSphere® microspheres. TARE-related grade 3 adverse events affected 17.1% of patients. Median follow-up was 32.1 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months and median overall time from TARE to death was 16.1 months and was significantly shorter in men. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in women (HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.26–0.90; p = 0.031). Risk of death or progression increased with the number of systemic chemotherapy lines. TARE can be safe and effective in patients with intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC, CCA, or mCRC refractory or intolerant to appropriate treatments.

Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil): Assessing the impact of dose related toxicities and progression free survival in (refractory) metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110179
Author(s):  
Olivia R Court
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

In the RECOURSE trial which lead to its accreditation, Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil) was shown to extend progression free survival (PFS) by 1.8 months in metastatic colorectal cancer. This Trust audit aims to assess the average quantity of cycles of Lonsurf received by participants and the length of time it extends PFS. Similarly, to identify how many participants required a dose-reduction or experienced toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies. Quantitative data was collected retrospectively from all participants who had received ≥1 cycle of Lonsurf from The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre (CCC) from 2016 until June 2020. Participant electronic patient records were accessed to identify toxicity grading, length of treatment received, the date progression was identified, if dose reductions were applied and if supportive therapies were administered. Lonsurf extends PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at CCC by 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.73–3.27) and average treatment length was 2.4 months. However, 78 participants (41.5%) received a dose reduction due to toxicities. A total of 955 toxicities were recorded by participants; the most commonly reported toxicities irrespective of grade were fatigue (33.8%), diarrhoea (13.8%) and nausea (12.3%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were constipation and infection. The most frequently utilised supportive therapies were loperamide (49.6%) and domperidone (49.1%). Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was required by patients on 5 occasions (0.3%) in total. Lonsurf extends median PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by 3.0 months. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies or a dose reduction were gastrointestinal and infection.

scholarly journals Molecular subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne ten Hoorn ◽  
Dirkje W. Sommeijer ◽  
Faye Elliott ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
Tim R. de Back ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumour Location ◽  
Selection For

Abstract Background Patient selection for addition of anti-EGFR therapy to chemotherapy for patients with RAS and BRAF wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer can still be optimised. Here we investigate the effect of anti-EGFR therapy on survival in different consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and stratified by primary tumour location. Methods Retrospective analyses, using the immunohistochemistry-based CMS classifier, were performed in the COIN (first-line oxaliplatin backbone with or without cetuximab) and PICCOLO trial (second-line irinotecan with or without panitumumab). Tumour tissue was available for 323 patients (20%) and 349 (41%), respectively. Results When using an irinotecan backbone, anti-EGFR therapy is effective in both CMS2/3 and CMS4 in left-sided primary tumours (progression-free survival (PFS): HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.75, P = 0.003 and HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.36, P < 0.001, respectively) and in CMS4 right-sided tumours (PFS HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.71, P = 0.02). Efficacy using an oxaliplatin backbone was restricted to left-sided CMS2/3 tumours (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.96, P = 0.034). Conclusions The subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone. This may provide the possibility of subtype-specific treatment strategies for a more optimal use of anti-EGFR therapy.

Sequential monitoring of PD-L1 on circulating stromal cells in blood predicts PFS in NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy after definitive chemoradiation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8534-8534
Author(s):  
Daniel L Adams ◽  
Alexander Augustyn ◽  
Jianzhong He ◽  
Yawei Qiao ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Inflammatory State ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Tumor Biopsies ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

8534 Background: Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs) are circulating stromal cells in the blood of patients (pts) with solid tumors that are phagocytic macrophages that may represent the inflammatory state of the tumor microenvironment. Previously, we demonstrated CAMLs ≥50µm after chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) in NSCLC is associated with worse progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also showed that PDL1 expression in CAMLs is dynamic & can change with CRT, difficult to assess with repeat biopsies, but possible with liquid biopsy. For this study we evaluated whether CAML properties can predict response to CRT with/without immunotherapy (IMT) agents in unresectable NSCLC. Methods: A single blind multi-year prospective study was undertaken to test the relationship of PDL1 expression and ≥50µm CAML size to PFS/OS in NSCLC, pre and post CRT with (n = 96) and without (n = 72) anti-PDL1/PD1 IMT. This included atezolizumab (prospective single arm NCT02525757) n = 39, durvalumab n = 52 or pembrolizumab n = 5 both after 2018 FDA approval. We recruited 168 pts with pathologically confirmed unresectable NSCLC prior to CRT. Blood samples 15 mL were taken at baseline (BL), CRT completion (T1), and ̃1 month after CRT (T2) (with n = 96 or without n = 72 IMT). Blood was filtered by CellSieve filtration and CAMLs quantified for size ( < 49 µm or ≥50 µm) and PDL1 expression to evaluate PFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs) by censored univariate and multivariate analysis at 24 months. Results: CAMLs were found in 90% of all samples, average 5.8 CAMLs/15mL. At BL, ≥50µm CAMLs did not predict PFS in CRT/IMT pts (HR 1.6, p = 0.220) nor CRT alone (HR 1.3, p = 0.593). However, after completion of CRT (T1) ≥50µm CAMLs predicted PFS in CRT/IMT pts (HR 2.7, p = 0.003) and CRT alone (HR 2.5, p = 0.015). In primary tumor biopsies, PDL1 expression > 1% did not predict CRT/IMT response (PFS HR 1.8, p = 0.262 & OS HR 2.3, p = 0.158). At BL, high CAML PDL1 did not predict PFS in CRT/IMT pts (HR 1.4, p = 0.427) nor CRT alone (HR 1.1, p = 0.982). Further, at CRT completion (T1), high CAML PDL1 only trended for better PFS in CRT/IMT pts (HR 1.7, p = 0.137), but not CRT alone (HR 1.1, p = 0.972). At T2, however, pts with continuously high CAML PDL1 had significantly better PFS with IMT (HR 3.2, p = 0.002) vs CRT alone (HR 1.4, p = 0.616). While ≥50µm CAMLs at BL did not predict 24 month progression, ≥50 µm CAMLs after CRT (with or without 1 cycle of anti-PDL1 IMT) was 84% accurate at predicting progression. Further subtyping and analysis is ongoing to evaluate OS and PDL1 in the CAML populations. Conclusions: Our data suggests that in unresectable NSCLC, ≥50 µm CAMLs after completion of CRT is prognostic regardless of IMT use. PDL1 expression in CAMLs also appears to predict for response to consolidated IMT after CRT. Additional studies are needed to validate these findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document