Prognostic value of baseline SUVmax in patients with advanced stage follicular lymphoma receiving frontline rituximab-based therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7540-7540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Mohamed Amin Ahmed ◽  
Nathan Hale Fowler ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Standardized Uptake Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Positron Emission

7540 Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) is recommended in follicular lymphoma (FL) for initial staging, evaluation of potential transformation, and response assessment. The prognostic value of pre-treatment PET scan has not been adequately explored. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with advanced stage FL, without histological evidence of transformation, treated with frontline rituximab-based therapy, and analyzed the prognostic significance of baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Results: The median follow-up for the cohort was 94 months. Of 346 patients, 151 (44%) received R-CHOP and 195 (56%) received non-R-CHOP regimens. Among multiple single unit increments of SUVmax, a value of >18 showed the strongest association with progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-2.3, p=0.08), and was selected as cut-off for further analysis. Fifty-two (15%) patients had a SUVmax > 18. On univariate analysis, factors associated with SUVmax > 18 were male sex (67% vs 52%, p=0.05), elevated β2-microglobulin (65% vs 47%, p=0.02), elevated LDH (37% vs 13%, p<0.001), presence of B symptoms (35% vs 14%, p=0.01), and largest lymph node ≥ 6 cm (64% vs 30%, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, largest lymph node ≥ 6 cm was the only factor maintaining its association with SUVmax > 18 (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.3, p=0.006). SUVmax > 18 significantly associated with a lower CR rate among patients treated with non-R-CHOP regimens (45% vs 92%) (p<0.001) but not among patients treated with R-CHOP (p=1). SUVmax > 18 associated with significantly shorter PFS among patients treated with non-R-CHOP regimens (77 months vs not reached, p=0.02), but not among patients treated with R-CHOP (p=0.73). SUVmax > 18 associated with shorter overall survival (OS) both in patients treated with R-CHOP (15 year OS 70% vs 75%, p=0.02) and non-R-CHOP regimens (15 year OS 50% vs 75%, p=0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, baseline SUVmax has prognostic value in patients with advanced stage FL receiving rituximab-based therapies. Evaluation in prospective studies is needed to further confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Baseline FDG-PET/CT detects bone marrow involvement in follicular lymphoma and provides relevant prognostic information

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1812-1823
Author(s):  
Reiko Nakajima ◽  
Alison J. Moskowitz ◽  
Laure Michaud ◽  
Audrey Mauguen ◽  
Connie Lee Batlevi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Abstract In follicular lymphoma (FL), detection of bone marrow (BM) involvement (BMI) by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) improves the accuracy of staging vs BM biopsy (BMB) alone. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic utility of PET for BMI FL and the prognostic value of BMI by PET (positive PET result [PET+]). Records of patients (2002-2016) with PET and BMB at the time of initial treatment were reviewed. BMI was identified by positive BMB result (BMB+) and/or unifocal or multifocal BM FDG uptake on blindly reviewed PET scans with no corresponding CT abnormality (PET+). Among 261 patients, BMI was diagnosed in 78 patients (29.9%) by PET+, in 81 patients (31.0%) by BMB+, and in 113 patients (43.3%) by either PET+ or BMB+. PET+ upstaged 24 patients to stage IV, including 10 from stages I or II to stage IV. Median duration of follow-up was 6.0 years (range, 0-16.6 years). In univariate analysis, a high Follicular Lymphoma International Prognosis Index (FLIPI) score, PET+, and BMB+ correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS; all P ≤ .03), and high FLIPI, PET+, and combined PET+ and BMB+ with shorter overall survival (OS; all P ≤ .01). In multivariate analysis, PET+ was the only independent predictor of PFS, whereas high FLIPI score and PET+ predicted OS (P ≤ .03). Combined PET and BMB identify BMI more accurately than either BMB or PET alone, but BMB rarely adds critical information. For patients initiating treatment of FL, identification of BMI by PET is predictive of PFS and OS.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Significance of Combined Pretreatment Fibrinogen and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Various Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Rongqiang Liu ◽  
Shiyang Zheng ◽  
Qing Yuan ◽  
Peiwen Zhu ◽  
Biao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Meta Regression

Purpose. The prognostic value of a new scoring system, termed F-NLR, that combines pretreatment fibrinogen level with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio has been evaluated in various cancers. However, the results are controversial. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively analyze the prognostic value of F-NLR score in patients with cancers. Methods. An integrated search of relevant studies was conducted by screening the PubMed and Embase databases. Pooled hazard ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated to estimate the prognostic significance of F-NLR score in patients with various tumors. A random effects model was used for comprehensive analysis, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results. Thirteen articles reporting data from of 4747 patients were included in the study. Pooled analysis revealed that high F-NLR score was significantly associated with poor OS ( HR = 1.77 ; 95% CI, 1.51–2.08) and poor DFS/PFS ( HR = 1.63 ; 95% CI, 1.30–2.05). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses did not alter the prognostic role of F-NLR score in OS and DFS/PFS. Conclusions. Increased F-NLR score is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancers and can serve as an effective prognostic indicator.

Obinutuzumab short-duration infusion (SDI) in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: Results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7545-7545
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel A. Canales Albendea ◽  
Thomas A. Buchholz ◽  
Koji Izutsu ◽  
Takayuki Ishikawa ◽  
Laura Maria Fogliatto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Phase Iv

7545 Background: Obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy (chemo) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with rituximab (R)-chemo in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). G is currently administered by IV infusion over ̃3–4 hours. A shorter duration of infusion in Cycle (C) 2 and subsequent cycles, as is standard practice with R, could improve convenience for patients (pts) and efficiency for infusion facilities. We report the primary analysis of the prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase IV, GAZELLE study (NCT03817853), which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI from C2 onwards in pts with FL. Methods: Pts with previously untreated FL received G (1000mg) intravenously on Day (D) 1, 8, and 15 of C1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemo (bendamustine, CHOP, or CVP) for 6–8 cycles. In C1, pts received G at the standard infusion rate. Pts without a Grade (Gr) ≥3 infusion-related reaction (IRR) in C1 were eligible to receive G as a 90-min SDI from C2. Pts with a Gr 3 IRR in C1 received the standard G infusion in C2, and were eligible for G SDI in subsequent cycles if no Gr ≥3 IRRs occurred. Pts with a second Gr 3/4 IRR discontinued G. At the end of induction (EOI), responding pts received maintenance G (1000mg) as SDI for 2 years or until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was incidence of Gr ≥3 IRRs during C2. IRRs were defined as any event occurring ≤24 hours from infusion judged to be related to treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed overall response rate at EOI. Results: As of December 3, 2020, 113 pts had received study treatment. Median age was 62.0 years, 50.4% were male, 61.9% had stage IV FL, and 45.1% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Of the 110 pts who were eligible for G SDI from C2, no pt experienced a Gr ≥3 IRR with SDI in C2 (Table). One pt experienced a Gr 3 IRR with SDI in C5, presenting hypertension. All other IRRs with SDI were Gr 1/2. No Gr 4/5 IRRs were reported. Other AEs were similar to those observed in previous studies. At the clinical cut-off date, 104 pts had a CT imaging-based response assessment at EOI and 9 pts had no response assessment; 76/113 (67.3%) had a complete response, 22 (19.5%) had a partial response, and six (5.8%) had PD. Conclusions: In GAZELLE, G SDI in C2 and beyond appeared to be safe. No Gr 3 IRRs were observed in C2 and only one Gr 3 IRR was reported in subsequent cycles. The safety profile of G SDI was comparable with the established profile of G in advanced FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03817853. [Table: see text]

Oncogenes and Male Breast Carcinoma: c-erbB-2 and p53 Coexpression Predicts a Poor Survival

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 2948-2956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achille Pich ◽  
Elena Margaria ◽  
Luigi Chiusa
Keyword(s):  
Breast Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
Male Breast Carcinoma ◽  
P53 Immunoreactivity ◽  
Mib 1

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of biomarkers in male breast carcinoma (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age, 62.2 years) with invasive ductal carcinoma were retrospectively studied. All patients received surgery; 35 had adjuvant postoperative therapy. The median follow-up was 59 months (range, 1 to 230 months). c-myc, c-erbB-2, p53, and bcl-2 proteins were immunohistochemically detected on sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using 9E11, CB11, DO7, and bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors were detected using specific mAbs. Cell proliferation was assessed by MIB-1 mAb. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, c-myc, c-erbB-2, and p53 protein overexpression was significantly correlated with prognosis. The median survival was 107 months for c-myc–negative and 52 months for c-myc–positive patients (P = .01), 96 months for c-erbB-2–negative and 39 months for c-erbB-2–positive patients (P = .02), and 100 months for p53-negative and 33 months for p53-positive patients (P = .0008). Tumor histologic grade (P = .01), tumor size (P = .02), patient age at diagnosis (P = .03), and MIB-1 scores (P = .0004) also had prognostic value. In multivariate analysis, only c-erbB-2 and p53 immunoreactivity retained independent prognostic significance. All nine patients who did not express c-erbB-2 and p53 proteins were alive after 58 months, whereas none of the 14 patients expressing both proteins survived at 61 months follow-up (P = .0002). CONCLUSION: Overexpression of c-myc, c-erbB-2, and p53 proteins may be regarded as an additional prognostic factor in MBC. The combination of c-erbB-2 and p53 immunoreactivity can stratify patients into different risk groups.

scholarly journals Clinical and Biological Prognostic Factors in Follicular Lymphoma Patients During Treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ádám Jóna ◽  
Anna Kenyeres ◽  
Sándor Barna ◽  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Zsófia Simon
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Standardized Uptake Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Biological Prognostic Factors

Abstract Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent yet heterogeneous B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. Most people respond to treatment well. However, a particular group of patients has a poor prognosis, and these patients are difficult to define.Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed FL patients treated at the University of Debrecen in the past 20 years. We investigated prognostic factors that may influence the survival of FL patients.Results: We found a standardized uptake value (SUV)max cut-off value of 9.85 at the staging PET/CT to significantly separate FL patients’ progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.0003, HR: 0.2560, 95%CI: 0.1232-0.5318). Lymphocyte/ monocyte (Ly/Mo) ratio of 3.45 drawn at diagnosis also significantly predicted PFS (p=0.0324, HR: 1.806, 95% CI: 1.051-3.104). Combining patients’ with staging SUVmax >9.85 and Ly/Mo < 3.45 a high-risk group of FL patients can be identified (p<0.0001, HR: 0.1033, 95%CI: 0.03719-0.2868). Similarly, a significant difference was shown with a SUVmax cut-off of 3.15 at the interim PET/CT (p<0.0001, HR: 0.1535, 95%CI: 0.06329-0.3720). Combining patients with staging SUVmax >9.85 and interim SUVmax >3.15, a high-risk group of FL patients can be identified (p<0.0001, HR: 0.1037, 95%CI: 0.03811-0.2824). The PFS difference is translated into overall survival advantage (p=0.0506, HR: 0.1187, 95%CI: 0.01401-1.005).Discussion: Biological prognostic factors, such as the Ly/ Mo ratio, may improve the prognostic assessment of staging PET/CT. Nevertheless, PFS difference is translated into OS when using a combination of staging and interim SUVmax. We consider investigating additional biological prognostic factors while currently highlighting PET/CT's role in FL.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Parameters Measured by SSTR PET/CT in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiale Hou ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
Na Chen ◽  
Dengming Chen ◽  
Shuo Hu
Keyword(s):  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Pet Ct

Purpose: A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the value of the volume parameters based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting the prognosis in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).Material: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Web of Knowledge were searched from January 1990 to May 2021 for studies evaluating prognostic value of volume-based parameters of SSTR PET/CT in NETs. The terms used were “volume,” “positron emission tomography,” “neuroendocrine tumors,” and “somatostatin receptor.” Pooled hazard ratio (HR) values were calculated to assess the correlations between volumetric parameters, including total tumor volume (TTV) and total-lesion SSTR expression (TL-SSTR), with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Heterogeneity and subgroup analysis were performed. Funnel plots, Begg's and Egger's test were used to assess possible underlying publication bias.Results: Eight eligible studies involving 593 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In TTV, the pooled HRs of its prognostic value of PFS and OS were 2.24 (95% CI: 1.73–2.89; P &lt; 0.00001) and 3.54 (95% CI, 1.77–7.09; P = 0.0004), respectively. In TL-SSTR, the pooled HR of the predictive value was 1.61 (95% CI, 0.48–5.44, P = 0.44) for PFS.Conclusion: High TTV was associated with a worse prognosis for PFS and OS in with patients NETs. The TTV of SSTR PET is a potential objective prognosis predictor.

Is It The Time That We Can Depend on Bioscore as a New Staging System in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer to Predict the Disease-Free Survival?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehab Farouk Mohamed ◽  
Donia Hussein Abd El Hameed ◽  
Mohamed Alaa Eldeen Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Purpose: Novel molecular characterization of breast cancer with cellular markers has allowed a new classification that offers prognostic value. This study investigates the prognostic value of the Bioscore among non-metastatic breast cancer patients with respect to disease free survival (DFS).Methods: This study included 317 patients with non-metastatic surgically treated breast cancer; they were identified in the period from January 2015 to December 2018 at Clinical Oncology Department of Assiut University Hospital. Many variables were used; pathologic stage (PS), T stage (T), nodal stage (N), grade (G), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status. Univariate & two multivariate analyses were performed to identify which of these variables are associated with disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The only significant factors in the Univariate analysis were PS3, T2, T3, T4, N3, G2, G3, ER -ve, PR -ve, and HER2 –ve. The factors which were significant in the first multivariate analysis; PS3, G3, ER –ve, and in the second one were; T2, T4, N3, G3, and ER –ve. Two sets of models were built to determine the utility of combining variables. Models incorporating G and E status had the highest C-index (0.72) for T+N + G + ER in comparison with (0.69) for (PS+ G + ER) and the lowest AIC (953.01) for T + N + G + E and (966.9) for PS + G + E. Conclusions: This study confirms the prognostic significance of bioscore in non-metastatic breast cancer in concerning DFS.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of First-Line Management Strategies for Stage I Follicular Lymphoma: Analysis of the National LymphoCare Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27) ◽  
pp. 3368-3375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
Michelle Byrtek ◽  
Brian K. Link ◽  
Christopher Flowers ◽  
Michael Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Imaging Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Treatment Approaches ◽  
Positron Emission

PurposeThe optimal management of stage I follicular lymphoma, according to consensus guidelines, is based on uncontrolled experiences of select institutions. Diverse treatment approaches are used despite guidelines that recommend radiation therapy (XRT).Patients and MethodsWe analyzed outcomes of patients with stage I follicular lymphoma enrolled onto the National LymphoCare database.ResultsOf 471 patients with stage I follicular lymphoma, 206 patients underwent rigorous staging as defined by both a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and an imaging study (a computed tomography [CT] scan of the whole body, a positron emission tomography [PET]/CT scan, or both). Rigorously staged patients had superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with nonrigorously staged patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63). Treatments given to rigorously staged patients were rituximab/chemotherapy (R-chemo; 28%), XRT (27%), observation (17%), systemic therapy + XRT (13%), rituximab monotherapy (12%), and other (3%). With a median follow-up of 57 months for PFS, there were 44 progression events (in 21% of patients) for rigorously staged patients. For these patients, PFS was significantly improved with either R-chemo or systemic therapy + XRT compared with patients receiving XRT alone after adjustment for histology, LDH, and the presence of B symptoms. There were no differences in overall survival.ConclusionIn this largest, prospectively enrolled group of patients with stage I follicular lymphoma, variable treatment approaches resulted in similar excellent outcomes, which challenges the paradigm that XRT should be standard for this presentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document