Prospective study to measure the impact of MMprofiler on treatment intention in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients (PROMMIS).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8030-8030
Author(s):  
Parameswaran Hari ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
David Samuel DiCapua Siegel ◽  
Saad Zafar Usmani ◽  
Binod Dhakal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Treatment Paradigm ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk

8030 Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is recognized as a heterogeneous group of patients with varying response and outcome of their disease, associated with various risk factors including genetic aberrations. Risk adapted treatment strategies are beginning to emerge (e.g. mSMART), which include gene expression signatures. SKY92, a 92-gene prognostic signature, classifies MM patients as “high” or “standard” risk. It has been reported to be a robust predictor for Overall and Progression Free Survival (Kuiper 2012, 2015). Here we report the preliminary impact of SKY92 on risk classification and treatment intention decisions in newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the PRospective Observational Multiple Myeloma Impact Study (PROMMIS). Methods: Patients with MM had their BM aspirate analyzed using the MMprofiler with SKY92. The physician completed questionnaires with his/her treatment intention, before and after knowing SKY92 results. Results: 39 MM patients were enrolled from 5 US centers. The SKY92 signature classified 15 patients (38%) as high risk. Prior to knowing SKY92 results, physicians regarded 20 (51%) patients as clinically high risk, for whom SKY92 indicated 12 patients to be standard risk. Upon revealing SKY92, 8 patients were then considered standard risk by the physician. For 2 patients with concordant high risk classification results, the confirmation of the risk classification was considered helpful. The impact of treatment intention decisions in clinical high risk patients was 40% (8 out of 20). In the 19 patients (49%) that were regarded clinically standard risk prior to knowing SKY92, SKY92 indicated 7 patients to be high risk. Physicians agreed to this classification. For 4 patients with concordant risk classification, the confirmation was found helpful. The impact of treatment intention decisions in clinical standard risk patients was 37% (7 out of 19). Conclusions: Preliminary results from the PROMMIS trial indicate that SKY92 impacts the physician’s treatment intention for 38% of patients with newly diagnosed MM. Moreover, the physicians found the SKY92 result useful for 54% of the patients. This underlines the relevance and need for assessment of SKY92 in MM patients, and associated risk stratified treatment paradigm. Clinical trial information: NCT02911571.

Outcome according to cytogenetic abnormalities and DNA ploidy in myeloma patients receiving short induction with weekly bortezomib followed by maintenance

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. 4547-4553 ◽  
Author(s):  
María-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Norma C. Gutiérrez ◽  
María-Luisa Martín-Ramos ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María-Angeles Montalbán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Dna Ploidy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) such as t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p), and nonhyperdiploidy are associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. We evaluated the influence of CAs by FISH and DNA ploidy by flow cytometry on response and survival in 232 elderly, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving an induction with weekly bortezomib followed by maintenance therapy with bortezomib-based combinations. Response was similar in the high-risk and standard-risk CA groups, both after induction (21% vs 27% complete responses [CRs]) and maintenance (39% vs 45% CR). However, high-risk patients showed shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than standard-risk patients, both from the first (24 vs 33 months; P = .04) and second randomization (17 vs 27 months; P = .01). This also translated into shorter overall survival (OS) for high-risk patients (3-year OS: 55% vs 77%; P = .001). This adverse prognosis applied to either t(4;14) or del(17p). Concerning DNA ploidy, hyperdiploid patients showed longer OS than nonhyperdiploid patients (77% vs 63% at 3 years; P = .04), and this was more evident in patients treated with bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone (77% vs 53% at 3 years; P = .02). The present schema does not overcome the negative prognosis of high-risk CAs and nonhyperdiploidy. This trial was registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00443235.

scholarly journals Outcomes with early response to first-line treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 744-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Tandon ◽  
Surbhi Sidana ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Light Chain Disease ◽  
The Impact

Abstract We evaluated the impact of achieving a rapid response in 840 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients from 2004 to 2015. Rates of very good partial response (VGPR) or better were 29% (240/840) after 2 cycles of treatment, 42% (350/840) after 4 cycles of treatment, and 66% (552/840) as best response. Early responders after 2 cycles of treatment had higher rates of light chain disease, anemia, renal failure, International Staging System (ISS) stage III disease, and high-risk cytogenetics, especially t(4;14), and were more likely to have received triplet therapy and undergo transplant. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not different among patients with ≥VGPR and <VGPR after 2 cycles (PFS, 28 vs 30 months, P = .6; OS, 78 vs 96 months, P = .1) and 4 cycles (PFS, 31 vs 29 months; OS, 89 vs 91 months, P = .9), although both were improved, with ≥VGPR as best response (PFS, 33 vs 22 months, P < .001; OS, 102 vs 77 months, P = .003). On multivariate analysis stratified by transplant status, achievement of ≥VGPR after 2 cycles was not associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]; transplant cohort, 1.1 [0.7-1.6]; nontransplant cohort, 1.2 [0.8-1.7]) or OS (transplant cohort, 1.6 [0.9-2.9]; nontransplant cohort, 1.5 [1.0-2.4]). Covariates in the model included high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage III, triplet therapy, creatinine ≥2 mg/dL, light chain disease, and age. Although patients with high-risk disease are more likely to achieve early response, a rapid achievement of a deep response by itself does not affect long-term outcomes.

Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Undergoing Therapy with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone: Impact of High-Risk Cytogenetic Risk Status on Outcome

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Thomas E Witzig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with very divergent outcomes that are dictated in a large part by specific cytogenetic abnormalities, as well as other prognostic factors such as the proliferative rate of marrow plasma cells. Prognostic systems incorporating these factors have shown clinical utility in identifying high-risk patients, and are increasingly being utilized for treatment decision-making. However, the prognostic relevance of these factors may change with the application of novel therapies. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of risk-stratification (incorporating plasma cell metaphase cytogenetics, interphase fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) and the slide-based plasma cell labeling index (PCLI)) in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed MM treated initially with lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rev-Dex). Methods: From March 2004 to November 2007, 100 consecutive patients treated with Rev (25mg/day) on days 1 through 21 of a 4-week cycle in combination with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma, were identified. High-risk MM was defined as presence of any one or more of the following: hypodiploidy, monoallelic loss of chromosome 13 or its long arm (by metaphase cytogenetics only), deletion of p53 (locus 17p13) or PCLI ≥ 3% or immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) translocations, t(4;14) (p16.3;q32) or t(14;16)(q32;q23) on FISH. PFS and OS survival estimates were created using the Kaplan Meier method, and compared by log-rank tests. Results: The median estimated follow-up of the entire cohort (N=100) was 36 months. The median PFS was 31 months; the median OS has not been reached. The 2- and 3-year OS estimates were 93% and 83%, respectively. 16% patients were deemed high-risk by at least one of the 3 tests (cytogenetics, FISH or PCLI). Response rates (PR or better) were 81% versus 89% in the high-risk and standard risk groups, respectively, P=NS; corresponding values for CR plus VGPR rates were 38% and 45% respectively. The median PFS was 18.5 months in high-risk patients compared to 37 months in the standard-risk patients (n=84), P<0.001(Figure). Corresponding values for TTP were 18.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively, P=<0.001. OS was not statistically significant between the two groups; 92% 2-year OS was noted in both the groups. Overall, 95 patients had at least one of the 3 tests to determine risk, while 55 patients could be adequately stratified based on the availability of all the 3 tests, or at least one test result that led to their inclusion in the high-risk category. The significant difference in PFS persisted even when the analysis was restricted to the 55 patients classified using this stringent criterion; 18.5 months vs. 36.5 months in the high-risk and standard- risk groups respectively; P<0.001. In a separate analysis, patients who underwent SCT before the disease progression were censored on the date of SCT to negate its effect, and PFS was still inferior in the high-risk group (p=0.002). Conclusion: The TTP and PFS of high-risk MM patients are inferior to that of the standard-risk patients treated with Rev-Dex, indicating that the current genetic and proliferation-based risk-stratification model remains prognostic with novel therapy. However, the TTP, PFS, and OS obtained in high-risk patients treated with Rev-Dex in this study is comparable to overall results in all myeloma patients reported in recent phase III trials. In addition, no significant impact of high-risk features on OS is apparent so far. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the impact of risk stratification on the OS of patients treated with Rev-Dex. Figure Figure

Carfilzomib-based induction/consolidation with or without autologous transplant (ASCT) followed by lenalidomide (R) or carfilzomib-lenalidomide (KR) maintenance: Efficacy in high-risk patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8002-8002
Author(s):  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Roberto Mina ◽  
Delia Rota-Scalabrini ◽  
Monica Galli ◽  
Angelo Belotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
1Q Gain

8002 Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) are one of the most powerful prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM). In the FORTE study, carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone induction/consolidation with ASCT (KRd_ASCT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs KRd without ASCT (KRd12, HR 0.64) or carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (KCd) plus ASCT (KCd_ASCT, HR 0.53). KR maintenance significantly improved PFS vs R (HR 0.63). Methods: MM patients (pts) were randomized to KRd_ASCT vs KCd_ASCT vs KRd12 and, thereafter, to KR vs R maintenance. Subgroup analyses according to FISH evaluated the impact of each single high-risk (HiR) CA [del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), del1p and 1q gain (3 copies) or amp1q (≥4 copies)] and that of combined CA, defining HiR by the presence of ≥1 HiR CA and double-hit (DH) by the presence of ≥2 HiR CA. Pts negative for all the HiR CA were considered at standard risk (SR). The primary objective was the impact of treatment on PFS according to pt risk. Results: 396 out of 474 enrolled pts were included in the analysis with complete FISH data: 243 HiR, 105 DH and 153 SR. Among HiR pts, 60 had del17p, 65 t(4;14), 20 t(14;16), 44 del1p, 126 1q gain and 49 amp1q. SR pts benefited from intensification with KRd_ASCT vs KRd12 (HR 0.47, p = 0.05) and KCd_ASCT (HR 0.38, p = 0.01), with a 4-year PFS of 80%, 67% and 57%, respectively. In HiR pts, KRd_ASCT improved PFS vs KRd12 (HR 0.6, p = 0.04) and KCd_ASCT (HR 0.57, p = 0.01), with a 4-year PFS of 62%, 45% and 45%, respectively. The advantage with KRd_ASCT vs KRd12 (HR 0.53, p = 0.07) and KCd_ASCT (HR 0.49; p = 0.03) was also observed in DH pts (4-year PFS 55%, 31% and 33%, respectively). Analyses by single CA were limited by the small number of pts in each subgroup, but a trend towards a PFS benefit from KRd_ASCT vs KRd12 was seen in pts with del17p (HR 0.61, p = 0.3), t(4;14) (HR 0.59, p = 0.2) and 1q gain (HR 0.45, p = 0.02). In pts with del1p, KRd_ASCT (HR 0.24, p = 0.06) and KRd12 (HR 0.33, p = 0.09) showed superiority over KCd_ASCT, while amp1q pts had the worst outcome regardless of treatment (KRd_ASCT vs KCd_ASCT, HR 1.16, p = 0.73; KRd12 vs KCd_ASCT, HR 1.34, p = 0.45). KR improved PFS vs R in SR (3-year PFS 90% vs 73%, HR 0.42, p = 0.06), HiR (3-year PFS 69% vs 56%, HR 0.6, p = 0.04) and DH pts (3-year PFS 67% vs 42%, HR 0.53, p = 0.1). Despite the small subgroups, a beneficial trend with KR vs R was observed in pts with del17p (HR 0.59, p = 0.37), t(4;14) (HR 0.59, p = 0.3), 1q gain (HR 0.54, p = 0.07) and del1p (HR 0.23, p = 0.08), while amp1q pts showed the worst outcome and no benefit from KR vs R (HR 0.83, p = 0.7). Conclusions: KRd_ASCT and KR maintenance are highly effective in SR and also in HiR and DH pts, with impressive 4-year PFS from diagnosis (KRd_ASCT: HiR 62%, DH 55%) and 3-year PFS from maintenance (KR: HiR 69%, DH 67%), thus supporting their use in HiR pts, who represent an unmet medical need. Clinical trial information: NCT02203643.

Lower Plasma Mir-92a Levels Predict Shorter Progression-Free Survival In Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1879-1879
Author(s):  
Seiichiro Yoshizawa ◽  
Tomohiro Umezu ◽  
Junko H Ohyashiki ◽  
Shinsuke Iida ◽  
Kazuma Ohyashiki
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chromosomal Aberrations ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Lower Plasma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cut Points ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background Current prognostic model for multiple myeloma (MM) is based on International Staging System (ISS) and presence of specific chromosomal abnormalities (CAs), especially by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the development and progression in multiple myeloma (MM). Previously, we have described that plasma miRNA profiling has showed considerably lower plasma miR-92a levels in newly diagnosed MM patients (Yoshizawa et al. Blood Cancer Journal 2(1):e53, 2012). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of plasma miR-92a levels to CAs and to prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Patients and methods From April 2004 to December 2012, 60 patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM (median age, 66 years; range, 34-93 years) were included in this study. We measured plasma miR-92a values (miR-92a/miR-638) by qRT-PCR. They were divided into high-risk and standard-risk by using FISH and conventional cytogenetic studies: high-risk cytogenetics was defined as translocations t(4;14), t(14;16), or del (17p13) detected by FISH, or del (13q) by Q-banding according to IMWG guidelines. All others, including t(11;14), were defined as standard-risk cytogenetics. We analyzed the clinical relevance of plasma miR-92a levels with respects to CAs. Furthermore we identified miR-92a expression cut points with the most impact on outcome to investigate which of the some disease characteristics and its cut-off value had prognostic influence in MM patients. Results Chromosomal aberrations were noted in 26 (43%) MM patients after diagnosis, including 12 patients with t(4;14), 5 with t(11;14), 3 with t(14;16), 2 with del (17p13), 2 with del (13q), and 1 with t(4;14) and del (17p13), 1 with t(11;14) and del (17p13). Between MM patients with and without high-risk cytogenetics, there were no significant differences in β2-microglobulin and albumin levels (P = 0.994 and 0.85, respectively), ISS staging (P = 0.583), age (P = 0.651), sex (P = 0.585), frequency of CRAB symptoms (hypercalcemia, P = 0.755; renal insufficiency, P = 0.75; anemia, P = 0.375; bone lesion, P= 0.65, respectively). The plasma miR-92a level was significantly lower in the newly diagnosed MM with high-risk groups than in those with standard-risk groups (P = 0.015). Patients with plasma miR-92a levels < 0.04 had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with plasma miR-92a levels ≥ 0.04 (median PFS: 48 vs 15.8 months, P = 0.011). In addition, some clinical parameters were associated with adverse PFS: high-risk cytogenetics (P = 0.001), high proportions of bone marrow plasma cells (P = 0.043), high levels of serum β2-microglobulin (P = 0.022) and not attaining ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) (P = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, lower miR-92a level was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Using the same miR-92a cut points, there was a tendency towards significant difference among standard-risk myeloma patients (P = 0.077). Moreover, the combinations of chromosomal aberrations and plasma miR-92a were able to classify newly diagnosed MM patients with three risk groups with different probabilities. Conclusion The plasma miR-92a values vary across high- and standard-risk cytogenetics in newly diagnosed MM patients. We conclude that measurement of plasma miR-92a levels may not only function as novel biomarkers for diagnosis, but may also be helpful for prognostic stratification. Disclosures: Ohyashiki: Janssen Pharmaceutical co.: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Upfront Daratumumab Combination Regimen in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3158-3158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyaw Zin Thein ◽  
Thura Win Htut ◽  
Myint Aung Win ◽  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Standard Risk

Introduction: Management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), which accounts for 1% of all cancers, is an area in dire need of therapeutic innovation. In recent years, the introduction of novel agents is one of the major advances in the management of patients with NDMM, in both transplant- eligible and transplant- ineligible candidates. Studies have combined daratumumab, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 which is highly expressed on myeloma cells, with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents-based regimens in the first-line treatment of NDMM. The purpose of our study is to explore and consolidate the efficacy of upfront daratumumab combination regimen in patients with NDMM. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2019. Phase III RCTs utilizing daratumumab in patients with newly diagnosed/ untreated multiple myeloma were incorporated in the analysis. A generic inverse variance method was used to calculate the estimated pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) for overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response (sCR), CR and very good partial response (VGPR). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q -statistic. Random effects model was applied. Results: Three phase III RCTs with a total of 2,528 patients with NDMMwere included.Studies compared daratumumab (D) + bortezomib (V) + melphan (M) + prednisone (P) vs VMP, D + lenalidomide (R) + dexamethasone (d) vs Rd, and DVd + thalidomide (T) vs VTd. The randomization ratio was 1:1 in all studies. The I2statistic for heterogeneity was 0, suggesting homogeneity among RCT. The pooled HR for PFS was statistically significant at 0.52 (95% CI: 0.44-0.61; P < 0.0001). The PFS benefit was observed in all ISS categories, types of immunoglobulin (Ig) and standard risk cytogenetic; ISS I cohort (HR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37- 0.82; P = 0.003), ISS II cohort (HR, 0.43; 95% CI: 0.33- 0.55; P < 0.0001), ISS III cohort (HR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48- 0.82; P = 0.0006), IgG cohort (HR, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40- 0.77; P = 0.0003), non-IgG cohort (HR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28- 0.97; P = 0.04), and standard risk cytogenetic cohort (HR, 0.43; 95% CI: 0.35- 0.53; P < 0.0001). The pooled HR for PFS in high risk cytogenetic cohort was not statistically significant at 0.76 (95% CI: 0.53- 1.10; P = 0.15). The pooled RR for ORR was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01-1.26; P = 0.03), sCR was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.33-3.08; P = 0.001), CR was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.20-1.79; P = 0.0002),and VGPR was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.82-1.25; P = 0.93). The pooled RR for negative minimal residual disease (MRD) was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.24-5.20; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Upfront combination regimen with daratumumab significantly improved PFS, ORR, sCR and CR along with negative MRD, compared to control arm in patients with NDMM. The improvement in PFS was noted across all subgroups except in high-risk cytogenetic group. More randomized studies are required to explore further novel agents and to formulate optimal combination regimen to improve survival in this high-risk cytogenetic subset. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Different Patient Subgroup Different Maintenance, Proteasome Inhibitors or Immunomodulators Maintenance for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A 7-Year Single-Center Date in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Han ◽  
Chunxiang Jin ◽  
Gaofeng Zheng ◽  
Donghua He ◽  
Yi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Patient Responses

IntroductionWe analyzed different patient subgroups to determine optimal maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients.MethodsA total of 226 NDMM patients in our center were included in the study. The characteristics, survival, and adverse reactions were compared among patients who received maintenance therapy or not, and patients who received proteasome inhibitors (PIs) or immunomodulators (IMiDs) maintenance. The survival of different maintenance durations of bortezomib-based regimens was also analyzed.ResultsThe maintenance therapy not only upgraded more patient responses (34.3 vs 13.3%, P = 0.006), but also significantly prolonged their progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 41.1 vs 10.5 months, P &lt; 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: not reached vs 38.6 months, P &lt; 0.001). Compared with IMiDs, the PFS (median PFS: 43.7 vs 38.5 months, P = 0.034) and OS (median OS: not reached vs 78.5 months, P = 0.041) were both enhanced by PIs maintenance. Patients younger than 65 years who received PIs had a significantly prolonged OS (P = 0.032). Patients achieving only a partial response (PR) after induction and consolidation therapy had significantly longer PFS and OS after PIs maintenance compared to IMiDs (P = 0.007, 0.002). High-risk patients (ISS 2–3, DS 2–3, and RISS 2–3) given PIs maintenance benefit from a prolonged PFS (P = 0.002, 0.02, 0.06) and OS (P = 0.059, 0.047, 0.044, respectively) compared with IMiDs therapy. OS was significantly prolonged in patients who received ≥ 12 months of bortezomib-based maintenance therapy compared to those who were treated for &lt; 12 months (P &lt; 0.001), but no difference was observed in OS between patients who received 12 to 24 or ≥ 24 months of bortezomib-based maintenance therapy (P = 0.292).ConclusionPIs maintenance was superior to IMiDs in overall PFS and OS. The beneficial effect was most evident in patients achieving PR after induction and consolidation therapy, and in high-risk patients. Moreover, younger patients also benefited from PIs maintenance with an increased OS. A bortezomib-based maintenance therapy duration of 12 to 24 months after induction and consolidation therapy produced satisfactory OS.

High Expression of the Very Late Antigen (VLA)-4 (CD49d) Integrin Predicts for Reduced Risk of Relapse and Better Outcome in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1592-1592
Author(s):  
Walter B. Walter ◽  
Todd A. Alonzo ◽  
Robert B. Gerbing ◽  
Franklin O. Smith ◽  
Susana C. Raimondi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Monosomy 7 ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Abstract 1592 Poster Board I-618 Background Previous studies highlighted the importance of the cell adhesion molecule, VLA-4, for chemoresistance and minimal residual disease (MRD) in AML, suggesting promise as therapeutic target. By comparison, the prognostic role of VLA-4 in AML remains controversial with retrospective studies implying either adverse or favorable prognosis. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated VLA-4 expression in participants of a recent Children's Oncology Group (COG) AML pilot protocol. Methods COG-AAML03P1 enrolled 340 newly diagnosed children (aged 1 month - 21 years) with de novo non-acute promyelocytic AML, excluding those with Down syndrome, and tested the feasibility of combining gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) with intensive induction chemotherapy followed by GO-containing intensification therapy or matched related donor stem cell transplantation; 216 patients submitted diagnostic marrow specimens for flow cytometric determination of VLA-4 expression that was then correlated with patient demographics, laboratory characteristics, and clinical outcome. Cytogenetics and molecular prognostic markers were used for risk classification as follows: low risk (mutation in core-binding factor, NPM1, or CEBPa; n=73), high risk (-5/5q-, monosomy 7, or FLT3/ITD with high allelic ratio; n=25), or standard risk (all other patients with cytogenetic/molecular data; n=101); 17 patients had insufficient data for risk classification. Results Among the 216 diagnostic specimens, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of VLA-4 expression varied over 35-fold from a baseline of 30 to 1110 (median, 219.5). Patients with high VLA-expression (>median MFI) were younger (p<0.001), had a lower prevalence of FLT3/ITD (p=0.002). Presence of extramedullary disease (EMD, chloroma or CNS involvement) was significantly higher in patients with high VLA-4 expression (16% vs. 5%, p=0.013), where 17/22 (77%) of patients with EMD had high VLA-4 expression. We initially inquired whether VLA-4 expression as a continuous variable correlated with disease outcome. We demonstrated that over the range of VLA-4 expression levels, every 10-unit increase in VLA-4 MFI corresponded to a 2% decrease in relapse risk (RR; p=0.023) and 2% increase in disease-free survival (DFS) from end of induction I (p=0.015). We subsequently divided the study patients into two cohorts based on median MFI and determined the clinical outcome per median VLA-4 MFI for the entire cohort as well as in specific risk groups (i.e., high risk, low risk, and standard risk). In the evaluation of the entire cohort, patients with high VLA-4 expression had a significantly superior DFS (67% vs 48%, p=0.023) and lower RR (24% vs 44%, p=0.011) compared to those with lower VLA-4 expression. In subgroup analyses, high VLA-4 expression was associated with significantly superior DFS (69% vs 34%, p=0.011) and lower RR (26% vs 61%, p=0.009) in patients with standard-risk AML but not in patients with high or low risk disease. In multivariate Cox regression analyses that included age, cytogenetics, and molecular prognostic factors, low VLA-4 expression remained significantly associated with elevated RR (hazard ratio for low VLA-4: 2.25, p=0.011). Finally, we determined the impact of MRD in the context of VLA-4 expression. The prevalence of MRD was similar for patients with low or high VLA-4 expression (29% vs. 25%, p=0.70). In patients with low VLA-4 expression, those with MRD had a RR of 75% compared to that of 35% for the MRD negative cohort (p=0.005). Corresponding DFS was 19% and 54% for those with and without MRD (p=0.018), a difference mainly attributable to increased RR. In patients with high VLA-4 expression, those with MRD had a RR of 31% vs. 23% for the MRD-negative patients (p=0.28) with a corresponding DFS of 46% and 75% for the MRD positive and negative patients (p=0.014), a difference mainly explained by higher treatment-related mortality in MRD positive patients. Conclusion This study demonstrates significant heterogeneity of VLA-4 expression in pediatric AML and its association with EMD and clinical outcome. This study further demonstrates that VLA-4 expression is an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcome and can identify the risk status in patients with no identifiable cytogenetic or molecular risk factors. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib Plus Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) Followed By Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Myeloma Patients Overcome the Poor Prognosis of High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities (CA) Detected By Fluorescence in Situ Hibridization (FISH)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4243-4243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Norma C Gutierrez ◽  
María-Luisa Martín ◽  
Joaquín Martínez-López ◽  
Miguel T Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background: Novel insights into the biology of myeloma cells have led to the identification of relevant prognosis factors. CA has become one of the most important prognostic factors, and the presence of t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p) are associated with poor prognosis. Although there are some reports indicating that 1q gains may be considered as a poor-risk feature, the information is not uniform. Furthermore, there are important controversies about whether or not novel agents-based combinations are able to overcome the poor prognosis of CA. Bortezomib-based combinations have shown to improve the outcome of patients with high-risk CA but they do not completely overcome their adverse prognosis. Here we report a preplanned analysis, in a series of elderly newly diagnosed myeloma patients included in the Spanish GEM2010 trial and receiving VMP and Rd, in a sequential or alternating approach, in order to evaluate the influence of CA by FISH on the response rate and outcome. Patients and methods: 242 pts were randomized to receive a sequential scheme consisting on 9 cycles of VMP followed by 9 cycles of Rd or the same regimens in an alternating approach (one cycle of VMP alternating with one Rd, up to 18 cycles. VMP included the iv administration of weekly bortezomib (except in the first cycle that was given twice weekly) at 1.3 mg/m2 in combination with oral melphalan 9 mg/m2 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-4. Rd treatment consisted on lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. FISH analysis for t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p) and 1q gains was performed at diagnosis according to standard procedures using purified plasma cells. Results: In 174 out of the 233 patients evaluable for efficacy and safety, FISH analysis at diagnosis were available and two groups were identified: high-risk group (n= 32 patients with t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or del(17p)) and standard-risk group (n=142 patients without high-risk CA). There weren't differences in the rates of CA according to the treatment arm. Response Rates (RR) were no different in the high-risk vs standard-risk groups, both in the sequential (74% vs 79% RR and 42% vs 39% CR) and alternating arms (69% vs 86% RR and 39% vs 38% CR). After a median follow-up of 37 months, high-risk patients showed shorter PFS as compared to standard risk in the alternating arm (24 versus 36 months, p=0.01, HR 2.2, 95% IC 1.1-4.2) and this also translated into a significantly shorter 4-years OS (27% vs 72%, p=0.006, HR 3.3, 95% IC 1.4-7.7). However, in the sequential arm, high-risk and standard-risk patients showed similar PFS (32 months vs 30 months) and 4-years OS (64% vs 60%). This effect was observed only in the sequential arm applied to either t(4;14) or del(17p). As far as 1q gains is concerned, 151 patients had 1q information and 76 of them had 1q gains (50.3%), defined as the presence of more than 3 copies in at least 10% of plasma cells. The rate of 1q gains was well balanced in both sequential and alternating arms. The ORR was similar in patients with or without 1q gains (83% vs 80%) as well as the CR rate (45% vs 31%), and no differences were observed between sequential and alternating arms. Patients with or without 1q gains had a similar PFS (33 months vs 30 months) and 4-years OS (58% vs 65%) in the whole series and no differences were observed in the sequential and alternating arms. This effect has been observed in patients with 1q gains as isolated CA and the outcome was slightly but not significantly worse when 1q gains were present plus either t(4;14) and/or del17p. Conclusions: The total therapy approach including VMP and Rd administered in a sequential approach is able to overcome the poor prognosis of the presence of high-risk CA in elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM. The presence of 1q gains has no impact in the PFS and OS of elderly patients treated with VMP and Rd. Disclosures Mateos: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Gironella:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paiva:BD Bioscience: Consultancy; Binding Site: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; EngMab AG: Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Puig:Janssen: Consultancy; The Binding Site: Consultancy. San Miguel:Millennium: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document