Phase II trial of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An updated analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21015-e21015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda Lynne Yushak ◽  
David H. Lawson ◽  
Monica Goings ◽  
Marjorie Mckellar ◽  
Necia Maynard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Grade 3

e21015 Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) are generally curable with surgery and/or radiation. Unfortunately, some patients develop locally advanced or metastatic disease, with an estimated 3900 to 8700 patients dying of cSCC in 2012. Aggressive disease is often associated with immunosuppression, and no treatment has shown an improvement in overall survival (OS). Recently the FDA has approved cemiplimab-rwlc which targets PD-1. This abstract provides an updated analysis and additional followup for patients treated with pembrolizumab which also targets PD-1. Methods: Clinical activity of pembrolizumab in cSCC patients was evaluated in patients who were not curable by surgery and/or radiation. Patients were treated with pembrolizumab 200mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. Tumor response was measured every 12 weeks using RECIST version 1.1. Response rate (RR) of pembrolizumab in metastatic cSCC was the primary objective. 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) and 1 year OS were secondary objectives. Results: 11 subjects have been enrolled thus far with a median age of 70.3 years. Two were female and all were Caucasian. ORR per RECIST criteria was 64% with 18% (2) having a complete response, 36% (4) a partial response, 36% (4) progressive disease (PD), and 9% (1) stable disease. The patient with stable disease had a clinical response and was eventually able to undergo surgery that rendered him without any evidence of disease. 6 month PFS for evaluable patients was 72%. Of those patients with a response, 50% had a durable response of 18 months or greater at the time of data cut-off. No subject deaths have occurred on study. Three grade 3 related-adverse events were noted (hepatitis and pneumonitis). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab is active in advanced cSCC. Responses appear durable and comparable to what has been seen in previous studies with the FDA-approved agent, cemiplimab. No new safety concerns were noted. Additional follow up is needed in order to establish an OS benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02964559.

Updated efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 286-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Peter H. O'Donnell ◽  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Terence W. Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Visceral Metastases ◽  
Grade 3

286 Background: Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy has shown promising clinical activity in urothelial carcinoma (UC). We report on a planned update of efficacy and follow-up in patients (pts) receiving durvalumab for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic UC. Methods: Pts received durvalumab 10 mg/kg Q2W up to 12 months (mo), unacceptable toxicity or confirmed progressive disease. Tumor PD-L1 expression was assessed using the validated Ventana SP263 assay (PD-L1 high = TC ≥ 25% or IC ≥ 25%). Primary endpoints were confirmed ORR by RECIST v1.1 with blinded independent central review (BICR) and safety. Duration of response (DoR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Results: As of July 24, 2016 (data cutoff [DCO]), the primary efficacy population included 103 pts who were followed for at least 13 weeks (median duration of follow up 7.3 mo); 37% had ≥ 2 prior regimens; 97% had prior platinum treatment; 95% had visceral metastases; and 49% had liver metastases at baseline. As of the DCO, 21 pts (20.4%) had a confirmed response per BICR (including 5 pts [4.9%] with a complete response) and an additional 3 pts had an unconfirmed response. Responses were seen in both PD-L1 high and PD-L1 low/negative subgroups (Table). Responses occurred early (median time to response 1.4 mo) and were durable. Median DoR has not been reached. Of the 21 confirmed responders, 18 pts had an ongoing response, 16 pts had DoR ≥ 6 mo and 7 pts had DoR ≥ 9 mo. Treatment-related Grade 3/4 AE rates were low (5.2%; as treated population, n = 191); Grade 3/4 immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) occurred in 3 pts, and 1 pt discontinued treatment due to an imAE of acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Durvalumab administered at 10 mg/kg Q2W showed clinical activity and an excellent safety profile in pts with locally advanced or metastatic UC. Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk patients (pts) with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6577-6577
Author(s):  
Jennifer Maria Johnson ◽  
Voichita Bar Ad ◽  
Emily Lorber ◽  
Dawn Poller ◽  
Gregor Manukian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lung Lesion ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Locoregional Control ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

6577 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the standard of care in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN but their role in the curative therapy setting with RT is under study. We evaluated the novel approach of combining Nivo, a PD-1 inhibitor, and Ipi, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, in lieu of chemotherapy, with concurrent RT in pts with high-risk LA SCCHN. Methods: We enrolled newly diagnosed, chemotherapy eligible pts with AJCC 7th edition stage IVA-IVB SCCHN of the oral cavity, oropharynx (OP), hypopharynx, and larynx. HPV+ OP were T4, N2c or N3 OP. Nivo (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks IV x 17 doses) and Ipi (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks x 6 doses) were administered starting 2 weeks prior to the start of RT. RT was prescribed to a dose of 70 Gy delivered in 2 Gy/fraction/day using VMAT. The primary objective was safety of combination ICI with RT. Secondary objectives included 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and correlative studies. Results: 24 pts were enrolled; median age of 60 (range 48-77); 20 were male; 16 oropharynx (14 HPV+), 2 hypopharynx, and 6 larynx; AJCC 7th edition stage IVA (23), IVB (1). Grade 3 acute in-field adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17/24 (71%) of patients during concurrent ICI-RT (9 mucositis, 6 dysphagia, 5 dermatitis, 4 odynophagia, 1 dysphonia); there were no grade 4/5 AEs during ICI-RT. During ICI maintenance 5 pts developed in-field ulcerations at the primary site detected at an average of 3 months post RT; 1 of them died of bleeding due to erosion into the carotid artery with no evidence of active cancer; 4 additional pts developed in-field necrosis. 7 pts discontinued ICI treatment at > 3 months post-RT: 1 due to immune AE, 5 due to in-field ulcerations, 1 due to persistent mucositis without ulceration. 4 pts (17%) had grade 3 immune AEs: 1 elevation of lipase, 1 colitis, and 2 rash. There were no grade 4/5 immune AEs. The median follow-up is 16 months (range, 6.3-30.6). 21 of 24 pts (87.5%) are alive with no evidence of disease progression. 2 pts recurred at distant sites: 1 had a solitary lung lesion at 11 months and was treated with RT; 1 in mediastinal lymph nodes at 9 months and was treated with chemo-RT. Locoregional control remains at 100%. Conclusions: RT plus dual ICI combination was feasible and resulted in no locoregional relapses so far in 24 high-risk LA SCCHN pts. Longer follow-up is needed to fully assess PFS and locoregional control as well as post-treatment in-field ulceration/necrosis that may be attributed to the potent radiosensitizing effect of dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade. Clinical trial information: NCT03162731 .

Maintenance avelumab + best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone after platinum-based first-line (1L) chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC): JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III interim analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1-LBA1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Eric Voog ◽  
Claudia Caserta ◽  
B.P. Valderrama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

LBA1 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy is an active 1L regimen for advanced UC; however, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are generally short because of chemotherapy resistance. This randomized, phase 3 trial (JAVELIN Bladder 100; NCT02603432) evaluated avelumab (anti–PD-L1) as maintenance therapy following response or stable disease with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced UC. Methods: Eligible patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC without disease progression after 4-6 cycles of gemcitabine with either cisplatin or carboplatin were randomized 1:1 to receive maintenance avelumab (10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) + best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone, stratified by best response to 1L chemotherapy (complete/partial response vs stable disease) and by visceral vs nonvisceral disease when initiating 1L chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was OS, assessed from randomization in 2 primary populations: all randomized patients and patients with PD-L1+ tumors (Ventana SP263 assay). Secondary endpoints included PFS, objective response, and safety. Results: 700 patients were randomly assigned to maintenance avelumab + BSC (n=350) or BSC alone (n=350) and were followed for a median of 19.6 and 19.2 months, respectively. Overall, 358 (51%) had PD-L1+ tumors. Avelumab + BSC significantly prolonged OS vs BSC alone in all randomized patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69; 95% CI 0.56, 0.86; 1-sided p=0.0005); median OS with avelumab + BSC vs BSC alone was 21.4 vs 14.3 months, respectively. Avelumab + BSC also significantly prolonged OS vs BSC alone in patients with PD-L1+ tumors (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40, 0.79; 1-sided p=0.0003); median OS was not reached vs 17.1 months, respectively. An OS benefit was also observed across all prespecified subgroups. The HR for PFS based on blinded independent central review with avelumab + BSC vs BSC alone was 0.62 (95% CI 0.52, 0.75) in all randomized patients and 0.56 (95% CI 0.43, 0.73) in patients with PD-L1+ tumors. In treated patients in the avelumab + BSC (n=344) vs BSC alone (n=345) arms, respectively, all-causality adverse events (AEs) were reported at any grade in 98.0% vs 77.7% and at grade ≥3 in 47.4% vs 25.2%, and the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were urinary tract infection (4.4% vs 2.6%), anemia (3.8% vs 2.9%), hematuria (1.7% vs 1.4%), fatigue (1.7% vs 0.6%), and back pain (1.2% vs 2.3%). Conclusions: JAVELIN Bladder 100 met its primary objective, demonstrating significantly prolonged OS with 1L maintenance avelumab + BSC vs BSC alone in advanced UC in all randomized patients and patients with PD-L1+ tumors. Efficacy benefits were seen across all prespecified subgroups, and the safety profile of avelumab was consistent with previous studies of monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02603432 .

Modified DCF (mDCF) regimen seems to be as effective as original DCF in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14628-e14628
Author(s):  
Serkan Keskin ◽  
Fatma Sen ◽  
Fatma Aydogan ◽  
Meltem Ekenel ◽  
Leyla Kilic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance

e14628 Background: The aim of this retrospective study (from January 2007 to December 2011) was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of mDCF schedule for chemotherapy naïve AGC patients. Methods: Patients (n=54) with locally inoperable or distant metastasis, and performance status of 0–2 were eligible. The triplet combination chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 day 1, 5-flourouracil 600 mg/m2 for 5 days continuous infusion were administered every 21 days, up to 9 cycles. Prophylactic G-CSF was not allowed. Two of the patients treated with second line cisplatin/capecitabine. None of the patients treated with radiotherapy. Results: In all, 36 (67%) patients were male and 18 (33%) were female; median age was 59 years (range: 23-80 years). Majority of patients (n=46, 85%) were metastatic disease and 8 (15%) of them were locally advanced disease. Liver metastasis and peritonitis carcinomatosa were found in 20 (%43) and 18 (39%) of the 46 cases, respectively. The median cycle of chemotherapy was 6 (ranging from 1 to 9 cycles). In assessing fifty patients for response evaluation, one had complete response. The partial responses achieved in 27 (54%) patients. Seventeen patients (34%) had stable disease and 5 (10%) progressed. Of 2% (n=4) and 11% (n=6) of the patients developed severe (grade 3-4) neutropenia and anemia, respectively. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Severe thrombocytopenia, hepatic and renal toxicity were not seen. During median follow-up time (8.1 months, range: 1.3-24), 28 (52%) patients were died. The overall and progression-free survival were 11.6 [95% CI: 10.2-13] and 7.7 [95% CI: 6.8-8.7] months, respectively. Conclusions: Although this was not a prospective comparative study, the mDCF regimen seems to be as effective as original DCF in AGC with acceptable and manageable side effects.

Feasibility study of TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (APOLLO-11).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 205-205
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Manabu Ohashi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Takuro Mizukami ◽  
Naoki Ishizuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

205 Background:TAS-118 (S-1 and leucovorin) + oxaliplatin (L-OHP) improved overall survival (OS) compared to S-1 + cisplatin for patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (GC) (Kang, Lancet Oncol. 2020). This study investigated the feasibility of peri (pre and post)-operative (op) chemotherapy (chemo) with TAS-118 ± L-OHP in pts with locally advanced resectable GC. While it was reported that pre-op TAS-118 + L-OHP followed by D2 gastrectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficay (Takahari, ASCO-GI. 2020), the recommended post-op chemo regimen, TAS-118 or TAS-118 + L-OHP, has yet to be determined. Methods:Eligible pts with GC of clinical T3-4N1-3M0 were enrolled. The protocol treatment consisted of pre-op chemo with 4 courses of TAS-118 (40-60 mg/body, orally, twice daily, 7 days) + L-OHP (85 mg/m2, intravenously, day 1) in a 2-week cycle, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by post-op chemo with 12 courses of TAS-118 (step 1) and 8 courses of TAS-118 + L-OHP (step 2). Step 2 was started if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in < 6 of 10 pts in step 1. Up to 20 pts were included in the analysis of feasibility after a recommended regimen was determined. Results:Between December 2016 and February 2019, 45 pts were enrolled. The numbers of pts with cT3/4a and cN1/2/3 were 13/32 and 25/17/3, respectively. Excluding 14 pts (4 achieving pathological complete response, 4 not satisfying the criteria for post-op chemo, 3 physician judgement or pt withdrawal, 2 progressive disease, 1 adverse event [AE]), 31 pts (11/20 in step 1/2) received the post-op chemo. No DLT was observed in either step. The post-op chemo completion rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 63.6-99.5) in step 1 and 80.0% (95% CI, 59.9-92.9) in step 2. The median relative dose intensity of TAS-118 in step 1 was 83.3%, and those of TAS-118 and L-OHP in step 2 were 69.9% and 74.3%, respectively. One pt in step 2 discontinued post-op chemo due to AE. Grade ³ 3 AEs observed in ≥ 10% of pts were weight loss in both step 1 and step 2 (2 in each), and hypokalemia (n = 3) and neutropenia (n = 2) in step 2. At 1-year follow-up after the last pt was enrolled, recurrence-free survival and OS rates were 91.1% (95% CI, 78.0-96.6) and 100%, respectively at 12 months, and 69.1% (95% CI, 49.6-82.3) and 95.5% (95% CI, 71.9-99.3), respectively at 24 months. Conclusions:Taken together with the feasibility and efficacy of pre-op chemo, peri-op chemo with TAS-118 + L-OHP with D2 gastrectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000024688.

ANCHOR (OP-104): Melflufen plus dexamethasone (dex) and bortezomib (BTZ) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)—Optimal dose, updated efficacy and safety results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8037-8037
Author(s):  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Luděk Pour ◽  
Miquel Granell ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Cardiac Failure ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Grade 3

8037 Background: Development of resistance to standard treatments for RRMM highlights the need for novel therapies. Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) that leverages aminopeptidases and rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen + dex showed clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in HORIZON (Richardson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 9 [Epub]). This is an update of the BTZ arm of the phase 1/2a ANCHOR study (NCT03481556). Methods: Patients (pts) with RRMM were intolerant or refractory to a prior IMiD, with 1-4 prior lines of therapy (LoTs). Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor (PI) was allowed, but pts could not be refractory to PIs in the last LoT. Melflufen (30, 40, or 20 mg intravenously; d 1 of each 28-d cycle) was administered with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous) + oral dex (20 mg on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 40 mg on d 15 and 22; dex dose reduced if aged ≥ 75 y). The primary objective in phase 1 was to determine the optimal phase 2 dose of melflufen for this combination. Results: As of the data cutoff date (October 19, 2020), 13 pts received melflufen (30 mg, n = 6; 40 mg, n = 7) + dex and BTZ. In the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, median age was 78.5 y (range, 70-82) and 70.0 y (range, 61-76); median prior LoTs was 3.5 (range, 2-4) and 2.0 (range, 1-4); 33% and 50% of evaluable pts had high-risk cytogenetics; 83% and 71% were refractory to last LoT; 100% and 86% received a prior PI; 33% and 14% were refractory to PIs. In the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, median treatment duration was 6.5 mo (range, 1.4-29.0) and 8.7 mo (range, 2.1-19.6); 4 (67%) and 4 pts (57%) were still on treatment; 2 and 3 pts discontinued (30 mg: progressive disease [PD] and other [1 pt each]; 40 mg: adverse event [AE], lack of efficacy, and PD [1 pt each]). Confirmed overall response rate in the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, was 50% (1 very good partial response [VGPR] and 2 partial response [PR]) and 71% (1 complete response, 3 VGPR, and 1 PR). Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were thrombocytopenia (30 mg: 50%; 40 mg: 100%) and neutropenia (30 mg: 33%; 40 mg: 71%); grade 3/4 nonhematologic TRAEs were infrequent; 3 pts discontinued study treatment due to treatment-emergent AEs (30 mg: cardiac failure chronic and osteolysis [1 pt each]; 40 mg: thrombocytopenia [1 pt]). Serious TRAEs occurred in 2 pts (33%) in the 30 mg cohort (neutropenia and pneumonia [1 pt], syncope [1 pt]) and 1 pt (14%) in the 40 mg cohort (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at either dose level. Fatal AEs occurred in 1 pt in the 30 mg cohort (cardiac failure chronic; unrelated to study treatment). Conclusions: ANCHOR determined that the optimal dose of melflufen is 30 mg + dex and BTZ; results showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts. Recruitment is ongoing; updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03481556.

Phase II Activity of Belinostat (PXD-101), Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Women With Previously Treated Ovarian Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 979-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don S. Dizon ◽  
Lars Damstrup ◽  
Neil J. Finkler ◽  
Ulrik Lassen ◽  
Paul Celano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Resistant Disease ◽  
Novel Approach

BackgroundPreclinical data show that belinostat (Bel) is synergistic with carboplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. To further evaluate the clinical activity of belinostat, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BelCaP), a phase 1b/2 study was performed, with an exploratory phase 2 expansion planned specifically for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsThirty-five women were treated on the phase 2 expansion cohort. BelCap was given as follows: belinostat, 1000 mg/m2 daily for 5 days with carboplatin, AUC 5; and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 given on day 3 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR), using a Simon 2 stage design.ResultsThe median age was 60 years (range, 39–80 years), and patients had received a median of 3 prior regimens (range, 1–4). Fifty-four percent had received more than two prior platinum-based combinations, sixteen patients (46%) had primary platinum-resistant disease, whereas 19 patients (54%) recurred within 6 months of their most recent platinum treatment. The median number of cycles of BelCaP administered was 6 (range, 1–23). Three patients had a complete response, and 12 had a partial response, for an ORR of 43% (95% confidence interval, 26%–61%). When stratified by primary platinum status, the ORR was 44% among resistant patients and 63% among sensitive patients. The most common drug-related adverse events related to BelCaP were nausea (83%), fatigue (74%), vomiting (63%), alopecia (57%), and diarrhea (37%). With a median follow-up of 4 months (range, 0–23.3 months), 6-month progression-free survival is 48% (95% confidence interval, 31%–66%). Median overall survival was not reached during study follow-up.ConclusionsBelinostat, carboplatin, and paclitaxel combined was reasonably well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit in heavily-pretreated patients with EOC. The addition of belinostat to this platinum-based regimen represents a novel approach to EOC therapy and warrants further exploration.

Cetuximab, paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4029-4029 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Suntharalingam ◽  
T. Dipetrillo ◽  
P. Akerman ◽  
H. Wanebo ◽  
B. Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Grade 3

4029 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG1, chimerized, monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab improves survival when combined with radiation for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiation for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell cancer of the esophagus or stomach without distant organ metastases were eligible. Patients with locally advanced disease from mediastinal, celiac, portal and gastric lymphadenopathy were eligible. Surgical resection was not required. Clinical complete response was defined as no tumor on postreatment endoscopic biopsy. Patients received cetuximab, 400mg/m2 week #1 then 250 mg/m2/week for 5 weeks, paclitaxel, 50 mg/m2/week, and carboplatin, AUC =2 weekly for 6 weeks, with concurrent 50.4 Gy radiation. Results: Thirty-seven patients have been entered. The median age was 61 (range of 30–87). Thirty-four have esophageal cancer and 3 have gastric cancer. Of the patients with esophageal cancer, twenty-five have adenocarcinoma and nine have squamous cell cancer. Thus far, 30 patients have completed treatment and are evaluable for toxicity. There have been no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities and 1 pt had grade 4 neutropenia (3%). Six patients (20%) had grade 3 esophagitis. Other grade 3 toxicities included dehydration (n=5), rash (n=9), and paclitaxel/cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions (n=2). Eighteen of 27 patients (67%) have had clinical complete response. Seven pts out of 16 (43%) who have gone to surgery have had a pathologic CR. Conclusions: Cetuximab can be safely administered with chemoradiation for patients with esophageal cancer. Consistent with the data in head and neck cancer, cetuximab increases cutaneous toxicity but does not increase mucositis/esophagitis when combined with chemoradiation. Further evaluation is ongoing. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and tolerability of bevacizumab (BEV) plus capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) in Chinese patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC): Results from the AVATAR study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 73-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Jian-Ming Xu ◽  
Hong-Ming Pan ◽  
Guanghai Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3

73 Background: In the AVAGAST study, chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin) + BEV did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) vs. chemotherapy + placebo. Geographic differences in efficacy were observed, but only 12 Chinese pts were included. AVATAR, a study similar in design to AVAGAST, is a randomized double-blind study conducted exclusively in China in pts with AGC. Methods: Pts aged >18 years with gastric adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1 to XP + BEV 7.5 mg/kg or placebo + XP. The primary objective was OS; secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 202 pts were well balanced. The primary efficacy endpoint of improved OS in the BEV arm was not met (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79–1.56; p=0.5567; see table ). BEV + XP was well tolerated. Grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were 60% and 19% for BEV and 68% vs. 21% for placebo, respectively. Grade 3–5 AEs of special interest with BEV occurred in 8% of BEV pts and 15% of placebo pts; the difference was mainly due to grade 3–5 haemorrhage (BEV 4%, placebo 12%). Conclusions: Addition of BEV to XP in Chinese pts with AGC did not significantly improve outcomes in AVATAR. The results from AVATAR are consistent with the findings seen in the Asian sub-population of the previous AVAGAST study. [Table: see text]

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3575-3575
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

3575 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. his trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally-advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document