Burden of genetic testing in an academic biobank by pathological and family history-based criteria in prostate cancer (PCa).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1576-1576
Author(s):  
James Ding ◽  
Emily Feld ◽  
Anh Le ◽  
Pauleen Sanchez ◽  
Jacquelyn Powers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Phenotypic Data ◽  
Genotype Information ◽  
Genetic Testing Guidelines ◽  
Testing Criteria

1576 Background: Approximately 5% of localized PCa and 12% of metastatic PCa are associated with germline mutations in DNA repair genes. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) issued genetic testing guidelines to identify PCa patients (pts) likely to harbor a germline DNA repair mutation. The overall burden of this guideline-based, resource-intensive genetic testing is unknown. Using supervised phenotype-genotype information extraction algorithms, we determined the projected genetic testing burden at a single institution adhering to NCCN PCa genetic testing guidelines. Methods: A PCa cohort of 2127 pts was identified from the Penn Medicine BioBank via ICD 9/10 codes. Phenotypic data were extracted from the Penn Medicine Cancer Registry and electronic health record systems via natural language processing and manual chart review. Pts were classified based on 9 germline genetic testing criteria outlined in the NCCN PCa guidelines (Version 4.2019). Results: 895/2127 pts met at least 1 of the 9 NCCN genetic testing criteria, corresponding to a 42.1% overall genetic testing burden. 35.2% qualified for testing via high-risk localized PCa and 6.4% qualified via metastatic disease. Of the pts with localized PCa (n=2014), 15.1% qualified for genetic testing via high Gleason score, 5.1% via high-risk family history, 3.7% via PSA>20ng/mL, 8.7% via Ashkenazi Jewish descent, and 0.8% via intraductal/ductal histology. Conclusions: In this single-center PCa cohort, germline genetic testing was NCCN-guideline recommended for a larger proportion of pts than would otherwise be expected based on previously published reports. Future studies are needed to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria for identifying germline mutations. Our study also highlights a need for novel methods to improve the efficiency of genetic testing for a large cohort. [Table: see text]

Germline mutations in DNA repair genes in a large series of unselected Chinese prostate cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17523-e17523
Author(s):  
Yu Wei ◽  
Yao Zhu ◽  
Junlong Wu ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Hao Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Dna Repair Genes ◽  
History Of ◽  
Repair Genes

e17523 Background: Germline DNA repair gene (DRG) mutations has emerged as a potential determinant of cancer risk and therapeutic response in PCa. Despite substantial advances in delineating the germline mutation in DRGs among Caucasian population, the prevalence of mutations in DRGs are largely unknown among a large series of unselected prostate cancer patients in Chinese population. Methods: We enrolled 1003 prostate cancer patients from three different hospitals in China, unselected for family history of cancer or age at diagnosis. All patients received germline genetic testing using a clinician-selected multi-gene panel. The 18 DNA repair genes and HOXB13, which has established or emerging potential clinical actionability in PCa, were analyzed in our study. Results: A total of 94 (9.7%) deleterious germline mutations were identified among the 1003 unselected prostate cancer patients. Of these, 5.6% patients carried a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (5.2% in BRCA2 and 0.4% in BRCA1), 3.6% patients carried other DRG mutations (including 10 genes) and 0.5% patients carried HOXB13 mutations. Besides, variants with uncertain significance (VUS) were found in approximately 45% patients. We also divided 633 metastatic PCa patients into 542 de novo metastastic PCa and 91 recurrent metastastic PCa and found mutation frequencies did not differ between these two groups (9.0% vs 11.6%, p = 0.6). Patients with younger age of onset or family history of cancers were more likely to harbour germline mutations in DRGs. However, the rate of germline mutations were still at a high level for patients more than 70 years old (6.7%) and patients without family history of cancers (7.5%). There is no statistically significant difference in the mutation frequencies between patients with metastasis and without metastasis (7.5% vs 9.2%, p = 0.4), which may be because 85% patients without metastasis in our cohort were in high to very high risk group or have lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: To our knowledge, our study reported the largested series of Chinese PCa patients who received germline genetic testing. Our study provided a rationality for germline genetic testing criteria from high risk to metastastic PCa regardless of family history considering the high proportion. In addition, we recommended a multigene panel covering 13 genes ( ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, FANCA, HOXB13, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53) in China. Nevertheless, the high prevalence of VUS (45%) in Chinese PCa patients warrant further efforts.

scholarly journals Cancer Previvors in an Active Duty Service Women Population: An Opportunity for Prevention and Increased Force Readiness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leann A Lovejoy ◽  
Clesson E Turner ◽  
Craig D Shriver ◽  
Rachel E Ellsworth
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Clinical Genetic ◽  
High Risk Women ◽  
Clinical Genetic Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
History Of ◽  
Risk Reducing

Abstract Background The majority of active duty service women (ADS) are young, have access to healthcare, and meet fitness standards set by the U.S. military, suggesting that ADS represent a healthy population at low risk of cancer. Breast cancer is, however, the most common cancer in ADS and may have a significant effect on troop readiness with lengthy absence during treatment and inability to return to duty after the treatment. The identification of unaffected ADS who carry germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes (“previvors”) would provide the opportunity to prevent or detect cancer at an early stage, thus minimizing effects on troop readiness. In this study, we determined (1) how many high-risk ADS without cancer pursued genetic testing, (2) how many previvors employed risk-reducing strategies, and (3) the number of undiagnosed previvors within an ADS population. Methods The Clinical Breast Care Project (protocol WRNMMC IRB #20704) database of the Murtha Cancer Center/Walter Reed National Military Medical Center was queried to identify all ADS with no current or previous history of cancer. Classification as high genetic risk was calculated using National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019 guidelines for genetic testing for breast, ovary, colon, and gastric cancer. The history of clinical genetic testing and risk-reducing strategies was extracted from the database. Genomic DNA from ADS with blood specimens available for research purposes were subjected to next-generation sequencing technologies using a cancer predisposition gene panel. Results Of the 336 cancer-free ADS enrolled in the Clinical Breast Care Project, 77 had a family history that met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and 2 had a family history of colon cancer meeting the criteria for genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Of the 28 (35%) high-risk women who underwent clinical genetic testing, 11 had pathogenic mutations in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 (n = 5), BRCA2 (n = 5), or CHEK2 (n = 1). Five of the six ADS who had a relative with a known pathogenic mutation were carriers of the tested mutation. All of the women who had pathogenic mutations detected through clinical genetic testing underwent prophylactic double mastectomy, and three also had risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Two (6%) of the 33 high-risk ADS tested only in the research setting had a family history of breast/ovarian cancer and carried pathogenic mutations: one carried a BRCA2 mutation, whereas the other carried a mutation in the colon cancer predisposition gene PMS2. No mutations were detected in the 177 low-risk women tested in the research setting. Discussion Within this unaffected cohort of ADS, 23% were classified as high risk. Although all of the previvors engaged in risk-reduction strategies, only one-third of the high-risk women sought genetic testing. These data suggest that detailed family histories of cancer should be collected in ADS and genetic testing should be encouraged in those at high risk. The identification of previvors and concomitant use of risk-reduction strategies may improve health in the ADS and optimize military readiness by decreasing cancer incidence.

Genetic testing in young women with breast cancer: Results from a web-based survey

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21093-21093
Author(s):  
J. A. Shin ◽  
S. Gelber ◽  
J. Garber ◽  
R. Rosenberg ◽  
M. Przypyszny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Young Women ◽  
College Education ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

21093 Background: Young women with breast cancer have an increased risk of harboring a BRCA1/2 mutation. The frequency of genetic testing in this population is not well described. We evaluated the reported frequency and factors associated with genetic testing among young breast cancer survivors identified through the Young Survival Coalition (YSC), an international advocacy group for young women with breast cancer. Methods: Items regarding family history and genetic testing were included in a large web-based survey addressing quality of life and fertility issues for young women with breast cancer. All YSC members were invited by email in March 2003 (N= 1,703 women) to participate in this cross-sectional survey. Results: 657 women completed the on-line survey; 622 were eligible for this analysis (age <40, no metastatic or recurrent disease). Mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 33 years; mean age when surveyed 35.5 years. Stages included: 0 (10%), I (27%), II (49%), III (12%), missing (3%). 90% of women were white; 64% married; 49% with children; 78% had at least a college education; 42% of women reported a 1st or 2nd degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and 13% considered themselves high-risk for harboring a genetic mutation at the time of diagnosis. At the time of the survey, 23% of women had undergone genetic testing, and 26% of those tested reported that a mutation was found. In a multivariate model, women who were younger (age 36–40 vs. age =30, O.R. 2.26, p=0.004), more educated (< college vs. > college education, O.R. 2.62, p=0.0009), had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (O.R. 3.15, p<0.0001), and had had a mastectomy (O.R. 1.99, p=0.001) were more likely to have undergone genetic testing. Non-significant covariates included: age at survey, stage, time since diagnosis, race, marital status, employment, finances, insurance, number of children, comorbidities, baseline anxiety and depression, and fear of recurrence. Conclusion: The majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 40 and younger do not undergo genetic testing. Younger, more educated women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer are more likely to get tested. Further research to define the appropriateness of genetic testing in this relatively high-risk population is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Decision support for family history intake to determine eligibility for BRCA testing among multiethnic women.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1586-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia E. McGuinness ◽  
Meghna S. Trivedi ◽  
Alejandro Vanegas ◽  
Hilary Colbeth ◽  
Rossy Sandoval ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
The Family ◽  
Brca Genetic Testing

1586 Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that women who meet family history criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) be referred for genetic counseling. However, HBOC genetic testing is under-utilized, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities. We evaluated different methods of family history intake, including a validated family history screener, documentation in the electronic health record (EHR), and a web-based decision aid (DA). Methods: Among women undergoing screening mammography, we administered a validated family history screener to determine eligibility for BRCA genetic testing based upon USPSTF guidelines. We developed a patient-centered DA ( RealRisks) which includes modules on breast cancer risk, collection of detailed family history, and information on HBOC genetic testing. Women who met high-risk criteria for breast cancer were enrolled in an intervention trial to determine whether exposure to RealRisks increases referrals for high-risk consultations. BRCA genetic counseling/testing uptake was assessed by self-report and EHR review. Results: From November 2014 to June 2016, 3077 women completed the family history screener. Median age was 59 years (range, 29-99), including 76% Hispanic, 4% Ashkenazi Jewish, and 60% with a high school education or less. 12% met family history criteria for BRCA genetic testing based upon the family history screener, of which only 5.9% had previously undergone genetic counseling or testing. Sixty high-risk women were enrolled to access RealRisks. When family histories based upon the screener, DA, and EHR were compared, 12 (20%) had discrepancies in number of affected relatives, type of cancer, and age at diagnosis which changed eligibility for BRCA testing. Follow-up is ongoing to determine whether the DA facilitates appropriate referrals for genetic counseling. Conclusions: In a population of predominantly Hispanic and less educated women, a large proportion met USPSTF family history criteria for BRCA testing, but uptake of genetic counseling was low. Developing decision support for accurate family history intake is critical to identifying appropriate candidates for genetic referrals.

DNA repair germline pathogenic mutation associations with treatment duration and family history in prostate cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 245-245
Author(s):  
James Vu ◽  
Marcus Marie Moses ◽  
Lahiru Ranasinghe ◽  
Patrick Cotogno ◽  
Charlotte Manogue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Family History ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
History Of

245 Background: Germline mutation testing for metastatic prostate cancer patients creates a potential opportunity to personalize targeted therapies to improve treatment outcomes. The goal of this study was to characterize cancer family history, and evaluate treatment outcomes, in mCRPC patients with DNA repair pathogenic germline alterations. Methods: A retrospective study of metastatic PCa patients at Tulane Cancer Center identified 246 patients undergoing germline testing using panels (30-80 genes) (Color.com or Inviate.com). Clinical annotations included family history, life-extending treatments, and treatment duration. Statistical analyses including chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum. Results: In the 246 patients tested for germline mutations, 27 patients (11.0%) had ≥1 DNA repair germline pathogenic mutation (BRCA2 = 11, BRCA1 = 3, CHEK2 = 5, ATM = 3, NBN = 1, PMS2 = 2, MSH2 = 1, PALB2 = 1) while 219 patients (89.0%) possessed no pathogenic mutation in these genes. Patients with a DNA repair pathogenic mutation were more likely to have > 2 family members affected by cancer, regardless of cancer type or degree of relationship (p = 0.04). In the DNA repair population, 5 pathogenic patients had no family history of cancer (18.5%, n = 5). Patients were more likely to have a germline alteration if they had 1 or more first degree relatives affected with breast cancer (p = 0.00001). Median lines of life-extending treatments to date between the pathogenic and non-pathogenic population were equal at 2. There were no significant differences in treatment duration for abiraterone (p = 0.49), enzalutamide (p = 0.99), docetaxel (p = 0.28), cabazitaxel (p = 0.53), carboplatin+docetaxel (p = 0.41), or radium-223 (p = 0.59) between the two groups. Conclusions: In this study, DNA repair pathogenic germline mutations did not affect treatment durations or lines of therapy but these studies are underpowered. The relationship between a family history of breast cancer and a DNA repair pathogenic mutation has not previously been reported.

Genetic counseling processes and outcomes among prostate cancer patients (ProGen).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS343-TPS343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Rachel Vatnick ◽  
Sandjida Aktar ◽  
Jill E. Stopfer ◽  
Lindsay Kipnis ◽  
Samantha K. Culver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Mismatch Repair Genes ◽  
Repair Genes

TPS343 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is among the leading causes of cancer mortality in males. Recent studies found 8-12% of advanced PC cases may be hereditary. Germline mutations have been reported in BRCA1/2, other DNA repair genes including ATM, CHEK2, PALB2 and DNA mismatch repair genes. Genetic testing can inform treatment decisions including drug targeting, such as PARP inhibitors for men with BRCA mutations, and checkpoint inhibitors for those with pathogenic mutations in mismatch repair genes2. Discovering a pathogenic mutation associated with increased cancer risk also prompts dissemination of this information to family, where subsequent testing can lead to risk stratification and impactful opportunities for cancer screening and prevention. It is critical that men with high risk and potentially lethal prostate cancer routinely be offered genetic testing as a component of their cancer care. Genetic counseling services are limited, and more efficient services are needed. Methods: We are investigating video education prior to genetic testing compared with in-person pretest counseling with a licensed genetic counselor (GC). ProGen is an ongoing randomized trial evaluating two distinct models of cancer genetics service delivery in 450 PC cases over a two-year period. The study is conducted in collaboration with Ambry Genetics utilizing a 67-gene cancer panel. The primary aim is analysis of the proportion and type of germline mutations identified. Secondary aims include testing uptake by arm, evaluation of distress, knowledge, satisfaction with testing services, family communication, and impact on cancer care. Results are communicated by telephone with a GC. Inclusion criteria are: potentially lethal PC (metastatic, localized with Gleason score ≥8, rising/persistent PSA after local therapy), early diagnosis (≤ 55 years), prior malignancy, and/or family history potentially indicating a hereditary cancer risk. Enrollment is 74% completed at a single institution. (NCT03328091). 1 Pritchard CC, et al. Inherited DNA‐repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer. NEJM. 2016;375:443 2 Mateo J, et al. DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. NEJM . 2015;373(18):1697-1708 Clinical trial information: NCT03328091.

Germline mutations in Brazilian pancreatic carcinoma patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16749-e16749
Author(s):  
Livia Munhoz Rodrigues ◽  
Simone Maistro ◽  
Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama ◽  
Luiz A.Senna Leite ◽  
Joao Glasberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Family History Of Cancer ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Cancer

e16749 Background: Pancreatic cancer has the prospect of becoming the second leading cause of cancer death by 2030. The NCCN Guidelines recommend genetic testing for all patients with pancreatic cancer, however, the spectrum of germline mutations has not been extensively evaluated because recent studies with genetic testing have explored only a limited number of genes and have focused predominantly on Caucasian populations. Therefore, our objective is to evaluate the frequency and spectrum of germline mutations in unselected patients with pancreatic cancer in a multiethnic population. Methods: Patients from Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (Brazil) with histopathological diagnosis of non-endocrine pancreatic carcinoma were included, regardless of the family history of cancer. These patients answered a life habits and family history of cancer questionnaire and supplied blood for the Next Generation Sequencing (MiSeq platform) with the TruSight Hereditary Cancer panel (Illumina), which includes 115 cancer predisposing genes. Variant analysis was performed with the VarStation, a Brazilian tool that offers post-sequencing computational support and aid for clinical interpretation. Results: To the present moment, 77 patients were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (27-83), among whom, 13% with young age (≤50 years) and 47 women (61%). Thirty-eight patients (49%) reported cases of cancer in first-degree relatives. Regarding risk factors, 41 patients (53%) reported smoking, 19 (25%) alcohol ingestion and 20 (26%) had obesity. Seven out of 77 patients presented pathogenic variants in ATM (n = 2) , CHEK2, FANCM (n = 2) or PALB2 (n = 2) genes. Two of these patients ( CHEK2 and FANCM) had early onset pancreatic cancer (≤45 years), both denied smoking habit and family history of cancer in 1st degree relatives. Two patients, who were ATM mutation carriers, reported 1st or 2nd degree relatives with cancer and are alive after 4 and 8 years of diagnosis. Conclusions: In this unselected group of pancreatic cancer patients, 15% were young, almost half reported first-degree relatives with cancer and 9% were carriers of pathogenic variants in genes related with the homologous recombination DNA repair.

Comparison of germline mutations in African American and Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5568-5568
Author(s):  
Elisa Marie Ledet ◽  
Ellen Jaeger ◽  
Whitley Hatton ◽  
Marcus W. Moses ◽  
Alexandra Sokolova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
African American ◽  
Family History ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Dna Repair Genes ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Repair Genes

5568 Background: The relevance of germline mutations in metastatic prostate cancer is well established; however, comparison of germline genetics in African American (AA) versus Caucasian (CA) men with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is limited. Methods: Germline data from self-identified AA and CA metastatic PCa patients (pts) were collected from 5 academic cancer centers. Various commercial cancer-specific germline testing panels were used to evaluate 12-86 genes. Pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) mutations, and variants of unknown significance (VUS), were reported according to ACMG guidelines. Self-reported family history (FH) was annotated for 99% of pts. Statistical analyses included Chi-squared and Fischer’s exact tests. Results: A total of 821 metastatic PCa pts were assessed: 152 AAs and 669 CAs. For P/LP alterations, AAs had a frequency of 11.2% (17/152) as compared to a frequency of 14.6% (98/669) in CAs (p = 0.302). AA pts were more likely to have a VUS than CA pts, 61% vs 43% respectively (OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.45, 2.99], p < 0.001). BRCA mutations were similar between races, but AA were more likely to have a BRCA1 P/LP alteration (OR = 6.00, 95% CI [1.33, 27.09], p = 0.025). AA pts were less likely to have a P/LP alteration in a non-BRCA gene (OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.15, 0.80], p = 0.013). Among DNA repair genes, there were no significant difference between AA and CA pts (p = 0.574); however, there was a trend toward AA pts having fewer P/LP alteration in a non-BRCA DNA repair genes (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.06, 1.08], p = 0.071). In pts with >1 first degree relative (FDR) with ovarian cancer, P/LP germline alterations were more likely in CAs (OR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.05, 5.17], p = 0.043); but there were no significant differences in AAs (p = 0.098). Those with >2 FDRs with PCa were more likely to have a P/LP change in CAs (OR = 2.32, 95% CI [1.04, 5.15], p = 0.043), but there were no difference in AAs (p = 0.700). In pts with ≥2 FDRs with breast cancer, P/LP germline alterations were more likely in both AAs (OR = 9.36, 95% CI [1.72, 50.84], p = 0.019) and CAs (OR = 3.92, 95% CI [1.79, 8.59], p = 0.001). Conclusions: We did not observe a difference in the overall frequency of germline P/LP alterations between AA and CA men with metastatic PCa but VUSs were more common in AA men. These AA men have an overall frequency of BRCA mutations similar to CA men; however, BRCA1 mutations were more prevalent in these AAs. Non-BRCA P/LP mutations are significantly less frequent in AA pts. A positive family history of >2 FDRs with breast cancer was associated with P/LP alterations in both AA and CA pts.

scholarly journals Should Patients with Apparently Sporadic Pheochromocytomas or Paragangliomas be Screened for Hereditary Syndromes?

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (8) ◽  
pp. 2851-2858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo Jiménez ◽  
Gilbert Cote ◽  
Andrew Arnold ◽  
Robert F. Gagel
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Hereditary Disease ◽  
Mitochondrial Complex ◽  
Hereditary Syndromes ◽  
Sporadic Pheochromocytoma ◽  
Hereditary Pheochromocytoma

Abstract Context: The recent identification of germline mutations of the mitochondrial complex II genes in variants of paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma syndrome has enlarged the number of known causative genes for hereditary pheochromocytoma. A question confronting clinicians is whether they should screen patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas for unsuspected germline mutations of some or all of the seven genes known to cause hereditary paraganglioma or pheochromocytoma (NF1, VHL, RET, MEN1, SDHD, SDHC, and SDHB). A positive answer was suggested by a report that placed the estimate of hereditary disease in apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma as high as 24%. Evidence Acquisition: We applied clinically useful criteria to a review of the literature, defining cases of apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma as those without a suspicious personal or family history, with a focal, unilateral pheochromocytoma, and presenting at age less than 50 yr. Evidence Synthesis: We reduced the overall estimate of unsuspected hereditary pheochromocytoma patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma to approximately 17%. Mutations in only three genes (VHL, SDHB, and SDHD) accounted for almost this entire minority, and unsuspected RET mutation was rare. Costs, coverage by insurance, the potential effect on insurability, and deficient information for populations outside of referral centers should be considered before recommending genetic testing in patients with apparently sporadic presentations of pheochromocytomas. Conclusion: We recommend genetic testing for patients with an apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma under the age of 20 yr with family history or features suggestive of hereditary pheochromocytoma or for patients with sympathetic paragangliomas. For individuals who do not meet these criteria, genetic testing is optional.

Mutation analysis of PALB2 in high-risk and lower-risk patients negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Shelly Cummings ◽  
Jenny Peterson ◽  
Elisha Hughes ◽  
Rajesh R. Kaldate ◽  
Sonia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Palb2 Mutation

30 Background: PALB2 has been identified as a breast cancer susceptibility gene conferring ~ 2-4 fold increased risk of breast cancer. A number of studies have estimated the PALB2 mutation prevalence to range from 0.5% - 2.9% in populations of breast cancer patients. We performed an analysis to determine the PALB2 mutation prevalence in a large U.S. referral testing population. Methods: DNA samples were anonymized from two subsets of patients: 955 early onset breast cancer patients with severe family history, and 524 patients with later onset of breast cancer and/or less severe family history. All patients were negative for deleterious sequence mutations or large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Results: We identified 10 disease associated PALB2 mutations in the high risk group of 955 patients and 2 deleterious PALB2 mutations in the lower risk group of 524 patients. Identified PALB2 mutations included 8 nonsense, 3 frameshift mutations and a splice site mutation. The mutation prevalence for the high risk population was 1.05% (95% C.I., 0.5 -1.92) whereas that for the lower risk population was 0.38% (95% C.I., 0.05-1.37). The observed rate of PALB2 variants of unknown significance (VUS) identified in this study was ~5% (78 VUS were in 75 of the 1479 patients that were tested). Our variant classification program which successfully decreased the VUS rate in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is similarly expected to enhance mutation classification on an on-going basis for PALB2 genetic testing. Conclusions: Genetic testing for PALB2 may be indicated as a reflex test for breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document