Intervention combining nurse navigators (NNs) and a mobile application versus standard of care (SOC) in cancer patients (pts) treated with oral anticancer agents (OAA): Results of CapRI, a single-center, randomized phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2000-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Mir ◽  
Marie Ferrua ◽  
Aude Fourcade ◽  
Delphine Mathivon ◽  
Adeline Duflot-Boukobza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Grade 3

2000 Background: Various interventions aiming to improve a safe use of oral anti-cancer agents have previously been reported. These retrospective studies involved nurse-led follow-up and use of health technologies. However, the potential impact of these combined strategies is limited by a lack of rigorous methodology. Methods: We performed a randomized phase 3 trial comparing an intervention combining NNs and a mobile application vs. SOC in cancer pts treated with OAA (excluding hormonal therapy) in our tertiary cancer center. Pts initiating OAA (all types of cancer, PS < 3, life expectancy > 6 months), were randomized in a 1:1 basis. The intervention combined a nursing-led follow-up and a mobile application for patients. NNs provided regular phone follow-ups to manage symptoms and assess toxicities, adherence and supportive care needs. Pts had access to a mobile application to record tracking data, contact NNs via secure messaging or a dedicated phone line. The intervention lasted 6 months. The primary endpoint was the Relative Dose Intensity (RDI). Secondary endpoints included adherence, toxicity, response and survival, quality of life, pts experience (PACIC Score), end-of-life support, and economic estimation of the use of healthcare resources. Results: From October 2016 to May 2019, 609 pts (median age: 62 years, 20-92; PS2: 11.8%) were included. 39% were receiving oral chemotherapy, and 61% other OAA. The RDI was significantly higher in the CAPRI arm (93.4% ±0.26 vs. 89.4% ±0.19, p = 0.04). The CAPRI intervention also improved PACIC scores (mean: 2.94±0.83 vs. 2.67±0.89, p = 0.01), the number of unplanned hospitalizations (15.1% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.04), hospitalization duration (mean: 2.82±6.96 days vs. 4.44±9.60, p = 0.02), and treatment-related grade≥3 toxicities (27.6% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Compared to SOC, the CAPRI intervention improved RDI, pts experience, hospitalizations and their duration, as well as the rate of treatment-related grade≥3 toxicities. This type of intervention should represent a new standard in pts receiving OAA. Clinical trial information: NCT02828462.

Patient experience of an intervention combining nurse navigators and e-Health technologies for use of oral anticancer agents.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23149-e23149
Author(s):  
Marie Ferrua ◽  
FATIMA YATIM ◽  
Aude Fourcade ◽  
Marilène Guillet Lacaze ◽  
Etienne Minvielle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Secure Messaging ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Human Contact ◽  
Patients Experience ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Oral Anticancer Agents

e23149 Background: An intervention (named CAPRI) combining Nurse Navigators (NN) and a mobile application dedicated to patients treated with oral anticancer agents was implemented in 2016 at Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France). NN provide regular telephone follow-ups to manage patients' symptoms and assess toxicities, adherence to treatment and supportive care needs. Patients can have access to a mobile application to record tracking data, contact NN via secure messaging, view therapy and side effect information or store documents. Methods: A questionnaire was addressed to patients after using for 5 months the CAPRI intervention in order to assess their experience with the device. In parallel, interviews were conducted with patients. To determine patient utilization of the mobile application, data were extracted over a 24-month period. Results: 148 patients completed the evaluation (response rate = 81%). 15 interviews were conducted. Patients' experience with CAPRI intervention is very positive: The open-ended comments on the questionnaires and interviews with patients highlighted the importance of listening, having a contact person who is easily reachable, available and empathetic. 83% of patients preferred contacting NN by phone rather than through the mobile application. Only 50% (n = 74) of patients reported having tried to connect to the mobile application and 38% reported monitoring data at least once. Conclusions: Patients' experience is highly positive about the intervention. However, the application is poorly used, patients seems to prefer human contact. In perspective, results from the randomized trial currently conducted will evaluate the impact of the intervention on clinical criteria.[Table: see text]

Feasibility study of TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (APOLLO-11).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 205-205
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Manabu Ohashi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Takuro Mizukami ◽  
Naoki Ishizuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

205 Background:TAS-118 (S-1 and leucovorin) + oxaliplatin (L-OHP) improved overall survival (OS) compared to S-1 + cisplatin for patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (GC) (Kang, Lancet Oncol. 2020). This study investigated the feasibility of peri (pre and post)-operative (op) chemotherapy (chemo) with TAS-118 ± L-OHP in pts with locally advanced resectable GC. While it was reported that pre-op TAS-118 + L-OHP followed by D2 gastrectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficay (Takahari, ASCO-GI. 2020), the recommended post-op chemo regimen, TAS-118 or TAS-118 + L-OHP, has yet to be determined. Methods:Eligible pts with GC of clinical T3-4N1-3M0 were enrolled. The protocol treatment consisted of pre-op chemo with 4 courses of TAS-118 (40-60 mg/body, orally, twice daily, 7 days) + L-OHP (85 mg/m2, intravenously, day 1) in a 2-week cycle, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by post-op chemo with 12 courses of TAS-118 (step 1) and 8 courses of TAS-118 + L-OHP (step 2). Step 2 was started if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in < 6 of 10 pts in step 1. Up to 20 pts were included in the analysis of feasibility after a recommended regimen was determined. Results:Between December 2016 and February 2019, 45 pts were enrolled. The numbers of pts with cT3/4a and cN1/2/3 were 13/32 and 25/17/3, respectively. Excluding 14 pts (4 achieving pathological complete response, 4 not satisfying the criteria for post-op chemo, 3 physician judgement or pt withdrawal, 2 progressive disease, 1 adverse event [AE]), 31 pts (11/20 in step 1/2) received the post-op chemo. No DLT was observed in either step. The post-op chemo completion rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 63.6-99.5) in step 1 and 80.0% (95% CI, 59.9-92.9) in step 2. The median relative dose intensity of TAS-118 in step 1 was 83.3%, and those of TAS-118 and L-OHP in step 2 were 69.9% and 74.3%, respectively. One pt in step 2 discontinued post-op chemo due to AE. Grade ³ 3 AEs observed in ≥ 10% of pts were weight loss in both step 1 and step 2 (2 in each), and hypokalemia (n = 3) and neutropenia (n = 2) in step 2. At 1-year follow-up after the last pt was enrolled, recurrence-free survival and OS rates were 91.1% (95% CI, 78.0-96.6) and 100%, respectively at 12 months, and 69.1% (95% CI, 49.6-82.3) and 95.5% (95% CI, 71.9-99.3), respectively at 24 months. Conclusions:Taken together with the feasibility and efficacy of pre-op chemo, peri-op chemo with TAS-118 + L-OHP with D2 gastrectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000024688.

scholarly journals 354 Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in advanced endometrial carcinoma (EC): long-term efficacy and safety update from a phase 1b/2 study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A381-A381
Author(s):  
Vicky Makker ◽  
Carol Aghajanian ◽  
Allen Cohn ◽  
Margarita Romeo ◽  
Raquel Bratos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cutoff Date

BackgroundLenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor of VEGFR 1–3, FGFR 1–4, PDGFRα, RET, and KIT. Pembrolizumab is an anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody. We previously reported results from a cohort of 108 patients with metastatic EC (data cutoff date, January 10, 2019) who received lenvatinib + pembrolizumab as part of an ongoing multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 study evaluating the combination treatment in patients with selected solid tumors (NCT02501096). Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab showed a tolerable safety profile and promising antitumor activity per immune-related (ir) Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) by investigator assessment, including an objective response rate (ORR) of 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.7–48.7), median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3–8.7), and median overall survival (OS) of 16.7 months (95% CI, 15.0-not estimable).1 Here we present updated efficacy and safety data (data cutoff date: August 18, 2020).MethodsPatients included in the EC cohort had histologically confirmed, measurable metastatic EC and had received ≤2 prior chemotherapies (unless discussed with the sponsor). Patients received lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) and pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks). The phase 2 efficacy endpoints included ORR, PFS, OS, and duration of response. Tumor assessments for primary and secondary endpoints were evaluated by investigators per irRECIST.ResultsThe 108 patients from the key efficacy analysis set for the previously reported results were all included in these updated analyses. Median follow-up duration for the study was 34.7 months. Efficacy outcomes are summarized in table 1. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 104 (96%) patients (94 [87%] grade ≤3, 10 [9%] grade ≥4). TRAEs led to study-drug interruption of 1 or both drugs in 80 (74.1%) patients and dose reductions of lenvatinib in 73 (67.6%) patients; 23 (21.3%) patients discontinued 1 or both drugs due to a TRAE. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were hypertension (33.3%), lipase increased (9.3%), fatigue (8.3%), and diarrhea (7.4%).Abstract 354 Table 1ConclusionsWith extended follow-up, our updated efficacy analysis continued to show clinical benefit in patients with metastatic EC who received lenvatinib + pembrolizumab. Moreover, the combination had a manageable safety profile that was generally consistent with the established safety profiles of the individual monotherapies. No new safety signals were detected. A phase 3 study of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice in advanced endometrial cancer further supports the lasting clinical benefits observed in our study.2Trial Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02501096ReferencesMakker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38(26):2981–2992.Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, et al. A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study to compare Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the following ethics committees/institutional review boards (IRBs): Oregon Health & Sciences University IRB, IntegReview IRB, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center IRB, University of Pennsylvania Office of Regulatory Affairs IRB, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute IRB, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division IRB, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB, Western IRB, Quorum Review IRB, US Oncology, Inc. IRB, CEIm - Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos, Regional Komite for Medisinsk og Helsefagli Forskningsetikk, and REC - Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. All participants gave informed consent before taking part in this study.ConsentNo identifying information is contained in this abstract so no permission from participants is considered necessary.

A phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare cisplatin plus fluorouracil with or without docetaxel as the first-line induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long-term outcomes update.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6032-6032
Author(s):  
Wang Fang FangZheng
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

6032 Background: A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare cisplatin plus 5-fluorourcil with or without docetaxel as first-line induction chemotherapy in the patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Here, we report on the long-term outcomes and late toxicities of the trial (NCT01536223). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed LANPC, stage III-IV disease, Karnofsky performance score≥70, without metastasis were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to TPF versus PF for three cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival; local control, OS and advent events were important key secondary end points. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to conduct and compare the survival curves in this study. Results: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. 276 patients (138 TPF and 138 PF) were evaluable. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between two groups, and the median age was 48 (range, 18-60 years). The ORR rates after induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were 90.6% and 9797.8% in TPF group and 87.0% (P > 0.05) and 97.8% (P > 0.05), respectively. The median follow-up was 99 months. For all patients, the 5- and 8-year OS and PFS were 76.9% and 74.9%, 72.3% and 69.1%, respectively. PF was associated with a similar PFS versus TPF ( 5-year PFS of 72.4% versus 73.2%, P =.747), and an equivalent OS at 5 years ( 79.2% and 79.1%, P = 0.519). Treatment-related grade 3 to 4 advent events were less frequent with PF compared with TPF. Conclusions: With prolonged follow-up, the survival outcomes in the PF group were not non-inferiority to those in the TPF group, but grade 3 to 4 advent events were less frequent. Clinical trial information: NCT01536223.

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3664-3670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Rodon ◽  
Brigitte Pegourie ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

Rituximab Therapy after Response to R-CHOP Induction Therapy for Patients with Previously Untreated Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL): Clinical Outcomes and Pharmacokinetics (PK)

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1295-1295
Author(s):  
Louis Fehrenbacher ◽  
Jonathan A. Polikoff ◽  
Robert Hermann ◽  
Haresh Jhangiani ◽  
Jean Bjerke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Residual Concentration ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Abstract The addition of rituximab (R) therapy significantly improves PFS in patients with relapsedl/refractory disease responding after CHOP as well as responders after R-CHOP induction (van Oers, 2005). The aim of this study was to assess, in patients with previously untreated indolent NHL, the safety, efficacy and PK of additional R therapy in responders to R-CHOP induction. Between 10/01 and 08/06, 102 patients aged 28–84 (mean 57 yr) yrs with Ann Arbor Stage III (28.4%) or IV (71.6%) indolent NHL were treated on this Phase II single-arm, open-label, multi-center, community-based trial. Baseline LDH and β2 microglobulin were above normal in 20.6% and 66.3% of patients, respectively. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 all IV on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle; prednisone 100 mg/d po Days 1–5; and R 375 mg/m2 IV 2–3 days prior to first dose of CHOP and thereafter on Day 1 of each cycle). Patients with ongoing response (CR/CRu or PR) received R 375 mg/m2 weekly x 4, repeated every 6 months x 2 yrs, for a total of up to 16 R doses, within 28 days after completion of R-CHOP. Median follow-up was 39 mos. ORR after R-CHOP was 86.3% (95% CI: 78.3, 92.1), with CR/CRu 48% (95% CI: 38.0, 58.2). As measured from initiation of R-CHOP, PFS at 2 and 3 yrs was 75.2% (95% CI: 64.0, 83.3) and 67.3% (95% CI: 54.6, 77.2), respectively. OS at 2 and 3 yrs was 92.9% (95% CI: 85.7, 96.6) and 89.4% (95% CI: 81.2, 94.2), respectively. Infusion-related toxicity with R given after R-CHOP was less frequent than seen with R-CHOP in this study. The overall incidence of serious adverse events during R therapy given after R-CHOP was 8.5%, including 3 NCI-CTC grade 3/4 events: viral encephalitis (n=1), patellar fracture (n=1) & development of colon cancer (n=1). Serum R concentrations were collected over serial timepoints from 12 patients. Both pre- and end of infusion serum R concentrations were similar across cycles 2–4 of R therapy given after R-CHOP. R concentration was higher just prior to infusion of the first R dose given after R-CHOP due to residual concentration from the R-CHOP treatment. Concentrations were very low (< 10 ug/mL) just prior to initiation of the subsequent R cycles. During R therapy given after R-CHOP, serum R concentrations were similar to those previously reported during R monotherapy treatment (Berinstein, 1998). In summary, this study demonstrated that R therapy given after R-CHOP to be generally well-tolerated, and associated with 75.2% PFS and 92.9% OS at 2 yrs, and 67.3% PFS and 89.4% OS at 3 yrs. Moreover, the current study demonstrates that PK data from R induction can be extrapolated to R given after R-CHOP. The benefit of adding additional R therapy to responders to R-chemotherapy will be addressed in the analysis of the ongoing Phase III PRIMA study, wherein patients with advanced follicular lymphoma who respond to R-chemotherapy induction are randomized to receive further R therapy vs. observation.

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (VMPT) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 652-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Valeria Magarotto ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Infusion ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In newly diagnosed myeloma patients the combination of bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone (VMP) was superior to MP. In relapsed-refractory patients the 4 drug combination of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (VMPT) induced a high proportion of complete responses (CR). Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloma patients (N=393) older than 65 years, from 58 centers in Italy, were randomly assigned to receive VMPT (N=193) or VMP (N=200). Initially, patients were treated with nine 6-week cycles of VMPT (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11,22,25,29,32 in cycles 1–4 and days 1,8,22,29 in cycles 5–9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 days 1–4; prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1–4 and thalidomide 50 mg days 1–42, followed by bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 15 days and thalidomide 50 mg/day as maintenance) or VMP (bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone at the same doses and schedules previously described without maintenance). In March 2007, the protocol was amended: both VMPT and VMP schedules were changed to nine 5-week cycles and bortezomib schedule was modified to weekly administration (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 in cycles 1–9). Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups: median age was 71 years, 23% of patients were aged > 75 years. Patients who received at least 1 cycle were evaluated: 152 patients for VMPT (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion) and 152 patients for VMP (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion). Data were analyzed in intention-to-treat. The very good partial response (VGPR) rate was higher in the VMPT group (55% versus 42%, p=0.02), including a CR rate of 31% in the VMPT group and 16% in the VMP group (p=0.003). In the subgroup treated with weekly infusion of bortezomib, VGPR was 59% for VMPT and 37% for VMP (p=0.004), including 28% CR for VMPT and 10% for VMP (p=0.004). Subgroup analyses did not show any statistical difference between responses and either age, B2-microglobulin or chromosomal abnormalities, such as del13, t(4;14), t(14;16) and del17. After a median follow-up of 13.6 months, the 2-year PFS was 83.9% in the VMPT group and 75.7% in the VMP group (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.38–1.42, p=0.35). In patients who received weekly infusion of bortezomib, the 2-year PFS was 86.8% in the VMPT group and 78.1% in the VMP group (HR=0.65, 95% CI 0.24–1.8, p=0.41). In patients who achieved CR after induction, the 2-year PFS was 100% for VMPT and 79% for VMP (p=0.02). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 89.5% in the VMPT group and 88.7% in the VMP group (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.43–2.46, p=0.96). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups. In the VMPT patients and in the VMP patients, the more frequent AEs were neutropenia (36% vs 31%), thrombocytopenia (20% vs 19%), peripheral neuropathy (18% vs 12%), infections (14% vs 10%), and gastrointestinal complications (7% vs 8%), respectively. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly decreased the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (9% for VMPT and 3% for VMP). Conclusion: VMPT is superior to VMP in terms of response rates. Longer follow-up is needed to assess their effects on PFS and OS. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy without influencing outcome. Table. Complete responses, progression-free survival and peripheral neuropathy in all patients and in those who received weekly infusion of bortezomib VMPT group (n=152) VMP group (n=152) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) CR rate (%) 31 28 16 10 2-year PFS (%) 84 87 76 78 Grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (%) 18 9 12 3

Rituximab Maintenance Treatment for a Maximum of 5 Years In Follicular Lymphoma: Safety Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Trial SAKK 35/03

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1802-1802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian J. Taverna ◽  
Simona Bassi ◽  
Felicitas Hitz ◽  
Walter Mingrone ◽  
Thomas Pabst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 1802 Background: Rituximab maintenance has been shown to be effective in patients with follicular lymphoma. The optimal duration of maintenance remains unknown. Methods: We prospectively registered 270 patients with untreated, chemotherapy resistant or relapsed follicular lymphoma. All patients received rituximab induction consisting of 4 weekly doses (375 mg/m2). Responding patients (PR and CR) were randomized to a short maintenance consisting of four doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) every two months (arm A) or prolonged maintenance consisting of rituximab every two months for a maximum of five years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm B). Primary endpoint is event-free survival. Here we present the safety analysis results after a median long-term maintenance period of 3.3 years. Results: From October 2004 to November 2007 165 patients were randomized, 82 in arm A and 83 in arm B. The median follow-up time is 3.2 years for arms A and B combined. While receiving maintenance therapy a total of 899 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were observed, 28 of grade 3 and 6 of grade 4. After randomization five patients experienced subsequent cancers. Seven grade 3 and 4 infections were reported. Two grade 3 infections occurred after 2 years of maintenance. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 6 (3.6 %) patients, decreased levels of IgG were observed in 24 (14.6 %) patients. In arm B, maintenance was stopped due to unacceptable toxicity in 2 patients after 16 and 42 months respectively and due to subsequent breast cancer in 1 patient after 20 months. One patient died 4 months after randomization because of ileus and consecutive peritonitis, considered to be unrelated to therapy. Sixty-three patients are on maintenance for two or more years of which 48 patients are on for three or more years. Two patients have completed the 5 years of maintenance. Conclusions: Rituximab maintenance beyond two years is feasible without evidence for increased toxicity. However, close follow up of patients under prolonged rituximab maintenance is still necessary. The trial has been closed for accrual but there are still patients on treatment. Disclosures: Taverna: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghielmini:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Use in Young Fit CLL Patients Receiving Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab Frontline: Impact on Outcomes, Relative Dose Intensity and Toxicities

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1798-1798
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Bouvet ◽  
Lucie Oberic ◽  
Christian Recher ◽  
Françoise Huguet ◽  
Xavier Carles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Relative Dose Intensity ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Abstract 1798 INTRODUCTION: fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) is the standard upfront immunochemotherapy for young fit CLL patients. The clinical benefit of growth factors support is yet unclear, despite recently published possible impact on outcomes in a series of 32 patients [Grüber M, 2011]. The use of G-CSF is not recommended in the CLL8 trial, outside febrile neutropenia, but often applied outside clinical trials to prevent toxicities and achieve good relative dose-intensity (RDI). We retrospectively assessed, in an Hematology healthcare network, the impact of G-CSF on survivals (PFS, TTNT, OS), outcomes (RDI, minimal residual disease (MRD), overall response rates (CR/CRi), and toxicities (grade 3–4 neutropenia, fever, hospitalizations). PATIENTS AND METHODS: among 101 patients treated with FCR frontline, three groups of patients are considered: group 1 (no G-CSF), group 2 (primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim after each course of FCR), and group 3 (patients of group 1 initially, but who were treated with G-CSF due to at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia (at the discretion of the physician)). Respectively, toxicities have been assessed in 24/28/13 patients, and outcomes in 45/23/23 patients. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between G-CSF-naïve and -treated patients (IgVH, Binet stage, del11q). No del17p patient was included in this series. Planned RDI for F and C were calculated before 1st cycle of FCR according to age (-20% if >65y), and creatinine clearance (-25% if <60ml/mn). Average RDI (ARDI) actually prescribed to patients were assessed at the last cycle, in mg/m2/week (6xFCR=24 wks) to include dose delays in the calculation of RDI. RESULTS: median age in the cohort of 101 FCR treated pts was 60y (21–83y), 68% were males. 20% had >65y, 13% had creatinine clearance <60ml/mn, CIRS-G comorbidity scores were: 0 (25.5%), 1 (26.5%), 2 (19%), 3 (10%), 4 (8%), 5 (5%), 6 (2%), ≥7 (4%). Planned RDI was ≤75% standard FCR doses (due to age, CrCL, or physician's choice) in 12% of cases, and ARDI was further decreased ≥20% of initial planned RDI in 25% of patients. Peripheral blood 4-color flow MRD wad undetectable in 49% of patients. Impact of G-CSF use on outcomes: results are summarized in Table 1. The use of G-CSF on curative intent for grade 4 neutropenia induced an increase in rates of CRi and prolonged neutropenia at the end of therapy. When used at the time of neutropenia (d15-d21 after FCR cycle), stimulation with G-CSF may be deleterious due to the prescription of the next FCR at d28. Median PFS, TTNT, OS were not significantly improved by the use of G-CSF (prophylactic or curative). G-CSF did not impact on MRD levels neither. MRD eradication was the strongest parameter linked to PFS/TTNT. Impact of G-CSF use on toxicities and RDI: results are summarized in Table 2. The use of prophylactic G-CSF (group 2) significantly reduced the rate of neutropenia grade 3–4, and tended to decrease the need for antibiotics given for fever. A dose modification (>10%) was observed in 26% vs 33.3% in patients receiving prophylactic G-CSF or not, respectively. A planned RDI <75% standard FCR doses was linked to reduced PFS and TTNT, but not OS. Prophylactic G-CSF did not prevent a decrease >20% of planned RDI at the end of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that prophylactic G-CSF use after FCR decreases toxicities but does not impact on outcomes. We plan to study G-CSF impact on FCR results in an older, less fit population (FORTIS phase III trial). Disclosures: Ysebaert: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

A Phase III Study Of ASCT Vs Cyclophosphamide-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide-Prednisone Maintenance Vs Lenalidomide Alone In Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 763-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
Adam Zdenek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The introduction of novel agents challenged the role of ASCT at diagnosis. We conducted a multicenter 2X2 randomized trial comparing conventional chemotherapy plus lenalidomide with ASCT followed by maintenance with lenalidomide-prednisone (RP) or lenalidomide (R) alone in newly diagnosed young MM (NDMM) patients. Methods Eligible patients with NDMM ≤ 65 years were enrolled. All patients received Rd induction (four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg day 1–21 and low-dose dexamethasone 40 mg day 1,8,15,22) followed by stem cell mobilization. Patients were randomized to receive consolidation with CRD [six 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 day 1,8,15), dexamethasone (40 mg days 1,8,15,22) and lenalidomide (25 mg days 1–21)] or MEL200-ASCT (melphalan 200 mg/m2 with stem-cell support). Patients were randomly assigned to receive subsequent maintenance with RP (28-day cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21 plus prednisone 50 mg every other day) or R alone (28-day cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21). Primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included safety, responses and overall survival (OS). Data cut off was May 30th, 2013. Results Three-hundred and eighty-nine patients were enrolled in the trial. Patient characteristics were well balanced between CRD (n=194) and MEL200-ASCT (n=195), and between R (n=195) and RP (n=194) arms. Median follow-up was 31 months. In the intent to treat (ITT) analysis, the median PFS was not reached with MEL200-ASCT and 28 months with CRD (the respective 3-year PFS was 60% vs. 38%, HR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.49-0.85, P=0.003). Median time from enrolment to maintenance was 14 months. In the population of patients eligible for maintenance, 2-year PFS from the start of maintenance was 73% for RP and 56% for R patients (HR= 0.57, 95%CI: 0.34-0.93; P=0.03). In the subgroup of patients who received MEL200-ASCT, 2-year PFS from the start of maintenance was 83% for patients who received RP and 64% for those who received R alone (HR=0.36 95%CI: 0.15-0.87, P=0.02). In the subgroup of patients who received CRD, 2-year PFS from the start of maintenance was 64% for patients who received RP and 47% for those who received R alone (HR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.40-1.39, P=0.36). At present, no differences in OS were noticed between patients randomised to received CRD or MEL200-ASCT, and between patients who received RP or R maintenance. As expected, the rates of grade 3-4 hematologic (85% vs. 26%, P<0.001) and non-hematologic (35% vs. 19%, P=0.003) adverse events (AEs) were higher in the MEL200-ASCT arm compared with the CRD arm. The main non-hematologic AEs were infections (18% vs. 5%, P=0.001) and gastrointestinal AEs (18% vs. 3%, P<0.001). Rates of grade 3-4 hematologic (8% vs. 7%, P=0.85) and non-hematologic (12% vs. 13%, P=0.88). AEs were similar in the RP and R arms. The main non-hematologic AEs in both RP and R groups were infections (3% vs. 3%). At present, 6 second primary malignancies and 3 cases of cutaneous basalioma have been reported. Conclusions MEL200-ASCT significantly prolonged PFS in comparison with CRD. At present no difference in OS was reported, this may be due to the low number of events and to the length of follow-up. The increase in toxicity with MEL200-ASCT did not adversely impact on efficacy. The addition of prednisone to lenalidomide maintenance significantly reduced the risk of progression in comparison with lenalidomide alone, without increasing the toxicity. Updated data with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spencer:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Larocca:Celgene: Honoraria. Caravita:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Petrucci:Celgene: Honoraria. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document