Cetuximab/irinotecan/5-FU +/-oxaliplatin or FOLFOXIRI +/- bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer and nonresectable liver metastases (AIO CELIM2-study).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Folprecht ◽  
Marika Mende ◽  
Torsten Liersch ◽  
Wolf Otto Bechstein ◽  
Claus-Henning Kohne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Poor Recruitment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Braf Mutant

4024 Background: EGFR based combinations and the triplet combination FOLFOXIRI are known to increase response rates compared to doublet combinations. Methods: Patients with colorectal cancer and non-resectable liver metastases were enrolled into the trial. RAS wild type patients were randomised to cetuximab/FOLFIRI or cetuximab/FOLFOXIRI, RAS/BRAF mutant patients were randomised to FOLFOXIRI with or without bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was response. Secondary endpoints included progression free and overall survival. The trial was closed early due to poor recruitment. Results: Between 2014 and 2018, ninety-two pts were enrolled into the study. 54 wild type pts were randomised into cetuximab based treatment with (28 pts) or without (26 pts) oxaliplatin, 38 RAS/BRAF mutant pts were randomised to receive FOLFOXIRI alone (18 pts) or plus bevacizumab (16 pts). Objective response was achieved in 21/26 pts (81 % [95 CI: 61 – 93 %]) with cet/FOLFIRI, 24/28 pts (86 % [95 CI: 67 – 96 %]) with cet / FOLFOXIRI, 13/1 8 pts (72 % [95 CI: 46 – 90 %]) with FOLFOXIRI and 14/20 pts (70 % [95 CI: 46 – 88 %]) with bev/FOLFOXIRI. Two pts with cet/FOLFOXIRI and one pat with FOLFOXIRI achieved CR according to imaging. The median PFS was 12.7 [95 % CI: 7.2 – 18.2], 15.0 [95 % CI: 11.3 – 18.7], 17.5 [95 % CI: 8.0 – 27.1] and 15.0 [95 % CI: 11.4 – 18.5] months with cet/FOLFIRI, cet/FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOXIRI and bev/FOLFOXIRI. The median overall survival was 42 mo. [95 % CI: 28 – 55], 55 [95 % CI:41 – 68], 28 [95 % CI: 22 – 36] and 44 [95 % CI: 0 – 94] months with cet/FOLFIRI, cet/FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOXIRI and bev/FOLFOXIRI. The frequency of grade ≥ 3 toxicity per arm (cet/FOLFIRI, cet/FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOXIRI and bev/FOLFOXIRI) was 29 %, 46 %, 56 %. 45 % for neutropenia/leukopenia, 11 %, 12 %, 28 %, 25 % for diarrhea and 29 %, 19 %, 6 % and 5 % for skin toxicities. Conclusions: High response rates were observed in patients with colorectal liver metastases with all regimens. The numerically highest response rate was observed in RAS wild type patients treated with cetuximab/FOLFOXIRI. Clinical trial information: NCT01802645 .

Folfoxiri with or without cetuximab as first-line treatment of patients with non-resectable liver, only metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS/NRAS wild type (FOCULM study).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS798-TPS798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Guanjian Liu ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Yue Cai
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Unresectable Liver Metastases

TPS798 Background: For liver limited metastatic colorectal cancers, complete resection of liver metastases is the only potentially curative treatment and can significantly improve overall survival. The current goal of medical treatment for colorectal cancer with initially unresectable liver metastases is to maximize the rate of secondary resection. This phase II study is to explore whether cetuximab in combination with FOLFOXIRI as first treatment could improve radical resectability in patients with KRAS/NRAS wild-type, unresectable liver - only metastases of colorectal cancer. Methods: The primary aim is to evaluate the percentage of patients who had a curative liver treatment following protocol treatment, i.e., liver metastases that can be completely resected and/or ablated with no evidence of residual malignant disease. Secondary aims include safty, objective response rate, overall survival, progression free survival, quality of life and an assessment of predictive molecular markers of response. 138 cases of patients met inclusion criteria and enrolled in the trial will be randomized to two therapy groups: experimental arm A (Chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI + Cetuximab) or standard arm B (Chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI). All patients will receive the study treatment regimen every 2 weeks, and a total of the maximum of 8 cycles. CT scan or MRI of the abdomen will be performed after 2 or 3 cycles of therapy to assess clinical response and resectability of liver metastases by multidisciplinary team including hepatic surgeon. If liver metastases are not deemed to be resectable at this assessment, but tumor assessment demonstrates stable disease or partial response, therapy will continue with re-assessment for clinical response and resectability after the next cycle. Clinical trial information: NCT02063529.

LM02-trial perioperative treatment with panitumumab and FOLFIRI in patients with wild-type RAS, potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16046-e16046
Author(s):  
Gudrun Piringer ◽  
Thomas Gruenberger ◽  
Irene Kuehrer ◽  
Dietmar Oefner ◽  
Klaus Kaczirek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preoperative Therapy ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

e16046 Background: Nearly half of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases and only 20% are initially resectable. Surgical resection of liver metastases results in five-year survival rates of 24-48%. Perioperative FOLFOX therapy increases progression free survival. In advanced disease the addition of targeting therapies to chemotherapy results in an overall survival advantage. In this study the efficacy and safety of perioperative panitumumab and FOLFIRI therapy were investigated. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, wild-type RAS, potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were included. Chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan 180mg/m2 intravenously over 120 minutes and fluorouracil bolus 400mg/m2 intravenously, followed by a 46 h infusion of fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 repeated every 2 weeks. Panitumumab was given as an intravenous dose of 6mg/kg every 2 weeks. Preoperative 4 cycles and postoperative 8 cycles were administered. Primary objectives were the evaluation of efficacy and safety. Results: We enrolled 36 patients in 7 centers in Austria. ITT-analyses included 35 patients. There were 28 men and 7 women, the median age was 66 years. 91.4% completed the planned 4 cycles of preoperative therapy and 82.9% underwent liver resection. R0 resection rate was 82.7%. 20 patients started postoperative chemotherapy and 12 patients completed the planned 8 cycles. Objective response rate after preoperative therapy was 65.7% with one radiological complete remission and 22 partial remissions. In 20% and 5.7% of patients stable disease and progressive disease were documented, respectively. Three patients discontinued preoperative treatment due to adverse events without response evaluation. The most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (n = 4), rash (n = 3) and leukopenia (n = 3) during preoperative therapy. One patient died due to sepsis and one had a pulmonary embolism grade 4. After surgery two patients died due to hepatic failure and one patient had a suture related complication grade 3. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events during postoperative therapy were rash (n = 2), stroke (n = 1) and intestinal obstruction (n = 1). Conclusions: Panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI as preoperative therapy for operable colorectal liver metastases in RAS wild-type patients results in a radiological objective response rate in 65.7% of patients with a manageable grade 3 diarrhea rate of 14.3%. Progression-free survival and overall survival are still monitored. Clinical trial information: 2012_000265-20 .

Safety report of a phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) with cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild type of metastatic colorectal cancer: HGCSG0902.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14062-e14062
Author(s):  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Takashi Kato ◽  
Ayumu Hosokawa ◽  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Safety Report ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

e14062 Background: IRIS is one of the standard regimens as second line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer since IRIS demonstrated the non-inferiority to FOLFIRI (FIRIS study) in Japan. We previously presented IRIS plus bevacizumab (ESMO 2010), however; there is still lack of combination data of IRIS plus molecular target drugs. Thus we conduct the study of IRIS plus cetuximab (HGCSG0902) and this is the planned safety analysis for first 20 patients. Methods: HGSCG0902 is a multicenter phase ll study. Eligibility includes histologically confirmed colorectal cancer, previously received oxaliplatin-contained chemotherapy, PS: 0-1, EGFR positive and KRAS wild type. Patients (pts) received S-1 80-120 mg/m2/day p.o. on days 1-14 and irinotecan 100mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 repeated 28 days. Cetuximab administrated 400mg/m2 loading dose and continued 250mg/m2 every week or 500mg/m2 bi-weekly. The primary endpoint was response rate and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, PFS, OS and safety. Results: Demographics of the 20 enrolled pts were male/female: 13/7, median age: 64.5, colon/rectal: 13/7, PS0/1: 12/8, prior bevacizumab +/-: 15/4 pts. Cetixumab were administrated weelkly/bi-weekly: 9/11 pts. 70% of pts had adverse events (AE). The most common non-hematological AE were diarrhea (85%), acne-like rash (80%), fatigue (75%) and anorexia (60%) and hematological AE were anemia (90%), AST increase (75%) and ALT increase (70%). The main grade 3-4 AE were diarrhea (45%), acne-like rash (20%), anorexia (20%) and stomatitis (20%). These AE were as expected. Nineteen pts stopped the treatment due to progression (52.6%) and AE (36.8%). Conclusions: This safety analysis suggests that IRIS plus cetuximab is well-tolerated and easy to administer.

Triplet chemotherapy (TC) with FOLFIRINOX regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Experience of the Val d’Aurelle Center.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3633-3633
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Samalin ◽  
Virginie Loriot ◽  
Simon Thézenas ◽  
Eric Assenat ◽  
Fabienne Portales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

3633 Background: TC is a treatment option for mCRC to improve the tumor response rate in selected patients (pts) and the conversion rate of initially non-resectable liver metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact and feasibility of FOLFIRINOX regimen in mCRC pts. Methods: All mCRC pts with non-resectable disease who have received FOLFIRINOX alone or combined with targeted therapies (bevacizumab or cetuximab) from October 2000 to December 2010 were selected for this analysis. Clinical data were collected in a mCRC specific data base and analyzed by the end of 2011. Results: Ninety two pts (52% of men), median age 59 yrs (range: 27-76) were treated with FOLFIRINOX (D1 oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² IV 2H then irinotecan 180 mg/m² IV 90 min and elvorin 200 mg/m², then 5FU 200 mg/m² and 2400 mg/m² by 46H infusion, D1=D15) alone (64%) or combined with cetuximab(30%) or bevacizumab (6%), as 1st-line in 82 pts (89%). Prophyllactic G-CSF was given in 58% of them. Primary tumor was located in colon (58%) or rectum (42%), and 64 (69%) of pts presented with synchronous metastases: liver 100%, lung 40%, peritoneum 17% and nodes 17%. Median number of cures was 8 (range: 1-12). There was 1 toxic death. Grade 3-4 toxicities were: diarrhea 22%, neuropathy 21%, cutaneous 12%, neutropenia 28%, febrile neutropenia 0%, thrombopenia 6%. Objective Response rate according to RECIST criteria was 72% [CI95% 61-81] including 10 pts with complete response (11%). The primary tumor was resected in 70 pts (76%) and 14% had KRAS mutated tumor. Among the pts with liver metastases, 63 (68%) pts were evaluated for secondary resectability by a multidisciplinary committee and 40 pts (43%) had resection achieved (70% R0). Median overall survival was 49 months [CI95%28-62]. Conclusions: These results confirm the feasibility of FOLFIRINOX regimen with or without targeted therapies and its efficacy in terms of response rate and overall survival as 1rst-line treatment in selected mCRC pts.

Overall survival analysis of the FOXFIRE prospective randomized studies of first-line selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3507-3507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky A. Sharma ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
Guy A. Van Hazel ◽  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Navesh K. Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
First Line ◽  
Selective Internal Radiotherapy ◽  
Internal Radiotherapy ◽  
Randomized Studies

3507 Background: The FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global (FF-SF-FFG) randomized studies evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with liver metastases. The studies were designed for prospective, combined analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: FF-SF-FFG randomized (1:1) chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients (performance status 0/1) with liver metastases not suitable for curative resection/ablation. Arm A was oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6/ OxMdG) ± investigator-chosen biologically targeted agent. Arm B was the same systemic therapy (oxaliplatin dose modification) + single treatment SIRT with cycle 1/2 of chemotherapy. Primary tumor in situ and/or limited extra-hepatic metastases were permitted. Minimum sample size was 1075 patients (HR 0.8, 80% power, two-sided 5% significance). Secondary outcomes included PFS, liver-specific PFS and response rate. Apart from safety, outcomes were analysed on intention-to-treat population using meta-analytic methods of pooled individual patient data. Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 1103 patients were randomized in 14 countries. Median age was 63 years (range 23-89); median follow-up 43.3 months. There were 844 deaths. There was no difference in OS (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.19, p= 0.609) or PFS (HR 0.90, CI 0.79-1.02, p= 0.108) between Arms. Objective response rate ( p= 0.001) and liver-specific progression (HR 0.51, CI 0.43-0.62, p< 0.001) were significantly more favorable in Arm B. Patients in Arm B had higher risk of non-liver progression as first event (HR 1.98, CI 1.53-2.58, p< 0.001). Grade 3-5 adverse events were more common in Arm B (74.0%) than A (66.5%), p= 0.009. In health status questionnaires, EQ-5D utility scores were not significantly different between Arms at 6, 12 or 24 months. Conclusion: Despite higher response rates and improved liver-specific PFS, the addition of SIRT to first-line oxaliplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for patients with liver-only and liver-dominant mCRC did not improve OS or PFS. Clinical trial information: 83867919.

Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4093-4093 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Yoshino ◽  
W. Koizumi ◽  
K. Yamaguchi ◽  
Y. Miyata ◽  
T. Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidine ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Grade 3

4093 Background: The results of phase I portion of the treatment with the oral S-1 (a new oral fluoropyrimidine) plus oral leucovorin (LV) in patients (pts) with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was reported at ESMO 2006. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were grade 3 stomatitis/pharyngitis, nausea, diarrhea, ileus and exanthema. The recommended doses (RDs) for this phase II portion were determined to be S-1 40 mg/m2 and LV 25 mg/body orally given twice daily on days 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle. The PK profiles of S-1 plus LV were similar to those of S-1 monotherapy and UFT plus LV, respectively. The main purpose of this phase II portion is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus LV at RD level in pts with untreated mCRC. Methods: Pts were eligible as follows; unresectable mCRC with no prior chemotherapy or receiving adjuvant chemotherapy completed at least 6 months before, histologically proven adenocarcinoma, PS(ECOG) 0–2, age 20 to 75, measurable lesions, adequate organ function and written informed consent. The pts received 40 mg/m2 of S-1 plus 25 mg/body of LV twice daily as RD in this phase II portion. The primary endpoint was the objective response rates (RRs), and secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and toxicities. Results: Between Sep 2004 and Jun 2006, 56 pts of 65 enrolled pts received the treatment at RD level. The objective RRs were 55% (36 of 65) for all pts and 55% (31 of 56) for pts at RD. Disease control rates (DCRs) were 86% (56 of 65) for all pts and 86% (48 of 56) for pts at RD. Median TTP was 5.5 months for pts at RD, with a median follow-up of 5.5 months. The median survival time is under observation. During the 6 months from starting the treatment, the most common grade 3/4 toxicities at RD were as follows: diarrhea, 23%; stomatitis, 20%; anorexia, 18%; and neutropenia 13%. Conclusions: A combination of S-1 plus oral LV is an effective, well tolerated, and convenient regimen in pts with untreated mCRC, without the addition of either oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The updated results of the objective RRs, DCRs, TTP reviewed extramurally, and detailed safety profile will be presented at the meeting. This trial was supported by Taiho pharmaceutical co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

mFOLFOXIRI with or without cetuximab as conversion therapy in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable liver metastases colorectal cancer: The FOCULM study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Meng Qiu ◽  
Rongbo Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Group A ◽  
Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Group B

99 Background: Conversion therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (LM) can downsize tumours and create a situation where the patient has no evidence of disease (NED). We assessed the effectiveness of cetuximab plus mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOXIRI in this setting. Methods: FOCULM was a prospective 2:1 controlled, multicenter, phase II trial. Given no free drugs offered and the patients' affordability for cetuximab, the study design has been amended from randomization to non-randomization since September, 2016. Patients with unresectable LM were assigned to receive cetuximab (500mg/m2) plus mFOLFOXIRI (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 165 mg/m2, folinic acid 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 2800mg/m2 46h infusion, every 2 weeks) (group A) or mFOLFOXIRI (group B). Primary endpoint was the rate of NED achieved, secondary endpoints were ORR, resection rate, the rate of local and ablative treatment (LAT), OS, PFS and DpR. Results: From February 2014 to July 2019, 114 patients were enrolled at 6 centers in China and 101 patients were in the ITT population (67 group A, 34 group B). Treatment groups were generally well balanced, although more patients with ≥5 LM were in group A. The rate of NED achieved was 62.7% in group A and 38.2% in group B (P = 0.020). At a median follow-up of 19.4 months, patients in group A had significantly prolonged the mOS, increased ORR, the rate of LAT and DpR compared with those in group B (Table). Patients with NED achieved yielded a significant survival benefit, whether in group A (Not reached vs. 49.4 months; P = 0.001) or group B (Not reached vs. 25.1 months; P = 0.007). Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to a mFOLFOXIRI in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable LM colorectal cancer significantly improved the rate of NED achieved, ORR and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT02063529. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of BRAF mutation as a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
T. Yokota ◽  
T. Ura ◽  
N. Shibata ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Braf Mutant

413 Background: Alterations in the RAS/RAF/ERK signaling pathways frequently occur in colorectal cancer (CRC). KRAS mutations preclude responsiveness to EGFR-targeted therapies for CRC patients. However, prognostic significance of KRAS mutation is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate clinicopathological features of KRAS mutation in codon 12 and 13 as well as of BRAF mutation, and to validate prognostic impact of KRAS/BRAF mutation in advanced and recurrent CRC. Methods: The population consisted of 230 unselected patients who had undergone first-line chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent CRC between November 2002 and June 2010. Cycleave PCR was performed to detect a point mutation at codon 12, 13 or 61 in KRAS, and the V600E mutation in BRAF. Prognostic factors associated with survival were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: KRAS mutations were present in 34.8% (n= 80) of patients, including 23.5% (n = 54) in codon 12, 11.3% (n = 26) in codon 13, and 0% in codon 61. 6.5% (n = 15) of patients had BRAF mutation. None of the CRC patients carried both KRAS and BRAF mutations. The primary tumor lesions were located on the right side of the colon in 60% of the BRAF mutant patients (p=0.0371). Furthermore, BRAF mutant was significantly associated with the pathological subtypes of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma (p<0.0001) and peritoneal metastasis (p=0.0059). The median overall survival for BRAF mutant and KRAS 13 mutant patients was 11.0 and 27.7 months, respectively, which was significantly worse than that for KRAS wild-type (wt)/BRAF wt (40.6 months) (BRAF; HR=3.89, 95% CI 1.83-8.24, p<0.001, KRAS13; HR=2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.74, p=0.024). After adjustment for significant features by multivariate Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 3.70, 95% CI, 1.48-9.28; p=0.005), together with performance status 2. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis shows that clinicopathological features of CRC patients with BRAF mutations seem to be distinct from those with wild type BRAF. BRAF mutation is one of the most powerful prognostic factors in advanced and recurrent CRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Alexander Kiani ◽  
Florian Kaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Protocol Population

Abstract Background Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves response and survival versus bevacizumab among response-evaluable patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC and the effect of primary tumour side on outcomes. Methods The intent-to-treat population included 593 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. Further testing identified 400 patients with extended RAS wild-type disease; of these, 352 (88%) who received ≥3 cycles of therapy and had ≥1 post-baseline scan were evaluable for response and constituted the per-protocol population (169 cetuximab and 183 bevacizumab). Patients received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with either weekly cetuximab or biweekly bevacizumab given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle until response, progression or toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The effect of primary tumour location was evaluated. Results Median OS in the RAS wild-type population was 31 vs 26 months in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively (HR 0.76, P = 0.012). In the per-protocol population, outcomes favoured cetuximab for ORR (77% vs 65%, P = 0.014) and median OS (33 vs 26 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.011), while PFS was comparable between groups. The advantage of cetuximab over bevacizumab occurred only in patients with left-sided primary tumours. Conclusions FOLFIRI plus cetuximab resulted in a significantly higher ORR and longer OS compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab among patients with left-sided tumours. The superior response associated with cetuximab may particularly benefit patients with symptomatic tumours or borderline-resectable metastases. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00433927.

Results of the Quad wild type arm of the AGITG ICECREAM study: A randomised phase II study of cetuximab alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer with no mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3572-3572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
Subotheni Thavaneswaran ◽  
Craig Underhill ◽  
Kristy Pamela Robledo ◽  
Christos Stelios Karapetis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

3572 Background: Cetuximab (cet) increases survival in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in first-line and chemorefractory patients (pts). Adding irinotecan (iri) to cet in refractory pts who had progressed on iri increased response and delayed progression in the BOND trial, which was conducted prior to recognition that RAS mutations are predictive of EGFR-inhibitor (EGFR-I) resistance. Subsequent trials in chemorefractory pts used single agent EGFR-I as standard. In the era of biomarker selection, the benefit of continuing iri versus single agent EGFR-I had not been resolved. Methods: ICECREAM is a randomised phase II trial evaluating cet v cet + iri in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, stratified for KRAS G13D mutation (previously reported) or no mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA (Quad WT ). EGFR-I naïve, ECOG PS 0-1 pts, progressing within 6 months of iri and refractory (or intolerant) to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin were randomised to cet 400mg/m2 IV loading then 250mg/m2 weekly +/- iri 180mg/m2q2 wks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (6m PFS); secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Results: From Nov 2012 to June 2016, 48 Quad WT pts were recruited: 2 ineligible (not iri-refractory, BRAF mutation) wre not included for analyses and a further 2 not evaluable for response. Characteristics were balanced between cet (n = 21) v cet-iri (n = 25), except for sex (male 62 v 72%) and primary site (left 95 v 68%). 6m PFS rate was 14% v 41%; HR 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.78, p = 0.008). RR was 10% (2 PR) v 36% (1 CR, 8 PR); p = 0.04. Toxicities were higher with cet-iri; at least one grade 3/4 adverse event in 50 v 23%. No differences in global or specific QOL were seen. Conclusions: The AGITG ICECREAM trial confirms a significant synergy for the addition of iri to cet and improved PFS in Quad WT chemorefractory mCRC, echoing data in molecularly unselected pts. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12612000901808.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document