PET-directed chemoradiation (CRT) with induction FOLFOX compared to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Rebecca Carr ◽  
Meier Hsu ◽  
Kay See Tan ◽  
Manjit S. Bains ◽  
Matthew Bott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Multivariable Analyses

4554 Background: Induction chemotherapy with PET-directed CRT and surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced EA at our institution. Following results of the CALGB 80803 trial, FOLFOX has recently replaced CP as the preferred induction regimen. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with locally advanced EA treated with induction CP vs FOLFOX, followed by trimodality therapy between January 2010 and June 2019. Patients treated with CP with RT followed by surgery without induction chemo were also included. We compared pathological complete response (pCR) and near pCR (ypN0 with ≥90% response) rates in the induction FOLFOX group to the induction CP and no-induction groups. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using max-combo weighted log rank test. Results: 445 patients were included. Patients in the induction FOLFOX group had significantly higher pCR and near pCR rates vs induction CP patients. Notably, pCR rate was 38% among FOLFOX PET responders vs 19% in non-responders. In multivariable analysis, compared to induction CP, induction FOLFOX administration was an independent predictor of near pCR (OR: 2.22, 95%CI: 1.20-4.20, p = 0.012). Compared to 24% pCR rate among no-induction patients, induction FOLFOX pCR rate was slightly higher at 32%. DFS by 2-years was higher in induction FOLFOX compared to no-induction-treated patients (62% vs. 42%, p = 0.05). Postoperative complication rates were similar among the three groups. Conclusions: PET-directed CRT with FOLFOX instead of CP improves pCR and near pCR rates. Improved DFS was observed in the FOLFOX vs no-induction patients. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm any survival benefits. [Table: see text]

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and cumulative cisplatin dose in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6046-6046
Author(s):  
Marc Oliva Bernal ◽  
Shao Hui Huang ◽  
Rachel Taylor ◽  
Jie Su ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

6046 Background: Total cumulative cisplatin dose (CDDP-D) (concurrent/induction/adjuvant) in multimodality therapy for LA-NPC has been associated with survival at centers in Asia. We evaluated the survival impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (adj chemo) and total CDDP-D in a large, single institution Canadian cohort of LA-NPC. Methods: Patients (Pts) withWHO type II and III LA-NPC treated with concurrent IMRT with high-dose CDDP and adj chemo with CDDP/Carboplatin and 5-FU (maximum total/adjuvant CDDP-D= 540/240 mg/m2) between 2003-2016 were analyzed. EBER status was tested by ISH. Staging was classified by UICC/AJCC7thedition TNM. Kaplan-Meier 5-year (5y) for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated and compared by log-rank test betweenstage, adj chemo (yes vs no) and total CDDP-D (>300 vs ≤300mg/m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) identified survival predictors. Results: A total of 312 pts were evaluated: median age = 49.8 (range 17.4-75.9); EBER+/-/unknown=67%/1%/32%; stage II/III/IV=2%/51%/47%; T4=36%; N3=17%; adj chemo=83% (21% switched to carboplatin); median total/adjuvant CDDP-D=380/160 mg/m2; median follow-up 7.6 years (range 0.6-14.9). 5y OS differed by stage II-III vs IV (95% vs 80%, p<0.001) and total CDDP-D >300 vs ≤300mg/m2 (89% vs 83%, p=0.02). Adj chemo and total CDDP-D impacted 5y OS in stage IV (table). 5y RFS was higher in stage IV with total CDDP-D >300 vs ≤300mg/m2 (74% vs 59%, p=0.03), with a trend in locoregional control (LRC) (91% vs 80%, p=0.05) but not significant on distant control (DC) (78% vs 72%, p=0.36). Conclusions: Total CDDP-D >300 mg/m2 impacts OS in the overall cohort. The benefit of adj chemo and total CDDP-D on OS and RFS is significant in stage IV but not stage II-III LA-NPC, mainly due to higher LRC rather than DC. [Table: see text]

The Efficacy of Etoposide-Based Therapy in Adult Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Leonard Naymagon ◽  
Douglas Tremblay ◽  
John Mascarenhas
Keyword(s):  
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Data supporting the use of etoposide-based therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) arise largely from pediatric studies. There is a lack of comparable data among adult patients with secondary HLH. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the impact of etoposide-based therapy on outcomes in adult secondary HLH. The primary outcome was overall survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Ninety adults with secondary HLH seen between January 1, 2009, and January 6, 2020, were included. Forty-two patients (47%) received etoposide-based therapy, while 48 (53%) received treatment only for their inciting proinflammatory condition. Thirty-three patients in the etoposide group (72%) and 32 in the no-etoposide group (67%) died during follow-up. Median survival in the etoposide and no-etoposide groups was 1.04 and 1.39 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between the etoposide and no-etoposide groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.4146). On multivariable analysis, there was no association between treatment with etoposide and survival (HR for death with etoposide = 1.067, 95% CI: 0.633–1.799, <i>p</i> = 0.8084). Use of etoposide-based therapy was not associated with improvement in outcomes in this large cohort of adult secondary HLH patients.

Long-term cardiopulmonary mortality after radiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Berman Milby ◽  
Andrzej Pawel Wojcieszynski ◽  
Smith Apisarnthanarax ◽  
James M. Metz ◽  
John Peter Plastaras
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Background Radiation ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

99 Background: Radiation (RT) is considered an integral component of trimodality therapy for locally-advanced esophageal carcinoma to improve locoregional control and potentially survival. However, the long-term risk of cardiopulmonary mortality (CPM) is not well-understood in this population. Methods: Patients age 20-85 with esophageal carcinoma with T3, T4 or node positive (N+) disease who underwent esophagectomy were identified within 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries from 1988-2006. Patients with metastatic disease or <6 mo follow up were excluded. CPM was calculated for patients receiving vs not receiving RT and compared by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for univariate associations and Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis (MVA). Results: A total of 4,079 patients met the defined selection criteria of whom 2,408 were treated with RT, and 1,671 were not. Median age was 62.2 yrs (22-84) and follow-up was 22 mos (6-248). There was no significant difference in CPM in patients who received RT versus those who did not (p=0.8). At 10 yr, the majority of deaths were from esophageal cancer (73 with vs 78% without RT) compared to CPM (13.7 with vs 11.6% without RT). On univariate analysis ( table ), age <60, diagnosis era, and histology were significant independent predictors of CPM. On MVA, age <60 (HR 0.36) and diagnosis era (0.63 for 1994-2000 and 0.55 for 2000-2006) remained statistically significant for CPM. Conclusions: RT for esophageal cancer is not associated with an increased long-term risk of CPM in the overall population. Older age and earlier diagnosis era predict for CPM. Although survival in esophageal cancer is dominated by cancer deaths, advances in RT are still needed to prevent excess treatment-related mortality. [Table: see text]

Randomized trial of amifostine in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiation (HRT): Long-term survival results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9801

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7529-7529
Author(s):  
B. Movsas ◽  
J. Moughan ◽  
C. Langer ◽  
M. Werner-Wasik ◽  
N. Nicolaou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Nsclc Patients

7529 Purpose: This analysis was conducted to address the potential antitumor effect of amifostine (AM) in NSCLC patients enrolled on RTOG-9801. The long-term survival results of RTOG-9801 are presented here. Methods: 243 patients (pts) with stage II/IIIAB NSCLC received induction paclitaxel (P) 225 mg/m2IV days 1, 22 and carboplatin (C) AUC 6 days 1, 22 and then concurrent weekly P (50 mg/m2) and C (AUC 2) and HRT (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy BID). Pts were randomly assigned to AM 500 mg IV 4x/week or no-AM during chemoradiation. Treatment differences for overall and disease-free survival (OS & DFS) were analyzed with the log-rank test; Gray's test was used for time to progression (TTP). Results: 118 pts were randomly assigned to receive AM and 121 to no-AM (4 pts were ineligible). The median follow-up for pts still alive is 52.3 months (mo) for the AM-arm and 58.3 mo for the no-AM arm (16.6 vs 17.9 for all pts). There are no significant differences in OS, DFS or TTP between arms. The median survival, 3-yr, and 5-yr OS are 17.1 mo, 27% and 17% (AM-arm) vs 18.4 mo, 28% and 16% (no-AM arm) (p=0.97). Grade 3/4/5 late-RT toxicities are similar (11%/3%/2% AM-arm vs 14%/4%/2% no-AM arm). Conclusion: While an earlier publication reported that amifostine did not reduce objective measures of severe esophagitis in RTOG-9801, patient-reported outcome analyses suggested a possible advantage to AM with decreased pain and swallowing symptoms (J Clin Oncol 23:2145–2154, 2005). This long-term follow-up analysis on survival shows no evidence of tumor radioprotection due to amifostine. The promising 5-yr OS suggests that induction paclitaxel/carboplatin (P/C) followed by concurrent RT and weekly low-dose P/C is comparable to other regimens using cisplatin doublets at higher dosages every 3–4 weeks. Research supported by NCI and Medimmune Oncology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The 50-month results of the four non-platinum concurrent chemoradiation regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5540-5540
Author(s):  
P. Kamnerdsupaphon ◽  
I. Chitapanarux ◽  
V. Sukthomya ◽  
V. Lorvidhaya
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Disease Free

5540 Objectives: To determine the efficacy, disease free and overall survivals of radiation therapy in combination with four non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients were those with a diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer, under 70 years of age, and undergone the necessary prestudy investigations. All patients received external-beam pelvic irradiation to a minimum dose of 5,000 cGy, and brachytherapy delivered to bring the minimum total dose at point A to 7,500 cGy. Patients were randomized to receive one of four chemotherapy regimens: Arm1: oral 5FU 250 mg/m2/day, Arm2: mitomycin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28 + oral 5FU 200 mg/m2/day, Arm3: mitomycin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28 followed by 5FU 1,000 mg/m2/day on days 1 through 4 and 28 through 31, Arm4: oral hydroxyurea 25 mg/kg/day. Results: From September 1995 to October 2001, the study include 921 women; 226 in arm 1, 229 in arm 2, 234 in arm 3, and 232 in arm 4. The median follow-up time was 51.69 months. More than 89% of the patients achieved complete response. Disease free survival rates were 62.4% among arm 1, 63.8% among arm 2, 66.2% among arm 3, and 68.5% among arm 4. Overall survival rates were 77.4%, 79.5%, 80.8%, and 84.5% respectively. Conclusion: The efficacy of these regimens were not inferior to the standard platinum based regimen for locally advanced cervical cancer. This study demonstrates the results of large randomized clinical study of radiochemotherapy and requires the longer follow up time for the late complications. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Induction treatment with FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (BV) followed by chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) + BV and surgery in locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC): The phase II TRUST trial.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
Aldo Sainato ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Piero Buccianti ◽  
Lorenzo Marcucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Induction Treatment

673 Background: Induction chemotherapy (CT) is a promising option in LARC. FOLFOXIRI + BV is an effective treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients (pts) with LARC at < 12 cm from the anal verge, N+ or cT4 or high risk cT3 (MRI criteria) underwent 6 cycles of FOLFOXIRI + BV followed by CRT (50.4 Gy + 5FU 225 mg/m2/day or capecitabine 800 mg/m2/bid 5 days/week + BV 5 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 28). Surgery was planned 8 weeks after CRT. Primary endpoint is 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results: From April 2012 to April 2015 48 pts were enrolled. At now, 46 pts completed induction CT, 43 completed CRT and 39 underwent surgery (5 pts ongoing). Pts characteristics were: median age, 53 years (range 30-74); cT2/cT3/cT4, 4%/60%/36%; cN0/N+, 4%/96%. Main grade (G) 3/4 toxicities during induction were neutropenia (42%), febrile neutropenia (4.2%), diarrhea (12.5. Two pts did not complete induction: one died due to bowel perforation and sepsis and one discontinued CT after acute kidney injury. Response rate (RR) after induction was 77%. Forty-five pts started CRT (1 pts underwent surgery after induction because of SAE). After the first 13 patients, protocol was amended and schedule of capecitabine modified due to an excessive rate of G3 toxicities during CRT: hand-foot syndrome (23%), proctalgia (23%), proctitis (23%) and diarrhea (15%). After amendment all pts completed CRT with acceptable toxicity: G3 proctitis 6.7% and proctalgia 3.3%. One pts died due to early progressive disease (PD) after CRT. RR after CRT was 88%. Surgery was low anterior resection 87%, abdomino-perineal resection 8%, other 5%. Radical resection was achieved in 95% of pts. Early post-surgical complication rate was 31%. Pathologic complete response was reached in 33% and pathological downstaging in 44% of pts. At a median follow up of 17 months, 8 pts had PD and estimated 2y-DFS is 72%. Conclusions: Induction CT with FOLFOXIRI + BV is feasible and highly active. A protocol amendment was needed due to toxicities during CRT. The rate of early post-surgical complications is not negligible. A longer follow up is needed for DFS. Clinical trial information: 2011-003340-45.

Anthracycline, gemcitabine, and pazopanib in epithelioid sarcoma: Results of a retrospective multi-institutional case series.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11065-11065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Frezza ◽  
Naofumi Asano ◽  
Robin Jones ◽  
Ravin Ratan ◽  
Pawel Teterycz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Epithelioid Sarcoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

11065 Background: To report on a multi-institution retrospective study on the activity of anthracycline-based (Ab) and gemcitabine-based (Gb) regimens as well as pazopanib (P) in patients with advanced epithelioid sarcoma (ES) treated within 16 sarcoma reference centres in Europe, US and Japan. Methods: Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced/metastatic ES were selected. Classic and distal subtypes were defined based on morphology (WHO 2014). INI1 expression is under evaluation.Response was evaluated by RECIST.Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Ninety ES patients were identified (Table 1). They were treated with Ab (72), Gb (30) and P (20); 25 pts received more than one treatment. The median follow-up for Ab, Gb and P groups was 32, 24 and 22 months, respectively. The response rate (RR) for Ab was 25% (95% CI 16%-37%), with a median PFS and OS of 6 and 17 months. The RR for Gb was 23% (95% CI 10% - 42%), with 1 complete response and a median PFS and OS of 5 and 20 months. In the P group, no objective responses were reported, and median PFS and OS were 3 and 9 months. A non-statistically significant trend towards a greater RR in proximal than classic subtype was seen in both Ab (27% vs 22%) and Gb (30% vs 13%) groups. Conclusions: This retrospective series, the largest currently available, confirms the activity of Ab and Gb in ES, with a similar RR and PFS in both groups. In this population, the value of P seems limited. These data may serve as a benchmark for trials of novel agents in ES. [Table: see text]

Total neoadjuvant chemo (ctx; TNT) for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC): The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Greally ◽  
Vivian E. Strong ◽  
Sam S. Yoon ◽  
Daniel G. Coit ◽  
Joanne F Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Subtotal Gastrectomy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

4046 Background: Peri-op chemo (ctx) and surgery is a standard in the treatment of GC, based on the MAGIC (NEJM 2006; 355:11) and FLOT4 (J Clin Oncol 35:4004 [abstr]) studies. However, less than half of patients (pts) completed ctx in the MAGIC and FLOT4 studies, mainly from issues delivering post-op therapy. We assessed safety and feasibility of TNT, where all ctx is given pre-op. Methods: We reviewed GC pts who received TNT or peri-op ctx and had surgery; decision for TNT was by physician preference, based on clinical or radiographic benefit to justify completing ctx pre-op. Pt characteristics were compared using Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Post-op length of stay (LOS) was calculated from date of surgery (DOS) to date of discharge and surgical morbidity was determined using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from DOS using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: 120 pts were identified, median age 63, 62.5% male, 98% ECOG 0/1. 93 pts (77.5%) received peri-op ctx and 27 (22.5%) received TNT. In peri-op pts, 19%, 43% and 38% received FLOT, platinum/fluropyrimidine (FP) and ECF/EOX respectively. In TNT pts, 56%, 37% and 7% received FLOT, platinum/FP and ECF/EOX respectively. 57% had subtotal gastrectomy. Surgical outcomes were similar between groups; median LOS was 6 and 7 days (p = 0.31) in peri-op and TNT pts respectively. There was no significant difference in Clavien Dindo grade I-II or III-IV morbidity between groups (p = 0.103). There were no deaths. TNT pts received higher proportions of planned treatment than peri-op ctx pts: 90% vs. 60% FP (0.001); 85% vs. 41% platinum ( < 0.001); 100% vs. 9% epirubicin (0.015) and 53% vs. 28% docetaxel (p = 0.169). At median follow-up of 19 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. There was no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.089) or OS (p = 0.59) between groups. Conclusions: TNT appears safe with no increase in post-op LOS or surgical morbidity observed. TNT pts had higher percentage drug delivery, suggesting potential benefit for administering all ctx before surgery. While longer survival follow-up is required, TNT may be considered in pts with locally advanced GC who are candidates for ctx.

Does weekly versus daily low-dose of concurrent cisplatin have any effect on compliance and clinical outcomes in cases of locally advanced head and neck cancers?

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17569-e17569
Author(s):  
Ayush Garg ◽  
Piyush Kumar ◽  
Arvind Kumar Chauhan ◽  
Pavan Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Disease Free

e17569 Background: Concurrent Cisplatin with radiotherapy improves outcomes in locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head neck.Cisplatin at 35mg/m2(weekly) raise compliance & hospitalization. There are only few reports on efficacy and toxicity of low dose Cisplatin (6mg/m2). Hence the purpose of this study was to evaluate the compliance and clinical outcomes between two concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy regimens & to see long term effects. Methods: Total 50 patients were included in study from Nov 2015 to Mar 2017 with 25 in each group. Radiotherapy given 70Gy/35# in 7weeks & Cisplatin at 35mg/m2 weekly (Group I) and 6mg/m2 daily (Group II). Assessment of toxicity was done by RTOG scoring criteria. WHO Response criterion was used to assess clinical response. Median follow up was 6 months. Results: Group I(80%) and Group II(84%)patients completed Radiotherapy. In Group I 48% patients received less than 6 cycles and Group II 40% received ≤25 cycles chemotherapy. Median OTT in Group I & II in was 51 & 52days. Neutropenia & Mucositis statistically insignificant between both groups.There was no statistical difference in complete response between the two groups. In Group I 40% patients developed Progressive disease on follow up as compared to 12% in Group II(p-0.02). After 1.5 years of follow up, Group I vs Group II 4 patients had complete response, 6 had recurrence & 11 vs 4 patients expired (p-0.03). At a median follow up of 6 months overall survival in Group I and II was 56% and 44%(p-0.39). While as median disease free survival in Group I & II was 6.6 & 11.9 months(p-0.14). Conclusions: Low dose daily Cisplatin offers ease of administration in the outpatient clinic, better tolerability and better quality of life.Group II patients were more compliant in terms of patients receiving chemotherapy or completing radiotherapy. At median follow up of 6 months there was no statistical difference in terms of overall and disease-free survival. The statistical difference was seen in terms of patients expired in Group I (44%) as compared to Group II (16%). Therefore, we need a larger number of patients for the use of low dose Cisplatin to be evaluated in future clinical trials.

Cisplatin (C) based chemoradiation (CXRT) for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal (AC): A 20-year perspective.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 482-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Eng ◽  
Y. Xing ◽  
Y. N. You ◽  
G. J. Chang ◽  
P. Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Canal ◽  
Salvage Surgery ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

482 Background: The standard of care for locally advanced SCCA of the AC is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin C (MMC) with concurrent XRT. C was evaluated with 5-FU in 2 large phase III studies (RTOG 98-11 and ACT II) to establish superiority over 5-FU/MMC. Neither study showed significant differences for disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). RTOG 98-11 reported reduced colostomy-free survival (CFS) in the C-induction arm; no differences were noted in the ACT II study. We present our 20-year experience with C for locally advanced SCCA of the AC which has been adopted as the standard unless contraindicated. Methods: A retrospective, single institution analysis for locally advanced SCCA of the AC was completed in patients (pts) that received concurrent 5-FU/C/XRT from 1989-2009. Medical records were reviewed for history of STDs, chronic immunosuppression, stage, dose of XRT, toxicity, clinical response (CR), recurrence, and OS. Multidisciplinary management included surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists. OS, DFS, and CFS were calculated using the K-M method. The log-rank test was used to compare OS among these subgroups. Results: 185 pts were identified (51 M:134 F). The median age was 56 (35-83 y.o.). AJCC stage was I (n = 25); II (n = 76); IIIA (n = 36); and IIIB (n = 48). The median XRT dose was 55 Gy in 30 fractions. 181 pts were evaluable for response; 4 were lost to follow up. Complete CR (cCR) was noted in 169 pts (93%); partial response (n = 12); 6 pts received an APR. After a median follow up of 8.6 years, 14 pts (8%) developed local recurrence; 11 received salvage surgery. 16 pts (9%) developed distant metastases (DM). The 5-yr DFS = 81%, 5-yr OS = 85% and 5-yr CFS was 88%. By univariate analysis, N-stage was a poor prognostic indicator for 5-yr DFS (p = 0.02) and DM (p = 0.046) but not OS or CFS. Increased T-stage correlated with salvage surgery (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation for locally advanced SCCA of the anal canal resulted in favorable DFS, OS, and CFS compared to historical data and phase III studies. Platinum-based therapy for anal cancer appears to be an acceptable alternative to MMC and should be considered as a standard option for locally advanced disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document