Phase II study of lower-dose pracinostat plus azacitidine safety and efficacy in patients with high/very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7556-7556
Author(s):  
Ehab L. Atallah ◽  
Samer K. Khaled ◽  
Brenda W. Cooper ◽  
Erica D. Warlick ◽  
David A. Ramies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Very High

7556 Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMA), such as azacitidine (AZA), are the standard of care for patients (pts) with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, overall response rate (ORR=CR+PR) with HMA alone is approximately 30%, with a 2-year overall survival (OS) rate of 50.8%. Preclinical studies show that pracinostat (PRAN), an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, synergizes with HMA. A study in pts with untreated IPSS intermediate-2/high-risk MDS receiving 60 mg PRAN plus AZA resulted in early discontinuations, mainly due to adverse events (AE), potentially leading to diminished clinical benefit. This follow-up phase II study evaluates a lower dose of PRAN (25% reduction) in combination with AZA in order to reduce toxicity, decrease early discontinuations, and improve outcomes. An interim analysis showed low discontinuation rate and promising efficacy, allowing trial expansion. Herein, we report preliminary safety and efficacy in the overall population. Methods: Open-label, II-stage, phase II trial (NCT03151304) in pts (≥18 years) naive to HMA therapy and with IPSS-R of high/very high-risk MDS. Planned enrollment was 60 pts. Pts received 45 mg PRAN 3 days/week for 3 consecutive weeks plus standard AZA dose for 7 days of each 28-day cycle. Primary objectives were to define the safety/tolerability of the combination and to assess the ORR (CR+PR). OS was a secondary endpoint. Results: Sixty-four pts were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of treatment. Most pts were male (67%), median age was 68 years (range 47–89), and the proportion of pts with high/very high-risk MDS was similar. After 17.6 months’ median follow-up, 31% of pts remain on treatment; 69% of pts discontinued treatment due to stem cell transplant (25%), disease progression (17%), AEs (11%), consent withdrawal (3%), pt noncompliance (3%), death (3%), lost to follow-up (2%), and other (5%). Most common nonhematologic AEs were constipation (55%), nausea (52%), fatigue (45%), decreased appetite (39%), peripheral edema (36%), diarrhea, and dyspnea (31% each). Frequent hematologic AEs were decreased neutrophil count (50%), anemia (39%), decreased platelet count (38%), febrile neutropenia (36%), and thrombocytopenia (30%). ORR was 33% (95% CI 22-46), with 33% achieving CR; 34% of pts had marrow CR. Median OS was 23.5 months (95% CI 16.4-nc), with an estimated 1-year OS of 77%. Conclusions: In pts with high/very high-risk MDS, a lower dose of pracinostat in combination with AZA demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03151304 .

A phase II study of intensive chemotherapy with fludarabine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone in P glycoprotein-negative high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Prébet ◽  
Sophie Ducastelle ◽  
Stephan Debotton ◽  
Aspasia Stamatoullas ◽  
Eric Deconinck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
P Glycoprotein

scholarly journals Postoperative XELOX therapy for patients with curatively resected high-risk stage II and stage III rectal cancer without preoperative chemoradiation: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsunekazu Mizushima ◽  
Masataka Ikeda ◽  
Takeshi Kato ◽  
Atsuyo Ikeda ◽  
Junichi Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Open Label

Abstract Background Preoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation is currently a standard treatment for advanced rectal cancer, particularly in Western countries. Although it reduced the local recurrence, it could not necessarily improve overall survival. Furthermore, it can also produce adverse effects and long-term sphincter function deficiency. Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) is a recommended regimen for patients with curatively resected colon cancer. However, the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer patients who have not undergone preoperative chemoradiation remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery and postoperative XELOX without preoperative chemoradiation for treating rectal cancer. Methods We performed a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single arm phase II study. Patients with curatively resected high-risk stage II and stage III rectal cancer who had not undergone preoperative therapy were treated with a 120 min intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day) in 2 divided doses for 14 days of a 3-week cycle, for a total of 8 cycles (24 weeks). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results Between August 2012 and June 2015, 60 men and 47 women with a median age was 63 years (range: 29–77 years) were enrolled. Ninety-three patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of ‘0’ and 14 had scores of ‘1’. Tumors were located in the upper and lower rectums in 54 and 48 patients, respectively; 8 patients had stage II disease and 99 had stage III. The 3-year DFS was 70.1% (95% confidence interval, 60.8–78.0%) and 33 patients (31%) experienced recurrence, most commonly in the lung (16 patients) followed by local recurrence (9) and hepatic recurrence (7). Conclusions Postoperative XELOX without preoperative chemoradiation is effective for rectal cancer and provides adequate 3-year DFS prospects. Trial registration This clinical trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network registry system as UMIN000008634 at Aug 06, 2012.

scholarly journals An Open‐Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Ramucirumab Combined With mFOLFOX‐6 as First‐Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocio Garcia‐Carbonero ◽  
Fernando Rivera ◽  
Joan Maurel ◽  
Jean‐Pierre M. Ayoub ◽  
Malcolm J. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Open Label Phase

Sphingosomal Vincristine in CHOP +/− Rituximab Is a Promising New Treatment for Patients with High Risk Untreated Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL): Follow-Up Results of a Phase II Study Sphingosomal Vincristine in CHOP +/− Rituximab Is a Promising New Treatment for Patients with High Risk Untreated Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL): Follow-Up Results of a Phase II Study.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4602-4602
Author(s):  
Maria Alma Rodriguez ◽  
Andreas Sarris ◽  
Nam H. Dang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Total N ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
New Treatment

Abstract Sphingosomal vincristine (SV) is a novel formulation of vincristine encapsulated in sphingomyelin liposomes or ‘sphingosomes’. SV was well tolerated with 45% ORR in multiply relapsed aggressive NHL (ASH Abst.412, 1999). The addition of rituximab to CHOP improves response in aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the elderly (Coiffier et al., NEJM2002:346; 235–42). Based on these data, a phase II study of RCHOP, substituting SV for free vincristine, was undertaken in patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL (excluding rituximab if T-cell lymphoma). Methods: Patients were treated with standard dose CHOP that included SV 2.0 mg/m2 without dose capping ± rituximab 375 mg/m2, given every 21 days for 6 to 8 courses (ASH Abst.338, 2002). Results: Of 73 patients enrolled in the study, 68 were evaluable for response. Median age was 63 (range 22–80). IPI score was 0–2 in 44 pts and ≥ 3 in 24 pts. Patients received a median of 6 study treatments (range 1–8). ORR was 93% (63/68 pts) with 62 pts achieving CR and Cru (91%), and 1 PR (2%). 3 pts had PD (4%) and 2 were not assessed for response (3%). The median PFS and OS have not been reached at a median follow up of 29.5 months. Responses according to IPI score were as follows: Results IPI 0–2 (n=44) IPI ≥3 (n=24) Total (n=68) ORR 93% (41) 92% (22) 93% (63) −CR 77% (34) 88% (21) 81% (55) −Cru 14% (6) 4% (1) 10 (7) −PR 2% (1) 0% (0) 2% (1) PD 5% (2) 4% (1) 4% (3) Not Assessed 2% (1) 4% (1) 3% (2) The probability of being progression free at 25 months was 86% (5 relapses and 1 death, reason unknown) for pts with IPI 0–2 and 77% (6 relapses) for pts with IPI ≥3. Overall survival probability was 94% at 28 months (1 death in the group with IPI 0–2 and 2 deaths in the group with IPI ≥3). Neuropathy was generally mild (Gr.1–2). Hematological toxicities were as follows: 64% Gr.3–4 neutropenia, 6% Gr.3 anemia, and 14% Gr.3–4 thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: CHOP plus rituximab regimen with sphingosomal vincristine substituted for free vincristine demonstrated promising activity with durable responses similar in both groups of patients with IPI score 0–2 and IPI ≥ 3. The treatment was well tolerated with only mild neurotoxicity.

A Phase II Study of Intravenous Azacitidine Alone in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes NCT00384956.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1451-1451
Author(s):  
Richard Walgren ◽  
Crystal Dao ◽  
Frederieke Kreisel ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Camille Abboud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Erythroid Response

Abstract Rationale: 5-Azacytidine (Aza), a DNA hypomethylating agent, has now been shown in 2 clinical trials involving high-risk MDS patients to provide a survival benefit over supportive/conventional care regimens. While one phase II study used a continuous 7-day IV infusion, Aza was administered subcutaneously (SQ) in most pre-approval studies. However, injection site reactions are not uncommon with SQ dosing, especially in thrombocytopenic patients. Aza given as a short intravenous (IV) infusion is anticipated to be efficacious from pharmacokinetic profiling and is FDA approved, but prospective efficacy data for short IV infusion are lacking. Study aim and design: To determine the efficacy of IV Aza when given as a short infusion, we have undertaken an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II study of Aza in patients with MDS, either de novo or secondary, defined by FAB classification. Previously treated subjects were ineligible if they had already received Aza or decitabine. Treatment consisted of Aza 75 mg/m2 given as a 20 minute IV infusion once daily on Days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle. Response was evaluated by IWG 2000 criteria. After two cycles at the 75 mg/m2 dose, patients failing to achieve a CR were eligible for an increased dose of 100 mg/m2. After 6 cycles of therapy, patients must have demonstrated at least a hematologic improvement to continue on study. Study endpoints include determination of the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates, and secondary endpoints examined the rates of hematological improvement, time to progression, and cytogenetic response. Results: Accrual began 8/17/06 with a target of 21 subjects. As of 7/31/07, 15 subjects have accrued with a median follow-up of 77 days (range 4 to 246). Subjects consisted of 9 males and 6 females with a median age of 69.6 yr (range 53 to 82). The median time from diagnosis is 213 days (range 0 days to 4 yr). By FAB criteria, subjects consist of 4 RA, 9 RAEB, 1 RAEB-t, and 1 CMML, and subjects are categorized by IPSS risk as 1 Low, 4 Int-1, and 10 Int-2. Two patients had therapy related MDS. The data remain preliminary with subjects having completed a mean of 3 cycles (range 1 to 6). None of the 5 subjects who have completed at least 4 cycles of therapy have achieved a CR. However, 2 (40%) of these subjects achieved a PR. Additionally, 1 (20%) patient had a major erythroid response, while another had a minor erythroid response. Median time to response was 2 months. Ten subjects remain on study, 1 patient withdrew due to progressive disease (in first week of therapy), and 4 deaths have occurred on study (2 due to sepsis, 1 each due to pneumonia and acute MI). No deaths were attributed to study drug. Common adverse events include nausea, emesis, and hematologic toxicities. Grade 2–3 nausea and grade 2–3 emesis each occurred in 5 subjects. Observed grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included: anemia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=4), leukopenia (n=3), neutropenia (n=7), and febrile neutropenia (n=1). Hematologic toxicities have resulted in transient treatment delays (< 4 weeks) and dose reduction, but hematologic toxicities have not prevented subsequent treatment on study. Conclusions: Although follow-up is short for assessment of efficacy, this is the first prospective study to report on efficacy and toxicity of short infusional Aza in the treatment of MDS.

Randomized phase II study of 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant imatinib for patients with intermediate- or high-risk GIST.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Kazuya Muguruma ◽  
Yukinori Kurokawa ◽  
Toshimasa Tsujinaka ◽  
Junya Fujita ◽  
Takuya Nakai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
P Value ◽  
Adjuvant Imatinib ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Ecog Ps

9 Background: The Z9001 study revealed adjuvant imatinib for 1 year significantly improved RFS in GIST patients (pts). The SSGXVIII study compared 3 years with 1 year of adjuvant imatinib for high risk GIST pts, but there was no study to evaluate shorter period of imatinib administration than 1 year. We conducted a randomized phase II study to compare 6 months (6-mo) with 12 months (12-mo) adjuvant imatinib for intermediate or high risk GIST pts. Methods: Inclusion criteria included ECOG-PS of 0 or 1, age between 20 and 79 years, and primary KIT-positive GIST with intermediate or high risk according to the Fletcher criteria. Pts were randomized assigned to the 6-mo or 12-mo treatment of imatinib 400 mg/day after complete resection. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The study was designed as a randomized screening trial to evaluate non-inferiority with margin of hazard ratio 1.67, 1-sided alpha 0.2 and power 0.8. Results: Ninety-two pts were randomly allocated the 6-mo group (n=45) or the 12-mo group (n=47) between Dec 2007 and Aug 2011, which was well balanced for baseline characteristics. One patient was ineligible due to non-GIST (desmoid) tumor at a central review. The proportions of pts completed their assigned adjuvant treatment were 80% in the 6-mo and 70% in the 12-mo group. The first interim analysis was conducted at Sep 2012 with the median follow-up time of 33 months. The 1- and 2-year RFS were 82% and 65% in the 6-mo group and 96% and 86% in the 12-mo group, respectively. Hazard ratio of recurrence was 1.81 (95%CI: 0.84-3.91), and the 2-sided log-rank p value was 0.12. Adjuvant imatinib was well tolerated, with one patient of Gr. 4 rash and no treatment-related death. Because of the lower efficacy of the 6-mo group than expected, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended the early release of first interim analysis results. Conclusions: Adjuvant Imatinib for 6-mo was inferior in efficacy to that for 12-mo in terms of RFS. Shortening of the adjuvant imatinib duration is not recommended for intermediate or high risk GIST pts. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000950.

Phase II study of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9522-9522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Pelster ◽  
Stephen K. Gruschkus ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
Dan S. Gombos ◽  
Michael Shephard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ecog Ps

9522 Background: UM is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Approximately 40-50% of patients (pts) with UM will ultimately develop metastatic disease. There is currently no standard approach for metastatic UM. Early studies of single agent immunotherapy (IO) in metastatic UM have yielded meager results. Combination checkpoint inhibitor IO has the potential to improve response rates and survival. Herein, we report the safety and efficacy of ipi/nivo in metastatic UM. Methods: We performed a single-arm phase II study in metastatic UM (CA184-187) for pts with at least 1 measureable lesion and ECOG PS 0-1. Any number of prior treatments were permitted. Pts received nivolumab 1mg/kg IV plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses; maintenance nivolumab was dosed 3mg/kg every 2 weeks or 480mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was best overall response rate (BORR) as determined by irRC. Secondary endpoints were median progression free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and one-year OS. Results: As of the January 31, 2019 data cutoff, 39 pts were enrolled. 35 pts received at least one treatment and were evaluable for toxicity. 5 pts were inevaluable for response due to lack of follow-up imaging, leaving 30 pts evaluable for efficacy. 32 pts (91%) experienced any adverse event (AE), and 29 pts (83%) experienced any treatment related AE (TRAE). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 14 pts (40%). 10 pts (29%) were removed from the study due to AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Median duration of follow up is 60.5 weeks. 19 pts (63%) completed all 4 cycles of ipi/nivo; median duration of treatment was 16 weeks. The BORR was partial response for 5 pts (17%), stable disease (SD) for 16 pts (53%), and progression of disease for 9 pts (30%). 8 pts had SD for at least 6 months. Median PFS was 26 weeks. Median OS was 83 weeks (1.6 years), and one-year OS was 62%. Conclusions: Full results of ipi/nivo safety and efficacy including immune-related AE and clinical characteristics of the responders will be presented at the meeting. Preliminary translational tumor work including RNA analysis has been performed on a subset of responders. Clinical trial information: NCT01585194.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document