Financial toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma participating in clinical trials: A U.S. Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19370-e19370
Author(s):  
Bellinda King-Kallimanis ◽  
Ting-Yu Chen ◽  
Bindu Kanapuru ◽  
Vishal Bhatnagar ◽  
Paul Gustav Kluetz
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Physical Condition ◽  
Economic Status ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

e19370 Background: Financial toxicity (FT) is a major concern for patients receiving standard cancer treatment, and FT can lead to worse cancer outcomes. However, little is known about the FT of patients enrolled in clinical trials (CT). While investigational treatment may be provided by sponsors free of charge, patients are subject to increased clinic visits (ie, missed workdays, travel costs) and still bear the cost of usual care. This analysis evaluates patient-reported FT in multiple myeloma (MM) trials submitted to US FDA and explores the relationship between baseline FT and overall response rate (ORR). Methods: We pooled data from 9 MM registration CTs submitted to the FDA that included the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 includes an item asking patients “Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties?”. We looked at proportion of patients at baseline reporting any FT and their ORR. We also report prevalence, incidence and change from baseline FT at 3 and 6 months. Results: 5,667 patients answered the FT item. Mean age of patients was 65 years, 55% were male, 85% were white and 6% were enrolled in the US. Approximately a third of patients reported experiencing any FT at baseline, 3 and 6 months. When compared to their baseline, 69% of patients had unchanged FT and 14% had worse FT at both 3 and 6 months. The incidence of new cases of FT at 3 months was 17% and at 6 months 7%. The ORR in patients who reported any FT at baseline was 69% compared to 72% in patients with no baseline FT, and was similar regardless of the degree of FT. Conclusions: Few studies have investigated FT in a large sample of CT participants. In this pooled analysis of patients enrolled in MM CTs, approximately a third of patients reported FT associated with their physical condition or medical treatment at baseline and throughout the trial. A small percentage of patients experienced worsening FT during the trial and a small percentage went from no FT to reporting any FT. The impact of baseline FT on ORR was small. Limitations of this preliminary analysis include missing patient level or group level insurance status, socio-economic status and other important determinants of health.

Descriptive and Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Bortezomib Experience in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Dubois ◽  
Ravinder Dhawan ◽  
Helgi van de Velde ◽  
Dixie Esseltine ◽  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Functional Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Complementary Value

Purpose Bortezomib, a boronic acid dipeptide, has been recently introduced as a new approach to treating multiple myeloma (MM). The goal of this work was to evaluate the added value of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in the interpretation of bortezomib clinical trial outcomes. Patients and Methods Two hundred two patients with relapsed, refractory MM were treated with bortezomib as part of the SUMMIT (Study of Uncontrolled Multiple Myeloma Managed with Proteasome Inhibition Therapy) study. Patients were administered the following four PRO measures at several time points: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the myeloma-specific module (QLQ-MY24), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Neurotoxicity (Ntx) scale. Minimal important difference (MID) thresholds were used to define patients as improved, stable, or worsened. A survival analysis was conducted to assess the predictive power of PRO data. Results For the total population, there was a positive change between baseline and best end point. Consistent with the clinical responses, change in PRO scores showed statistically significant differences between response groups with PRO improvement in patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), mostly stable scores in patients with minor response or no change, and deterioration in most scores for patients with progressive disease. Change in scores for neuropathy-related symptoms was reasonably stable. In contrast, fatigue scores significantly improved for patients with CR or PR. When various MID thresholds were applied, the proportion of improved patients exceeded 35% for several domains within all change group definitions. Moreover, survival analysis results demonstrated the additional prognostic information PRO data can provide to supplement clinical data. Conclusion This study demonstrated the complementary value for PRO assessments in further interpreting clinical response, the impact of adverse effects, and patient prognosis in clinical trials.

The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1355-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn C. Gotay ◽  
Crissy T. Kawamoto ◽  
Andrew Bottomley ◽  
Fabio Efficace
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), routinely collected as a part of cancer clinical trials, have been linked with survival in numerous clinical studies, but a comprehensive critical review has not been reported. This study systematically assessed the impact of PROs on patient survival after a cancer diagnosis within the context of clinical trials. Design Cancer clinical trials that assessed baseline PROs and mortality were identified through MEDLINE (through December 2006) supplemented by the Cochrane database, American Society of Clinical Oncology/European Society for Medical Oncology abstracts and hand searches. Inclusion criteria were publication in English language and use of multivariate analyses of PROs that controlled for one or more clinical factors. Two raters reviewed each study, abstracted data, and assessed study quality; two additional raters verified abstractions. Results In 36 of 39 studies (N = 13,874), at least one PRO was significantly associated with survival (P < .05) in multivariate analysis, with varying effect sizes. Studies of lung (n = 12) and breast cancer (n = 8) were most prevalent. The most commonly assessed PRO was quality of life, measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 in 56% of studies. Clinical variables adjusted for included performance status (PS), treatment arm, stage, weight loss, and serum markers. Results indicated that PROs provide distinct prognostic information beyond standard clinical measures in cancer clinical trials. Conclusion PROs might be considered for stratification purposes in future trials, as they were often better predictors of survival than PS. Studies are needed to determine whether interventions that improve PROs also increase survival and to identify explanatory mechanisms through which PROs relate to survival.

Overview of the Patient Perspective at OMERACT 10 — Conceptualizing Methods for Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1699-1701 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN R. KIRWAN ◽  
PETER S. TUGWELL
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Experimental Work ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Perspective ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Instrument Selection ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Choice Of Instruments ◽  
The Way

This overview draws out the main conclusions from the 4 workshops focused on incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment at the 10th Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT 10) conference. They raised methodological issues about the choice of outcome domains to include in clinical trials, the development or choice of instruments to measure these domains, and the way these instruments might capture the impact of a disease and its treatment. The need to develop a more rigorous conceptual model of quantifying the way conditions affect health, and the need to ensure patients are directly involved in the decisions about domains and instruments, emerged clearly. The OMERACT participants voted to develop guidelines for domain and instrument selection, and conceptual and experimental work will be brought forward to revise and upgrade the OMERACT Filter.

Dare voce ai pazienti nella ricerca sulle malattie rare e sui famaci orfani / Giving patients a voice in the rare diseases and orphan drugs research

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40
Author(s):  
Elena Mancini ◽  
Roberta Martina Zagarella
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Rare Diseases ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Narrative Medicine ◽  
Orphan Drugs ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Critical Issues ◽  
The Impact

L’articolo ha l’obiettivo di mettere in luce potenzialità e criticità dell’inclusione della prospettiva dei pazienti nella ricerca sulle malattie rare e sui farmaci orfani. A tal fine, nella prima parte, si propone un’analisi epistemologica dell’utilizzo dei racconti dell’esperienza individuale della malattia nella ricerca scientifica e nei trial clinici, facendo emergere, anche attraverso gli strumenti della medicina narrativa, le sfide teoriche e operative poste dall’inclusione della soggettività del paziente e del vissuto di malattia nonché l’importanza della valorizzazione della prospettiva del paziente, sia in generale sia nella ricerca sulle malattie rare e sui farmaci orfani. Nella seconda parte, il testo analizza in particolare il ruolo degli esiti riportati dai pazienti o Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs), misure per la valutazione complessiva della salute basate sulla prospettiva dei pazienti stessi, incentrandosi sulla sperimentazione clinica nel campo delle malattie rare. In questo contesto, infatti, i racconti di malattia, raccolti e valorizzati da fonti istituzionali e associazioni di pazienti, hanno contribuito a far emergere importanti questioni critiche e difficoltà nell’impiego di outcome centrati sul paziente nello sviluppo di nuovi farmaci e trattamenti, generando una serie di documenti e raccomandazioni relative al loro utilizzo per il benessere della comunità dei malati rari. ---------- This paper aims to highlight the potentiality and criticality of including patients’ perspective in rare diseases and orphan drugs research. In the first part, we propose an epistemological analysis of individual narrations of disease experience as they are used in scientific research and clinical trials. With the help of narrative medicine approach, this analysis points out theoretical and operational challenges of a perspective that includes patient’s subjectivity and illness experience. Furthermore, it reveals the significance of patients’ standpoints in general and in rare diseases as well as in the orphan drugs research. The second part of our article focuses on the role of the Patient reported Outcomes (PROs) – which are measures for the health’s overall assessment based on patient’s perspective – by investigating the impact on clinical trials for rare diseases. In this context, illness stories, which are collected and promoted by institutional sources and patients’ associations, contribute to underline important critical issues at stake in the employment of patient-centered outcomes both in new drugs and in the treatments development. Moreover, these stories are crucial to elaborate documents and recommendations concerning the use of PROs for the rare patients’ community welfare.

scholarly journals The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Cruz Rivera ◽  
Derek G. Kyte ◽  
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi ◽  
Anita L. Slade ◽  
Christel McMullan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Research Impact ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly collected in clinical trials and should provide impactful evidence on the effect of interventions on patient symptoms and quality of life. However, it is unclear how PRO impact is currently realised in practice. In addition, the different types of impact associated with PRO trial results, their barriers and facilitators, and appropriate impact metrics are not well defined. Therefore, our objectives were: i) to determine the range of potential impacts from PRO clinical trial data, ii) identify potential PRO impact metrics and iii) identify barriers/facilitators to maximising PRO impact; and iv) to examine real-world evidence of PRO trial data impact based on Research Excellence Framework (REF) impact case studies. Methods Two independent investigators searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL+, HMIC databases from inception until December 2018. Articles were eligible if they discussed research impact in the context of PRO clinical trial data. In addition, the REF 2014 database was systematically searched. REF impact case studies were included if they incorporated PRO data in a clinical trial. Results Thirty-nine publications of eleven thousand four hundred eighty screened met the inclusion criteria. Nine types of PRO trial impact were identified; the most frequent of which centred around PRO data informing clinical decision-making. The included publications identified several barriers and facilitators around PRO trial design, conduct, analysis and report that can hinder or promote the impact of PRO trial data. Sixty-nine out of two hundred nine screened REF 2014 case studies were included. 12 (17%) REF case studies led to demonstrable impact including changes to international guidelines; national guidelines; influencing cost-effectiveness analysis; and influencing drug approvals. Conclusions PRO trial data may potentially lead to a range of benefits for patients and society, which can be measured through appropriate impact metrics. However, in practice there is relatively limited evidence demonstrating directly attributable and indirect real world PRO-related research impact. In part, this is due to the wider challenges of measuring the impact of research and PRO-specific issues around design, conduct, analysis and reporting. Adherence to guidelines and multi-stakeholder collaboration is essential to maximise the use of PRO trial data, facilitate impact and minimise research waste. Trial registration Systematic Review registration PROSPERO CRD42017067799.

scholarly journals Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (25) ◽  
pp. 2900-2910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan-Jose Lahuerta ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
Maria-Belen Vidriales ◽  
Lourdes Cordón ◽  
Maria-Teresa Cedena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P < .001) and OS (median not reached; P < .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of “operational cure” was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.

Global Approaches in Myeloma: Critical Trials That May Change Practice

2018 ◽  
pp. 656-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Cyrille Touzeau
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
The Past ◽  
Induced Changes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Specific Section

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically in the past decade with the introduction of new drugs into therapeutic strategies both in the frontline and relapse settings. With the availability of at least six different classes of agents that can be combined in doublet, triplet, or even quadruplet regimens and used together with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, the choice of the optimal strategy at diagnosis and at relapse represents a challenge for physicians. Also problematic is the lack of trials addressing questions, such as sequencing or the duration of maintenance. This review will focus on the results of recent clinical trials both in the frontline and relapse settings that have induced changes in clinical practice and will discuss the impact of important ongoing trials. A specific section will discuss therapeutic strategies when new drugs are not available.

Multiple Myeloma (MM): Impact of Immunoglobulin Isotype on the Speed of Response

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4191-4191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene Caillon ◽  
Michel Attal ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Thomas Dejoie
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Speed Of Response ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Multiple Myelomas ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Monoclonal Components

Abstract Background: Detection and/or measurement of monoclonal components by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is essential for evaluation of response in multiple myeloma according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Patient peak on SPE has a single presentation due to the extreme heterogeneity of monoclonal components based on isotype of immunoglobulin (Ig), charge, polymerization, viscosity, precipitation … Regarding the Ig isotype, distribution of myelomas has been known for a long time with about 55 % of IgG myelomas, 25 % of IgA myelomas, and 15% of light chain multiple myelomas (LCMM). Therefore differences in terms of various physical and chemical characteristics are observed according to isotype such as half-lives (IgG : 7-21 days ; IgA : 6 days ; only a few hours for light chains of Ig). Considering both differences about frequency and clearance according to Ig isotype, we addressed the question of the impact of isotype on the speed of response in multiple myeloma. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess if the different isotypes of monoclonal components involved in multiple myeloma have an impact on the velocity and the depth of response. Design and methods: Data from two recent clinical trials conducted by IFM were analysed. The first analysis was based on patients enrolled in the IFM DFCI 2009 clinical trial who benefited of each of the three MRD points planned in this trial (after induction and autograft for one arm, pre-maintenance and post-maintenance). Patients were categorized on the isotype of the monoclonal component involved : IgG, IgA or IgD intact immunoglobulin multiple myelomas (IIMM) with serum measurable disease according to IMWG criteria (i.e. serum monoclonal peak ≥ 10 g/L), LCMM, and IIMM without any serum measurable disease (i.e. serum monoclonal peak < 10 g/L).The percentage of patients who achieved at least a very good partial response (VGPR) was evaluated globally as well as for each category defined. The same analysis was carried out for the IFM 2013-04 clinical trial with one response assessment, after four induction cycles. Results: Concerning IFM DFCI 2009 trial, 398 patients evaluated on the three MRD points could be included in this analysis, divided into 185 and 213 in each arm of treatment. Within the total enrolment, two types of response kinetics could be distinguished : for IgA, IgD IIMM, IIMM without serum measurable disease and LCMM, the gain of response between post-induction +/- autograft and post-maintenance is on average 11,1 points (6,7 - 15) when IgG myelomas presented a difference of VGPR percentage of 27,9 points. The same observation could be made for each arm of treatment : 16,6 and 5,8 points of VGPR percentage gained in each arm for the "faster response" group as defined previously, whereas 33,3 and 23,3 points were gained for IgG myelomas. Apart from this difference of kinetics, we notably observed that IgG myelomas never reached VGPR rates obtained with other isotype myelomas. About IFM 2013-04 trial, 264 patients could be evaluated in our analysis after four cycles of VTD (131) or VCD (133) for induction. 98,0% of IgA myelomas achieved at least VGPR after induction (96,3% for VTD arm and 100% for VCD arm) whereas only 50,6% for IgG myelomas (57,3% and 43,2%) and 68,3% for LCMM (46,7% for VTD arm and 80,8 for VCD arm). Conclusion: This study shows that time of evaluation is a key factor regarding the different speed of response for each isotype of Ig. IgA myelomas and LCMM have a faster response than IgG myelomas. IgG myelomas have a lower biochemical response than other isotype myelomas. Consequently, for an accurate interpretation of data in clinical trials, patients should be equally distributed in each arm of treatment according to their isotype. Ideally, to be compared, clinical trials should always have the same isotype distribution, especially when an early evaluation is performed such as after induction. Disclosures Attal: jansen: Honoraria; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Adverse event (AE) management in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) taking pomalidomide (POM) plus low dose-dexamethasone (LoDEX): A pooled analysis from 3 clinical trials.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8031-8031
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
David Samuel DiCapua Siegel ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Addressing risk of financial toxicity in an ambulatory oncology practice: Our institutional experience with the ASCO Quality Training Program.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 114-114
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Hensing ◽  
Tyler Bauer ◽  
Anna Palafox ◽  
Margaret Whalen ◽  
George W. Carro
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Pareto Chart ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ambulatory Oncology ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

114 Background: Due to escalating cost of cancer care, patients (PTs) with cancer are at increased risk for financial toxicity (FTOX) that can exacerbate disparities in care and lead to clinically relevant adverse PT outcomes; including quality of life; symptom burden; adherence; and survival. A review of our informed consent (IC) process demonstrated that PTs were not routinely informed of financial risks of high-cost (HC) cancer therapies at the time of IC. Methods: A multidisciplinary team was formed to conduct a rapid-cycle quality improvement project with the aim of reducing FTOX through improvement in patient education at the time of IC. Because of HC and increased utilization, the initial pilot focused on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). A cause and effect diagram identified the potential causes that FTOX was not addressed during the IC process. Diagnostic data were obtained through staff surveys and querying our EMR from June to August, 2016. A Pareto chart identified lack of educational (ED) tools at the time of IC and a poorly understood prior authorization (PA) process as the most common causes for not addressing risk of FTOX during IC. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) #1 began with development of a PT ED tool to be used during IC. The tool was approved by the Patient Advisory Board. Staff from clinical teams utilizing ICI for approved indication completed training on its use and a pilot study was initiated. PDSA#2 focused on optimizing the PA process and PDSA#3 focused on PT distress and FTOX monitoring through the NCCN distress and a validated patient-reported-outcome tools (COST), respectively. Results: The utilization of the PT ED tool reached the project aim (administer to > 65% of pts during IC) during initial phase of PDSA#1, although accrual is ongoing. A revised PA process (PDSA#2) was developed, staff were educated and the updated PA process was initiated. Work on PDSA#3 is ongoing. Conclusions: This QI project suggests that it is feasible to address FTOX through PT ED during IC for HC cancer therapies. However, the impact of this intervention on PT distress, overall FTOX and treatment disparities will need to be monitored closely.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document