A phase I study of olaparib in combination with capecitabine-based chemoradiation (CRT) in patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 709-709
Author(s):  
T.R. Jeffry Evans ◽  
Martin McKinlay Eatock ◽  
Liz-Anne Lewsley ◽  
Caroline Kelly ◽  
Elaine McCartney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Hair Follicles ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Grade 3

709 Background: Olaparib is a potent inhibitor of PARP-1, which has a critical role in signalling DNA single strand breaks (SSB) as part of the base excision repair pathway, and may have radio-sensitizing effects due to impaired resolution of radiation induced SSB. We hypothesize that O may potentiate the effects of X-CRT in pts with LAPC. Methods: Eligible pts with LAPC, ECOG < 1, tumor diameter < 6cm, with stable disease (SD) or response after 12 weeks’ induction chemotherapy, were treated with 1 of 4 escalating doses of O given bid po starting on day -3, and then in combination with X (830 mg/m2 bid) and radiation (50·4 Gy in 28 fractions) all administered Mon-Fri. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were determined on clinical and lab toxicity assessments (NCI-CTC AE v4.03) performed weekly from the start of O until completion of O plus X-CRT (i.e. 6 weeks). Dose escalation continued with a rolling-six design until the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was reached. Blood samples for PK analyses of O and PD measurement (inhibition of PARP activity) were collected on day -3 (O monotherapy) and during week 1 of O + X-CRT. Results: 18 pts, (9 m, 9 f, ECOG 0/1 [n=6/12]), age range 49-81 (median=70) years, with histologic (14) or cytologic (4) proven LAPC, had received induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine [GEM] (n=2), GEM + X (12), or FOLFIRINOX (3) with partial response (n=4) or stable disease (14). Pts received 50 (3), 100 (4), 150 (6), or 200 (5) mgs bid of O with X+CRT. DLTs were observed in 2 pts (both at 200mgs bid): 1 pt with grade 3 nausea (on optimal anti-emetics) and grade 3 fatigue, 1 pt with grade 3 anorexia. 6 pts were subsequently recruited at 150mgs bid with no DLTs. No pts had complete response, 2 pts had partial response (1 pt each at 100 and 150 mgs bid) and 1 pt (at 100 mgs bid) had progressive disease; the remaining 14 pts had SD. Conclusions: The recommended dose (RP2) of O is 150mgs bid when given in combination with X + CRT in LAPC. Recruitment of up to 12 pts with borderline operable LAPC at the RP2 is ongoing. PK analyses of O, PD studies (PARP inhibition – PBMCs; cytokeratin 18 – serum; γH2AX foci – hair follicles), and exploratory predictive marker studies (tumor – NGS; RNA exome sequencing) are ongoing. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN10361292.

SCALOP: Results of a randomized phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine (G) or capecitabine (Cap) based chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LANPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA146-LBA146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somnath Mukherjee ◽  
Chris Hurt ◽  
Gareth Griffiths ◽  
John A. Bridgewater ◽  
Thomas Crosby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Treatment Volume ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Uk

LBA146 Background: CRT with G or 5FU (F) is used to treat LAPC. No multicenter, randomized studies have compared G-CRT vs. F-CRT or the oral fluropyrimidine, Cap-CRT. In the UK, where chemotherapy is traditionally standard of care for LAPC, a trial was conducted to assess the safety, efficacy, and deliverability of G-CRT and Cap-CRT. Methods: Eligibility: histologically proven inoperable LAPC < 7 cm in diameter. Induction chemotherapy: 3 cycles of GEMCAP (G 1,000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15; Cap 830 mg/m2 days 1-21 q28 days). Patients with stable/responding disease, tumor diameter ≤ 6cm, and PS 0-1 were eligible for CRT randomisation where patients received a further cycle of GEMCAP followed by either Cap (830 mg/m2 bd weekdays only) or G (300 mg/m2 weekly) with radiation (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Treatment volume = tumour plus enlarged nodes and margins of 2 cm sup-inf and 1.5 cm radially. Prospective RT quality assurance was mandated. Primary end-point was 9-month PFS (Fleming’s design). Funder: Cancer Research UK (CR UK 07/040). Results: Between July 2009 and October 2011, 114 patients from 28 UK centres were registered of whom 74 patients were randomised. Randomised patient characteristics: median age 64.6; 55.4% male; WHO PS (0:1) 41.9%:58.1%; median tumor diameter 4cm; site (head:body) 85.1%:14.9%. During CRT, more patients in the G arm experienced grade 3/4 haematological (18.4% vs 0%, p=0.007) and non-haematological (26.3% vs 11.1%, p=0.095) toxicity. Both C and G arms passed the primary endpoint with 9-month PFS of 62.9% (80% CIs: 50.6%-73.9%) and 51.4% (80% CIs: 39.4%-63.4%) respectively. OS was significantly superior in the Cap-CRT arm (median OS 15.2 vs 13.4 months, HR=0.50, log rank p=0.025). Conclusions: SCALOP is the largest RCT comparing radio-sensitizers in pancreatic cancer and demonstrates that both G-CRT and Cap-CRT can be delivered safely and effectively. Both regimens met the pre-specified PFS criteria. Compared to G-CRT, Cap-CRT demonstrated significantly better survival and toxicity and should form the template regimen for future trials investigating RT dose escalation and combination with novel radio-sensitizers. Clinical trial information: NCT01032057.

Phase II study of induction chemotherapy with fixed dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15122-15122
Author(s):  
J. Kim ◽  
S. Im ◽  
H. Park ◽  
E. Chie ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Grade Iii

15122 Background: Despite the use of 5-FU based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over the past decades, prognosis of patients with LAPC remains dismal. To deliver more efficient systemic treatment earlier and reduce toxicity of CRT, we designed a treatment protocol consisting of induction (IND) chemotherapy with FDR gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP), followed by CRT with capecitabine (CAP) in LAPC. Methods: Eligible patients had unresectable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of pancreas, ECOG PS of 0–2, and no prior chemo- or radiotherapy for this phase II study. Patients received FDR GEM 1000 mg/m2 (D1,8) and CDDP 60 mg/m2 (D1) every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Patients without disease progression subsequently received CRT of 55.8 Gy in 31 fractions concurrently with CAP, 650 mg/m2 given twice daily without drug holidays. Four weeks after CRT, FDR GEM 1000 mg/m2 was given on day 1, 8 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Time to progression was the primary endpoint. Results: Between Jan 2005 and Nov 2006, 21 patients were enrolled (median age 59, M/F: 13/8, ECOG PS 0/1: 3/18). Two patients withdrew consent after 1st and 2nd cycle and remaining 19 patients completed all three cycles of IND chemotherapy, with three (15.8%) out of 19 evaluable patients achieving partial response (0 CR, 3 PR, 14 SD, 2 PD). All 17 patients completed CRT with mean radiation dose of 55.4 Gy. Further four patients progressed during CRT, while one additional patient achieved partial response. As of Jan 2007, 5 patients died and 12 patients showed tumor progression. Median TTP was 12.5 mo (95% CI: 4.2–20.8) and median survival was not reached with median follow up duration of 9.7 months. Grade III/IV toxicities included neutropenia (38.1%/9.5%), thrombocytopenia (4.8%/0%), and anemia (14.3%/0%) during IND phase. Toxicites were generally mild during CRT phase with grade III neutropenia and diarrhea occurring in one and two patients, respectively. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis after 3rd cycle of IND chemotherapy. Conclusions: FDR GEM-CDDP induction chemotherapy followed by CAP-RT and maintenance FDR GEM is feasible and active with promising TTP of 12.5 months. Enrollment continues till reaching target accrual of 37 patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine plus 5-Fluorouracil Followed by Gemcitabine-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ender Kurt ◽  
Meral Kurt ◽  
Ozkan Kanat ◽  
Sibel Kahraman Cetintas ◽  
Sevilcan Aygun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3

Aims and background To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new treatment approach including induction chemotherapy (CT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods Twenty-four patients with LAPC were enrolled in the study. They first received induction CT consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (500 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2), which were given weekly for 3 weeks of every 4. Patients showing a response or disease stabilization after 2 cycles of induction CT received CRT consisting of external beam radiotherapy (50.4-54 Gy in fractions of 1.8 Gy/day) and gemcitabine (350 mg/m2, weekly for 6 weeks). Patients without disease progression received 2 additional cycles of CT consisting of 5FU plus gemcitabine with the same doses and schedule as given in the induction CT. Results After the end of the study, 2 (8%) and 5 (21%) patients showed complete and partial responses, respectively. Five patients (21%) had disease stabilization. The grade 3 and 4 toxicities associated with CT were neutropenia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). The grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurring in patients who received CRT were neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (24%), diarrhea (18%), and nausea (12%). The median progression-free survival for all patients was 6 months (95% CI, 3.6-8.4), and the median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI, 8.16-13.84). Conclusions The CRT approach of this study is moderately active and has an acceptable toxicity profile. However, the incor-poration of combination CT into CRT at the present schedule could not produce any additional benefit over CRT alone. Newer agents with more systemic activity are clearly warranted.

Comparison of the efficacy of gemcitabine with capecitabine and gemcitabine with erlotinib combination chemotherapy in recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer as first-line treatment: Single-center experience.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 329-329
Author(s):  
S. Chun ◽  
M. Lee ◽  
E. Jeon ◽  
H. An ◽  
T. Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

329 Background: We compared the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine with capecitabine (GX), and gemcitabine with erlotinib (GT) chemotherapy for recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer by retrospective analysis. Methods: Between October 2006 and June 2010, 44 patients with recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer, diagnosed at Seoul St. Mary's hospital were enrolled. In GT group, gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 followed by a 1-week rest in first treatment cycle (8 weeks), and then D1, 8, 15 followed by a 1-week rest. Erlotinib was taken orally at 150mg daily through the entire cycle. In GX group, gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 was administered on days 1 and 8. Capecitabine was taken orally at 650mg/m2 twice daily on day 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Results: In 44 patients, 26 patients were treated with GT, and 18 patients treated with GX. The median age was 56.58 years in GT and 57.67 years in GX. Median number of cycle was 3.04 in GT and 3.57 in GX, and the dose reduction was significantly more common in GX than GT (50% vs. 19%, p=0.031). No complete response was achieved in either group. In GT, partial response and stable disease were achieved in 6 (23.1%) and 8 (30.8%) patients. In GX, partial response and stable disease were shown in 4 (22.2%) and 7 (38.9%) patients, respectively. No significant differences in two patients groups (p=0.442). GX had more favorable clinical outcome of the time to progression (6.1 months vs. 3.0 months, p=0.002) and the overall survival (11.13 months vs. 6.1 months, p=0.012) than GT. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity in GT and GX treatment were hematologic toxicity: anemia (8.3%:0%), neutropenia (34.6%:38.8%), thrombocytopenia (15.4%:11.1%). Grade 3 or 4 hand-foot-syndrome of GX was reported in only one patient. Conclusions: GX showed better time to progression and overall survival outcome than GT, but dose reduction was more common. Although there was no significant difference in response rate, and the less dose intensity, GX regimen may be more effective than GT in advanced pancreatic cancer. Further prospective, randomized trials would be warranted in large scale. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Chemotherapy for Advanced and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer using both AMSTAR2 and ROBIS as Quality Assessment Tools

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Dang ◽  
Surendar Chidirala ◽  
Prashanth Veeranki ◽  
BN Vallish
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Critical Overview

Background: We performed a critical overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) of chemotherapy for advanced and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and evaluated their quality using AMSTAR2 and ROBIS tools. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Central Library were searched for SRs on 13th June 2020. SRs with metaanalysis which included only randomized controlled trials and that had assessed chemotherapy as one of the treatment arms were included. The outcome measures, which were looked into, were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above. Two reviewers independently assessed all the SRs with both ROBIS and AMSTAR2. Results: Out of the 1,879 identified records, 26 SRs were included for the overview. Most SRs had concluded that gemcitabine-based combination regimes, prolonged OS and PFS, but increased the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities, when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, but survival benefits were not consistent when gemcitabine was combined with molecular targeted agents. As per ROBIS, 24/26 SRs had high risk of bias, with only 1/26 SR having low risk of bias. As per AMSTAR2, 25/26 SRs had critically low, and 1/26 SR had low, confidence in the results. The study which scored ‘low’ risk of bias in ROBIS scored ‘low confidence in results’ in AMSTAR2. The inter-rater reliability for scoring the overall confidence in the SRs with AMSTAR2 and the overall domain in ROBIS was substantial; ROBIS: kappa=0.785, SEM=0.207, p<0.001; AMSTAR2: kappa=0.649, SEM=0.323, p<0.001. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-based combination regimens can prolong OS and PFS but also worsen AEs when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The included SRs have an overall low methodological quality and high risk of bias as per AMSTAR2 and ROBIS respectively.

scholarly journals Downstaging and Resection of Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Anti-PD-1 Antibody Combinations

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Dong Zhu ◽  
Cheng Huang ◽  
Ying-Hao Shen ◽  
Yuan Ji ◽  
Ning-Ling Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Remnant Liver ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Combined therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies has shown high tumor response rates for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, using this treatment strategy to convert initially unresectable HCC to resectable HCC was not reported. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Consecutive patients with unresectable HCC who received first-line therapy with combined TKI/anti-PD-1 antibodies were analyzed. Tumor response and resectability were evaluated via imaging every 2 months (±2 weeks) using RECIST v1.1. Resectability criteria were (1) R0 resection could be achieved with sufficient remnant liver volume and function; (2) intrahepatic lesions were evaluated as partial responses or stable disease for at least 2 months; (3) no severe or persistent adverse effects occurred; and (4) hepatectomy was not contraindicated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Sixty-three consecutive patients were enrolled. Of them, 10 (15.9%) underwent R0 resection in 3.2 months (range: 2.4–8.3 months) after the initiation of combination therapy. At baseline, these 10 patients had a median largest tumor diameter of 9.3 cm, 7 had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (vascular invasion) disease, 2 had stage B, and 1 had stage A. Before surgery, 6 patients were evaluated as a partial response, 3 stable disease, and 1 partial response in the intrahepatic lesion but a new metastatic lesion in the right adrenal gland. Six patients (60%) achieved a pathological complete response. One patient died from immune-related adverse effects 2.4 months after hepatectomy. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months (range: 7.8–15.9 months) for other 9 patients, 8 survived without disease recurrence, and 1 experienced tumor recurrence. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Combination of TKI/anti-PD-1 antibodies is a feasible conversion therapy for patients with unresectable HCC to become resectable. This study represents the largest patient cohort on downstaging role of combinational systemic therapy on TKI and PD-1 antibody for HCC.

Phase I Trial of Escalating-Dose Irinotecan Given Weekly With Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 2926-2932 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Ilson ◽  
Manjit Bains ◽  
David P. Kelsen ◽  
Eileen O’Reilly ◽  
Martin Karpeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy ◽  
Minimal Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: To identify the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly irinotecan combined with cisplatin and radiation in esophageal cancer. Patients and Methods: Nineteen patients with clinical stage II to III esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma were treated on this phase I trial. Induction chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was administered for four treatments during weeks 1 to 5. Radiotherapy was delivered weeks 8 to 13 in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to a dose of 50.4 Gy. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and escalating-dose irinotecan (40, 50, 65, and 80 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of radiotherapy. DLT was defined as a 2-week delay in radiotherapy for grade 3 to 4 toxicity. Results: Minimal toxicity was observed during chemoradiotherapy, with no grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, diarrhea, or stomatitis. DLT caused by myelosuppression was seen in two of six patients treated at the 80-mg/m2 dose level, thus irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was defined as the recommended phase II dose. Dysphagia improved or resolved after induction chemotherapy in 13 (81%) of 16 patients who reported dysphagia before therapy. Only one patient (5%) required a feeding tube. Six complete responses (32%) were observed, including four pathologic complete responses in 15 patients selected to undergo surgery (27%). Conclusion: Cisplatin, irinotecan, and concurrent radiotherapy can be administered on a convenient schedule with relatively minimal toxicity and an acceptable rate of complete response in esophageal cancer. Further phase II evaluation of this regimen is ongoing. A phase III comparison to fluorouracil or taxane-containing chemoradiotherapy should be considered.

scholarly journals Management of Advanced Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma with Vandetanib: Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-07
Author(s):  
Andrés Flórez R
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Medullary Thyroid ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade 3

Objective: To describe the tumor response and adverse events in patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) treated with vandetanib at the National Cancer Institute in Bogotá, Colombia. Materials and Methods: Case series including five patients with advanced MTC treated with vandetanib from April 2011 to August 2018 and a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Results: 5 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 3 women. The mean age was 49 years. A total of 4 patients underwent total thyroidectomy prior to starting vandetanib. The main indication for vandetanib was progression of liver metastasis (4 patients). Regarding treatment response, 3 patients presented stable disease, 1 patient showed partial response, and 1 had disease progression. The mean treatment duration was 16.5 months. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in three patients, 1 with diarrhea, 1 with hypertension, and 1 with rash. All symptoms improved with dose reduction or temporary suspension of vandetanib. Conclusions: The management of advanced MTC with vandetanib allows for prolonged disease control (stable disease or partial response). Although adverse events are frequent, most are mild and severe cases are manageable.

Prognostic impact of chemoradiation-related lymphopenia in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 439-439
Author(s):  
Daniel W Kim ◽  
Grace Lee ◽  
Colin D. Weekes ◽  
David P. Ryan ◽  
Aparna Raj Parikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Grade 3

439 Background: Chemoradiation (CRT) induced lymphopenia is common and associated with poorer survival in multiple solid malignancies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphopenia in patients with nonmetastatic, unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated by neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU]/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin) followed by CRT. We hypothesized that severe lymphopenia would correlate with worse survival. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this single-institution retrospective study were: 1) biopsy-proven diagnosis of unresectable PDAC, 2) absence of distant metastasis, 3) receipt of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by CRT, and 4) absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) available prior to and two months after initiating CRT. In general, CRT consisted of 5FU or capecitabine and RT with 58.8 Gy over 28 fractions. Lymphopenia was graded according to CTCAE v5.0. The primary variable of interest was lymphopenia at two months, dichotomized by ALC of < 0.5/μl (Grade 3 lymphopenia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox modeling and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to perform survival analyses. Results: A total of 138 patients were identified. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 16 months. Median age was 65. Fifty-six percent were female, 86% were Caucasian, and 97% had ECOG ≤1. Median tumor size was 3.8 cm. Tumor location was pancreatic head in 63%, body in 22%, tail in 8%, and neck in 7%. Median baseline ALC for the entire cohort was 1.5 k/ul. Two months after initiating CRT, 106 (77%) had severe (Grade 3 or worse) lymphopenia. While there were no significant differences in baseline patient or disease characteristics, patients with severe lymphopenia received higher doses of RT with longer duration of treatment compared to those without severe lymphopenia. On multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia at two months was significantly associated with increased hazards of death (HR = 4.00 [95% CI 2.03-7.89], p < 0.001). Greater number of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX cycles received prior to CRT was associated with lower hazards of death (HR = 0.84 [95% CI 0.77-0.92], p < 0.001). The 12-month OS was 73% vs. 90% in the cohort with vs. without severe lymphopenia, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treatment-related lymphopenia is common and severe lymphopenia may be a prognostic marker of poorer survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Closer observation in high-risk patients and minimization of RT dose and duration are potential approaches to mitigating CRT-related lymphopenia. Our findings also suggest an important role of the host immunity in pancreatic cancer outcomes, supporting the ongoing efforts of immunotherapy trials in pancreatic cancer.

scholarly journals Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Work-Up, Staging, and Local Intervention Strategies

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eran van Veldhuisen ◽  
Claudia van den Oord ◽  
Lilly J. Brada ◽  
Marieke S. Walma ◽  
Jantien A. Vogel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Vascular Involvement ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Ablative Techniques

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has several definitions but essentially is a nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer, in which upfront resection is considered not beneficial due to extensive vascular involvement and consequent high chance of a nonradical resection. The introduction of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (gem-nab) has had major implications for the management and outcome of patients with LAPC. After 4–6 months induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients have stable disease or even tumor-regression. Of these, 12 to 35% are successfully downstaged to resectable disease. Several studies have reported a 30–35 months overall survival after resection; although it currently remains unclear if this is a result of the resection or the good response to chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, selection of patients for resection is difficult, as contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CT) scan is unreliable in differentiating between viable tumor and fibrosis. In case a resection is not considered possible but stable disease is observed, local ablative techniques are being studied, such as irreversible electroporation, radiofrequency ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Pragmatic, multicenter, randomized studies will ultimately have to confirm the exact role of both surgical exploration and ablation in these patients. Since evidence-based guidelines for the management of LAPC are lacking, this review proposes a standardized approach for the treatment of LAPC based on the best available evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document