Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1(nab-P/S-1) versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/Gem) for first-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC): A randomized study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 717-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Zong ◽  
Zhi Peng ◽  
Xicheng Wang ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Lesion ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference

717 Background: Nab-P/Gem significantly improved survival compared with gem in patients (pts) with metastatic PDAC, but the ORR was limited to 23% with increased myelosuppression. Two phase II trials demonstrated high ORR of 50.0-53.1% with nab-P/S-1 and showed less hematologic toxicity. Methods: A randomized (1:1) phase II trial was conducted. Eligibility required treatment-naïve pts with unresectable PDAC. Pts received nab-P 125mg/m2on day 1 + S-1 80-120mg orally per day on day 1-7 every 2 weeks or nab-P 125mg/m2+ Gem 1000mg/m2 on days 1,8 every 3 weeks. With an increase of ORR from 25% to 50%, 100 pts were required for 90% power at a two-sided significance level of 0.05. We enrolled 40 pts for a pilot study. Primary endpoints were ORR and 6-month PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were ORR of primary lesion, DCR, PFS, OS and safety. Results: 40 pts were enrolled between 06/2018 and 06/2019, including locally advanced (27.5%) and metastatic (72.5%) PDACs. 42.5% were male and the median age was 61 (range, 36-75) years old. The median duration of treatment was 2.3 months in nab-P/S-1 (n = 20) and 2.7 months in nab-P/Gem (n = 20). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the ORR and DCR were 35.0% vs 25.0% ( P= 0.49) and 70.0% vs 70.0%, respectively.The ORR of primary lesion was 30.0% vs 25.0% ( P= 0.72). In the evaluable pts (nab-P/S-1 n = 18, nab-P/Gem n = 18), the ORR, DCR and the ORR of primary lesion were 38.9% vs 27.8%, 77.8% vs 77.8% and 35.3% vs 29.4%, respectively.With the median follow-up of 5.0 (range 0.3-11.4) months, the median PFS and 6-month PFS rate was 6.3 vs 5.7 months and 56.1% vs 36.2%( P= 0.61) for nab-P/S-1 and nab-P/Gem, respectively. The median OS have not reached. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 30.0% nab-P/S-1 and 30.0% nab-P/Gem: leukopenia/neutropenia(15.0% vs 25.0%), febrile neutropenia (0 vs 5.0%), rash (0 vs 5.0%) and diarrhea (10.0% vs 0). Conclusions: Compared with nab-P/Gem, nab-P/S-1 had higher ORR, ORR of primary lesion and longer PFS without significant difference. Nab-P/S-1 developed a trend towards less hematologic toxicity. Follow up for survival is ongoing. Clinical trial information: 03636308.

scholarly journals Does the Addition of Cetuximab to Radiochemotherapy Improve Outcome of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? Long-Term Results from Phase II Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kripp ◽  
K. Horisberger ◽  
S. Mai ◽  
P. Kienle ◽  
T. Gaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose. The addition of cetuximab to radiochemotherapy (RCT) failed to improve complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We report the long-term results in patients treated within two sequential clinical trials.Methods. Patients receiving neoadjuvant RCT using capecitabine and irinotecan (CapIri) within a phase I/II trial or CapIri + cetuximab within a phase II trial were evaluated for analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon 2 mutational status had been analyzed in patients receiving cetuximab.Results. 37 patients from the CapIri trial and 49 patients from the CapIri-cetuximab treatment group were evaluable. Median follow-up time was 75.2 months. The 5-year DFS rate was 82% (CapIri) and 79% (CapIri-cetuximab)(P=0.62). The median OS was 127.4 months. 5-year OS was 73% for both groups (CapIri and CapIri-cetuximab)(P=0.61). No significant difference in DFS(P=0.86)or OS(P=0.39)was noticed between patients receiving CapIri and those receiving CapIri-cetuximab with KRAS wild-type tumors.Conclusions. As the addition of cetuximab did not improve neither DFS nor OS it should not play a role in the perioperative treatment of patients with LARC, not even of patients with (K)RAS WT tumors.

Adjuvant methotrexate escalated to toxicity for resectable stage III and IV squamous head and neck carcinomas--a prospective, randomized study.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
R E Rentschler ◽  
D W Wilbur ◽  
G H Petti ◽  
G D Chonkich ◽  
D A Hilliard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Head And Neck Carcinomas ◽  
Significant Difference

To determine if adjuvant methotrexate (MTX), escalated weekly to toxicity, could improve disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival by preventing recurrent disease, 60 patients with potentially resectable stage III or IV squamous head and neck carcinomas were stratified by primary site, stage, and nutritional status, then randomized by pairs to receive or not receive adjuvant MTX. All received standard surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. Five patients were taken off study because of unresectability at the time of surgery, leaving 55 evaluable patients. There were no statistically significant imbalances in known prognostic factors between the two treatment arms. MTX was begun at 40 mg/m2 and escalated 10 mg/m2 weekly (four doses preoperatively; four doses postoperatively, preradiation therapy; eight doses postradiation therapy) to mucosal or hematologic toxicity. The median peak MTX dose achieved was 80 mg/m2. Although three patients were hospitalized with MTX toxicity, none died of MTX toxicity. No patient receiving MTX had disease progression during treatment, and there was no increase in postoperative complications. Thirty-two patients died (median survival, 19 months); 23 patients are alive with median follow-up of 43 months. There was no statistically significant difference in actuarial DFS (P = 1.0) or overall survival (P = .61). Although patients on the MTX arm appeared to have less local and regional recurrences at first recurrence (thus more distant metastases), this did not reach statistical significance (P = .06). There was no significant difference between the sites of recurrence at death or last follow-up (P = .38).

Does neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy improve the oncological prognosis of high-risk stage II and III colon cancers ? Three years’ follow-up results of the Prodige 22 phase II randomized multicenter trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4110-4110
Author(s):  
Medhi Karoui ◽  
Claire Gallois ◽  
Guillaume Piessen ◽  
Jean-Louis Legoux ◽  
Emilie Barbier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Folfox Chemotherapy

4110 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a perioperative setting has proven valuable in locally advanced resectable colon cancer (CC) in terms of toxicity, postoperative morbidity and downstaging, but its effect on oncological outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: Prodige 22 was a randomized multicenter phase II trial in patients with resectable high-risk T3, T4 and/or N2 CC on baseline CT-scan. Patients were randomized to receive either 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX after colectomy (control) or perioperative FOLFOX for 4 cycles before surgery and 8 cycles after (FOLFOX peri-op). In RAS wild-type (wt) patients a third arm testing perioperative FOLFOX-cetuximab was added. Primary endpoint was the Tumor Regression Grade. Secondary endpoints were 3-years overall (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and time to recurrence (TTR). Results: 120 patients were enrolled. At interim analysis, the FOLFOX-cetuximab arm was stopped for futility. The remaining 104 patients (control, n = 52; FOLFOX peri-op n = 52) represented our intention-to-treat population. In the FOLFOX peri-op group, 96% received the schedule 4 cycles prior to surgery and all but one underwent adjuvant FOLFOX for a total of 12 cycles. In the control arm, 38 patients received adjuvant FOLFOX (1 postoperative death and 13 low-risk stage II patients). Median follow-up was 54.3 months [48.5-57.2]. Nineteen deaths and 26 disease recurrences were observed leading to a 3 years-OS of 90.3% in both arms (p = 0.7) and to a 3-years DFS of 76.8% and 69.2% in the peri-op and control arm respectively (p = 0.6). A trend to a better TTR in the peri-op arm was observed with a 3-years TTR of 82% as compared to 72% in the control arm (p = 0.3). No benefit from adding Cetuximab was observed in the 16 RAS-wt treated patients. Conclusions: In this pilot randomized study, perioperative FOLFOX chemotherapy has no detrimental effect on long term oncological outcomes and may be an option for some patients with locally advanced CC. A pooled analysis of randomized trials testing peri-operative strategies in this setting is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01675999 .

PS02.162: THREE-YEAR OVERALL SURVIVAL UPDATE FROM PHASE II STUDY OF CHEMOSELECTION WITH DCF AND SUBSEQUENT CONVERSION SURGERY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED UNRESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 167-168
Author(s):  
Tomoya Yokota ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Yasuo Hamamoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Tsubosa ◽  
Hirofumi Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Subsequent Conversion ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background A multicenter phase II trial revealed that docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (DCF) induction chemotherapy (IC) and subsequent conversion surgery (CS) was tolerable and effective in patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer (LAUEC) (Br J Cancer 2016;115:1328–1334). Here, we report updated 3-year analyses to further characterize the impact of DCF-IC followed by CS. Methods Esophageal cancer patients with clinical T4 disease and/or unresectable supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were eligible. The treatment starts with 3 cycles of DCF-IC, followed by CS if resectable, or by concurrent radiation plus chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (CF-RT) if not resectable. This updated analysis represents 3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year progression free survival (PFS), location of relapse, and subsequent therapy. Results As of October 11, 2017, 25 patients were dead. The median follow-up period in patients surviving without death was 39.3 months (95%CI: 38.7 - 41.7months). The estimated 1-year OS was 66.7% and lower limit of 95% confidence interval was 54.6%. The estimated 3-year OS was 46.6% (95% CI; 34.2 - 63.5%). The OS for patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 19) was significantly longer than those who did not undergo R0 resection (3-year OS: 71.4% vs. 30.1%). The estimated 1-year PFS was 50.6% (95%CI: 38.1 - 67.3%) and the estimated 3-year PFS was 39.6% (95%CI: 27.7 - 56.6%). The PFS for patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 19) was significantly longer than those who did not undergo R0 resection (3-year PFS: 61.3% vs. 25%). The recurrence or progression in primary site was observed in 31% of non R0 group. There was no significant difference in the rates of distant metastasis between the two groups (non R0 group vs. R0 group; 21% vs. 16%). The subsequent therapy after protocol therapy included chemotherapy (n = 18), radiotherapy (n = 11), and surgery (n = 5). Conclusion This longer follow up of DCF-IC followed by CS strategy for patients with LAUEC revealed promising OS and PFS. Based on this phase 2 trial, JCOG1510, a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare chemoselection with DCF-IC followed by CS versus CF-RT as a standard treatment is in preparation for LAUEC. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Nab-paclitaxel/S-1(AS) versus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine(AG) for first-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC): A retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15743-e15743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Zong ◽  
Zhi Peng ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Xicheng Wang ◽  
Jun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Lesion ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e15743 Background: AG significantly improved PFS and OS compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic PDAC, but the confirmed ORR was limited to 23% with increased grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression. In GEST and JASPAC01 studies, S-1 showed non-inferior or superior activity to gemcitabine in advanced and postoperative PDAC. S-1 also developed less hematologic adverse events especially in neutropenia and was a convenient oral alternative. Two single-arm phase II trials in China demonstrated high ORR of 50.0-53.1% with AS. We investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy with AS versus AG in pts with aPDAC. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of aPDAC pts treated with first-line AS and AG in GI dpt. Of PUCH between 11/2013 and 12/2018. Pts received 125mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel intravenously (IV) on day1, and 80-100mg S-1 orally per day on day1-7 every two weeks in AS cohort, while pts received 125mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel IV on day1,8, and 1000mg/m2 gemcitabine IV on day1,8 every three weeks in AG cohort. ORR, ORR of primary lesion, DCR, PFS, OS and safety were analysed between two cohorts. Survival outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was made to determine independent predictors of survival. Results: A total of 70 pts (45 in AS cohort, 25 in AG cohort) with locally advanced (4%) and metastatic (96%) PDACs were identified. 75% were male and the median age was 65(range 36-72). Among intention-to-treat population, the ORR and DCR were 40.0% vs 32.0% (p = 0.70) and 75.6% vs 64.0% (p = 0.57) in AS and AG cohort, respectively. The ORR of primary lesion was 31.1% with AS vs 20.0% with AG (p = 0.73). With the median follow-up of 9.8 months(range 2.3-22.2), the median PFS and OS were 4.7m vs 6.7m (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6 to 2.4; p = 0.62) and 10.3m vs 11.3m (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.8; p = 0.78) in AS and AG cohort, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 31.1% AS vs 36.0% AG (p = 0.59). Most G3/4 toxicities were: leukopenia/neutropenia (26.7% vs 20.0%), febrile neutropenia (2.2% vs 8.0%), thrombocytopenia (0 vs 12%), fatigue (4.4% vs 12%), peripheral neuropathy (0 vs 8.0%). In multivariate analysis, liver metastasis was the only independent predictor of poor OS (HR 0.3, 95%CI 0.1-0.8, p = 0.014). Conclusions: AS was a comparable and convenient alternative with manageable toxicities in aPDAC. There was a trend towards improved ORR of primary lesion compared with AG.

TCOG T5217 trial: A phase II randomized study of SLOG versus modified FOLFIRINOX as the first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4143-4143
Author(s):  
Nai-Jung Chiang ◽  
Yan-Shen Shan ◽  
Li-Yuan Bai ◽  
Chung-Pin Li ◽  
Jen-Shi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Fixed Rate ◽  
Disease Extent

4143 Background: The triplet regimen of S-1, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (SLOG) has shown promising efficacy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in our previous study. Current multicenter randomized, phase II study compared the efficacy and safety of SLOG versus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) in patients with advanced/metastatic PDAC. Methods: Patients with chemo-naïve, histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic PDAC, were randomly assigned to either SLOG (gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, fixed-rate infusion and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, plus daily 40/50/60 mg of S-1 based on BSA and 30 mg of oral leucovorin, twice daily, on days 1-7, every 2 weeks) or mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on day 1 plus 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 for 46 hrs, every 2 weeks). Patients were stratified according to disease extent, ECOG PS and primary tumor location. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and overall survival (OS) and safety profile. Tumor response was assessed by CT/MRI every 8 weeks according to RECIST v1.1. As an exploratory trial, 130 (65 per arm) patients were estimated to detect a two-sided 15% difference in 6-month PFS (60% in SLOG and 45% in mFOLFIRINOX) with a significant level of α = 0.1 and β = 0.25. Results: Between March 2018 and October 2019, 130 patients were accrued. One patient who was assigned to mFOLFIRINOX arm didn’t receive assigned treatment. Of them, 62.3% were male, 45.4% were ECOG PS0, 81.5% had metastatic diseases, and 16.9% had prior surgery. The 6-month PFS rate was 55.4% in SLOG arm (n = 65) and 50% in mFOLFIRINOX arm (n = 64) (p = 0.850). The ORR and DCR in the SLOG and the mFOLFIRINOX arms were 40% versus 26.6% (p = 0.135) and 76.2% versus 71.9% (p = 0.550), respectively. The median PFS was 7.5 months in SLOG arm and 6.5 months in mFOLFIRINOX arm (p = 0.395); while the median OS was 12.9 months in SLOG arm and 12.1 months in mFOLFIRINOX arm (p = 0.88). Ten patients underwent conversion surgery, of whom 7 had SLOG and 3 had mFOLFIRINOX. The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly higher in mFOLFIRINOX arm (53.2% vs. 16.9% in SLOG arm, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: SLOG could achieve comparable but numerically better ORR, and median PFS and OS as compared to mFOLFIRINOX in patients of advanced PDAC. SLOG can be an alternative first-line regimen for advanced PDAC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03443492.

scholarly journals Intracameral Bevacizumab Versus Sub-Tenon’s Mitomycin C as Adjuncts to Trabeculectomy: 3-Year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2054
Author(s):  
Gerasimos Kopsinis ◽  
Dimitrios Tsoukanas ◽  
Dimitra Kopsini ◽  
Theodoros Filippopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Filtration Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Exfoliative Glaucoma

Conjunctival wound healing determines success after filtration surgery and the quest for better antifibrotic agents remains active. This study compares intracameral bevacizumab to sub-Tenon’s mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy. Primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma patients were randomized to either bevacizumab (n = 50 eyes) or MMC (n = 50 eyes). The primary outcome measure was complete success, defined as Intraocular Pressure (IOP) > 5 mmHg and ≤ 21 mmHg with a minimum 20% reduction from baseline without medications. Average IOP and glaucoma medications decreased significantly in both groups at all follow-up points compared to baseline (p < 0.001), without significant difference between groups at 3 years (IOP: bevacizumab group from 29 ± 9.4 to 15 ± 3.4 mmHg, MMC group from 28.3 ± 8.7 to 15.4 ± 3.8 mmHg, p = 0.60; Medications: bevacizumab group from 3.5 ± 0.9 to 0.5 ± 1, MMC group from 3.6 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 1.1, p = 0.70). Complete success, although similar between groups at 3 years (66% vs. 64%), was significantly higher for bevacizumab at months 6 and 12 (96% vs. 82%, p = 0.03; 88% vs. 72%, p = 0.04, respectively) with fewer patients requiring medications at months 6, 9 and 12 (4% vs. 18%, p = 0.03; 6% vs. 20%, p = 0.04; 8% vs. 24%, p = 0.03, respectively). Complication rates were similar between groups. In conclusion, intracameral bevacizumab appears to provide similar long-term efficacy and safety results as sub-Tenon’s MMC after trabeculectomy.

scholarly journals The experience with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation in subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
V. N. Blokhina ◽  
M. M. Kopachka ◽  
E. M. Troshina ◽  
D. S. Kanshin ◽  
S. G. Nikolaev
Keyword(s):  
Functional Status ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Traditional Treatment ◽  
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Of Pain ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs

Introduction. Lumbosacral radiculopathy is а leading cause of long-term disability. Taking into a consideration the duration of treatment radiculopathy, the risk of developing adverse reactions when taking analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the physiotherapeutic method — repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation may become a promising method of therapy.Aim of the study. Assessment of the effectiveness of the complex treatment for patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy using the course of the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.Materials and methods. Forty patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy were enrolled in the open non-randomized study, were divided into 2 parallel groups. The patients of the 1st group received a course of traditional treatment and a course of the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation. The patients of the 2nd group were treated with the traditional treatment without the course of the stimulation. A magnetic stimulator MagPro (Magventure, Denmark) was used for repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.Results. A significant difference (p <0.001) was registered regarding the reduction of pain syndrome and the improvement of the functional status after treatment in both groups. 14 (70 %) patients of the first group achieved a pain visual analogue scale relief by 50 % after 10 repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation sessions, while 6 (30 %) patients did this after 15 repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation sessions. We did not observed a statistically significant differences (p >0.05) in pain syndrome, functional status, anxiety level at the end of follow-up between the groups.Conclusion. We did not receive the benefits of the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation course in comparison with a traditional treatment of a lumbosacral radiculopathy. Further placebo-controlled studies to study the effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on pain and anxiety in patients with back pain and radiculopathy are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document