scholarly journals Does Clarithromycin Use in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis Shorten Length of Hospital Stay?

2020 ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
Gülnur Esenülkü ◽  
Fatma Hancı
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Pediatric Clinic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

Introduction: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common cause of hospitalization among infants. Although antibiotics are not recommended in the absence of secondary bacterial infection, rates of antibiotic usage is high rate in clinical practices Objectives: To test the hypothesis that clarithromycin use in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis shortens length of hospital stay. Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty-seven patients aged 1-24 months hospitalized for treatment with a diagnosis of acute viral bronchiolitis at pediatric clinic between April 2017 and May 2018 were investigated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two separate groups, Group A (122 patients), using clarithromycin therapy during hospitalization, and Group B (45 patients), which did not receive clarithromycin (Group B). Demographic and clinical data, treatments received, and duration of hospital stay were obtained from patients’ records. Results: The rate of clarithromycin use in this study was 73%. No statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay was determined between patients receiving clarithromycin and those receiving no antibiotic therapy. However, length of hospital stay decreased with age. Clarithromycin use elicited no statistically significant decrease in hospital stay in patients with acute viral bronchiolitis. Conclusions: The routine use of clarithromycin is not recommended in acute viral bronchiolitis in the light of its cost and side-effects, and the fact is has no impact on clinical status and hospital stay

Alvimopan as an essential component of ERAS protocol to decrease length of hospital stay.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 517-517
Author(s):  
Peter Hanna ◽  
Arveen Kalapara ◽  
Subodh Regmi ◽  
Kalyana Srujana ◽  
Joseph Zabell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Eras Protocol

517 Background: Radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer is the gold standard. However, it is frequently associated with a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). We study the effect of ERAS protocol implementations and Alvimopan use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and its impact on length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving consecutive patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We evaluated Alvimopan use plus an ERAS protocol post radical cystectomy versus patients who underwent ERAS protocol alone versus those who were managed prior to ERAS protocol implementation. Primary outcome of interest was LOS, controlling for age, sex, smoking status and Charleson comorbidities index. Results: 146 patients (49.32 %) received standard care (non-ERAS) (group A), 102 patients (34.45 %) underwent ERAS protocol alone (group B) and 47 patients (15.87 %) underwent ERAS protocol plus Alvimopan (group C). There was no significant difference in length of stay between group A and group B (p=0.856). However, group C experienced a shorter LOS (16.6%) compared to group A (p=0.015). Similarly, group B was not significantly associated with the days to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.112), however, group C demonstrated a significantly shorter time (16.3%) to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.015). On other hand, group c wasn’t significantly associated with time tolerance to regular diet (p=0.068). Limitations include retrospective nature of some of the data, non-randomized approach and confounders such as a mix of robot and open approaches to cystectomy. Conclusions: Of all ERAS protocol components, Alvimopan appeared to be the most significant contributor in accelerating GI recovery and decrease LOS in our cohort.

scholarly journals Effects of perioperative enteral glutamine on surgical outcome in gastrointestinal cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 903
Author(s):  
Raghavendra . ◽  
Raghupathi S.
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Previous trials have shown that perioperative glutamine could protect patients from infectious complications after gastrointestinal cancer operations.Methods: 54 patients with a planned elective operation for gastrointestinal cancer were divided into two groups: GROUP A: patients given glutamine enriched enteral nutrition perioperatively (n=27), GROUP B: patients given enteral feed without glutamine (n=27). Patients were assessed in terms of post-operative complications like infective complications, anastomotic leak, need for reintervention, length of hospital stay and mortality.Results: In group A seven patients and in group B six patients had surgical site infection post operatively (p=0.750). In group A five patients and in group B three patients had lung and urinary tract infection post operatively (p=0.444). In group A three patients and in group B five patients had intra-abdominal abscess/collection post operatively (p=0.444). In group A one patient and in group B three patients had anastomotic leak post operatively (p=0.299). In group A three patients and in group B three patients had reintervention in form of ultrasound guided aspiration and ultrasound guided pigtail aspiration for intra-abdominal collection (p=1.000). In group A and in group B mean length of hospital stay was 26 days and 23 days respectively (p=0.346). In group A and in group B mean length of post-operative hospital stay was 13 and 12 days respectively (p=0.642). There was no mortality in our study. No significant difference between the groups was found in complication rates, length of hospital stay.Conclusions: Routine perioperative glutamine to the patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery is not beneficial.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of nebulised 3% saline versus nebulised 0.9% saline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Pragalatha Kumar A. ◽  
Indhuja Rajarathinam ◽  
Aruna Gowdra
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory tract infection in young children. Despite the high prevalence of acute bronchiolitis, no consensus exists on the management. Studies have shown that except oxygen therapy, no other treatment found to be effective. Hence, the present study was conducted to find out the efficacy of nebulised 3% saline versus is 0.9% saline for the treatment of acute bronchiolitis.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study of 150 children between the age group of 2 months to 24 months with signs and symptoms of Acute Bronchiolitis admitted to Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore from January 2016 to December 2016 formed the study group, they were randomized into 2 groups, one received 3% saline nebulization and the other received 0.9% saline.Results: A total of 150 children were enrolled in the study, 75 children (group A) received 0.9% saline and 75 children (group B) received 3% saline. At 24 hours, the mean clinical severity score for group A was 2.49±1.03 and group B was 2.16±0.49 (P=0.013). The duration of hospital stay was shorter (1-3 days) in 3% saline with a mean of 2.35 days and was longer (3-5 days) in 0.9% saline with mean value of 4.04 days which was statistically significant (p <0.001).Conclusions: 3% saline nebulization can be used as an effective treatment for acute bronchiolitis. It significantly reduced the clinical severity score and length of hospital stay compared to 0.9% normal saline.

Clinical Results Of A Lamina With Spinous Process And An Iliac Graft As Bone Grafts In The Surgical Treatment Of Single-Segment Lumbar Pyogenic Discitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyang Zhong ◽  
Xinjie Liang ◽  
Xiaolin Wang ◽  
Ke Tang ◽  
Tianji Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Segmental Angle

Abstract Background: A retrospective study investigated and compared the results of a lamina withspinous process (LSP) and an iliac graft (IG) as bone grafts in single-segment lumbar pyogenic discitis (LPD) through one-stage-posterior-only approach with radical debridement and internal instrumentation.Methods: Data from 37 patients were reviewed. A LSP was placed in 17 patients (group A), and an IG was implemented in 20 patients (group B). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, hospital stay, drainage, and follow-up (FU) were reviewed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, segmental angle, intervertebral height and bony fusion time were compared preoperatively and at the final FU.Results: All patients were followed-up for a mean of 27.94±2.35 months in group A and 30.29±1.89 months in group B, without a difference. The mean age was younger in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, and hospitalization cost were lower in group A than in group B (P<0.05), except for the hospital stay and drainage time. Fever occurred in 10 patients in group A and 12 patients in group B. The ESR, CRP level, and VAS and ODI scores were significantly decreased, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the final FU. The distribution of bacterial agents in blood culture was 1 case of Aerobacter cloacae, 2 of Staphylococcus aureus, 2 of Escherichia coli, and 1 of Streptococcus viridis in group A and 1 of S. aureus，1 of Staphylococcus warneri and 2 of Klebsiella pneumoniae in group B. Pyogenic infection was observed in the pathological findings of all patients. No significant difference was found in the mean segmental angle or mean intervertebral height preoperation and at the final FU between the groups.Conclusion: The use of LSP as a new bone graft is reliable, safe, and effective for surgical management for the LPD while surgery is proposed as a good management strategy for LPD in carefully selected patients.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Efficiency between Povidone Iodine and Normal Saline Lavage in the Treatment of Acute Peritonitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Haridas Saha ◽  
Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Aminul Islam ◽  
Abdullah Al Mamun ◽  
Md Margub Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Acute Peritonitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Saline Lavage

Background: Control of the primary site of sepsis is the main determinant of good surgical outcome. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency between povidone iodine and normal saline lavage in the treatment of acute peritonitis. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients with acute peritonitis due to gastrointestinal causes who were admitted in the different units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the study period were selected as study population. Among them patients who were treated with povidone iodine were enrolled in the present study in group A and patients who were treated with conventional normal saline were in group B. Results: A total number of 1050 patients were recruited for this study. Among them 100 patients were enrolled in the present study of which group A (50 patients) for povidone iodine and group B (50 patients) for conventional normal saline. On 7th POD wound infection was found in Group A and Group B were 11(22.4%) and 21(44.7%) respectively. Statistically significant difference in post operative complication of wound infection was observed on 7th POD between the groups (p<0.05). Post operative hospital stay in Group A and Group B were 11.50 ± 4.48 and 13.46 ± 5.13 days respectively. There is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant difference observed in post operative complication of wound infection and burst abdomen on 7th POD between the groups. The present study there is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups also observed. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(1):15-20

scholarly journals Comparison of conventional fenestration discectomy with Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation:minimum 2-year long-term follow-up in 1100 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanyi Li ◽  
Yongchun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy of conventional interlaminar fenestration discectomy (IFD) with transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The clinical data of 1100 patients who had been diagnosed with LDH between January 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. IFD was performed on 605 patients in Group A, whereas TELD was performed on 505 patients in Group B. The Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the outcomes. The surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative off-bed activity and postoperative length of hospital stay were recorded. Results The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 60 months, with an average of 43 months. The excellent and good outcome rates were 93.5% in Group A and 92.6% in Group B. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the groups (P > 0.05). However, Group B had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter bed rest duration and postoperative length of hospital stay than Group A (P < 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in Group A and three in Group B. Conclusions Although conventional IFD and TELD had similar levels of efficacy in treating LDH, TELD had several advantages. There was less intraoperative bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay and shorter bed rest duration. It can be considered a safe and effective surgical option for treating LDH.

scholarly journals Adrenaline and Dexamethasone, vs Adrenaline and Fluticasone, vs Adrenaline alone in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Jayendra R. Gohil ◽  
Atul M. Sheladiya ◽  
N. B. Adithya ◽  
Ratna D. Bhojak
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background and Objectives: There is no consensus over which drug best reduces symptoms in Bronchiolitis syndrome. The primary objective of our study is to establish comparative effect of adrenaline nebulisation alone and combination of adrenaline nebulisation plus injectable dexamethasone and adrenaline nebulisation plus fluticasone nebulisation in the treatment of clinical cases of bronchiolitis. Methods: 100 patients diagnosed clinically as bronchiolitis were enrolled in study from 1 month to 24 months of age. Patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. Patients with respiratory distress assessment instrument score [RDAI] of 4 to 15 were chosen, randomized into three groups and treatment given till patient fullfilled discharge criteria. Group A (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline alone, Group B (n=34) were given nebulised adrenaline plus injectable dexamethasone and Group C (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone. Results: The mean reduction in clinical severity-RDAI score was 1.75 ±0.86 in Group A, 2.30 ± 0.68 in Group B and 1.42 ± 0.9 in Group C when measured in terms of difference in clinical scores between day 1 and 2 (p=0.0003). Mean duration of hospital stay in the group A was (4.93±1.95 days), Group C (4.78±1.83) and Group B (3.91 ±1.37 days). The difference of stay between the Groups A and B was 1.02±0.58 days vs 0.87± 0.46 days in groups B and C (p-0.0048). Reduction in the length of hospital stay in group B was 22% compared to Group A & 19% compared to Group C (p-0.0048). Side effects were tachycardia in six patients. Conclusion: Combination of adrenaline nebulization and injectable dexamethasone was found significantly better as compared to nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone and nebulised adrenaline alone in patients of clinical bronchiolitis in reducing severity of clinical symptoms and duration of hospitalization.

Correlates of lengthy stay in a mental health hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-31
Author(s):  
Mostafa Mohamed Al Sayed ◽  
Michael Elnemais Fawzy
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Mental Hospital ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Inpatient Group ◽  
Main Factors

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the role of social factors that determine the length of stay in a mental hospital and also understand the main factors leading to the phenomena as a step to solve it. Design/methodology/approach A case-control cross-sectional observational study is performed which studies correlates for the lengthy stay in a mental hospital. The study population consists of two groups: Group A (94 patients), taken from the patients hospitalized for more than one year, further subdivided into schizophrenia and schizoaffective inpatient group and bipolar affective inpatient group; and Group B (94 patients), receiving their treatment at the outpatient clinic after being admitted for less than six months, this group was further subdivided into same categories as Group A. Findings The study showed that the positive score in positive and negative symptoms scale (PANSS) showed highly statistically significant (p<0.01) correlation with the length of hospital stay for the schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients in the inpatient group. The results showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the inpatient schizophrenic cases and the inpatient affective cases regarding the length of hospital stay. Research limitations/implications The linear regression model was used to understand the predictors of increased length of hospital stay. The linear regression analyzing the scale data of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients found that the length of hospital stay for the schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients depends on the patient’s age and his positive PANSS score. On the other hand, linear regression model for bipolar affective patients in the study found no statistically significant attributes of the length of hospital stay. Practical implications The study found that the length of hospital stay for schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients depends on the patient’s age and his positive PANSS score. Social implications The need for this study stems from the large numbers of mental inpatients who have been lengthily admitted in mental health hospitals in Egypt, while trying to understand main factors leading to the phenomena as a step to solve it. The study found that there is a highly significant difference between inpatient group and outpatient group regarding the marital status, education level, and psychosocial class, with inpatient group having more single, illiterate, and very low social class cases. Originality/value Research in the area of chronic psychiatric hospitalization and its effect on the course and prognosis of mental illness is still scarce, especially in the Arab world; therefore, the research will open the door for further research efforts in the future with a larger sample of patients to study the pros and cons of deinstitutionalization taking into account the past experience of health systems in other countries.

The Improvement Effect of Different Doses of Gamma Globulin on the Disease Condition of Infants with Hemolytic Disease of Newborn and Their Effects on Immune Factors in Serum

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuwen HUANG ◽  
Lin LIU ◽  
Guanglei QIAN ◽  
Wenxue LIU ◽  
Jialiang WANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Gamma Globulin ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Serum Total Bilirubin ◽  
Hemolytic Disease ◽  
Group A ◽  
Immune Factors ◽  
Group B ◽  
Different Doses

Background: To explore the effect of different doses of Gamma Globulin (GG) on the condition of children with Hemolytic Disease of Newborn (HDN) and the influence of immune factors in serum. Methods: Overall, 180 infants with hemolytic disease of newborn in the People’s Hospital of Zhangqiu Area, Jinan, China from April 2016 to August 2018 were divided into group A (88 cases) and group B (92 cases). Group A was given intravenous low-dose GG on the basis of phototherapy, and group B was given intravenous high-dose GG on the basis of phototherapy. The level of serum total bilirubin of the infants, the levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, IgA, IgG and IgM of the infants, the time of jaundice disappearance and the length of hospital stay, hemoglobin and reticulocyte levels were recorded before treatment and after treatment. The number and condition of adverse reactions were recorded. Results: After treatment, the levels of TBiL, hemoglobin and reticulocyte, the time of jaundice disappearance and hospital stay in group B were significantly lower than those in group A. The level of immune cells in group B was significantly higher than that in group A after 7 days of treatment, and the levels of IgA / IgG / IgM in group B were significantly higher than those in group A after 28 days of treatment. Conclusion: Intravenous high-dose GG has a better effect on the condition of neonatal hemolytic disease patients, and more effectively improve the immune function of children.

Comparison of 3% saline and 0.9% normal saline nebulization as diluent in children with bronchiolitis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shobha Sapkota ◽  
Ammara Kaleem ◽  
Suffura Huma ◽  
Muhammad Aleem Ud-Din ◽  
Shabbir Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Chloride ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
Key Words 3 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Objective: To compare the outcome in terms of mean time to disappearance of cough, wheezing, crackles and length of hospital stay in patients treated with sodium chloride 3% with sodium chloride 0.9% as nebulisation diluent in children for suffering from bronchiolitis. Methods: The prospective study was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Medicine Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from November 2014 to April 2015, and comprised children aged between 6 weeks and 24 months having bronchiolitis. Group A received 3% sodium chloride and Group B received 0.9% of the same solution. Duration of cough, wheezing, crackles and duration of stay at hospital were compared between the groups. Data was analysed using SPSS 17. Results: Of the 100 patients, there were 50(50%) in Group A with a mean age of 7.17±4.46, and as many in Group B with a mean age of 6.6±3.74. Overall, there were 55(55%) boys and 45(45%) girls. Mean cough and wheezing remission time as well as length of hospital stay was significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: In children having bronchiolitis, 3% saline as nebuliser solution was found to be more effective than 0.9% saline solution. Key Words: 3% saline solution, Bronchiolitis, Wheezing, Crepitations, Hospital stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document