Oncology rapid assessment clinic and effect on ED visits.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258
Author(s):  
Marie S. Dreyer ◽  
Marcus Paschall ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
Blase N. Polite
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Rapid Assessment ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Medical Issues ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Chicago Medical ◽  
Determine Effect ◽  
Active Cancer

258 Background: The use of the Emergency Department (ED) by oncology patients for lower acuity issues is common. Oncology Rapid Assessment Clinics (ORAC) may play a key role in reducing ED visits among oncology patients. We analyzed whether the advent of ORAC was associated with lower ED utilization by patients receiving cancer care at University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC). Methods: UCMC opened its ORAC in March 2019 to provide supportive care and symptom management to cancer patients who needed acute medical issues addressed. To identify active cancer patients, we identified those that had either a forward or reverse 9 month rolling count of greater than or equal to 2 Outpatient Clinic Visits (complete or future). Of all those patients, we identified any ED visit made within the time period considered Pre-ORAC (6/2018-2/2019) and Post-ORAC (6/2019-2/2020). To determine effect of ORAC on ED utilization, we performed t-test comparison of rates. Results: A total of 9,043 unique patients were seen in the Pre-ORAC period and 8,753 in the Post-ORAC period. Predominant cancers seen in both periods were Breast, Lung/Head & Neck, GI, Lymphoma/Leukemia, GU, and Multiple Myeloma. The ED visit rate was 0.252 (2279/9043) in Pre-ORAC period and 0.237 (2075/8753) in the Post-ORAC period (p = 0.02). Conclusions: There was a decrease in ED visit rates for oncology patients cared for by UCMC in the immediate period after the opening of the ORAC clinic. More substantial declines are expected in the future as the capacity and efficiency of the ORAC clinic grows and the concept is socialized among cancer providers.

The Oncology Evaluation Center: Implementation of a same-day evaluation and treatment center to avoid unnecessary ED visits.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 81-81
Author(s):  
Lindsey Zinck ◽  
Suzanne McGettigan ◽  
Jennifer Braun ◽  
Abbey Walsh ◽  
Lauren Cullen
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Ambulatory Treatment ◽  
Tumor Boards ◽  
Ed Visits

81 Background: Oncology patients have high rates of both Emergency Department (ED) visits and readmissions. The Hematology-Oncology Division at this urban, 776-bed academic medical center established the Oncology Evaluation Center (OEC) to provide cancer patients with prompt ambulatory evaluation for new symptoms that may otherwise lead to ED visits and unplanned admissions. With new therapeutic options associated with unique complications, the OEC Advanced Practice Providers are knowledgeable in providing care to this high-risk population. ED providers can lack oncology-specific training, comfort, and confidence when caring for cancer patients, resulting in sub-optimal care. Methods: A retrospective review of the chief complaints (CC) of oncology patients presenting to the ED was conducted. Using Plan Do Study Act methodology, in 2016 the OEC was opened to provide same day evaluations and interventions to patients with symptoms related to their cancer diagnosis, their treatment, or their comorbidities. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed to ensure appropriate referrals to the OEC. A hospital awareness campaign launched to promote OEC referrals, including educational sessions at multidisciplinary tumor boards. Additionally, two Lean Six Sigma trained infusion RNs led initiatives to promote OEC utilization. Results: The OEC resulted in quick evaluation and intervention for oncology patients. The most common CC are pain, dehydration, fever, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. Of the 2721 patients seen to date in the OEC, 72% were discharged to home. According to survey results, 81% of oncology providers agree that if the OEC were not in existence, patients referred to the OEC would be referred to the ED. Oncology readmission rates have decreased from 14% (2016) to 12% (2018). Conclusions: The OEC has proven to be an innovative solution for prompt evaluation and ambulatory treatment of cancer patients with complications. This is a valuable component of comprehensive patient-focused care, resulting in ED visit and readmission avoidance. The OEC is an effective low cost, high reward programmatic strategy to expand access to care while improving patient experience.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID19 Pandemic on Admissions and Emergency Department Visits of Adults with Sickle Cell Disease

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Alice J. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Pain Medications ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Ed Visits

Background: The most common complication of sickle cell disease (SCD) in adults is vaso-occlusive crisis that is characterized by severe pain. These events can often be managed at home with oral analgesics, but if the pain is not controlled or the patient develops other associated problems, they seek care in an emergency department (ED). In the ED, they receive initial treatment with pain medications and are assessed for other complications such as infection and acute chest syndrome. If an individual's pain is not controlled in a short period of time, the majority of these patients are admitted to the hospital for inpatient management or placed in an observation unit (OBs) for 6-47 hours. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the Greater Newark community starting in mid March with the majority of all inpatient admissions (Ads) being COVID related through the end of May. It has been observed both at our medical center and nationally that during this time period and even afterwards, the number of ED visits and Ads had significantly fallen. The reasons for this finding may include fear of contracting COVID infection at the hospital, regular telemedicine (TM) calls to facilitate outpatient management, and an increase in the number of prescriptions of home pain medications. The purpose of this analysis was to examine patterns of ED visits, Ads, outpatient visits, prescription renewals and nurse (RN) and social worker (MSW) calls in order to determine the impact of COVID-19 infection on the local SCD community. Methodology: A retrospective review was undertaken of billing data and the EMR of all patients with SCD treated at Newark Beth Israel Medical Center (a 450 bed community-based academic tertiary care medical center) between January 2020 and June 2020. Data collected included the number of and reason for ED and OBs, Ads, the number of TM and outpatient visits, and MSW and RN telephone contacts. All patients 18 years of age and older were included. Overall, 100 adults with SCD received care between January and June. Results: Peak hospital COVID Ads, ED and OBs for all patients (SCD and non-SCD) occurred during the weeks between March 25 and May 24, 2020 with a daily inpatient census over 200 between April 7 and 24. SCD Ads at peak COVID (April-May) were significantly lower at 26±2/month compared to 64±11/month pre-COVID (January-February) (p= 0.04). ED and OBs were unchanged. During the peak of COVID, 10/93 (11%) SCD Ads (1 death) were COVID related with 80/96 (86%) for uncomplicated pain crises. MSW and RN called all patients proactively to offer support at onset of COVID pandemic. During this same time period, the number of MSW telephone contacts increased from 138±37/month pre-COVID to 372±21/month during COVID (p=0.02). RN contacts with SCD patients were stable and mostly were for pain prescription renewals. TM was initiated in March 2020 and an increase in these visits correlated with a fall in face to face physician visits: 83.5±11/month pre-COVID to 39.5±8/month peak COVID (p= 0.04), and TM 0/month pre-COVID and 31±4/month peak COVID (0.01). Conclusion: The outbreak of COVID-19 in the community reduced the number of Ads for patients with SCD without an increase in ED and OBs visits. MD face-to-face encounters were reduced but outpatient care continued with the initiation of TM, regular RN contact with maintenance of pain medication prescriptions and a greater numbers of MSW calls for psychosocial support. Further investigation and understanding of the use of Ads for SCD care, and the reduction during COVID, may have implications for current SCD management. Disclosures Cohen: GBT: Speakers Bureau.

Benefits of an early mobility program for hospitalized cancer patients: A pilot study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7008-7008
Author(s):  
Cardinale B. Smith ◽  
Melissa Gunning ◽  
Margie Hubman ◽  
Christine Conklin ◽  
Nicole Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Willingness To Recommend

7008 Background: Cancer patients are often hospitalized with complications from cancer and cancer treatment. Many experience a decline in physical functioning which likely contributes to increased length of stay (LOS) and excess days, increased readmissions and decreased patient experience. We aimed to determine whether a mobility program project would improve quality of care and decrease healthcare utilization. Methods: We implemented a mobility aide program on an oncology unit in a large academic medical center between April 2, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The program consisted of nursing evaluation using the Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AMPAC), an ordinal scale ranging from bed rest to ambulating ≥250 feet, was used to quantify mobility. Plan of care was determined in a multidisciplinary manner with physical therapy (PT), nursing and a mobility aide, a medical assistant with enhanced rehabilitation training. Patients were then mobilized two times per day seven days a week. Using descriptive statistics we evaluated the programs impact on excess days, readmissions, changes in mobility and patient experience as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) during this time period compared to the 6 month interval prior to implementation. Results: During the study interval, 988 patients were admitted and received the mobility program. There was a 6% reduction in excess days (p = 0.04). Similarly, readmission rates decreased from 25% to 19% (p = 0.03). Overall 76% of patients wither maintained or improved their mobility score. During this time period HCAHPS scores (willingness to recommend hospital) increased from 63% at baseline to 91% (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Use of this mobility program resulted in a significant decrease in healthcare utilization and improvement in patient experience. This demonstrates that non-PT professionals can mobilize hospitalized cancer patients decreasing the burden of PT and nursing resources. Future work will evaluate the sustainability of the program and evaluate association with healthcare costs.

VTE risk assessment in cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
I. Pabinger ◽  
C. Ay
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Risk Assessment Models ◽  
Increased Risk

SummaryVenous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality, and its prevention is of major clinical importance. However, the VTE rates in the cancer population vary between 0.5% - 20%, depending on cancer-, treatment- and patient-related factors. The most important contributors to VTE risk are the tumor entity, stage and certain anticancer treatments. Cancer surgery represents a strong risk factor for VTE, and medical oncology patients are at increased risk of developing VTE, especially when receiving chemotherapy or immunomodulatory drugs. Also biomarkers have been investigated for their usefulness to predict risk of VTE (e.g. elevated leukocyte and platelet counts, soluble P-selectin, D-dimer, etc.). In order to identify cancer patients at high risk of VTE and to improve risk stratification, risk assessment models have been developed, which contain both clinical parameters and biomarkers. While primary thromboprophylaxis with lowmolecular- weight-heparin (LMWH) is recommended postoperatively for a period of up to 4 weeks after major cancer surgery, the evidence is less clear for medical oncology patients. Thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical oncology patients is advocated, and is based on results of randomized controlled trials which evaluated the efficacy and safety of LMWH for prevention of VTE in hospitalized medically ill patients. In recent trials the benefit of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the ambulatory setting has been investigated. However, at the present stage primary thromboprophylaxis for prevention of VTE in these patients is still a matter of debate and cannot be recommended for all cancer outpatients.

scholarly journals Impact of COVID-19 infection among cancer patients treated at the Los Angeles County Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 100273
Author(s):  
Lauren Antrim ◽  
Stephen Capone ◽  
Stephen Dong ◽  
David Chung ◽  
Sonia Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Los Angeles County ◽  
Medical Center

Multiple B-D Glucan and Cmv Test Ordering By Multiple Physicians – Analysis To Assess The Frequency Of Duplicate Test Orders

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S152-S152
Author(s):  
S Fathima ◽  
A R Gardner ◽  
A J Sohn ◽  
R Benavides
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Direct Care ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Multiple Test ◽  
Baylor University ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Time Stamps ◽  
Test Ordering

Abstract Introduction/Objective In teaching hospitals, patients receive direct care from a succession of different physicians, each of whom may order diagnostic tests on the same patient resulting in multiple physicians unknowingly ordering the same test in the same time period, leading to overutilization. We examined the association of test-ordering by multiple physicians with duplication of two tests, Beta D-Glucan (BDG) and CMV Viral Load by PCR non blood, as aid for detection of fungal and cytomegaloviral infections, respectively Methods Retrospective medical records at Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas were examined in between 10/1/2019- 10/30/2019. A total 167 test orders were identified for CMV Viral Load non blood and BDG presence in blood. Each medical record was assessed for frequency of ordering along with the physicians who ordered them Results A total 167 tests were ordered in which, 120 times BDG was ordered and 52 times CMV was ordered. Singleton orders were noted in 85(50%) instances of BDG & 30(17%) for CMV.Multiple test orders were 44 (25%) for BDG and 8 (4%) for CMV respectively. Both CMV and BDG were ordered together 57 times. The time stamps of multiple test orders in individual patients was assessed for instances of orders that were less than 3 days apart and analysis showed out of the 44 multiple test orders, 34% (15) test orders were ordered less than 3 days apart and 66%(29) tests were ordered more than 3 days apart for BDG. Upon chart review, most of these quickly successive orders were by different physicians. The estimated costs of the duplicate orders are 4334.0$ & 1104.16$ for BDG and CMV respectively. Conclusion CMV and BDG are commonly ordered on many patients. Analysis shows that many times, physicians order testing when the same test has been ordered very recently by a separate physician. Note that for both tests, retesting in less than three days is not normally indicated, however this happens often, especially for BDG. This is most likely due to difficulty in determining within the EHR what tests are drawn and “pending’ but not yet finalized and reported. With usage of prompts/ alerts in EMR that warn of existing “pending’ orders by another caregiver, the frequency of duplicate test ordering for the same patient may be reduced, in turn reducing the costs of healthcare.

scholarly journals Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Breast Cancer Patients at a Medical Center in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542098391
Author(s):  
Chieh-Ying Chin ◽  
Yung-Hsiang Chen ◽  
Shin-Chung Wu ◽  
Chien-Ting Liu ◽  
Yun-Fang Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Complementary And Alternative Medicine ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cam Use ◽  
Complementary And Alternative

Background Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming more common in medical practice, but little is known about the concurrent use of CAM and conventional treatment. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the types of CAM used and their prevalence in a regional patient cohort with breast cancer (BC). Methods BC patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire survey on the use of CAM in southern Taiwan at an Integrative Breast Cancer Center (IBCC). The National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) classification was used to group responses. Over a period of 8 months, all patients receiving treatment for cancer at the IBCC were approached. Results A total of 106 BC patients completed the survey (response rate: 79.7%). The prevalence of CAM use was 82.4%. Patients who were employed, were receiving radiotherapy and hormone therapy, and had cancer for a longer duration were more likely to use CAM ( P < .05). Multivariate analysis identified employment as an independent predictor of CAM use (OR = 6.92; 95% CI = 1.33-36.15). Dietary supplementation (n = 69, 82.1%) was the type of CAM most frequently used, followed by exercise (n = 48, 57.1%) and traditional Chinese medicine (n = 29, 34.5%). The main reason for using CAM was to ameliorate the side effects of conventional therapies. Almost half (46.4%) of these CAM users did not disclose that they were using it in medical consultations with their physicians. Most chose to use CAM due to recommendations from family and friends. Conclusion A large portion of BC patients at the IBCC undergoing anti-cancer treatment courses used CAM, but less than half discussed it with their physicians. Given the high prevalence of CAM, it would be justifiable to direct further resources toward this service so that cancer patients can benefit from a holistic approach to their treatment.

scholarly journals Influence of Postoperative Changes in Sarcopenia on Long-Term Survival in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2410
Author(s):  
Chungyeop Lee ◽  
In-Ja Park ◽  
Kyung-Won Kim ◽  
Yongbin Shin ◽  
Seok-Byung Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
The Body ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Postoperative Changes ◽  
Asan Medical ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

The effect of perioperative sarcopenic changes on prognosis remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 2333 non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated between January 2009 and December 2012 at the Asan Medical Center. The body composition at diagnosis was measured via abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using Asan-J software. Patients underwent CT scans preoperatively, as well as at 6 months–1 year and 2–3 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the association between perioperative sarcopenic changes and survival. According to sarcopenic criteria, 1155 (49.5%), 890 (38.2%), and 893 (38.3%) patients had sarcopenia preoperatively, 6 months–1 year, and 2–3 years postoperatively, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (95.8% vs. 92.1%, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.234, p < 0.001) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (93.2% vs. 86.2%, HR = 2.251, p < 0.001) rates were significantly lower in patients with preoperative sarcopenia. Both OS and RFS were lower in patients with persistent sarcopenia 2–3 years postoperatively than in those who recovered (OS: 96.2% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.001; RFS: 91.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, postoperative sarcopenia was confirmed as an independent factor associated with decreased OS and RFS. Pre- and postoperative sarcopenia and changes in the condition during surveillance were associated with oncological outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document