COVID-19 and medical education: Rethinking student assessment—The Virtual Observational Standard Clinical Examination.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11005-11005
Author(s):  
Mariana Abal ◽  
Lourdes Gil Deza ◽  
Ernesto Gil Deza ◽  
Marta Dragosky ◽  
Claudia Lorena Acuna ◽  
...  

11005 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced new challenges for medical education. In particular, student assessment posed some of the most urging questions. How do we evaluate practical skills when our universities are on lockdown and our hospitals are working on a shortage of personnel? Is it possible to evaluate these skills via online means, mitigating the effects in students’ career development? This paper presents an online evaluation experience implemented at Instituto Oncológico Henry Moore-Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires in the postgraduate program of Clinical Oncology. The Virtual Observational Standard Clinical Examination (V-OSCE) is a technology-based adaptation of the Observational Standard Clinical Examination (OSCE) (JCO 34 (15), Abstract e18150, 2017) implemented in previous years. Methods: The V-OSCE took place in November 14, 2020 and consisted on a half-day evaluation during which students rotated through 8 stations (Table). The exam ran on three platforms: Blackboard Collaborate for the interactive elements of all stations; University online campus (Moodle platform) for student questionnaires, and Google Forms for the evaluators’ assessment of each student. Students and evaluators participated in various training sessions, and were given a month to practice before the exam. All interactions were recorded and an anonymous survey on students’ experience and opinions was conducted after the exam. Results: A total of 25 postgraduate Oncology students participated in the V-OSCE. 24 students (96%) completed all stations on time with minimum or no network connection issues. Student opinions: 24 students completed the exam experience anonymous survey; 23 found the exam tech-friendly and valued the practice time provided. When asked to score the exam in a scale of 1 to 10: 80% of the students ranked the exam with 9 or 10; and 20%, with 7 or 8. Conclusions: A) It is feasible to design new ways to assess medical students via online means. B) The experience of an OSCE can be translated to an online environment with minimum technological requirements. C) The COVID-19 pandemic effects are extensive, with serious implications in medical education. However, it has proved to be an opportunity to rethink our educational practices, design innovative formative experiences, and assess new skills that will remain significant even long after the pandemic has ended.[Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-140032
Author(s):  
Michail Papapanou ◽  
Eleni Routsi ◽  
Konstantinos Tsamakis ◽  
Lampros Fotis ◽  
Georgios Marinos ◽  
...  

COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly disrupted the well-established, traditional structure of medical education. Τhe new limitations of physical presence have accelerated the development of an online learning environment, comprising both of asynchronous and synchronous distance education, and the introduction of novel ways of student assessment. At the same time, this prolonged crisis had serious implications on the lives of medical students including their psychological well-being and the impact on their academic trajectories. The new reality has, on many occasions, triggered the ‘acting up’ of medical students as frontline healthcare staff, which has been perceived by many of them as a positive learning and contributing experience, and has led to a variety of responses from the educational institutions. All things considered, the urgency for rapid and novel adaptations to the new circumstances has functioned as a springboard for remarkable innovations in medical education,including the promotion of a more “evidence-based” approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e244-e250
Author(s):  
Aliya C. Roginiel ◽  
Christopher C. Teng ◽  
Jessica H. Chow

Abstract Background Sutureless ophthalmic procedures are becoming more commonplace, reducing opportunities for ophthalmology residents to learn microsurgical suturing techniques. There is no standard curriculum in place to address this gap in clinical training among ophthalmology residency programs. Objective The aim of this study was to design, implement, and evaluate a preliminary microsurgical suturing curriculum for ophthalmology residents using Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development as a guideline, and the principles of distributed practice and guided, self-directed practice. Methods We designed a faculty-led teaching session on fundamental microsurgical suturing techniques for all 15 ophthalmology residents from Yale University over one academic year. Suturing skills were evaluated, followed by a guided teaching session, 30 days of self-directed practice time, and a re-evaluation of skills. The residents were evaluated through a written knowledge assessment and practical skills assessment. The residents also evaluated their skill level before and after the teaching session and practice period through written Likert-scale surveys. Data were evaluated in Excel using descriptive statistics and the paired t-test. Results After the session, postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) residents felt more confident in recognition and use of surgical instruments (p < 0.01). PGY-3 residents felt less confident in their knowledge of microsurgical suturing after the session (p = 0.02). PGY-4 residents felt they were better able to identify different suture types after the session (p = 0.02). All residents improved on the written knowledge assessment (p < 0.001) and in all categories of the practical skills assessment (p < 0.001). Conclusions Implementation of a faculty-led microsurgical suturing training session, followed by 1-month of practice time, significantly improved residents' knowledge and practical application of various microsurgical suturing techniques that are necessary for performing common ophthalmic procedures.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjstel-2020-000814
Author(s):  
Natasha Houghton ◽  
Will Houstoun ◽  
Sophie Yates ◽  
Bill Badley ◽  
Roger Kneebone

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the cancellation of clinical attachments and face-to-face teaching at medical schools across the world. Experiential learning—through simulation or direct patient contact—is essential for the development of clinical skills and procedural knowledge. Adapting this type of teaching for remote delivery is a major challenge for undergraduate medical education. It is also an opportunity for innovation in technology enhanced learning and prompts educators to embrace new ways of thinking. In this article, the authors explored how educators from different disciplines (medicine, music and performing arts) are using technology to enhance practical skills-based learning remotely.The authors, five experienced educators from different fields (surgery, medicine, music and magic), jointly documented the transition to technology enhanced remote teaching through a series of five structured conversations. Drawing from literature on distance learning in medicine and professional experience in education, the authors identified seven practice-enhancing recommendations for optimising teaching of procedural knowledge and skills. These are: (1) make a virtue out of necessity; (2) actively manage your environment; (3) make expectations clear; (4) embrace purposeful communication; (5) use digital resources; (6) be prepared for things to go wrong and (7) personalise the approach. The authors argue that widening the discourse in technology enhanced learning to include cross-disciplinary perspectives adds richness and depth to discussions. This article demonstrates a cross-disciplinary approach to addressing challenges in technology-enhanced medical education.


Author(s):  
Mora Claramita ◽  
Gandes Retno Rahayu ◽  
Rahmi Surayya ◽  
Abu Bakar ◽  
Murti Mandawati ◽  
...  

Background: Medical education research has been flourished in the past two decades in Indonesia. It is highly important to study results of medical education researches in Indonesia to provide future direction for medical education. Six published literature in medical education from Asian context was used as the basis of this study.Method: We used the narrative review in which quantitative data were interpreted qualitatively. All national and international publication and the unpublished research in medical education from Indonesia between 2000 - 2013 were collected with multiple methods based on 8 criteria of inclusion/ exclusion. We also grouped the articles into quantitative and qualitative groups based on each method in each study.Results: Total articles interpreted was 151 and grouped into 17 areas of interest and level of evidences from ‘very rarely’ to ‘very frequently’ studied. Studies in the area of understanding problem–based learning (PBL) are still dominating the area of interest including the student-assessment within PBL program. Other areas are still rarely done, especially research in health professions education other than medical doctors.Conclusion: Research in medical education in Indonesia should be more stimulated; in terms of numbers and quality, more importantly to strive for future agent of culture, socio-economic and political changes based on the actual community problems in the universal coverage era toward solid interprofessional team work to accomplish patient safety.


F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 450
Author(s):  
Ken Masters ◽  
Nadia Al-Wardy

Determining a Hofstee cut-off point in medical education student assessment is problematic: traditional methods can be time-consuming, inaccurate, and inflexible.  To counter this, we developed a simple Android app that receives raw, unsorted student assessment data in .csv format, allows for multiple judges’ inputs, mean or median inputs, calculates the Hofstee cut-off mathematically, and outputs the results with other guiding information. The app contains a detailed description of its functionality.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic N. Schwartz ◽  
Mara L. Hover ◽  
Marjorie Kinney ◽  
Lise McCoy

2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Moreno-Ger ◽  
Javier Torrente ◽  
Julián Bustamante ◽  
Carmen Fernández-Galaz ◽  
Baltasar Fernández-Manjón ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13616-e13616
Author(s):  
Ernesto Gil Deza ◽  
Lourdes Gil Deza ◽  
Mariana Abal ◽  
Marta Dragosky ◽  
Claudia Lorena Acuna ◽  
...  

e13616 Background: COVID-19 posed new challenges in patient care and led to an increase in teleoncology. This paper analyzes telemedicine communication skills of millennial medical students of the postgraduate program of Clinical Oncology at Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires. Methods: Student assessment was based on a video call interaction with simulated patients in two stations (30 minutes each) of the Virtual Observational Standard Clinical Examination (V-OSCE), implemented in November 2020. Students received virtual communication guidelines and participated in training sessions to use the video call platform. All interactions were recorded. Assessment items (Table). Results: A total of 25 students were evaluated: 1 (4%) was ineligible due to network connection issues; 24 (96%) participated in both interactions. We analyzed 48 interactions in total. Opening: 6/48 interactions completed all five required items. Most recurring problems: not checking for patient’s previous experience with teleoncology (37/48) and not providing an alternative communication channel in case of technical difficulties (40/48). Middle: the results were similar to in-person interaction observed in previous exams, 35/48 interactions completed all required items. End: 16/48 interactions completed both items. In 32/48 the student did not check for patient understanding of the information provided. Only 3/48 interactions completed all 12 items. Conclusions: A) The V-OSCE is a useful tool to practice and evaluate teleoncology communication skills. B) The Middle Moment of the interactions was similar to an in-person interaction. However, the Opening and End of the interview were more challenging. The most critical struggles being: checking for patient’s previous experience in teleoncology, providing an alternative communication channel in case of technical difficulties and checking for patient understanding. C) COVID-19 established new forms of communication that are likely to remain even after the pandemic has ended. It is important to address this demand for online communication skills in medical education curricula.[Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (02) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Rajoo Singh Chhina

ABSTRACTThere is a disconnect between the objectives of medical education in the country and the actual training being imparted. The present system of discipline based MBBS Curriculum has many inherent disadvantages eg. Compartmentalized teaching, poor development of problem solving skills, failure to generate interest in students and acquisition of dissociated knowledge are few of them. The SPICES model of medical education ie. (Student centered, Problem based, Integrated, Community oriented, Elective enabling and Systematic exposure) may be better suited to our country. Assessment system and examination system need a very drastic change based on the needs of the Community and the stakeholders in the healthcare section. Internship programme needs to be totally revamped. The acquisition of practical skills using newer medical education technology like DOPS (Directly Observed Practical Skills), one minute preceptor and other newer methods needs to be incorporated. In our study on “DOPS” interns we found the usefulness of this methodology (FAIMER study - Chhina RS).The use of technology has revolutionized the world eg. in Space technology, Computer Sciences, Social marketing Strategies. There is an urgent need to incorporate the “MOOC” model and the Social media eg. Facebook, Twitter, We chat, Whatsapp for better coverage and more useful teaching modules. In our study, we found “Facebook” teaching to be an important component of improving the teaching methodology and acquisition of knowledge by students (FAIMER study- Sharma Anu & Chhina RS). The “Feedback” technique for improvement in the needs of student knowledge base, their aspirations, what they thought is appropriate in teaching skills and methodology was studied and powerful conclusions have been drawn in our institution. (FAIMER study-Singh Daljit). The postgraduate training seats needs to be modified as the disease burden load in the country requires. A study done by us showed a total disconnect between the need and the available resources in the State of Punjab. The requirements of the Community, Medical students, Healthcare providers and patients need to be advanced in an objectively scientific, need oriented manner in relation to medical education in India.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document