Risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy, biologic therapy or active surveillance: Patient outcomes from multicenter institution in New York.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1513-1513
Author(s):  
Nibash Budhathoki ◽  
John Kucharczyk ◽  
Nina D'Abreo ◽  
Maryann J. Kwa ◽  
Magdalena Plasilova ◽  
...  

1513 Background: In high-risk estrogen-receptor positive, HER2 positive, or triple negative breast cancer (BC), chemotherapy can increase cure rates in early-stage disease and prolong survival in setting of advanced disease. Real world data specific to BC is needed to counsel patients (pts) with BC on their risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: In this retrospective study, we abstracted clinical data including demographics, tumor histology, cancer treatment, and COVID-19 testing results status from the electronic medical record of 3778 BC patients who received cancer care from 02/01/2020 – 05/01/2020 in New York City at our cancer center. The primary endpoint of the study was incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by treatment type (cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) vs non-cytotoxic therapies (endocrine and/or HER2 directed therapy (E/H)) diagnosed by either serology, RT-PCR, or documented clinical diagnosis. Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) and Mann-Whitney Test were used to assess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by treatment and assess outcomes based on oncologic and non-oncologic risk factors respectively. Results: 3062 patients met inclusion criteria with 379 pts in CT, 2343 pts in E/H and 340 in NT groups. During study period 641 patients (20.9%) were tested by either PCR or serology with 64 patients (2.1%) diagnosed with COVID-19. All pts who tested positive by PCR and subsequently had serology testing were positive for IgG. The weighted risk of SARS-COV-2 infection was 3.5% in CT vs. 2.7% in E/H (p=0.523). 27 patients (0.9%) expired over follow up, with 10 deaths attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The weighted risk for death was 0.7% with CT vs. 0.1% with E/H, p=0.24 (Table A). Age, BMI,CCI and advanced cancer stage were associated with increased mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table). Conclusions: CT was not associated with increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 infection or death following infection. BC cancer treatment, including CT, can be safely administered with enhanced infectious precautions and should not be withheld particularly when given for curative intent.[Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Bazan ◽  
Sachin R. Jhawar ◽  
Daniel Stover ◽  
Ko Un Park ◽  
Sasha Beyer ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 68-68
Author(s):  
Susan Faye Dent ◽  
Freya L. Crawley ◽  
Nadine A. Graham ◽  
Michelle M. Campbell

68 Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for postmenopausal (PM) women with early stage breast cancer (EBC). Studies suggest higher risk of vascular toxicities (VT) on aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. We report incidence/discontinuation rates of VTs in a cardiac clinic. Methods: PM women with hormone receptor positive EBC treated with ET (tamoxifen (T) ± AI) at Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center 01/99-2/06. Data included: demographics, vascular co-morbidities (VCM), ET, duration, VTs. Results: 626 pts, median age 59 years (r: 30-92), median follow-up 98 months (m), stage: I (196 pts), II (341 pts) III (89 pts) EBC. Majority (52.5%) pts had VCM at ET initiation; hypertension (HTN) (36%), hyperlipidemia (HYLP) (17%), coronary disease (12%), thrombosis (9%), angina (6%) TIA (6%). Treatment discontinued due to VT 3x more with T vs. AI. Most common VTs: edema, arrhythmias (ARR), cardiovascular (CVS) event, and HYLP. With Letrozole and T, previous VCM significantly increased risk of developing VT (chi-square: P=0.022 and 0.009). Time to develop VT shortest for T and exemestane. Previous VCM did not affect this interval. Longer exposure to T correlated with higher VT rate (t-test: p=0.046) not seen with AIs. Exposure to multiple AIs associated with higher VT rate (t-test: p=0.009). Conclusions: This cohort study reports similar VT rates with AI therapy as reported in the literature. T was associated with higher discontinuation rates (10.5%) due to VTs compared to AIs (2.8-3.3%). Longer duration of AI therapy was not associated with increased risk of VTs. These encouraging results reflect the real-life experience of women exposed to ET. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Rebekah Young ◽  
Kimberly Gergelis ◽  
Shalom Kalnicki ◽  
Jana Lauren Fox

93 Background: Women with early-stage TN breast cancers are at increased risk for recurrence (RR) compared to other molecular subtypes, and are often treated with mastectomy without local adjuvant therapy. We wish to evaluate the RR for these women. Methods: In this single institution retrospective study, women with T1-2N0 TN breast cancer who underwent mastectomy between 2008-12 were identified from tumor registry. Adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed, but adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was excluded. Of 3,000 cases reviewed, 52 women were identified. Median age was 58.5 (30–90). Lesions were high-grade (83%), and T1-2 (47%, 53%). 21 women (42%) had at least 1 risk factor. 5 women were BRCA+. Women underwent total mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy, and the majority (84%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: At a median follow-up of 3.5 years (6-71 months), there were 8 recurrences (15.4%). 3 (5.8% of cohort) were locoregional (LR) only (2 chest wall (CW) and 1 ipsilateral axilla), 6 (11.5%) involved a concurrent LR and distant recurrence, and 2 (3.8%) were distant only. Median time to recurrence was 17.3 months. The isolated LR recurrences (LRR) were at 14, 15.6 and 15.1 months. Most women (41, 78.8%) were alive with NED. 3 were alive with disease, underdoing treatment, and 1 woman was disease free after treatment for CW recurrence. 8 patients (15.4%) are deceased, half from their cancer. On univariate analysis, there was no significant correlation (p>0.05) between age or high-risk features and RR (STATA v 11). Conclusions: T1-2N0 breast cancer patients are believed to have a low RR following mastectomy. TN disease, however, is more aggressive, and the question of irradiating early stage disease after mastectomy has arisen. A single institution, retrospective study found women with T1-2N0 TN disease fare better with BCT that includes RT, compared to mastectomy alone. Other studies have shown no statistical difference in RR between these 2 groups. We found an isolated LRR rate at 3.5 years of 5.8%. Follow-up and ultimately prospective data is needed to determine whether the isolated LRR warrants a change in treatment recommendations for this pt subset.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 76s-76s
Author(s):  
N. Ballari ◽  
R. Miriyala ◽  
T. Jindia ◽  
S. Gedela ◽  
L. Annam ◽  
...  

Background: There is a geographical, socioeconomical and logistic diversity among the cancer patients who reach a regional cancer center. In a developing economy like that of India's, only a minority of patients have medical insurance. So in our setup a cancer patient is met with time, distance and financial challenges. These intangible factors theoretically are expected to influence the ultimate outcome of cancer treatment. Aim: To evaluate the prevailing demographic and economic variables of cancer patients visiting our RCC and to look for any correlation among each other. Methods: The demographic details of cancer patients registered at our RCC between August 2017- September 2017 were retrieved retrospectively. Distance traveled to get to the RCC and get a diagnosis of cancer, time taken for diagnosis and initiation of treatment, and the source of finances for treatment were collected. A correlation among these factors was attempted to be identified. Statistical correlation was identified using Student t-test. Results: Among 591 patients who were analyzed, the median age of patient was 55 years old. The median time taken for the patient to reach the RCC from permanent residence after the beginning of cancer related complaints was 3.19 months. The median distance traveled for the same was 131 km. The source of income was private employment for 223 patients and government employment for 164 patients and self-employment for 200 patients. Only 164 patients had some kind of structured health scheme to manage their health care expenses. Among these, 96 patients had private insurance/reimbursement and 64 patients had government reimbursement. 384 (64%) of patients presented with advanced and locally advanced stage disease while 114 (19%) patients presented to us with early stage disease. However a correlation between delay in presentation to the RCC, distance traveled to reach the RCC, source of income and advanced stage of disease couldn't not be established. Conclusion: Majority of patients visiting our RCC is from far off places and most of these patients pay for the cancer treatment themselves without any support from government or private insurances. All these factors may be responsible for late or advanced stage presentation of cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana de Moura Leite ◽  
Marcelle Goldner Cesca ◽  
Monique Celeste Tavares ◽  
Debora Maciel Santana ◽  
Erick Figueiredo Saldanha ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Recently, phase I studies with novel antibody drug conjugates targeting HER2 suggested benefit in HER2-low patients – defined as immunohistochemistry(IHC) +1 or +2 FISH/ISH non-amplified, with advanced breast cancer(BC). Data on the prognostic value of HER2-low in early stage disease is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of HER2-low status on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) and survival outcomes in early stage HER2- negative BC. Methods: Records from all BC patients treated with NACT from January 2007 to December 2018 in a single cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. Primary objective was to compare differences between pathologic complete response(pCR) and relapse free survival(RFS) in luminal HER2-low/HER2-0 and triple negative(TNBC) HER2-low/HER2-0. Results: 855 non-HER2-positive patients were identified. Median follow-up was 59 months. 542 had luminal BC (63.4%) and 313 TNBC (36.6%). 285 (33.3%) were HER2-low. Among luminal tumors, 145 had HER2 IHC+1 (26.8%) and 91 IHC+2/ISH non-amplified (16.8%). In TNBC, only 36 had HER2 IHC+1 (11.5%) and 13 IHC+2/ISH non-amplified (4.2%). Among luminal/HER2-low and luminal/HER2-0 population, there was a high proportion of clinical T3/4 (61.5% vs 69.2%, p=0.053), node positive (74.2% vs 66.3%, p=0.27) and stage III tumors (63.1% vs 65%, p=0.51). The same was true TNBC/HER-low as compared to TNBC/HER2-0, despite a non-statistically significant higher cT4 among TNBC/HER-low (32.7% vs. 19.3%, p=0.17). pCR was 13% in luminal/HER2-low versus 9.5% in luminal/HER2-0 (p=0.27), and 51% in TNBC/HER2-low versus 47% in TNBC/HER2-0 (p=0.64). 5y RFS was 72.1% in luminal/HER2-low and 71.7% in luminal/HER2-0 (p=0.47), and 75.6% in TNBC/HER2-low versus 70.8% in TNBC/HER2-0 (p=0.23). HER2-low status was not associated with RFS in multivariate analysis (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.6–1.11, p=0.21). Conclusion: Our data does not support HER2-low as a biologically distinct BC subtype, with no predictive effect on pCR after NACT nor prognostic value on survival outcomes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 194-194
Author(s):  
Steve Power ◽  
Rhonda Lynn Bitting ◽  
P. Kelly Marcom ◽  
Arif Kamal

194 Background: ASCO has recently selected “Choosing Wisely” measures that identify physician health behaviors of low value in cancer care. Two of these measures address the use of advanced imaging for early stage disease. These measures aim to reduce imaging in patients at low risk for metastatic disease unless there is a clinical indication. To date, no evidence-based benchmarks for meeting these measures have been reported. Methods: We analyzed all patients from January 2010 to June 2012 at the Duke Cancer Institute (DCI), an NCI-designated, comprehensive cancer center. We investigated conformance to two Choosing Wisely measures: avoiding imaging for staging in early stage (ES) prostate cancer (PC) and ES breast cancer (BC). ES was defined by Choosing Wisely as Stage IIb or less for BC and Gleason <7 or PSA <10 ng/mL for PC. Advanced imaging was defined as bone scan, computed tomography (CT) scan, or positron emission tomography (PET) performed at the DCI within 60 days of cancer diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and chi-square were performed. Results: Total 1143 BC and 29 PC were identified. Median age was 58 and 61 years, respectively. 0% (0/29) of PC cases had advanced imaging. Within BC, 20.6% (235/1143) had at least one imaging procedure performed; 16.5% had two or more. Patients with imaging were more likely hormone receptor negative, triple negative, younger (<50), and higher stage (Stage IIb), (all p<0.0001). Of imaging performed in BC, 41% were CT only, 22% were PET or PET/CT, and 36% were bone scans. Ongoing chart abstractions are identifying clinical indications for the ordering of imaging and associated clinical consequences. Conclusions: We have established internal benchmarks for conformance to two Choosing Wisely measures. The lack of advanced imaging for low-risk PC patients demonstrates the feasibility of this measure even in a multi-disciplinary setting. Imaging in <25% low-risk BC patients suggests that these are performed for clinical rather than staging purposes. Further data sharing and comparisons are needed to establish oncology-wide benchmarks.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10123-10123
Author(s):  
Olexiy Aseyev ◽  
Moira Rushton-Marovac ◽  
Freya L. Crawley ◽  
Christopher Johnson ◽  
Susan Faye Dent

10123 Background: Trastuzumab-based therapy (TT) is standard treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer (HBC). Subclinical cardiotoxicity (SCTx), defined as asymptomatic decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 10% to < 50%, has been reported in up to 30 % of HBC patients (pts) receiving TT. Objectives included: determine prevalence of SCTx; associated risk factors (RF); and completion rates of TT in pts with HBC referred to a cardio-oncology clinic (COC). Methods: HBC patients receiving TT referred to the Ottawa Hospital COC were included. Demographics, TNM staging, performance status, stage, cardio-vascular (CV) RF (history of heart disease, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, and diabetes), cardiac medications (CM) (ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers), baseline LVEF, previous cancer therapy, baseline anthracycline exposure, previous radiation therapy (RT) (including mediastinal RT) were collected. LVEF was evaluated by ECHO or MUGA. Rate of successful completion of TT among pts with SCTx was determined. Risk ratio (RR) and logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: 240/408 BC pts referred to the COC (2008-2016) had HBC and 163/240 (68%) were referred with SCTx while on TT. 139/163 (85 %) pts with SCTx recovered after COC assessment: 77/163 (47%) pts were prescribed CMs. A significantly higher proportion of recovery was observed in pts who did not require CM (0.92 vs 0.78, p = 0.012; RR = 0.85, 95%CI:0.74-0.91). A total of 129/163 (79%) pts who experienced SCTx finished a full course of TT. Regression analysis found baseline LVEF, diabetes, and diastolic blood pressure as significant RFs for SCTx. There were no independent predictors for recovery after asymptomatic drop in LVEF while on TT. Diabetes (OR:2.97, 95%CI:1.3-6.8) and left chest wall RT (OR:2.4, 95%CI:1.1-5.6) significantly increased risk of permanent TT interruption in pts with asymptomatic drop in LVEF. Conclusions: The majority of HBC pts who experience SCTx can safely complete a full course of TT; many without use of CMs. While CV RFs were associated with increased risk of SCTx, this did not impact CV recovery after asymptomatic drops in LVEF.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
Robert B. Jenkins ◽  
Amylou C. Dueck ◽  
Anne E. Wiktor ◽  
Patrick P. Bedroske ◽  
...  

Purpose Findings from the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B31 trial suggested that MYC/HER2 coamplification (> 5.0 copies/nucleus) was associated with additional benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with early-stage breast cancer. To further explore this relationship, we investigated associations between MYC amplification and disease-free survival (DFS) in a similar adjuvant trastuzumab HER2-positive breast cancer trial—North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831. Patients and Methods This analysis included 799 patients randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone or with concurrent trastuzumab on N9831. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed by using a dual-probe mixture for MYC and centromere 8 (MYC:CEP8) on tissue microarrays. MYC amplification was prespecified as MYC:CEP8 ratio > 2.2 or average MYC copies/nucleus > 5.0. Exploratory variables included polysomy 8. Results In comparing DFS (median follow-up, 4.0 years) between treatments, patients with MYC:CEP8 ratio ≤ 2.2 (n = 618; 77%) and > 2.2 (n = 181; 23%) had hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.46 (P < .001) and 0.67 (P = .33), respectively (interaction P = .38). Patients with MYC copies/nucleus ≤ 5.0 (n = 534; 67%) and > 5.0 (n = 265; 33%) had HRs of 0.52 (P = .002) and 0.48 (P = .02), respectively (interaction P = .94). Patients with MYC:CEP8 ratio < 1.3 with normal chromosome 8 copy number (n = 141; 18%) and ≥ 1.3 or < 1.3 with polysomy 8 (n = 658; 82%) had HRs of 0.66 (P = .28) and 0.44 (P < .001), respectively (interaction P = .23). Patients with MYC copies/nucleus < 2.5 (n = 130; 16%) and ≥ 2.5 (n = 669; 84%) had HRs of 1.07 (P = .87) and 0.42 (P < .001), respectively (interaction P = .05). Conclusion We did not confirm the B31 association between MYC amplification and additional trastuzumab benefit. Exploratory analyses revealed potential associations between alternative MYC/chromosome 8 copy number alterations and differential benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1338-1347
Author(s):  
Tabitha Tse ◽  
Sandeep Sehdev ◽  
Jean Seely ◽  
Denis H. Gravel ◽  
Mark Clemons ◽  
...  

Practice and behaviour change in healthcare is complex, and requires a set of critical steps that would be needed to implement and sustain the change. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is traditionally used for locally advanced disease and is primarily advantageous for surgical downstaging purposes. However, it does also offer patients with certain biologic subtypes such as the triple negative or Her2 positive breast cancers the opportunity to improve survival, even in early stage disease. During the height of the pandemic, an opportunity and motivation for the increased use of neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer was identified. This paper describes the conditions that have supported this practice change at the provider and institutional levels. We also include our own institutional algorithm based on tumor biology and extent of disease that have guided our decisions on breast cancer management during the pandemic. Our processes can be adapted by other institutions and breast oncology practices in accordance with local conditions and resources, during and beyond the pandemic.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12570-e12570
Author(s):  
Shalini R Krishnasamy ◽  
Jae Jung

e12570 Background: With the rapid development of targeted inhibitors, the incidence of cutaneous chemotoxicities is rising and represents a significant cause of morbidity in cancer patients. Therefore, rapid recognition of rashes that warrant dose reduction or discontinuing treatment is critical. Unfortunately, the concomitant use of systemic steroids with chemotherapeutics that can produce acneiform eruptions, make it difficult to distinguish a cutaneous chemotoxicity from systemic steroid induced acne (SSIA). Although SSIA is a well known complication of systemic steroid administration, there are few published studies regarding this condition, none of which have been done in cancer patients. In this study, we sought to examine the incidence of SSIA, the patient and tumor characteristics as well as the chemotherapy regimen most commonly associated with SSIA in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy at the City of Hope National Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: We performed a retrospective study. Using the institutional registry of patients, we identified 3,848 patients that received a diagnosis of breast cancer between 1/2009-6/2015, 1,991 (51%) of which received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. 61 of these patients received a ICD-9 billing code for “acne” or “ steroid acne”, 10 of whom had explicit documentation of acne or acneiform eruption in their chart. Results: All 10 patients were female with a median age of 49 (range 36-56). 50% of patients had ER+/PR+ disease and 30% had ER-/PR-/HER2- breast cancer. 90% of patients had stage I or II disease. 70% of patients developed steroid induced acne after the 1st cycle of chemotherapy. All regimens contained either docetaxel or paclitaxel. Dexamethasone was implicated in all but one case. We report an overall incidence of SSIA of 0.05% among breast cancer patients treated with at least once cycle of chemotherapy at our institution. Conclusions: These results suggest that breast cancer patients at highest risk for SSIA are on taxane-based regimens with early stage disease and are most likely to develop the reaction after their first cycle of chemotherapy. This study however is limited by the retrospective design, the reliance on ICD 9 billing codes, and the limited sample size.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document