Survival among older patients with previously treated multiple myeloma treated with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) in the BOSTON study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8019-8019
Author(s):  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Sosana Delimpasi ◽  
Maryana Simonova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Boston Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

8019 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) typically affects older populations, which are more vulnerable to toxicity with anti-MM treatments. These patients (pts) have significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in a need for dose modifications or alternative suboptimal treatment options. Significant improvements were observed in the BOSTON study with XVd vs Vd in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and rates of peripheral neuropathy (PN); median overall survival (OS) trended in favor of XVd. Methods: The phase 3 randomized BOSTON trial (NCT03110562) is a controlled, open-label study of once weekly XVd vs. twice weekly standard Vd in pts with MM and 1-3 prior treatment regimens. We performed post-hoc analyses to compare survival benefits in pts ≥65 vs < 65 years of age. Results: The BOSTON study enrolled a total of 402 pts between June 2017 and February 2019 that were randomized into XVd or Vd arms. The numbers of pts treated with XVd or Vd who were ≥65 were 109/132 and 86/75 who were < 65, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar by age although pts ≥65 years were less likely to have received ASCT than those < 65 years (48.4% vs. 25.3%). Median PFS was prolonged with XVd compared with Vd, across both age groups: ≥65 (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.37-0.83] P = 0.002) and < 65, (HR, 0. 74 [95% CI, 0.49-1.11], P = 0.07). Vd was associated with a lower ORR (64.4%) than treatment with XVd (76.1%) (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.00-3.11], P = 0.024) in pts ≥65, while the ORR in those < 65 was 76.7% with XVd and 58.7% (OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.18-4.59], P = 0.007) with Vd. As of Jan 2021, the median OS for the overall population was not reached for both arms (HR = 0.86; p = 0.193), with 61 and 75 deaths in the XVd and Vd arms, respectively. Median OS was not reached in pts ≥65 with XVd and was 28.6 months with Vd (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94; p = 0.012), while there was no difference in the OS for pts < 65 (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.86-2.68; p = 0.926). Pts ≥65 had a lower incidence of death with XVd as compared to Vd (29 vs 56) and there were 32 deaths with XVd and 19 with Vd in pts < 65. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were not observed more often in older compared to younger pts. Amongst pts ≥65, PN of any grade was lower with XVd (32.1%) compared to Vd (46.5%); (OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.97], p = 0.017), including a lower incidence of grade ≥3 PN (XVd 4.6% vs. Vd 11.6%). Pts < 65 followed a similar trend of PN AEs of any grade: XVd, 32.6%; Vd, 48.0% (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.21-0.82], p = 0.006). Conclusions: In an older patient population with a poor prognosis, XVd was associated with a significant survival benefit, improved PFS and OR with reduced PN, and requires relatively short and infrequent clinic visits. XVd may be a simple, effective regimen for pts ≥65 years of age. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562.

Selinexor containing regimens in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (αCD38 mAbs).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20020-e20020
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Brea Lipe ◽  
Sascha Tuchman ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Functional Inactivation ◽  
Dose Modifications

e20020 Background: Exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the nuclear export and functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, is required for MM growth, is associated with poor prognosis in MM and mediates resistance to standard MM therapies. Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound approved in combination with dexamethasone (dex) ± bortezomib for patients (pts) with previously treated MM. Once MM becomes refractory to αCD38 mAb, pts have limited effective treatment options and poor prognosis. Overall response rate (ORR) to the first regimen after refractoriness to an αCD38 mAb is 31%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) is 3.4 months (m), and median overall survival (mOS) is 8.6 m. The doublet SEL-dex (Xd) has shown ORR ̃26% in triple-class (IMID, PI, αCD38 mAb) refractory MM; SEL-based triplets could be more effective in this population. Methods: STOMP (Selinexor and Backbone Treatments of Multiple Myeloma Patients) is a multi-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluating SEL in various triplet combinations. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of SEL-containing triplets in pts previously treated with αCD38 mAbs. Pts received SEL-dex (Xd) plus pomalidomide (XPd, n = 19), bortezomib (XVd, n = 4), lenalidomide (XRd, n = 4), daratumumab (XDd, n = 2) or carfilzomib (XKd, n = 18). ORR, mOS, mPFS and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results: Among the 47 pts, median age 64 yrs, female 53%, median time from diagnosis 5.1 yrs, median number of prior regimens 5 (range, 2–11). Prior daratumumab (96%), isatuximab (4%); 96% had MM refractory to aCD38 mAb, 81% had triple-class refractory MM, 74% and 47% were quad- and penta-exposed, 43% and 15% had quad- and penta-refractory MM. αCD38 mAb was included in the immediate prior regimen of 57% of pts and median duration from end of most recent aCD38 mAb therapy to first dose of study treatment was 6.9 weeks (range, 2.6-114.9). ORR was 51% among the 45 evaluable pts, 59% in the XPd arm (n = 17; 2 pts were not efficacy evaluable) and 67% in the XKd arm. ORR was 47% (9/19) among pts with quad-refractory MM and evaluable efficacy. Among all evaluable pts mPFS was 8.8 m (95% CI: 4.9, NE) and mOS was 20.4 m (95% CI: 9.6, NE). Among the 25 pts with αCD38 mAb in their immediate prior regimen, efficacy was similar to that regimen: ORR 52% vs. 45%, mPFS 8.8 vs. 9.3 m. The most common treatment emergent AEs were nausea (72%), anemia (64%), thrombocytopenia (60%), fatigue (57%), which were managed with standard supportive care and dose modifications. Conclusions: SEL-containing triplets in pts with MM previously treated with αCD38 mAbs, most of whom had triple-class refractory MM, exhibit tolerability and comparable effectiveness to their most recent αCD38 mAb-containing regimens. Compared to historical control, mOS was much higher among these patients. Further investigation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042.

Safety and efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 772-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Mohamad Hussein ◽  
James Berenson ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, toxicities from dexamethasone can be dose limiting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Patients (N = 222) received lenalidomide 30 mg/day once daily (days 1-21 every 28 days) until disease progression or intolerance. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. Overall, 67% of patients had received 3 or more prior treatment regimens. Partial response or better was reported in 26% of patients, with minimal response 18%. There was no difference between patients who had received 2 or fewer versus 3 or more prior treatment regimens (45% vs 44%, respectively). Median values for TTP, PFS, and OS were 5.2, 4.9, and 23.2 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and anemia (20%), which proved manageable with dose reduction. Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 4% of patients. Lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed and refractory MM with acceptable toxicities. These data support treatment with single-agent lenalidomide, as well as its use in steroid-sparing combination approaches. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00065351.

Safety and efficacy of AMG 386 in combination with sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in an open-label multicenter phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4606-4606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Gwenaelle Gravis ◽  
Kazimierz Drosik ◽  
Tomasz Demkow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitors ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Amg 386 ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

4606 Background: AMG 386, an investigational peptide-Fc fusion protein, inhibits angiogenesis by disrupting the angiopoietin/Tie2 axis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMG 386 plus sunitinib in patients (pts) with mRCC. Methods: Adults with mRCC who were naïve to angiogenesis inhibitors were sequentially enrolled to 2 cohorts: sunitinib 50 mg PO QD (4 wks on, 2 wks off) plus AMG 386 at 10 mg/kg (A) or 15 mg/kg (B) IV QW. Primary endpoints: adverse events (AEs), dose interruptions/reductions due to AEs in the first 12 wks of treatment; secondary endpoints included: progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (ORR). Results: 85 pts received ≥1 dose of study medication (A/B, n=43/42). In A/B, 88%/76% were male and 30%/36% were age ≥65; MSKCC risk scores were low (40%/36%) or intermediate (60%/62%). For A/B: median follow-up time was 19.6/12.0 mos; AMG 386 discontinuations due to AEs were 16%/29%; and grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 72%/74% with virtually all attributed to sunitinib. Grade 3 AEs occurring with >5% frequency were hypertension, hand foot syndrome, asthenia, fatigue, elevated lipase, diarrhea, mucositis, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia, with no distinction between dose levels. The percentage of pts with sunitinib dose interruptions within the first 12 wks (A/B, 58%/57%) met the prespecified criteria. One pt in B had fatal acute pulmonary edema. No pt developed anti-AMG 386 antibodies. The Kaplan-Meier estimate (95% CI) of PFS was 13.9 (10.4, 19.2) mos in A; PFS in B is not yet mature with only 21% of pts having disease progression. ORR (95% CI) was 58% (42, 73) in A including 1 CR, and 59% (42, 74) in B. Conclusions: In pts with mRCC, AMG 386 at 10 and 15 mg/kg combined with sunitinib appeared to be tolerable. Reported sunitinib dose modifications for the observation period were within the prespecified range. Efficacy results suggest potential benefit for the addition of AMG 386 to sunitinib.

scholarly journals Once weekly selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone in carfilzomib non-refractory multiple myeloma patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Sascha A. Tuchman ◽  
Natalie S. Callander ◽  
Muhamed Baljevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

Abstract Background Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), including carfilzomib, potentiate the activity of selinexor, a novel, first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in preclinical models of multiple myeloma (MM). Methods The safety, efficacy, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor (80 or 100 mg) + carfilzomib (56 or 70 mg/m2) + dexamethasone (40 mg) (XKd) once weekly (QW) was evaluated in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) not refractory to carfilzomib. Results Thirty-two patients, median prior therapies 4 (range, 1–8), were enrolled. MM was triple-class refractory in 38% of patients and 53% of patients had high-risk cytogenetics del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or gain 1q. Common treatment-related adverse events (all/Grade 3) were thrombocytopenia 72%/47% (G3 and G4), nausea 72%/6%, anaemia 53%/19% and fatigue 53%/9%, all expected and manageable with supportive care and dose modifications. MTD and RP2D were identified as selinexor 80 mg, carfilzomib 56 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 40 mg, all QW. The overall response rate was 78% including 14 (44%) ≥ very good partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 15 months. Conclusions Weekly XKd is highly effective and well-tolerated. These data support further investigation of XKd in patients with MM.

scholarly journals Daratumumab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Joaquín Martinez-Lopez ◽  
María-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drug ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. The increasing adoption of lenalidomide-based therapy for frontline treatment of multiple myeloma has resulted in a need for effective regimens for lenalidomide-refractory patients. This phase 1b study evaluated daratumumab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (D-Kd) in patients with RRMM after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug; lenalidomide-refractory patients were eligible. Carfilzomib- and daratumumab-naïve patients (n = 85) received carfilzomib weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m2 initial dose, escalated to 70 mg/m2 thereafter) and dexamethasone (40 mg/wk). Of these, 10 patients received the first daratumumab dose as a single infusion (16 mg/kg, day 1 cycle 1), and 75 patients received a split first dose (8 mg/kg, days 1-2 cycle 1). Subsequent dosing was per the approved schedule for daratumumab. Patients received a median of 2 (range, 1-4) prior lines of therapy; 60% were lenalidomide refractory. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31%), lymphopenia (24%), anemia (21%), and neutropenia (21%). Infusion-related reactions were observed in 60% and 43% of single and split first-dose patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 84% (79% in lenalidomide-refractory patients). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached; 12-month PFS rates were 74% for all treated patients and 65% for lenalidomide-refractory patients. D-Kd was well tolerated with low neutropenia rates, and it demonstrated deep responses and encouraging PFS, including in patients refractory to lenalidomide. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01998971.

SAVOIR: A phase III study of savolitinib versus sunitinib in pts with MET-driven papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Mathilde Cancel ◽  
Remy B Verheijen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Chromosome 7 ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

5002 Background: PRCC is the most common type of non-clear cell RCC, accounting for 10–15% of renal malignancies. As a subset of PRCC cases are MET-driven, MET inhibition may be an appropriate targeted treatment approach. In a single-arm Phase II study, savolitinib (AZD6094, HMPL‐504, volitinib), a highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in pts with MET-driven PRCC (Choueiri et al. JCO 2017). The Phase III SAVOIR study (NCT03091192) further assessed savolitinib vs standard of care sunitinib in pts with MET-driven PRCC. Methods: In this open-label (sponsor blinded), randomized study, pts with centrally confirmed MET-driven ( MET and/or HGF amplification, chromosome 7 gain and/or MET kinase domain mutations), metastatic PRCC were randomized to savolitinib 600 mg once daily (QD), or sunitinib 50 mg QD 4 weeks on / 2 weeks off. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety and tolerability. Results: After external data on predicted PFS with sunitinib in pts with MET-driven disease became available, study enrollment was closed. At data cutoff (Aug 2019), only 60 of the planned 180 pts were randomized (savolitinib n = 33; sunitinib n = 27). Most had chromosome 7 gain (savolitinib 91%; sunitinib 96%) and no prior therapy (savolitinib 85%; sunitinib 93%). PFS, OS, and ORR were numerically improved with savolitinib vs sunitinib (Table). CTCAE grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42% and 81% of pts; dose modifications were related to AEs in 30% and 74% of pts with savolitinib and sunitinib respectively. After discontinuation, 36% of all savolitinib and 19% of all sunitinib pts received subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions: Although pt numbers and follow-up were limited, savolitinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an improved safety profile vs sunitinib, with fewer grade ≥3 AEs and fewer dose modifications required. Sunitinib performance was poorer than expected based on external retrospective data. Further investigation of savolitinib as a treatment option for MET-driven PRCC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03091192 . [Table: see text]

A phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of pembrolizumab for refractory atypical and anaplastic meningioma and hemangiopericytoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2064-2064
Author(s):  
Shlomit Yust-Katz ◽  
Alexandera Amiel ◽  
Tali Siegal ◽  
Dror Limon
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anaplastic Meningioma ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Grade 3

2064 Background: Grade II and III meningiomas are invasive tumors which tend to recur following initial treatment and are associated with shorter survival (relative to grade I). Hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is a dural based tumor that originates in the pericytes in the walls of capillaries. Treatment options for these tumors include surgical resection and radiation. There are no defined standard treatments after failure of these modalities, and efficient systemic treatments are lacking. This trial concept was formed following previous reports of high PD-L1 levels in anaplastic meningioma. We currently report our initial experience with pembrolizumab for refractory atypical/anaplastic meningioma (RAM) and HPC patients. Methods: This is a single arm, single institute, phase 2 trial. Inclusion criteria included patients with RAM or HPC whose all previous lines of treatment were exhausted. All patients were treated with pembrolizumab (200mg every 3 weeks) until disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6- and 12-months progression free survival (PFS). The study was planned for 25 patients and we report here preliminary results. Results: Through February 2021, 12 patients were enrolled to this study (two with HPC, 10 with RAM). After a median follow up of 18.5 months, the 6 and 12 months PFS were 25% and 16.7% respectively, with a median PFS of 2.75 months. Two patients had a partial response while all others progressed, making the overall response rate 16.7%. One of the responders had HPC and has been stable for 30 months, while the second had atypical meningioma and was stable for 13 months. Median survival has not been yet reached; 1 year survival rate was 82.5%. Grade 3 toxicities included hyperglycemia, elevated liver enzymes and fatigue (that did not cause treatment discontinuation), with no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. PD-L1, mutation burden, MSI and other genomic analyses are still pending. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab induced a low response rate for RAM and HPC. However, a subset of patients might benefit from this treatment with a prolonged response period. To define this subpopulation further molecular studies are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03016091.

Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8026-8026
Author(s):  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Grade 3

8026 Background: A prespecified interim efficacy analysis of the Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated that isatuximab (Isa) plus carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) (Isa-Kd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with Kd in patients (pts) with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM) (HR 0.531; 99% CI, 0.318–0.889; P=0.0007), with a clinically meaningful increase in minimal residual disease negativity (MRD-) (29.6% vs 13.0%) and complete response (CR) (39.7% vs 27.6%) rates, and a manageable safety profile. This subgroup analysis of IKEMA examined efficacy and safety in pts aged <70 and ≥70 years. Methods: Pts with 1–3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to receive Isa-Kd (n=179) or Kd (n=123). The primary end point was PFS, as assessed by an independent response committee. We compared outcomes in pts <70 vs ≥70 years; division into different or additional age groups resulted in smaller sample sizes. Results: Of the 302 randomized pts, 71.5% were aged <70 years (Isa-Kd: 70.9%; Kd: 72.4%) and 28.5% were aged ≥70 years (Isa-Kd: 29.1%; Kd: 27.6%). Consistent with the significant improvement of PFS in the overall population, the addition of Isa to Kd resulted in improved PFS independently of age (Table). The CR, ≥very good partial response (VGPR), and MRD- rates were higher with Isa-Kd vs Kd. Within the Isa-Kd arm, CR rate and ≥VGPR rate were similar in elderly and younger pts. MRD- was observed in 32.3% of younger pts and 23.1% of elderly pts with Isa-Kd. In both arms, Grade ≥3 and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more frequently reported in elderly pts vs pts <70 years old (Table). For both age groups, the incidence of Grade ≥3 TEAEs was higher whereas the incidence of serious TEAEs was similar between Isa-Kd and Kd. In the elderly subgroup, 3 (5.9%) pts receiving Isa-Kd and 1 (2.9%) receiving Kd had fatal TEAEs (Isa-Kd, infection; Kd, general health deterioration due to progressive disease). The most common Grade ≥3 TEAEs in pts aged <70 and ≥70 years treated with Isa-Kd vs Kd were hypertension (18.3% vs 17.0% [<70 years] and 25.5% vs 26.5% [≥70 years]) and pneumonia (14.3% vs 9.1% [<70 years] and 21.6% vs 20.6% [≥70 years]). Conclusions: The addition of Isa to Kd improved PFS and quality of response in elderly pts, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with the benefit observed in the overall IKEMA study population. Isa-Kd provides a potential new treatment option for elderly pts with RMM. Funding: Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT03275285. [Table: see text]

CTIM-31. A PHASE II, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE ARM TRIAL OF PEMBROLIZUMAB FOR REFRACTORY ATYPICAL AND ANAPLASTIC MENINGIOMA AND HEMANGIOPERICYTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi57-vi57
Author(s):  
Shlomit Yust-Katz ◽  
Alexandra Amiel ◽  
Shlomit Yust-Katz ◽  
Dror Limon
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anaplastic Meningioma ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND Grade II and III meningiomas are invasive tumors which tend to recur following initial treatment and are associated with shorter survival (relative to grade I). Hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is a dural based tumor that originates in the pericytes. Treatment options for these tumors include surgical resection and radiation. There are no defined standard treatments after failure these modalities, and effective systemic treatments are lacking. This trial concept was developed following previous reports of high PD-L1 levels in anaplastic meningioma. We currently report our initial experience with pembrolizumab for refractory atypical/anaplastic meningioma (RAM) and HPC patients. METHODS This is a single arm, single institute, phase 2 trial. Inclusion criteria included patients with RAM or HPC whose all previous lines of treatment were exhausted. All patients were treated with pembrolizumab (200mg every 3 weeks) until disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6- and 12-months progression free survival (PFS). The study was planned for 25 patients and we report here preliminary results. RESULTS Through February 2021, 12 patients were enrolled to this study (two with HPC, 10 with RAM). After a median follow up of 18.5 months, the 6 and 12 months PFS were 25% and 16.7% respectively, with a median PFS of 2.75 months. Two patients had a partial response while all others progressed, making the overall response rate 16.7%. One of the responders had HPC and has been stable for 30 months, while the second had atypical meningioma and was stable for 13 months. Median survival has not been reached yet; 1 year survival rate was 82.5%. Grade 3 toxicities included hyperglycemia, elevated liver enzymes and fatigue, with no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab induced a low response rate for RAM and HPC. However, a subset of patients might benefit from this treatment with a prolonged response period.

scholarly journals 349 Tolerability of tivozanib vs. sorafenib in elderly and/or immunotherapy-pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) in TIVO-3

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A376-A376
Author(s):  
Vijay Kasturi ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Brian Rini ◽  
Sumanta Pal ◽  
David McDermott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
List Type ◽  
Class Effect ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

BackgroundThe TIVO-3 trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) with TIVO when compared to sorafenib (SOR; 5.6 mo. vs 3.9 mo., respectively; HR 0.73) and better tolerability with reduced need for dose interruptions (p = 0.0164), dose reductions (p = 0.0147), and discontinuations< sup >1</sup >. As the majority of patients diagnosed with mRCC in the US are >65 years, with the largest recent increase in incidence among those ≥75, and front-line treatment now standardly includes immunotherapy (IO), tolerability of new therapies for relapsed or refractory (R/R) mRCC must be acceptable in the elderly and/or IO pretreated populationMethodsData was analyzed to identify relationships between tolerability and advanced age or IO pretreatment. In addition to measures of drug exposure, any grade ≥3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) and VEFGR TKI class effect grade ≥3 TRAEs are reported by age (<65, 65–74, ≥75) and prior IO (yes, no)ResultsOf the 343 patients treated on study, 120 (35%) were between age 65 and 75 and 34 (10%) were over 75. Patients received 1.5-2x more cycles of TIVO compared to SOR and fewer overall grade ≥3 TRAEs in all age groups and irrespective of prior IO. Differences in VEGFR TKI class effect TRAEs seen in the total population were retained across most subgroups (table 1). Among patients 75 and over, there were almost half the rate of the dose reductions or discontinuations with TIVO compared to SOR. Prior IO was associated with less asthenia overall, more HTN with TIVO, and more rash but less diarrhea with SORAbstract 349 Table 1Drug exposure, dose modifications, and TRAEs in TIVO-3 by age and prior IOConclusionsTolerability benefits with TIVO compared to SOR in mRCC are retained in elderly patients and those previously treated with IO. This finding, paired with consistently improved PFS in these subpopulations (age >65: HR 0.59, prior IO: HR 0.55), suggests TIVO is a safe and effective option in the context of the current R/R mRCC treatment paradigmTrial RegistrationClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT02627963ReferenceRini B, Pal S, Escudier B, Atkins M, Hutson T, et al. Tivozanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (TIVO-3): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:95–104Ethics ApprovalThis trial was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at every centre and complied with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki, and local laws. All patients provided written informed consent before any trial procedure. The trial protocol including the relevant centres is provided in the appendix of the reference 1

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document