CNS activity of poziotinib in NSCLC with exon 20 insertion mutations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9093-9093
Author(s):  
Xiuning Le ◽  
Marina Chiara Garassino ◽  
Robin Cornelissen ◽  
Mark A. Socinski ◽  
Nishan Tchekmedyian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Cns Metastases ◽  
Cns Activity ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Insertion Mutations

9093 Background: Treatment addressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations remains an unmet need. These tumors are associated with a high incidence of CNS metastases and unfavorable survival rates. Poziotinib is a potent, irreversible, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a structure that can overcome the steric hindrance of the exon 20 limited binding pocket. Preclinical data suggest poziotinib CNS penetration, and here we show meaningful poziotinib CNS activity in patients with NSCLC harboring exon 20 insertion mutations in an ongoing multi-cohort, multi-center Phase 2 study (ZENITH20; NCT03318939). Methods: ZENITH20 enrolled previously treated and naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations in several cohorts: Cohort 1 (C1) EGFR previously treated; Cohort 2 (C2) HER2 previously treated and Cohort 3 (C3) EGFR treatment-naïve. All patients with stable CNS metastases at baseline were included. Poziotinib (16 mg) was administered orally QD, with follow-up for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was Objective Response Rate (ORR) evaluated centrally using RECIST v1.1 by an independent image review committee. Secondary endpoints included Disease Control Rate (DCR), Duration of Response (DOR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and safety. Primary efficacy results have been previously released. Intracranial response was determined based on the modified RECIST criteria. Results: A total of 284 patients across 3 cohorts (C1 n=115; and C2 n=90; and C3 n=79) with a median age of 60.5 years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 7.3, 8.3, and 9.2 months for all patients in C1, C2, and C3, respectively. In NSCLC patients that had baseline CNS lesions (N=36), the analysis showed a patient-based ORR of 22.2% (8/36) and a DCR of 88.9% (32/36). One patient in each cohort had a complete intracranial response and stable disease was 80.6% across 3 cohorts and 92.9% in C2. Two patients each in C1 and C3 had progressive disease (PD) and none had CNS progression in C2 (Table). Conclusions: Poziotinib exhibited clinically meaningful CNS activity in patients with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations in ZENITH20 Cohorts 1-3. The majority of the patients had no CNS progression and 3/36 patients had intracranial complete responses. The preliminary data suggest that poziotinib may provide a meaningful treatment alternative for patients with NSCLC that harbor EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations and who present with CNS metastases that have poor prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT03318939. [Table: see text]

Poziotinib shows activity and durability of responses in subgroups of previously treated EGFR exon 20 NSCLC patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9514-9514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuning Le ◽  
Jonathan Wade Goldman ◽  
Jeffrey Melson Clarke ◽  
Nishan Tchekmedyian ◽  
Zofia Piotrowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Dose Reductions

9514 Background: Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 mutations is an unmet medical need. Poziotinib is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutants. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of poziotinib in previously treated NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in an independent cohort of a multi-cohort, multi-center Phase 2 study ( ZENITH20-1). Methods: ZENITH20-1 study enrolled pts with advanced NSCLC with an EGFR exon 20 insertion identified on local tissue testing who had received at least one prior line of therapy. Poziotinib (16 mg) was administered orally QD, allowing dose reductions for AEs, with follow up for 24 months. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), evaluated centrally by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Efficacy was also evaluated by specific exon 20 insertions and prior lines of therapy. Results: 115 patients with a median age of 61 years (33-83) were enrolled. Patients had a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-9.) The median relative dose intensity was 72% (7-100%) with 65% having dose reductions. The ORR in the as-treated population was 14.8% (95% CI 8.9 - 22.6%), and the DCR was 68.7% (95% CI 59.4 - 77.0%) with a median DoR of 7.4 months. 65% patients had tumor size reductions and the median PFS was 4.2 months. In the evaluable population (n = 88), the ORR was 19.3% and the unconfirmed ORR was 25%. Responses were predominantly observed in insertions between residues M766 to D770 of exon 20 (8/44; 18.2%). Responses were observed in patients with 2 lines (14%); ≥3 lines of therapy (16.2%). The most common treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs were rash (28%), diarrhea (26%), stomatitis (9%) and paronychia (6%). The incidence of treatment-related pneumonitis was 4%, however some cases may have been confounded by prior checkpoint inhibitors as first line treatment. Conclusions: Although the ORR primary endpoint was not met, poziotinib induced tumor reduction in the majority of patients with durable responses, including the heavily pre-treated population. Responses were more common in patients with insertions between M766 to D770 of EGFR exon 20. The safety profile was overall consistent with other 2nd generation EGFR TKIs. Evaluation of these subgroups with refined dosing and improved toxicity management to maintain continuous treatment is warranted to assess the potential of poziotinib in Exon20 related tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03318939 .

scholarly journals Poziotinib in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations After Prior Therapies: ZENITH20-2 Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuning Le ◽  
Robin Cornelissen ◽  
Marina Garassino ◽  
Jeffrey M. Clarke ◽  
Nishan Tchekmedyian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Insertion Mutations

PURPOSE Insertion mutations in Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene ( ERBB2 or HER2) exon 20 occur in 2%-5% of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and function as an oncogenic driver. Poziotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was evaluated in previously treated patients with NSCLC with HER2 exon 20 insertions. METHODS ZENITH20, a multicenter, multicohort, open-label phase II study, evaluated poziotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In cohort 2, patients received poziotinib (16 mg) once daily. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by independent review committee (RECIST v1.1); secondary outcome measures were disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety and tolerability. Quality of life was assessed. RESULTS Between October 2017 and March 2021, 90 patients with a median of two prior lines of therapy (range: 1-6) were treated. With a median follow-up of 9.0 months, objective response rate was 27.8% (95% CI, 18.9 to 38.2); 25 of 90 patients achieved a partial response. Disease control rate was 70.0% (95% CI, 59.4 to 79.2). Most patients (74%) had tumor reduction (median reduction 22%). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8); median duration of response was 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.5). Clinical benefit was seen regardless of lines and types of prior therapy, presence of central nervous system metastasis, and types of HER2 mutations. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included rash (48.9%), diarrhea (25.6%), and stomatitis (24.4%). Most patients had poziotinib dose reductions (76.7%), with median relative dose intensity of 71.5%. Permanent treatment discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13.3% of patients. CONCLUSION Poziotinib demonstrates antitumor activity in previously treated patients with HER2 exon 20 insertion NSCLC.

KEYNOTE-224: Phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS504-TPS504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Stephen L. Chan ◽  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Previously Treated

TPS504 Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib is the standard of care for first-line hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients with HCC after disease progression on sorafenib or for those with intolerance to sorafenib, no approved therapies are available. Because HCC is often driven by inflammation and is also associated with a suppressed immunoenvironment, there is a strong rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in patients with this type of cancer. The single-arm, multisite, phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02702414) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti–PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced HCC. Methods: Approximately 100 patients will be enrolled. Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease or BCLC stage B disease not amenable to or refractory to locoregional therapy, and disease not amenable to a curative treatment approach (eg, transplantation, surgery, or ablation). Patients must also have measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1 as confirmed by central imaging vendor review, documented objective radiographic progression after stopping treatment with sorafenib or intolerance to sorafenib, Child-Pugh liver score A, ECOG performance status 0-1, and predicted life expectancy > 3 months. Patients will be allocated to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (~2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision. Response will be assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 days thereafter (90 days for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. The primary end point is objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Secondary end points are overall survival; safety and tolerability; and duration of response, disease control rate, time to progression, and progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-224 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Atezolizumab (atezo) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): A 2-year clinical update from a phase Ia study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 290-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
Fadi S. Braiteh ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
The United States ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Ecog Ps

290 Background: Atezo (anti–PD-L1) has demonstrated safety and efficacy in a broad range of cancers and is approved in the United States for mUC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we report long-term results in mUC from Phase Ia study NCT01375842 (PCD4989g). Methods: Previously treated mUC patients received atezo 15 mg/kg or 1200 mg IV q3w. Enrollment in this Phase Ia expansion cohort initially required PD-L1–selected status and later opened to patients regardless of PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed RECIST v1.1 ORR (confirmed), DOR and OS. Results: 95 patients were safety evaluable (Table). Median age was 66 years, 76% were male and 80% had primary bladder tumors. 61% had ECOG PS 1. 52% received ≥ 3 prior systemic therapies for mUC (70% platinum). Median treatment duration was 3 months (range: 0-32 months); 24% were treated for ≥ 1 year. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 66% (all Grade) and 8% (Grade 3-4) of patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. In 94 objective response–evaluable patients (follow-up ≥ 12 weeks), the ORR was 27% (95% CI: 18, 37%), and the CR rate was 10%; the SD rate was 19%. mDOR was 22.1 months (95% CI: 12.1, NE months) in all patients; 56% of responses (7/9 CRs and 7/16 PRs) were ongoing at the December 15, 2015 data cutoff. With a 24-month median follow-up duration (range: 1+ to 32 months), the 1-year OS rate was 47% (95% CI: 36, 58%), and the 2-year rate was 29% (19, 40%); mOS is in the Table. Updated clinical data with further follow-up and analyses by PD-L1 status will be presented. Conclusions: Long-term treatment with atezo was well tolerated, without new safety signals in heavily pre-treated mUC patients. The durability of responses, including CRs, along with extended OS, confirm atezo as a new standard for previously treated mUC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01375842. [Table: see text]

First-line avelumab + axitinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a phase 1b trial (VEGF Liver 100).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4072-4072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kenta Motomura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

4072 Background: Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for treatment of advanced/metastatic (a/m) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Avelumab is a human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for VEGF receptors 1/2/3. VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533) is a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab + axitinib in treatment-naive patients (pts) with HCC; interim results are reported here. Methods: Eligible pts had confirmed a/m HCC, ≥1 measurable lesion, a fresh or archival tumor specimen, ECOG PS ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A. Pts received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W + axitinib 5 mg orally BID until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and objective response (RECIST v1.1; modified [m] RECIST for HCC). Results: Interim assessment was performed after a minimum follow up of 6 months based on the released study data set (clinical cut-off date: Aug 1, 2018). As of the cut-off date, 22 pts (median age: 68.5 y) were treated with avelumab (median: 20.0 wk) and axitinib (median: 19.9 wk). The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥10% of patients) were hypertension (50.0%) and hand-foot syndrome (22.7%); no grade 4/5 TRAEs were reported. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) (≥10% of pts) were hypothyroidism (31.8%) and hyperthyroidism (13.6%). No grade ≥3 irAEs were reported; no pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs or irAEs. Based on Waterfall plot calculations, tumor shrinkage was observed in 15 (68.2%) and 16 (72.7%) pts by RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. ORR was 13.6% (95% CI, 2.9%-34.9%) and 31.8% (95% CI, 13.9%-54.9%) by RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. OS data were immature at data cutoff. Conclusions: The preliminary safety of avelumab + axitinib in HCC is manageable and consistent with the known safety profiles of avelumab and axitinib when administered as monotherapies. This study demonstrates antitumor activity of the combination in HCC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03289533. [Table: see text]

Clinical experience of a targeted TCR-IL2 fusion protein in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13088-e13088
Author(s):  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
Jeffrey S. Weber ◽  
Asim Amin ◽  
Sanjiv S Agarwala ◽  
David H. Lawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Single Chain

e13088 Background: ALT-801 is recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2) genetically fused to a single-chain T-cell receptor specific to a peptide antigen of human p53 presented in the context of HLA-A2 positivity. In melanoma xenograft mouse models, this fusion protein alone demonstrated potent, targeted antitumor activity and synergistic efficacy was observed in combination with CDDP. A prior phase I study in pts with metastatic malignancies, including metastatic melanoma, showed that ALT-801 monotherapy could be safely administered and was associated with immunologic changes of potential antitumor relevance (Fishman 2011 CCR 17:7765). Here we report the results of a phase Ib study of ALT-801+ CDDP in pts with metastatic melanoma. Methods: The primary objectives of this multicenter study are to: 1) define an MTD and evaluate the safety of ALT-801+CDDP and 2) assess the objective response rate according to RECIST criteria in treated patients. Eligible pts (histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic melanoma, p53 peptide/HLA-A2+ tumor, chemotherapy naive, PS (ECOG) 0-1, adequate renal and cardiac functions) received 2 consecutive 4-wk courses of CDDP (70 mg/m2 iv, Day 1) and ALT-801 (iv, Days 3, 5, 15, 17 & 19). Pts with SD or better after 2 courses received 2 additional courses of treatment. Up to 5 cohorts (3+3 dose escalation) of ALT-801 (0.04 - 0.12 mg/kg) were planned with a 2-stage design of expanded pt enrollment at the MTD. Results: 22 patients (11M, 11F, 30-74 yrs) were evaluable at ALT-801 dose levels from 0.04 to 0.10 mg/kg. The MTD has not been reached at 0.10 mg/kg ALT-801. Toxicity was manageable and transient. RECIST-confirmed tumor response and disease stabilization was reported for some patients. Overall survival rates (6 mon, 87%; 12 mon, 58%) observed to date suggest durable clinical benefit. Conclusions: ALT-801+CDDP can be safely administered in an out-patient setting to pts with metastatic melanoma. Preliminary evaluation suggests durable clinical activity of the ALT-801+CDDP regimen in melanoma patients. A trial using ALT-801 at the 0.1 mg/kg dose level in combination with a BRAF kinase inhibitor is being planned for patients with metastatic melanoma (CA097550).

Updated efficacy and safety of the j-alex study comparing alectinib (ALC) with crizotinib (CRZ) in ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK fusion positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9064-9064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Takiguchi ◽  
Toyoaki Hida ◽  
Hiroshi Nokihara ◽  
Masashi Kondo ◽  
Young Hak Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Superior Efficacy ◽  
Independent Review

9064 Background: ALC is a highly selective, CNS-active ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In the J-ALEX study, ALC proved superior efficacy and tolerability compared to CRZ at the pre-planned interim analysis at 83 progression free survival (PFS) events (51% of target events) . Here we report the updated data with a further 10 months of follow up. Methods: Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive ALC 300 mg b.i.d or CRZ 250 mg b.i.d and stratified by ECOG PS, treatment line, and clinical stage. Study Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS according to the blinded independent review. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival, objective response rate and safety. Results: From Nov 2013 to Aug 2015, 207 patients were enrolled. Data cut off for the present analysis was Sep 2016. Median durations of PFS follow up were 20.5 months in the ALC arm and 20.4 months in the CRZ arm with 116 events by independent review observed. The updated PFS HR was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.26-0.55, p< 0.0001). Median PFS was 25.9 months (95% CI: 20.3-not estimated) with ALC and 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.3-12.0) with CRZ. For patients without brain metastasis at baseline (n = 164), ALC prevented CNS metastasis onset compared to CRZ (HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.53). For patients with brain metastasis at baseline (n = 43), ALC also prevented CNS progression compared to CRZ (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.16-1.64). Adverse events (AEs) with frequency of more than 30% were constipation (37.9%) and nasopharyngitis (32.0%) in the ALC arm, while in the CRZ arm nausea (76.0%), diarrhea (74.0%), vomiting (57.7%), visual disturbance (54.8%), dysgeusia (51.9%), constipation (46.2%), increased ALT (32.7%), and increased AST (31.7%) were observed. Grade 3-4 AEs occurred with greater frequency in the CRZ arm (ALC: 32.0% vs CRZ: 56.7%). There were no Grade 5 AEs in either arm. Conclusions: In the updated analysis, ALC consistently showed superior efficacy compared to CRZ in systemic disease and prevention of CNS progression. ALC was also associated with a more favorable tolerability profile than CRZ. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-132316.

The open, multicenters, double-arms, randomized, parallel controlled clinical trial of lobaplatin or gemcitabine combined with docetaxel as second-line therapy for advanced osteosarcoma-the effectiveness and safety analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22506-e22506
Author(s):  
Yuanjue Sun ◽  
Yang Yao ◽  
Zhengdong Cai ◽  
Xiuchun Yu ◽  
Sujia Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

e22506 Background: to study the progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety of lobaplatin or gemcitabine combined with docetaxel as second-line therapy for advanced osteosarcoma. Methods: the NO. of clinical trial was HNCA001,a total of 15 cases were enrolled into experiment group adopted lobaplatin combined with docetaxel,and 14 into control group received gemcitabine combined with docetaxel.The trial concluded screening, treatment and follow-up periods.21 dyas as one treatment period,they got drugs at the first day,and were evaluated the effects per two periods, treated at most 6 periods. Results: The baseline characteristics of two groups were no ststistical differences(diastolic blood pressure excluded) (P > 0.05).The PFS rates of 2,4 and 6 periods in experiment group were 87.50%、87.50% and 70.00%,83.33%,27.78% and 0 in control group,middle PFS more than 12 months in experiment group and 3.20 months in control group;while there was no statistical difference of PFS rates(χ2= 2.42,P = 0.1194).The survival rates of 2,4 and 6 periods in experiment group were 100.00%,83.33% and 83.33%,83.33%,83.33% and 0 in control group,the middle OS more than 12 months in the two groups, there was no statistical difference of survival rates (χ2= 0.65,P = 0.4196).The ORR was 6.67% in experiment group and 0 in control group(P = 1.0000).There were no adverse events occurring in the two groups. Conclusions: There is negative results of the trial,most reason may be the samples are greatly less;the next step is samples expanded and follow-up extended for the priority of lobaplatin or gemcitabine combined with docetaxel as second-Line therapy for advanced osteosarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02099396.

Phase I study of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) with sunitinib for advanced gastroesophageal cancers (EGC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15569-e15569
Author(s):  
Sarbajit Mukherjee ◽  
Christos Fountzilas ◽  
Patrick McKay Boland ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Free Survival

e15569 Background: Sunitinib (S) is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against VEGFR, PDGRF, KIT, FLT-3, and RET. S is synergistic with chemotherapy in preclinical models. We hypothesized that S+FOLFIRI combination will have increased efficacy in advanced EGC. Methods: This was a phase I study for patients with advanced chemo naïve EGC. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and safety of S+FOLFIRI. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: Twenty-three patients participated in the study (Male 78%, Female 22%). Median age was 60 (Range: 37-77) years. Median follow up time was 67.5 (95% CI: 58.9, 76) months. The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (78%; G3/4: 43%), nausea (74%; G3/4:13%), diarrhea (65%; G3/4: 4%), vomiting (61%, G3/4: 9%) lymphopenia (52%; G3/4: 13%) and fatigue (52%; G3/4:17%).Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were noted each at dose level (DL) 1 and 1A, one at DL 1B and 3 at DL 2 (Table 1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined at DL 1B. At the time of data reporting 21 patients had died. Two patients came off the study per investigator request. All patients were evaluated for efficacy. The median OS and PFS were 12.4 (95% CI: 8.9, 16.5) months and 6.2 (95% CI: 3.4, 13.5) months, respectively. Conclusions: S+FOLFIRI was reasonably tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and signs of clinical activity in patients with advanced EGC. This study was supported by a research grant from Pfizer, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00524186. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Longer follow-up.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10018-10018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Rischin ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
Alexander David Guminski ◽  
Anne Lynn S. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Previously Treated

10018 Background: Cemiplimab monotherapy achieves clinically meaningful activity in pts with advanced CSCC (metastatic [mCSCC] or locally advanced [laCSCC] not amenable to curative surgery or curative radiation) and has a safety profile consistent with other anti–PD-1 agents. Based on initial data (median follow-up of 9.4 months in the pivotal study, NCT02760498), cemiplimab (cemiplimab-rwlc in the US) was approved for the treatment of pts with advanced CSCC. Historical data shows median overall survival (OS) of approximately 15 months with conventional chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors (ASCO 2019, e21033). We present ~1-year additional follow-up from the largest prospective data set in advanced CSCC. Methods: Pts received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W (Group [Gp] 1; mCSCC; Gp 2, laCSCC) or cemiplimab 350 mg Q3W (Gp 3, mCSCC). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; complete response + partial response) per independent central review (ICR). Data presented here are per investigator review (INV); ICR data will be available at the meeting. Results: 193 pts were enrolled (Gp 1, n = 59; Gp 2, n = 78; Gp 3, n = 56). 128 pts had received no prior anti-cancer systemic therapy, 65 pts were previously treated. As of Oct 11, 2019 (data cut-off), median duration of follow-up was 15.7 months (range: 0.6–36.1) among all pts; 18.5 months (range: 1.1–36.1) for Gp 1, 15.5 months (range: 0.8–35.0) for Gp 2, and 17.3 months (range: 0.6–26.3) for Gp 3. ORR per INV was 54.4% (95% CI: 47.1–61.6) for all pts; 50.8% (95% CI: 37.5–64.1) for Gp 1, 56.4% (95% CI: 44.7–67.6) for Gp 2, and 55.4% (95% CI: 41.5–68.7) for Gp 3. ORR per INV was 57.8% (95% CI: 48.8–66.5) among treatment-naïve pts and 47.7% (95% CI: 35.1–60.5) among previously treated pts. Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached (observed DOR range: 1.8–34.2 months). In responding pts, estimated proportion of pts with ongoing response at 24 months was 76.0% (95% CI: 64.1–84.4). Median OS has not been reached. Estimated OS at 24 months was 73.3% (95% CI: 66.1–79.2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) by any grade were fatigue (34.7%), diarrhea (27.5%), and nausea (23.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were hypertension (4.7%) and anemia and cellulitis (each 4.1%). Conclusions: For pts with advanced CSCC, cemiplimab achieves ORRs, DOR and survival superior to what has been reported with other agents. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document