A precision dosing application for prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel and G-CSF.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13585-e13585
Author(s):  
Claire Villette ◽  
Christian Hurry ◽  
Hitesh Mistry ◽  
Jim Millen ◽  
Christophe Chassagnole

e13585 Background: The aim of this study is to produce a precision dosing application for clinicians to control neutropenia in prostate cancer patients treated with both docetaxel and G-CSF. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) poses serious harm to patients due to the heightened risk of severe infection. Accordingly, chemotherapy dose is assessed at the beginning of each cycle. The therapeutic window of chemotherapy is determined from population studies, with an individual’s dose often scaled by their body surface area. This leads to a large number of patients being over- or under- dosed. We previously developed an application [1] which uses weekly neutrophil counts from the first cycle of docetaxel treatment to predict the level of neutropoenia in subsequent cycles for a given dose of docetaxel. However, in the original app the administration of G-CSF, used as a prophylactic treatment for neutropenia, was not considered. G-CSF administration lacks standardisation and the COVID-19 pandemic has created a highly risk adverse environment to infections, raising the prospects that a clinician will administer G-CSF. Methods: We adapted and combined representations of endogenous and exogenous G-CSF action on CIN from the literature [2,3,4] to capture the inherent feedback effect of circulating neutrophils on progenitor proliferation as well as the stimulatory action of G-CSF injection on proliferation and maturation of progenitor cells. Using data in the public domain from the comparator arm of a phase III clinical trial for metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer (NCT00617669), we identified 134 patients treated with docetaxel with recorded weekly blood tests in the first and second cycle, including 27 also receiving G-CSF. We calibrated individualised patient models against neutrophil counts measured in the first cycle by minimising a Bayesian objective function and evaluated their ability to predict the levels observed in the second cycle. Results: The model was able to capture the main features of endogenous and exogenous G-CSF action on neutrophil count described in the literature, including endogenous-G-CSF-mediated rebound above baseline after chemotherapy-induced depletion [4], rapid rise in neutrophil count following exogenous G-CSF administration [5], as well as reduced chemotherapy-induced depletion and earlier recovery under G-CSF treatment compared to chemotherapy alone [5]. Conclusions: This tool has the potential to help determine how a docetaxel patient may best benefit from G-CSF treatment and/or a change in dose of docetaxel. References: Villettte C., et al., AACR; Cancer Res, 2019;79(13 Suppl): Abstract nr 677. Pastor, M.L., et al. 2013. Pharm. Res, 30(11), pp.2795-2807. Krzyzanski, W., et al. 2010. J. Clin. Pharmacol, 50(S9), pp.101S-112S. Quartino, A.L et al., 2014. Pharm. Res, 31(12), pp.3390-3403. Crawford, J., et al. 1991. N. Engl. J. Med, 325(3), pp.164-170.

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S19-S20
Author(s):  
S. Aluwini ◽  
F. pos ◽  
E. Schimmel ◽  
E. van Lin ◽  
A. krol ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 1990-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie T.H. Peeters ◽  
Wilma D. Heemsbergen ◽  
Peter C.M. Koper ◽  
Wim L.J. van Putten ◽  
Annerie Slot ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether a dose of 78 Gy improves outcome compared with a conventional dose of 68 Gy for prostate cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Patients and Methods Between June 1997 and February 2003, stage T1b-4 prostate cancer patients were enrolled onto a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy with 78 Gy. Patients were stratified by institution, age, (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), and treatment group. Four treatment groups (with specific radiation volumes) were defined based on the probability of seminal vesicle involvement. The primary end point was freedom from failure (FFF). Failure was defined as clinical failure or biochemical failure, according to the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology definition. Other end points were freedom from clinical failure (FFCF), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Median follow-up time was 51 months. Of the 669 enrolled patients, 664 were included in the analysis. HT was prescribed for 143 patients. FFF was significantly better in the 78-Gy arm compared with the 68-Gy arm (5-year FFF rate, 64% v 54%, respectively), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.74 (P = .02). No significant differences in FFCF or OS were seen between the treatment arms. There was no difference in late genitourinary toxicity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer grade 2 or more and a slightly higher nonsignificant incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 2 or more. Conclusion This multicenter randomized trial shows a significantly improved FFF in prostate cancer patients treated with a higher dose of radiotherapy.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1465-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
A V D'Amico ◽  
R Whittington ◽  
S B Malkowicz ◽  
D Schultz ◽  
J E Tomaszewski ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A multivariable analysis to evaluate the potential clinical and pathologic factors that predict for early biochemical failure in patients with pathologically organ-confined and margin-negative disease was performed to define patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred forty-one prostate cancer patients treated with a radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 1989 and June 1995 and found to have pathologically organ-confined and margin-negative disease comprised the study population. A logistic regression multivariable analysis to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pathologic (prostatectomy) Gleason score, and pathologic stage on PSA failure occurring during the first postoperative year was performed. RESULTS Predictors of PSA failure during the first postoperative year in patients with pathologically organ-confined disease included pathologic Gleason score > or = 7 (P = .0007) and preoperative PSA level greater than 10 (P < .0001). Corresponding 3-year freedom-from-PSA-failure rates for these pathologic organ-confined patients with both, one, or neither of these factors were 60%, 75% to 84%, and 95%, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION Prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined and margin-negative disease and a preoperative PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL or a pathologic Gleason score > or = 7 have significant decrements in short-term PSA-failure-free survival. Therefore, these patients should be considered for adjuvant therapy in the setting of a phase III clinical trial.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Julian Kenyon ◽  
Julian Kenyon ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Colin Stott

This is an observational study of objective responses of Prostate Cancer patients to Pharmaceutical Grade Synthetic Cannabidiol. The total number of patients in the study was 12, 11 had a response of one kind or another.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19594-19594 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Aragon-Ching ◽  
Y. M. Ning ◽  
L. Latham ◽  
J. Guadagnini ◽  
P. M. Arlen ◽  
...  

19594 Background: ONJ has been associated with IV bisphosphonate use in cancer patients (pts) and chemotherapy may be an additional risk factor. ONJ is believed to result from localized vascular insufficiency due to faulty bone remodeling. ONJ incidence in pts not receiving chemotherapy (e.g. Paget's disease) is reportedly only 0.8%; prostate cancer pts have an incidence of 6.5%. Methods: We reviewed data from pts with advanced AIPC who developed ONJ while being treated on a Phase II study of ATTP. Results: Six of 36 (17%) pts treated with ATTP had ONJ confirmed by oral surgery. Four of the 6 pts presented with pain and, in five, the ONJ was mandibular in location. All pts were treated conservatively with either sequestrectomy or oral cleansing with chlorhexidine. All pts had been treated monthly with IV zoledronic acid (ZA). The mean duration of ZA use before diagnosis of ONJ was 20 months (mos). One patient had been treated with oral alendronate for 3 years and then developed ONJ after 5 mos of ZA. Of the 36 pts on-study, previous dental history could be verified in 24 pts. ONJ was diagnosed in 4 of the 5 pts with a prior dental infection or invasive dental procedure. Pts received an average of 11 cycles of ATTP before ONJ was diagnosed. All pts with ONJ had received full doses of bevacizumab and most had received full doses of all medications for all cycles. Conclusions: The possibility exists that the risk for ONJ may be higher with specific chemotherapy regimens, particularly those that include steroids or anti-angiogenic agents. However, at this time prior dental infections or procedures remain the greatest known risk factor. It is also possible that the relatively high incidence of ONJ in prostate cancer patients may reflect increased awareness in this population. Randomized phase III trials in AIPC, specifically addressing the incidence of ONJ, are needed to determine whether specific chemotherapy regimens are associated with an increased risk of this complication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5169-5169
Author(s):  
T. M. Mayer ◽  
W. K. Kelly ◽  
J. Concato ◽  
H. Chao

5169 Background: A large proportion of prostate cancer patients receive their care within the VA Healthcare System. As this is a population affected by complex comorbidities, they may be underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. Our objective was to quantify the frequency with which castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients in VACHS would be excluded from major phase III randomized controlled trials. Methods: We reviewed records of all prostate cancer patients at the VACHS between 2004–2007 and identified patients with CRPC. We reviewed eligibility criteria of 24 major phase III clinical trials, from 2006 onwards, studying investigational drugs for CRPC and created a “master list” (ML) of the most pertinent criteria. We analyzed our patient population according to both the ML criteria and to the TAX327 study criteria. Results: We identified 106 patients with CRPC, excluded 7 patients with insufficient medical records, and analyzed 99 patients. Performance status and life expectancy could not be accurately assessed from most charts and were excluded as specific criteria (though reflected in other serious medical condition). Major reasons for exclusion according to ML/TAX327 criteria include: 10/10 other malignancy within 5 years; 11/14 abnormal laboratory parameters; 27/30 other serious medical conditions; 3/4 abnormal cardiac function. ML list only exclusions: 5 active angina; 1 unstable DM; 1 major GI surgery; 1 contraindication to steroids. Serious medical conditions included: active cardiac disease, dementia, serious neurologic, psychiatric, vascular, pulmonary or hematologic disease, and poor performance status or compliance. Overall, 45% (45/99) of patients were excluded when using both the ML and TAX327 criteria. Conclusions: Approximately half of CRPC patients in the VACHS between 2004–2007 did not meet eligibility criteria for major therapeutic trials for CRPC. This retrospective review demonstrates that VA patients are underrepresented in randomized clinical trials for CRPC and are a special population due to their complex comorbidities. These findings underscore the importance of designing better clinical trials for CRPC with less barriers for this underrepresented but common patient population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Y. Yu ◽  
F. E. Nathan ◽  
C. S. Higano

135 Background: Many patients with biochemical relapse after definitive therapy for prostate cancer receive androgen deprivation therapy. Although most patients experience a decline in PSA, PSA eventually rises despite a castrate level of testosterone. Many of these patients have non-metastatic disease and do not develop metastases for a median of 30 mos (Smith MR. JCO, 2005). However, there is no standard therapy for asymptomatic patients with non-metastatic CRPC. ENTHUSE M0 (Study 15) is an ongoing global phase III study comparing zibotentan 10 mg (an oral specific endothelin A receptor antagonist) vs placebo in non-metastatic CRPC patients. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free survival; secondary endpoints are safety, PSA, quality of life, and time to symptomatic progression. Eligible patients are screened for metastases by bone and CT/MRI scan and other parameters. An unexpectedly high number of patients failed screening, prompting this analysis. Methods: All patients who were screened were included in the analysis. Reasons for exclusion were recorded. Results: As of June 3, 2010, 1,756 patients completed screening. Of these patients, 960 (55%) were randomized and 796 (45%) failed screening. The leading causes of screen failures are listed in the table. Exclusion rates by investigator specialty and country will be reported. Conclusions: As 30% of patients had metastatic disease on screening and were excluded, these data suggest that the frequency of asymptomatic metastases is high in men thought to have non-metastatic CRPC. These findings stress the value of periodic staging studies in men progressing from hormone sensitive to non-metastatic CRPC as metastatic CRPC patients may benefit from standard treatments or research treatments on other protocols. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document