Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related thrombocytopenia: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on overall survival.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14549-e14549
Author(s):  
Tyler Haddad ◽  
Songzhu Zhao ◽  
Mingjia Li ◽  
Sandip H. Patel ◽  
Andrew Johns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

e14549 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a standard of care therapy for patients with many different cancers. ICI are generally well tolerated but are associated with unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune-related thrombocytopenia (irTCP) is an understudied and poorly understood toxicity and risk factors for irTCP are unknown. Although other irAE have been associated with clinical benefit, little data is available regarding either risk of irTCP or the effect of irTCP on clinical outcomes of patients treated with ICI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of sequential patients with any solid or hematologic cancer treated with ICI between 2011 and 2017 at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. All patients who received ICI alone or in combination with other systemic therapy in any line of treatment were included; those with thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 at baseline were excluded. Thrombocytopenia grading was performed utilizing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Attribution to ICI was defined as timing after ICI initiation, lack of alternative causes, and improvement with either holding treatment or use of immune suppressive therapy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of initiation of ICI to death from any cause or date of the last follow-up examination. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations between platelet categories with OS. Median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method with 95% CI. Results: We identified 1,038 patients treated with ICI therapy after excluding patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. The median age was 61.4; 613 (59.1%) were male and 613 (59.1%) had history of smoking. The most common cancer types were melanoma (n = 337, 32.5%), lung (n = 213, 20.5%), and renal cell carcinoma (n = 114, 11%). The most common ICI were PD1/L1 (n = 729, 70.2%) and CTLA4 (n = 191, 18.4%). Overall, 89 (8.6%) patients developed grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia; twenty were attributed to ICI (1.93% overall). Patients who developed ≥3 irTCP had worse overall survival compared to those whose thrombocytopenia was unrelated to ICI (5.45 vs 11.3 months; HR. 2.077, 95% CI 1.231, 3.503; log-rank p = 0.005). Patients with ≥3 irTCP also had shorter survival compared to those without thrombocytopenia of any etiology (5.45 vs 13.3 months; HR 2.247, 95% CI: 1.414, 3.571; p < 0.001). irTCP was more common among those treated with PD1/L1 (p = 0.03) but was not associated with cancer type, smoking status, age, gender, race, or line of therapy. Conclusions: Type of immunotherapy is related to irTCP, whereas cancer type and line of therapy are not. Unlike other irAEs, we found that irTCP was associated with shorter overall survival. These findings provide important insight into a poorly understood and rare toxicity. irTCP should be evaluated in more extensive studies to better inform clinical decision making.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced hepatitis: Risk factors, outcomes, and impact on survival.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14525-e14525
Author(s):  
Abdul Miah ◽  
Songzhu Zhao ◽  
Sandip H. Patel ◽  
Andrew Johns ◽  
Madison Grogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Grade 3

e14525 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the survival of patients with multiple cancer types, however ICI treatment is associated with a unique set of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ. Few studies have evaluated the risk factors and outcomes of ICI induced hepatitis (ICIH). Methods: We utilized an institutional database of patients with advanced cancers treated with ICI between 2011 and 2017 at The OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center to identify patients with ICIH. Any patient who received at least one dose of ICI alone or in combination with other systemic therapies either as part of clinical trial or standard of care were included. Clinical data were extracted through chart abstraction. irAEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of ICI initiation to death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up. OS with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. OS was also evaluated by occurrence of ICIH using the log-rank test. Results: We identified 1,096 patients treated with at least one dose of ICI. Most common cancers included lung (n=224, 20%) and melanoma (n=342, 31%). The most common ICIs were PD1/L1 (n=774, 71%) and CTLA-4 inhibitors (n=195, 18%). ICIH of any grade occurred in 64 (6%) patients. Overall, 46 (71%) were male and median age was 60 years. Severity of hepatitis was grade 1-2 in 30 patients (47%) (Table 1). The incidence of ≥grade 3 ICIH in the entire cohort was 3.1%. Median time to ICIH diagnosis was 63 days. ICIH occurred alone in 24 patients, and co-occurred with other irAEs in 40 patients. The most common co-occurring irAEs were pneumonitis (n=7); colitis (n=15), thyroid abnormality (n=14); and dermatitis (n=15). ICIH was more common in women (p=0.038), in patients treated with combination ICIs (p<0.001), and among patients receiving first line therapy (p=0.018). Patients who developed ICIH had significantly longer OS than patients who did not develop ICIH; there was no difference in OS between patients with ≥grade 3 ICIH vs grade 1-2 (Table). 33 out of 34 patients with ≥grade3 ICIH were treated with steroids; 3 received mycophenolate and one received infliximab. Of patients with ≥grade 3 ICIH, 11 resumed ICI therapy without recurrent ICIH. Conclusions: Female sex, combination immunotherapy, and line of therapy were associated with ICIH. Patients with ICIH had improved clinical outcomes compared to those that did not develop ICIH, even those with higher grade toxicity. Further study is needed to assist in developing risk stratification models and optimal treatment for ICIH. OS of patients with and without immune checkpoint inhibitor hepatitis.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related thrombocytopenia: incidence, risk factors and effect on survival

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler C. Haddad ◽  
Songzhu Zhao ◽  
Mingjia Li ◽  
Sandip H. Patel ◽  
Andrew Johns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Incidence Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune-related thrombocytopenia (irTCP) is an understudied and poorly understood toxicity; little data are available regarding either risk of irTCP or the effect of irTCP on clinical outcomes of patients treated with ICI. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of sequential cancer patients treated with ICI between 2011 and 2017 at our institution. All patients who received ICI alone or in combination with other systemic therapy in any line of treatment were included; those with thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 at baseline were excluded. We calculated the incidence of ≥ grade 3 irTCP and overall survival (OS). Patient factors associated with irTCP were assessed. Results We identified 1,038 patients that met eligibility criteria. Overall, 89 (8.6%) patients developed grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia; eighteen were attributed to ICI (1.73% overall). Patients who developed grade ≥ 3 irTCP had worse overall survival compared to those whose thrombocytopenia was unrelated to ICI (4.17 vs. 10.8 month; HR. 1.94, 95% CI 1.13, 3.33; log-rank p = 0.0164). Patients with grade ≥ 3 irTCP also had worse survival compared to those without thrombocytopenia (4.17 vs. 13.31 months; HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.36, 3.62; log-rank p = 0.001). The incidence of irTCP appeared lowest among those treated with PD-1/L1 monotherapy (p = 0.059) and was not associated with cancer type, smoking status, age, gender, race, or line of therapy. Conclusions Unlike other irAEs, we found that irTCP was associated with worse overall survival. The incidence of irTCP appeared lowest among those treated with PD-1/L1 monotherapy.

Phase II study of AZD2171 for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6570-6570
Author(s):  
Shannon Eileen O'Mahar ◽  
Alcee Jumonville ◽  
Patrick J. Flynn ◽  
Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia ◽  
Charles Erlichman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Orally Bioavailable ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

6570 Background: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) can block growth and trigger apoptosis in neoplastic cells. AZD2171 (cediranib) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, VEGFR-1/2 inhibitor. We conducted a phase II study of the efficacy of AZD2171 for the treatment of MDS. Methods: Adults with MDS (IPSS Int-2 or High) were eligible if they exhibited adequate organ function and ECOG 0-2. The primary endpoint was proportion of responses according to the IWG criteria assessed at one and every 3 months. Prior investigation of cediranib at 45 mg daily in patients with acute leukemia demonstrated toxicity concerns and therefore, the starting dose of this study was lowered to 30 mg daily. Results: A total of 16 pts with MDS (median age 73 years) were enrolled at a 30 mg starting dose, and all were evaluable. Median baseline marrow blasts were 12.0 % (range 2-18); 3 pts (18.8 %) had low, 6 (37.5 %) intermediate, and 7 (43.8 %) had high risk cytogenetics. Prior therapy included azacitidine (n=7), decitabine (n=2), cytarabine (n=2), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) (n=2), lenalidomide (n=1), or none (n=6). Patients were treated for a median of two 28-day cycles (range 1 to 11). There were no confirmed responses. Patients with baseline blasts > 5% showed no significant reduction in the blast count at 4 and 12 weeks. Median OS was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.6 – 11.6). Median TTP was 3.8 mo (95% CI: 1.7 – 10.8). Grade 4 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to cediranib were neutropenia (n=2) and thrombocytopenia (n=4). Grade 3 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to study treatment included: neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), and anemia (n=2). Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included fatigue (n=4), dyspnea (n=3), dehydration (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), nausea (n=2), asthenia (n=1), and hypertension (n=1). Hypertension and proteinuria was uncommon with the 30 mg/day dose. Conclusions: With no confirmed response from 16 patients, cediranib was determined to be ineffective at a dose of 30 mg daily in our patient population. Supported by NCI N01-CM62205, NCI P30-CA014520 and the UW Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Risk factors for immune mediated adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2622-2622
Author(s):  
Ari Pelcovits ◽  
Hetal Mistry ◽  
Rani Chudasama ◽  
Sarah Andrea ◽  
Humera Khurshid
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Weighted Estimates ◽  
Grade 3

2622 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with unique toxicity - immune-related adverse events (irAEs). irAEs are common, occurring in nearly 30 % of patients (pts) in clinical trials. Risk factors for irAEs remain largely unknown, with limited evidence to guide risk stratification for these pts. Methods: In this historical cohort study, we identified 400 pts receiving ICIs at our institution between 1/1/2015 - 12/31/2019 and followed them until progression, death, or study end date. Using modified Poisson and multinomial logistic regression we assessed irAEs (yes/no; none/grade 1-2/grade 3-4) as a function of independent risk factors in separate models. These included age, PDL-1%, steroid use in the 2 weeks (S2wks) prior to ICI, concurrent chemotherapy, combination ICI use, and pre-ICI creatinine (Cr) and absolute lymphocyte count. We constructed sample weights using sociodemographic and clinical factors to account for confounding by indication and mortality-related censoring. Results: 367 pts (median age: 68 yrs) had complete data for analysis comprising 55% men and 89% white. 111 (31%) experienced an irAE during the study period (median time to first event: 81 days). Risk was greatest for the youngest and oldest pts on ICI. In weighted models, Pts ≤59 yrs were 3 times as likely to experience an irAE relative to those aged 60-68 (95% CI: 1.18,7.41; Table). Additionally, for each 1 unit increase in Cr, risk of irAE increased by 19% (95% CI: 1.08,1.28). Precision of weighted estimates was impacted by limited pt comparability across factors of interest and overall sample size. While not statistically significant (RR: 2.04;95% CI:0.92,4.53) 70.6% of pts on combination ICIs experienced an irAE compared with 20.3% on one ICI. Similarly, while not statistically significant, 15.4% of pts with PDL-1 >49% experienced a grade 3/4 irAE compared with 7.7% of pts with PDL-1<1%. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis of irAEs, younger age and elevated creatinine were risk factors for development of irAEs. Further research leveraging larger data sources is needed to examine PDL-1% as a potential risk factor of irAE.[Table: see text]

A comprehensive meta-analysis of endocrine immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and outcomes in head and neck cancer and lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14096-e14096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Jeyce Gomes-Lima ◽  
John Kwagyan ◽  
Fred King ◽  
Stephen J Fernandez ◽  
Kenneth D Burman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grade 3

e14096 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have emerged as an effective treatment for a variety of cancers. However, important immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can occur. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of endocrine irAEs in patients with head and neck cancer and lung cancer that have used a ICPi and outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed within PubMed and EMBASE databases. Search terms included “durvalumab”, “atezolizumab”, “nivolumab”, “pembrolizumab”, “ipilimumab”, “head & neck cancer”, “lung cancer”. Studies published before September 2018 were included. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) phase III written in English. Data were extracted about patient characteristics, interventions, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and endocrine irAEs. A summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and a scatter plot was generated. Results: Twelve RCTs comprising 7060 patients were reviewed; 3815 used an ICPi (treatment arm). The mean follow-up time of 12.2 months ± 7.1 SD. The survival rate of the treatment arm was enhanced (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80), compared to the alternate arm. Similarly, the PFS of the treatment arm was improved (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81) but with a higher incidence of endocrine irAEs. The most common endocrine irAE reported was hypothyroidism;193 patients in the treatment arm vs. 29 in the alternate arm (p < 0.001); grade 3/4 AE was observed in 10 patients vs. 1 patient, respectively. Other endocrine irAEs were reported in 168 patients in the treatment arm vs. 26 patients in the alternate arm (p < 0.001); grade 3/4 AE was observed in 28 patients vs. 3 patients, respectively. A significant positive correlation between endocrine irAEs and OS was observed (p = 0.019). Conclusions: ICPi are a powerful tool in the treatment of cancer. The prevalence of endocrine irAEs in this meta-analysis was 9%. There is evidence of improved overall survival in patients who developed endocrine irAEs. Further studies are needed to correlate the development of irAEs and OS advantage.

CLO19-031: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Optimization of Pharmacy Services in Toxicity Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. CLO19-031
Author(s):  
Olivia G. Fahey ◽  
Elizabeth N. Dow ◽  
Jennifer K. Piccolo ◽  
Ticiana A. Leal
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) in oncology continues to rapidly expand. ICPis have a unique toxicity profile and can lead to immune related adverse events (irAEs), some serious and potentially life-threatening. Early detection and appropriate treatment may limit the morbidity and mortality of irAEs and allow patients who are deriving benefit from ICPi to continue treatment. Pharmacists practicing in UW Health Carbone Cancer Center clinics are uniquely positioned to educate patients about common ICPi toxicities and ensure appropriate, early recognition and management of irAEs in collaboration with the multidisciplinary team. Methods: Within lung, melanoma, and gastrointestinal medical oncology clinics, a program was implemented involving pharmacists educating patients and families prior to the start of treatment as well as contacting patients at regular intervals to assess for any signs or symptoms of irAEs. The primary outcome is the number of patients experiencing Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE) grade 1 or 2 irAEs identified by a pharmacist enrolled in the program. Secondary outcomes include grade ≥ 3 irAEs identified by a pharmacist, the total number of patients enrolled in the program with any irAE, reason for discontinuation of ICPi, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions during the study period. Results: Between November 14, 2017 and October 15, 2018, a total of 81 patients were enrolled in the program with 49 of those patients still enrolled at the end of the study period. These patients experienced a total of 39 grade 1 and 13 grade 2 irAEs, of which 53.8% (n=28) were identified by pharmacists. The most common grade 1 or 2 toxicities identified by pharmacists were gastrointestinal (n=15) and dermatologic (n=6). Endocrine (n=7) and dermatologic (n=7) were the most common grade 1 or 2 irAEs identified by other providers. There were 4 grade 3 irAEs (endocrine, fatigue, liver, and pneumonitis) identified by other providers, and there were no grade 4 irAEs. Conclusion: Proactive pharmacist contact at regular intervals during ICPi treatment resulted in the early discovery of grade 1 or 2 irAEs experienced by patients. This pharmacist-driven approach may allow for earlier treatment of any toxicities experienced after ICPi treatment and reduce the rates of serious irAEs. Current efforts are focused on expanding these services to all UW Health Carbone Cancer Center clinics.

Effect of immunotherapy on survival outcomes in prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17030-e17030
Author(s):  
Vinod solipuram ◽  
Kishor Pokharel ◽  
Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu ◽  
Harideep Samanapally
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grade 3

e17030 Background: Prostate cancer is one of the leading cancers in men with an estimated 191,930 new cases in 2020 in the USA alone. Treatment options for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have evolved in recent years. Immunotherapy involving vaccines like sipuleucel-T, PROSTVAC and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been evaluated in these patients. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the effect of immunotherapy in mCRPC. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library without language limitations from inception to January 3, 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS), prostate specific antigen (PSA) reduction ≥ 50% and incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. The analysis of OS, PFS was done using random effects hazard ratio (HR) by generic inverse variance method and analysis of PSA reduction ≥ 50% and grade 3-4 adverse events was done using random effects risk ratio (RR) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: 12 RCTs comprising 4109 patients were included in the analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.89; 95% CI (0.81, 0.97)) and PFS (HR 0.83; 95% CI (0.76, 0.92)) in the immunotherapy arm compared to placebo or standard treatment arms with moderate quality of evidence. Patients in the immunotherapy group had significant reduction in PSA ≥ 50% (RR 1.71; 95% CI (1.09, 2.68)) but also had statistically significant increased risk of grade 3-4 adverse events (RR (1.25; 95% CI (1.02, 1.54)) when compared to placebo and the standard treatment group. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of vaccine therapy in prostate cancer leads to significant improvement in OS (HR 0.83; 95% CI (0.74, 0.93)) and PFS (HR 0.80; 95% CI (0.67, 0.95)) compared to placebo and standard treatment. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors was not associated with statistically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.98; 95% CI (0.88, 1.09)) but is associated with improvement in PFS (HR 0.87; 95%CI (0.81, 0.94)). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that immunotherapy led to significant improvement in OS, PFS and PSA reduction of ≥ 50%. However, there is an increased incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events with the use of immunotherapy when compared to other standard therapies and placebo. The improvement in overall survival is limited to the use of vaccine therapy and not to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Careful use of selective forms of immunotherapy in mCRPC can lead to greater improvement in survival.

657 Interleukin-6 receptor blockade for management of immune checkpoint inhibitor related adverse events in patients with melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A694-A694
Author(s):  
Chantal Saberian ◽  
Faisal Fa’ak ◽  
Jean Tayar ◽  
Maryam Buni ◽  
Sang Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Interleukin 6 Receptor ◽  
Md Anderson

BackgroundManagement of certain immune mediated adverse events (irAEs) can be challenging and may require prolonged/chronic immune suppression with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressant which could compromise and even reverse the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). While the exact immunobiology of irAEs is not fully understood there is enough evidence that IL-6 induced Th-17 that may play critical role in the pathogenesis. Herein, we describe our clinical experience using interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade in management of irAEs in melanoma patients.MethodsWe searched MD Anderson databases to identify cancer patients who had received ICIs between January 2004 and March 2020. Of 11,391 ICI-treated patients, 21 patients with melanoma who received IL-6R blockade after ICI infusion were identified and their medical records were reviewed.ResultsMedian age was 61 years (41–82), 52% were females, 90% received anti-programmed cell death-1 antibodies. Fourteen patients (67%) had de novo onset irAEs (11 had arthritis, and 1 each with polymyalgia rheumatica, oral mucositis, and CNS vasculitis), and 7 patients (33%) had flare of their pre-existing autoimmune diseases (5 had had rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 each with myasthenia gravis and Crohn’s disease). Median time from ICI initiation to irAEs was 91 days (range, 1–496) and to initiation of IL-6R blockade was 6.6 months (range, 0.6–24.3). Median number of IL-6R blockade was 12 (range, 1–35), and 16 patients (76%) were concomitantly receiving corticosteroids of median dose of 10 mg (range, 5–20 mg). Of the 21 patients, irAEs improved in 14 (67%) (95% CI: 46%-87%). Of 13 evaluable patients with arthritis, 11 (85%) achieved remission or minimal disease activity as defined by the clinical disease activity index. Median time from initiation of IL-6R blockade till improvement of irAEs was 2.9 months (range, 1.5–36.9). Nineteen patients tolerated well IL-6R blockade, while two patients stopped treatment due to abdominal pain and sinus tachycardia. The median CRP levels at irAEs was 84 mg/L (0.6–187) and decreased to 1.9 mg/L (0.56–12) at 10 weeks after initiation of IL-6R blockade (P=0.02). Of the 17 evaluable patients, the overall tumor response rate by RECIST-1.1 criteria was similar before and after IL-6R blockade initiation (41% vs. 53%).ConclusionsOur data demonstrated that IL-6R blockade could be an effective therapy for irAEs management without dampening the efficacy of ICIs. Prospective clinical trials with longitudinal blood, tumor, and inflamed tissue biopsies are planned to accurately validate these findings and better study the immunobiology of irAEs.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center intuition’s Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089

287 Safety and antitumor activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) inhibitor KHK2455 in combination with anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A313-A314
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Timothy Yap ◽  
David Hong ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dependent

BackgroundIDO-1 inhibitors have shown antitumor activity in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in multiple cancers. KHK2455 is a novel and selective oral IDO-1 inhibitor. KHK2455 inhibits IDO-1 apo-enzyme, with long-lasting and potent activity. Mogamulizumab is an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody that has shown synergy with KHK2455 in preclinical models. Mogamulizumab is approved in the US and EU for treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.MethodsIn this first-in-human study, patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating oral doses of KHK2455 alone (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg once daily) for 4 weeks (Cycle 0), followed by combination with 1 mg/kg weekly of IV mogamulizumab for 4 weeks (Cycle 1), and then on Days 1 and 15 (from Cycle 2 onward) in a standard 3+3 Phase I design. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and IDO activity (kynurenine [Kyn] and tryptophan [Trp] levels and ex vivo Kyn production) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled across all cohorts. One patient with lower esophageal cancer in the 100 mg cohort exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 gastrointestinal necrosis). The most frequent (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented in table 1. Overall numbers of TEAEs, ≥Grade 3 TEAEs, and serious TEAEs related to KHK2455 and mogamulizumab are presented in table 2. Serious KHK2455-related TEAEs included gastrointestinal necrosis (KHK2455 monotherapy), and nausea and drug eruption (combination therapy). In addition, five drug-related TEAEs in combination therapy led to discontinuation; there were no fatal outcomes related to either study drug. Plasma KHK2455 concentrations reached steady state by Day 8 (Cycle 0) and increased dose-dependently. Potent dose-dependent inhibition of IDO activity was demonstrated by plasma Kyn concentration and Kyn/Trp ratio (median inhibition 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively, at 100 mg dose on Day 15, compared to baseline) and ex vivo Kyn production (>95% inhibition at ≥10 mg KHK2455), confirming target modulation. Six of 26 evaluable patients from all dosing groups achieved durable disease stabilization (≥6 months, RECIST 1.1), and one patient with bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma demonstrated confirmed partial response (43.5% tumor reduction over a 2-year observation period). Median overall survival was 13.4 months, with 30% of subjects surviving for 2 years or longer (figure 1).Abstract 287 Table 1Study 2455-001: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (≥10% by Preferred Term)Abstract 287 Table 2Abstract 287 Figure 1Study 2455-001: Overall SurvivalConclusionsKHK2455 in combination with mogamulizumab was well-tolerated and manageable at all doses tested, suppressed Kyn production in a dose-dependent and sustained manner, and demonstrated signals of antitumor activity. These data support the continued development of this combination.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Susan E. Johnson, PhD, S.E. Johnson Consulting, LLC, New Hope, PA, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT02867007 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Ethics Committees at all participating study institutions.

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib in refractory/recurrent/advanced pediatric solid tumors: A retrospective study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11556-11556
Author(s):  
Suying Lu ◽  
Ye Hong ◽  
Huimou Chen ◽  
Liuhong Wu ◽  
Jia Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3

11556 Background: Refractory and recurrent advanced pediatric solid tumors are short of effective treatment and with a dismal outcome, thus an urgent need for novel and effective treatment. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a novel and oral multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in refractory or recurrent advanced pediatric solid tumors. Methods: The retrospective, single-institutional, observed study was conducted in Sun Yat-sen University cancer center in China. Refractory, recurrent, or advanced pediatric solid tumors patients treated with anlotinib between 2018 to 2020 were evaluated. Results: Forty-one patients and thirty patients were enrolled in the study to evaluated efficacy and safety, respectively. The objective response ratio (ORR) was 12.2% (95%CI 1.7-22.7): complete response (n = 0) and partial response (n = 5) (Table). The disease control rate (DCR) was 65.9% (95%CI 50.7-81). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.87 months (95%CI 0.86-4.88). According to anlotinib treatment schedule, all patients were divided into three groups: anlotinib monotherapy (A, n = 16), anlotinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (A + ICI, n = 6), anlotinib combined with salvage chemotherapy (A + SC, n = 19). The ORR, DCR and median PFS for three groups were 6.3% (95%CI 7.1-19.6), 56.3% (95%CI 28.9-83.6), 2.43months, 16.7% (95%CI 26.2-59.5), 66.7% (95%CI 12.5-120.9), 1.13months, 15.8% (95%CI 2.3-33.8), 73.7% (95%CI 51.9-95.5), 2.87months, respectively. There was no significantly difference between three groups in aforementioned response index. The incidence rates of any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events were 80% and 20%, respectively. Bleeding (20%), hand-foot syndrome (13.3%), and diarrhea (13.3%) were the most common adverse events. Grade 3-4 adverse events include hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. There was no adverse events-related death. Conclusions: For heavily pretreated pediatric solid tumors, anlotinib may be an effective treatment with tolerable adverse events. Further prospective randomized controlled clinical study is warranted.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document