A phase II trial of pembrolizumab and poly-ICLC in patients with metastatic mismatch repair-proficient colon cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15552-e15552
Author(s):  
Nabin Raj Karki ◽  
Kulsum Bano ◽  
Sadek Ramses ◽  
Asha Nayak
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response

e15552 Background: Single agent programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitor is ineffective against mismatch repair proficient (MMRp) colon cancer with response rates in single digits. Polyinosinic-Polycytidylic (Poly-ICLC) is a synthetic double stranded ribonucleic acid that generates inflammatory response increasing epitope recognition, develops tumor reactive T cells and induces interferon production which increases PD-L1 expression. In this trial, we test the effectiveness of combination of poly-ICLC and pembrolizumab in MMRp metastatic colon cancer. Methods: In this open label, single arm, single institution, phase 2 study, we enrolled 12 MMRp metastatic colon cancer patients from 1/25/2019 to 2/10/2021. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed MMRp metastatic colon cancer, ECOG 1-2 and progression on at least 2 lines of therapy. Treatment (Tx) consisted of Pembrolizumab (200 mg q3 weeks) and poly-ICLC (2 mg twice weekly, 3 days apart) for 1 year of treatment. Tx continued until progression, discontinuation or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, adverse event profiling, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Intention-to-treat analyses (ITT) included all patient receiving at least one dose of the study agent. Results: 12 patients with median age 68.5 years (range 54-75) and 33% (4/12) male had been enrolled till 2/10/2021. Objective response rate was 8.3% (1 patient had partial response). The duration of response was 196 days. Among these 12 patients, median PFS was 63.5 days and median OS was 196 days. Treatment related adverse events of any grade were reported in 12/12 (100%) patients with the most common toxicities being nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dehydration and dizziness. 3/12 (25%) had serious (grade ≥ 3) toxicities and one patient died after experiencing leukocytosis, dehydration and hyperbilirubinemia attributed to the trial drugs. Conclusions: Poly-ICLC was not effective in combination with pembrolizumab for MMRp metastatic colon cancer in 3rd line setting and it did not seem to improve response rates to immunotherapy. Novel strategies for stimulating immunogenicity of cold tumors are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02834052.

Envafolimab (KN035) in advanced tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3021-3021
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Weijie Zhang ◽  
Aiping Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Previously Treated

3021 Background: KN035 is a novel fusion protein of humanized anti-PD-L1 single domain antibody and human IgG1 Fc formulated for subcutaneous injection. This open-label phase II study evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of KN035 in patients with advanced microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) cancer. Methods: The study included patients aged ≥18 years with previously treated MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) or other advanced solid tumors. MSI-H/dMMR status was assessed centrally for CRC and gastric cancer (GC) and locally for other tumors. KN035 was administered at 150 mg once weekly until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Tumor assessments were every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiology review. The primary efficacy population (PEP) included patients with CRC who failed fluoropyrimidine (F), oxaliplatin (O), and irinotecan (I) plus those with advanced GC who had failed at least one prior systemic treatment. This was a planned interim analysis performed after the first 50 patients in the PEP had at least two on-study tumor assessments (PEPi). Results: As of December 17, 2019, 103 patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced cancers were enrolled at 25 centers in China. The PEPi included 39 patients with CRC and 11 with GC, with a median follow-up of 7.5 months. The overall population included 65 patients with CRC (24 had prior therapy with F and O or I), 18 with GC, and 20 with other tumors, with a median follow-up of 6.7 months. The confirmed objective response rate was 30% (95% CI: 17.9%, 44.6%) in the PEPi, 54.2% (95% CI: 32.8%, 74.4%) in the CRC patients who had prior therapy with F and O or I, and 34.0% (95% CI: 24.9%, 44.0%) in the overall population. Of patients who had an objective response at the interim analysis, 80% of those in the PEPi, 84.6% of CRC patients who had prior therapy with F and O or I, and 85.7% of those in the overall population were still responding at the time of data cutoff. Median progression-free survival was 6.6 months in both the PEPi and the overall population. Median overall survival was not reached in either population. Fourteen (13.6%) patients had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. No grade 5 treatment-related adverse events, pneumonitis, or colitis were reported. Local injection-site reactions, all grade 1 or 2, were reported in nine patients. Conclusions: Envafolimab demonstrated durable anti-tumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated advanced MSI-H/dMMR cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03667170 .

ENVASARC: A pivotal trial of envafolimab, and envafolimab in combination with ipilimumab, in patients with advanced or metastatic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or myxofibrosarcoma who have progressed on prior chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11581-TPS11581
Author(s):  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Steven Ian Robinson ◽  
Joelle Lam ◽  
Bonne J. Adams ◽  
James L. Freddo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma

TPS11581 Background: Metastatic undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS) and the genetically related myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes with poor prognoses. While responses to front line chemotherapy can approach 20%, efficacy remains limited in the 2nd line setting and beyond. Pazopanib, the only approved treatment in the refractory setting, has demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 4%. Envafolimab is a single domain PD-L1 antibody administered rapidly by subcutaneous (SQ) injection that is being studied in two additional pivotal trials: microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer and biliary tract cancer. The activity of envafolimab appears to be similar to other PD-1 antibodies administered i.v. Envafolimab demonstrated a 32% objective response rate (ORR) in MSI-H colorectal cancer patients who failed three approved chemotherapeutics, similar to the ORR of 28% and 33% with nivolumab and pembrolizumab in these patient populations, respectively. The rationale for the ENVASARC trial is based on the previously reported activity of checkpoint inhibition in UPS/MFS. Single agent pembrolizumab demonstrated a 23% ORR, while the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated a 29% ORR in refractory UPS/MFS. Methods: ENVASARC (NCT 04480502) is a pivotal multicenter (at ̃25 U.S. centers) open-label, randomized, non-comparative, parallel cohort study of treatment with envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection (cohort A; n = 80) or envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection combined with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks i.v. for four doses (cohort B; n = 80) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic UPS/MFS who have progressed on one or two lines of prior therapy. The primary objective of each of parallel cohort is to demonstrate an ORR with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval that excludes 5.0% in each cohort. If ≥ 9 responders are observed of the 80 patients enrolled in each cohort, then the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval will exclude 5.0%. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria: ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy excluded), ECOG ≤ 1. Clinical trial information: NCT 04480502.

scholarly journals Phase II Open-Label Study of Pembrolizumab in Treatment-Refractory, Microsatellite Instability–High/Mismatch Repair–Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: KEYNOTE-164

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung T. Le ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Dirk Jäger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE KEYNOTE-164 (NCT02460198) evaluated the antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in previously treated, metastatic, microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS This phase II open-label study involved 128 centers worldwide. Eligible patients were age ≥ 18 years and had metastatic MSI-H/dMMR CRC treated with ≥ 2 prior lines of standard therapy, including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with or without anti–vascular endothelial growth factor/epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (cohort A) or ≥ 1 prior line of therapy (cohort B). MSI-H/dMMR status was assessed locally. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary end point was objective response rate by RECIST version 1.1 by independent central review. Secondary end points were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS A total of 124 patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC (61 in cohort A, 63 in cohort B) enrolled. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 31.3 months (range, 0.2-35.6 months) for cohort A and 24.2 months (range, 0.1-27.1 months) for cohort B. Objective response rate was 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%) and 33% (95% CI, 22% to 46%), respectively, with median duration of response not reached in either cohort. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 8.1 months) and 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 18.9 months). Median overall survival was 31.4 months (95% CI, 21.4 months to not reached) and not reached (95% CI, 19.2 months to not reached). Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 10 patients (16%) in cohort A and 8 (13%) in cohort B, with the most common occurring in ≥ 2 patients being pancreatitis, fatigue, increased alanine aminotransferase, and increased lipase (2 patients each; 3%) in cohort A. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab is effective with a manageable safety profile in patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC.

scholarly journals Nivolumab Alone and With Ipilimumab in Previously Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: CheckMate 032 Nivolumab 1 mg/kg Plus Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Expansion Cohort Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (19) ◽  
pp. 1608-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padmanee Sharma ◽  
Arlene Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Filippo de Braud ◽  
Umberto Basso ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE CheckMate 032 is an open-label, multicohort study that includes patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg monotherapy every 2 weeks (NIVO3), nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (NIVO3+IPI1), or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (NIVO1+IPI3). We report on the expanded NIVO1+IPI3 cohort and extended follow-up for the NIVO3 and NIVO3+IPI1 cohorts. METHODS Patients with platinum-pretreated mUC were enrolled in this phase I/II multicenter study to receive NIVO3, NIVO3+IPI1, or NIVO1+IPI3 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, including duration of response. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were treated with NIVO3 (minimum follow-up, 37.7 months), 104 with NIVO3+IPI1 (minimum follow-up, 38.8 months), and 92 with NIVO1+IPI3 (minimum follow-up, 7.9 months). Objective response rate was 25.6%, 26.9%, and 38.0% in the NIVO3, NIVO3+IPI1, and NIVO1+IPI3 arms, respectively. Median duration of response was more than 22 months in all arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 (26.9%), 32 (30.8%), and 36 (39.1%) patients treated with NIVO3, NIVO3+IPI1, and NIVO1+IPI3, respectively. Grade 5 treatment-related pneumonitis occurred in one patient each in the NIVO3 and NIVO3+IPI1 arms. CONCLUSION With longer follow-up, NIVO3 demonstrated sustained antitumor activity alone and in combination with ipilimumab. NIVO1+IPI3 provided the greatest antitumor activity of all regimens, with a manageable safety profile. This result not only supports additional study of NIVO1+IPI3 in mUC, but demonstrates the potential benefit of immunotherapy combinations in this disease.

scholarly journals Pyrotinib in HER2-Mutant Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (24) ◽  
pp. 2753-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Xingya Li ◽  
Qiming Wang ◽  
Guanghui Gao ◽  
Yiping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Targeted therapies against non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring HER2 mutations remain an unmet need. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled to receive pyrotinib at a dose of 400 mg/d for 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC). RESULTS Between October 20, 2016, and December 10, 2018, 60 patients received pyrotinib monotherapy. At baseline, 58 (96.7%) were stage IV, and 25 (41.7%) received at least 2 lines of prior chemotherapy. As of data cutoff on June 20, 2019, IRC-assessed objective response rate was 30.0% (95% CI, 18.8% to 43.2%). All subgroups of patients with different HER2 mutation types showed a favorable objective response rate. The objective response rates were similar between patients with and without brain metastases (25.0% v 31.3%). The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.1 months). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) per IRC. The median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 21.3 months). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28.3% of patients, with the most common being diarrhea (20.0%; all grade 3). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION Pyrotinib showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in chemotherapy-treated patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC.

Efficacy of vemurafenib in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutation.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9074-9074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Radj Gervais ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Braf Inhibition ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

9074 Background: BRAFV600 mutations occur in 1–2% of pts with NSCLC. We previously reported the efficacy of vemurafenib, a selective BRAFV600 inhibitor, in BRAF mutation-positive non-melanoma tumors (VE-BASKET study). We now present final data for the expanded NSCLC cohort. Methods: This open-label, histology-independent, phase 2 study included 6 prespecified cohorts (including NSCLC) plus one ‘all-others’ cohort. Pts received vemurafenib (960 mg bid) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included best overall response rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Because the pre-specified clinical benefit endpoint was met in the initial NSCLC cohort, the cohort was expanded. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01524978. Results: Database lock was 12 Jan 2017. Of 208 pts enrolled at 25 centers worldwide, 62 pts had NSCLC: median age 65 years; 56% male; 13% had no prior systemic therapy; 50% had ≥2 prior therapies. Responses were seen in previously treated and untreated pts (Table). The most common all-grade adverse event (AE) was nausea (40%); grade 3–5 AEs included keratoacanthoma (15%) and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (15%). Six pts discontinued vemurafenib due to AEs; two had non-treatment-related fatal AEs. Conclusions: Vemurafenib showed evidence of encouraging efficacy in pts with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutation, with prolonged PFS in previously untreated pts; median OS was not estimable due to ongoing responses. The safety profile of vemurafenib was similar to that seen in melanoma studies. Our results suggest a role for BRAF inhibition in NSCLC with BRAF mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT01524978. [Table: see text]

Durable clinical benefit from combination ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in anti-PD-1 therapy resistant, platinum resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 481-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niamh M. Keegan ◽  
Samuel Aaron Funt ◽  
Brooke Elizabeth Kania ◽  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
Jessica Mary Clement ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Endpoints ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
Major Interest ◽  
Duration Of Response

481 Background: Overcoming resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in UC patients (pts) is of major interest given the modest single agent response rates for pts with mUC. Herein we report the outcome of combined NIVO and IPI in pts who progressed on single agent NIVO. Methods: This prospective, open label, adaptive study treated platinum resistant mUC pts with NIVO monotherapy with the designated intent to add IPI at disease progression. RECIST 1.1 assessments were performed every 6 wks for 24 wks then every 12 wks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and possible associations between clinical endpoints and tumor genomic characteristics. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to assess DNA Damage Response (DDR) gene mutations and Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB). Results: To date, 21 pts who progressed after NIVO monotherapy have received IPI plus NIVO. ORRs to prior NIVO monotherapy were variable; partial response (PR = 4/21, 19%), stable disease (SD = 6/21, 29%) and progressive disease (PD = 11/21,52%). 57% (12/21) had visceral metastases. For IPI + NIVO the ORR was 19% (PR: n=4, CR: n=0) and duration of response >12 mo in a subset; 2 pts with PR remain on treatment (3+, 5+ mo), 1 pt has an ongoing PR (13+ months) after stopping treatment due to toxicity. Responding disease sites include node, liver and lung. Immune-related toxicity ≥ G3 seen in 9 pts (43%), of whom 4 (44%) had disease control (PR+SD≥3mo). No correlation detected between clinical outcome and TMB or DDR mutations. Conclusions: IPI plus NIVO responses can be seen in pts with NIVO resistance and the benefit from combined checkpoint blockade can be prolonged. Immune related toxicity frequently accompanied disease control. TMB and DDR were not associated with benefit in this small cohort; immune correlative analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02553642. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase II Trial (KEYNOTE-629)

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (25) ◽  
pp. 2916-2925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Grob ◽  
Rene Gonzalez ◽  
Nicole Basset-Seguin ◽  
Olga Vornicova ◽  
Jacob Schachter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE Treatment options are limited for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC); mortality rates exceed 70% in patients with distant metastases. Here, we present the first interim analysis of the R/M cSCC cohort from the 2-cohort—locally advanced and R/M—phase II KEYNOTE-629 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with R/M cSCC not amenable to surgery or radiation received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points were duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS At data cutoff (April 8, 2019), median follow-up of 105 enrolled patients in the R/M cohort was 11.4 months (range, 0.4 to 16.3 months). Objective response rate was 34.3% (95% CI, 25.3% to 44.2%; 4 complete responses, 32 partial responses), and disease control rate was 52.4% (95% CI, 42.4% to 62.2%). Median duration of response was not reached (range, 2.7 to 13.1+ months; ‘+’ refers to ongoing response at data cutoff). Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 3.1 months to 8.5 months). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 10.7 months to not reached). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66.7% of patients (n = 70), the most common of which were pruritus (n = 15; 14.3%), asthenia (n = 14; 13.3%), and fatigue (n = 13; 12.4%). Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5.7% (n = 6) of patients. One patient died of treatment-related cranial nerve neuropathy. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab demonstrated effective antitumor activity; clinically meaningful, durable responses; and acceptable safety in primarily elderly patients with R/M cSCC, supporting its use in clinical practice. Pembrolizumab adverse events in this study were consistent with its established safety profile.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab for Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Phase II CheckMate 142 Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Maria Luisa Limon ◽  
Ka Yeung Mark Wong ◽  
Alain Hendlisz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line

PURPOSE Nivolumab received US Food and Drug Administration approval as a single agent or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan based on CheckMate 142. Presented are results of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in the first-line therapy cohort from the phase II CheckMate 142 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting for MSI-H/dMMR CRC were treated with nivolumab every 2 weeks plus low-dose ipilimumab every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (investigator assessment; RECIST v1.1). RESULTS Median age of treated patients was 66 years (N = 45). Median follow-up was 29.0 months. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 69% (95% CI, 53 to 82) and 84% (95% CI, 70.5 to 93.5), respectively, with 13% complete response rate. Median duration of response was not reached; 74% of responders had ongoing responses at data cutoff. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not reached with minimum follow-up of 24.2 months (24-month rates, 74% and 79%, respectively). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of baseline demographic and tumor characteristics, including BRAF or KRAS mutation status. In a post hoc analysis, of 14 patients who discontinued treatment and did not receive subsequent therapy, 10 remained progression-free. Patient-reported outcomes were stable over the treatment period. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22% of patients; 13% discontinued because of any-grade treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as a first-line treatment for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Based on these promising data, randomized studies are warranted.

scholarly journals Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (17) ◽  
pp. 1658-1667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Chesney ◽  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Frances Collichio ◽  
Parminder Singh ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Talimogene Laherparepvec ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
End Point ◽  
Open Label Phase

Purpose We evaluated the combination of talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II study. To our knowledge, this was the first randomized trial to evaluate addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor. Methods Patients with unresectable stages IIIB to IV melanoma, with no more than one prior therapy if BRAF wild-type, no more than two prior therapies if BRAF mutant, measurable/injectable disease, and without symptomatic autoimmunity or clinically significant immunosuppression were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Talimogene laherparepvec treatment began in week 1 (first dose, ≤ 4 mL × 106 plaque-forming units/mL; after 3 weeks, ≤ 4 mL × 108 plaque-forming units/mL every 2 weeks). Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; up to four doses) began week 1 in the ipilimumab alone arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by investigators per immune-related response criteria. Results One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab (n = 98), or ipilimumab alone (n = 100). Thirty-eight patients (39%) in the combination arm and 18 patients (18%) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P = .002). Responses were not limited to injected lesions; visceral lesion decreases were observed in 52% of patients in the combination arm and 23% of patients in the ipilimumab arm. Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (combination, 59%; ipilimumab alone, 42%), chills (combination, 53%; ipilimumab alone, 3%), and diarrhea (combination, 42%; ipilimumab alone, 35%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 45% and 35%, respectively. Three patients in the combination arm had fatal AEs; none were treatment related. Conclusion The study met its primary end point; the objective response rate was significantly higher with talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone. These data indicate that the combination has greater antitumor activity without additional safety concerns versus ipilimumab.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document