A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase 2 trial of surufatinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16123-e16123
Author(s):  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Huichuan Sun ◽  
Chunmei Bai ◽  
Ru Jia ◽  
...  

e16123 Background: Several clinical studies of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF/VEGFR) therapy as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC) has demonstrated moderate efficacy. In this study, surufatinib was evaluated as a second-line VEGFR therapy in BTC patients. Methods: This was a single-arm, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study conducted in China. The study enrolled eligible BTC patients who progressed after fist-line chemotherapy. Patients received surufatinib monotherapy as second-line treatment, at doses of 300 mg, once daily, in 28-day cycles. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks ± 7 days according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Results: As of Nov. 30, 2018, a total of 39 BTC patients, including 29 (74.4%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 5 (12.8%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 5 (12.8%) with gallbladder cancer, were enrolled and treated with surufatinib. Sixteen-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 46.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.38‒65.73), with median PFS of 3.7 months and median overall survival (OS) of 6.9 months. In addition, results from subgroup and post-hoc analyses suggested the trends of better clinical efficacy in patients with tumor locations inside the liver, or with lower baseline values of CA19-9 (≤ 1000 IU/mL) and CEA (≤ 3 ng/mL). The top three treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with severity of Grade ≥ 3 included blood bilirubin increased (20.5%), hypertension (17.9%), and proteinuria (12.8%). Conclusions: When applied in the treatment of BTC patients, surufatinib monotherapy has offered moderate clinical efficacy and has demonstrated favorable tolerability and safety profiles. Moreover, surufatinib further boosting the antitumor effects of cancer immunotherapy is desirable. Clinical trial information: NCT02966821.

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Osanto ◽  
Tom van der Hulle

Cabozantinib is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that potently inhibits MET and AXL, both associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), next to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, KIT, FLT3 and RET. Chronic treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting sunitinib upregulates MET and AXL in RCC, indicating that cabozantinib may be particularly effective in patients with advanced RCC whose disease progressed on prior VEGFR-targeted treatment. Cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) has been investigated in comparison to everolimus (10 mg once daily) in a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 658 patients with advanced RCC of whom 71% had received one prior and 29% had received at least two prior lines of VEGR-targeted therapy. This study demonstrated highly significant improved progression-free survival of 7.4 months versus 3.9 months with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.62] in favour of cabozantinib. Cabozantinib also showed a superior overall survival of 21.4 months versus 16.5 months (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53–0.83). Objective response rate was higher in cabozantinib-treated patients, 17% versus 3%. Clinical benefit was shown in all subgroups of patients, including in patients with bone or visceral metastases. The safety profile was acceptable with manageable side effects. Based on this study, cabozantinib is a highly effective approved second-line treatment option for patients with advanced RCC with a manageable toxicity profile. Other recently approved second-line agents include checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab and VEGF-targeting agent lenvatinib combined with everolimus. In the absence of predictive markers as well as head-to-head comparisons of these three recently approved treatments, the choice between these drugs in second-line treatment will probably be made based on comorbidities, tolerability of previous treatment and presence of high tumour burden with rapidly progressive disease. Future pretreatment assessment of MET and AXL tumour aberration may aid clinicians to make a rational choice between currently approved second-line treatment options.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (13) ◽  
pp. 1500-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Petrylak ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Manish Kohli ◽  
Andrea Eisen ◽  
Christina Canil ◽  
...  

Purpose This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel monotherapy or docetaxel in combination with ramucirumab (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody) or icrucumab (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 antibody) after progression during or within 12 months of platinum-based regimens for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle (arm A), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV plus ramucirumab 10 mg/kg IV on day 1 of a 3-week cycle (arm B), or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 plus icrucumab 12 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle (arm C). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned and treated in arms A (n = 45), B (n = 46), or C (n = 49). PFS was significantly longer in arm B compared with arm A (median, 5.4 months; 95% CI, 3.1 to 6.9 months v 2.8 months; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.6 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.389; 95% CI, 0.235 to 0.643; P = .0002). Arm C did not experience improved PFS compared with arm A (1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; stratified hazard ratio, 0.863; 95% CI, 0.550 to 1.357; P = .5053). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (arms A, B, and C) were neutropenia (36%, 33%, and 39%), fatigue (13%, 30%, and 20%), febrile neutropenia (13%, 17%, and 6.1%), and anemia (6.7%, 13%, and 14%, respectively). Conclusion The addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel met the prespecified efficacy end point for prolonging PFS in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving second-line treatment and warrants further investigation in the phase III setting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 370-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Taira ◽  
Yuji Nadatani ◽  
Shinji Hirano ◽  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
Yasuhiro Fujiwara

Ramucirumab is an antiangiogenic agent targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF)-2 that has been approved for second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. VEGF-targeted therapy has various distinctive adverse effects owing to its antitumour effects. However, little is known with regard to its skin toxicity, such as its ability to cause skin ulcers. We report a case of large skin ulceration around a colostomy and delayed healing caused by ramucirumab. A 58-year-old patient diagnosed with rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases. He was administered folinic acid, fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab as first-line treatment. A laparoscopic colostomy was performed for suspected worsening of the bowel obstruction. He was then administered folinic acid, 5 fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and ramucirumab as second-line treatment after surgery. However, dehiscence and a small skin ulceration caused by ramucirumab developed around the colostomy which increased in size and became necrotic; therefore, he was administered only FOLFIRI, without ramucirumab. The ulcer decreased in size slightly with surgical debridement and showering. He resumed FOLFIRI and ramucirumab.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Van Damme ◽  
Petra Tilkin ◽  
Katarina Jansson Mercer ◽  
Joke Terryn ◽  
Ann D’Hondt ◽  
...  

Abstract We studied the feasibility, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of intracerebroventricular delivery of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In this phase I study in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the study drug was delivered using an implantable programmable pump connected to a catheter inserted in the frontal horn of the lateral cerebral ventricle. A first cohort received open label vascular endothelial growth factor (0.2, 0.8 and 2 µg/day), a second cohort received placebo, 0.8 or 2 µg/day of study dug. After the 3-month study period, all patients could participate in an open label extension study. In total, 18 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, seen at the University Hospitals in Leuven were included. The surgical procedure was well tolerated in most patients. One patient had transient postoperative seizures, due to an ischemic lesion along the catheter tract. The first 3-month study period was completed by 15/18 patients. Administration of 2 µg/day vascular endothelial growth factor resulted in sustained detectable levels in cerebrospinal fluid. A pulmonary embolus occurred in 3 patients, in 1 patient in the first 3-month study, and in 2 patients during the open label extension study. The study drug was well tolerated in the other patients, for up to 6 years in the open label extension study. Our study shows that intracerebroventricular administration of 2 µg/day of vascular endothelial growth factor to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is feasible, results in detectable cerebrospinal fluid levels and is well tolerated in most patients. The most common serious adverse event was a pulmonary embolus.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen S. Basappa

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was introduced a decade ago, and since then a number of therapeutic options have been developed. Vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy is the widely accepted first-line option for mRCC. After progression, treatment in the second-line setting has typically been with either axitinib or everolimus. However, with the advent of several new agents demonstrating efficacy in the second-line setting, including nivolumab, cabozantinib, and the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus, the treatment paradigm has shifted toward these novel therapies with improved patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document