Evaluation of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients diagnosed with genitourinary (GU) cancers with linked claims plus prior authorization data.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 284-284
Author(s):  
Lincy S. Lal ◽  
Caitlin Elliott ◽  
Stephanie Korrer ◽  
Stacey DaCosta Byfield ◽  
Benjamin Chastek ◽  
...  

284 Background: Integration of clinical and claims data allows for the examination of outcomes and characteristics which is essential for real world evidence generation and clinical decision making. We describe utilization of clinical data collected from an oncology Prior Authorization (PA) program integrated with claims data to evaluate treatment patterns, resource utilization, and total costs of care during therapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic and non-metastatic renal (R), bladder (B), and testicular (T) cancers. Methods: Commercially insured patients with a GU cancer diagnosis, from 2/2016 to 12/2019 with both clinical information from a PA tool (based on NCCN guidelines) and claims from the Optum Research Database were identified. Demographics, clinical information (metastatic status and line of therapy), treatment duration, resource utilization, and all-cause costs were collected, and uploaded to a dynamic web-based Tableau dashboard. Analysis was conducted for non-metastatic and metastatic settings based on the first observed treatment episode. Drug additions or switches incremented line of therapy; single drug discontinuations did not. All cost data were adjusted to 2019 values. Results: A total of 3,736 patients were included; 13% were censored (i.e. on treatment at the end of the study period). 916 patients (25%) were metastatic and 2,820 (75%) were in their adjuvant/neoadjuvant (A/N) line. 60% of the population was ≥55 years old and 85% were male. The top regimen in A/N line for each cancer type were: nivolumab (R), BCG(B), bleomycin + carboplatin/cisplatin+ etoposide (T). The top regimen in metastatic cancer were: nivolumab (R), carboplatin/cisplatin + gemcitabine (B), bleomycin + carboplatin/cisplatin + etoposide (T). The median duration of A/N line ranged from 50(B) to 119(R) days while the median duration for metastatic line range from 71(T) to 82(R) days. The highest rate of inpatient admissions was observed in patients with R (31%). Of the three cancers, R was the most expensive in the A/N and metastatic settings with mean (standard deviation) costs of $192,308 ($269,358) and $136,293 ($146,632), respectively. Conclusions: Combination of clinical and claims data provide valuable information on real world outcomes in routine clinical care and may support treatment selection decisions at the point of care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18766-e18766
Author(s):  
Keri Yang ◽  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Anna Ratiu ◽  
Rachel Delinger ◽  
Todd Zimmerman ◽  
...  

e18766 Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, incurable non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Given limited real-world data on WM treatment utilization, this study evaluates real-world treatment patterns and associated outcomes in the US commercially insured population. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare supplement database. Adults with ≥2 WM diagnoses and ≥1 WM treatment between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Patients included were newly diagnosed, initiating treatment, and enrolled continuously for 6 months before and ≥60 days following the index date, defined as the first date of WM treatment. Treatment regimens were categorized as: rituximab monotherapy, chemotherapy-based (alone or in combination), proteasome inhibitor-based (alone or in combination with rituximab), ibrutinib (alone or in combination with rituximab), and other regimens. Treatment patterns were evaluated by frequency and duration of treatment regimen. Adherence is measured by discontinuation and switching rates. Healthcare resource utilization examined included inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy visits. Total costs were calculated as sum of inpatient, outpatient and pharmacy costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM). Treatment regimens, costs, and hospitalizations were examined overall, and by line of therapy. Results: A total of 453 patients (mean age: 67 years, 51% male) received 1st-line therapy (mean duration: 246 days); 143 (32%) patients received 2nd-line therapy (mean duration: 231 days), and 24 (5%) received 3rd-line therapy (mean duration: 212 days). The most commonly used treatment regimens by line of therapy are shown in the treatment pattern table. Discontinuation rates were 43.3%, 50.4%, and 45.8%, and the switching rates were 25.4%, 10.5%, 20.8% during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd line of therapy, respectively. The overall hospitalization rate was 20% with an average length of stay (LOS) of 2.3 days. Approximately 17% (LOS: 1.4 days), 20% (LOS: 1.8 days), and 25% (LOS: 7.0 days) of patients had a hospitalization, during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd line of therapy, respectively. Mean total PPPM costs were $26,688 in overall population, and increased by line of therapy (1st: $18,682; 2nd: $19,171; and 3rd: $36,878). Conclusions: There remains a significant clinical and economic burden with suboptimal treatment adherence in US commercially-insured patients with WM. Future studies are needed to further understand factors associated with treatment selection. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Eleanor O Caplan ◽  
Anisha M Patel ◽  
Richard W DeClue ◽  
Marina Sehman ◽  
Daniel Cornett ◽  
...  

Aim: Examine real-world characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes among treated persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) stratified by age. Patients & methods: This study utilized US claims data from 1 January 2007–31 July 2018 from the Humana Research Database. Unadjusted comparisons were conducted across PwHA (<18, 18–55, 56–89 years) enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans. Results: A total of 294 PwHA were identified; 21.1% experienced ≥1 bleeding event, and 41.2 and 53.1% had evidence of arthropathy or related disorders, and pain, respectively. Along with all-cause and hemophilia-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), these were highest among PwHA aged 56–89 years. Conclusion: Insights into treatment, outcomes and HCRU may identify opportunities for enhanced disease management, particularly in older PwHA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14581-e14581
Author(s):  
David Hadley ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Debra A. Kientop

e14581 Background: There is a need to enable as many suitable patients onto clinical trials in oncology, that are also representative of patients seen in clinical practice. Currently, oncology trials often require patients to have minimum laboratory tests for hematology and liver function amongst others. We compared the real-world laboratory results and clinical information in TransMed’s patient repository against the requirements of a set of clinical trials to assess patient eligibility retrospectively. Methods: Industry-sponsored clinical trials for follicular lymphoma which started in 2018 were retrieved from the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s clinical trials website. We aimed to find the most common set of diagnosis inclusion criteria and the range of platelet requirements to those observed from real-world data. TransMed’s patient data was collected from its consortium of 205 clinical sites, which includes a variety of source systems at each site, such as electronic medical record systems and laboratory information management systems among others. Results: There were 16 trials which matched our criteria. The most common trial inclusion criteria were for grades 1-3a, progression after at least one line of therapy, and a platelet count > 75 x10-9/L. We found 53 retrospectively-eligible patients who would have met the trial’s main criteria when the patient was between therapies in 2018. At some point within 90 days before starting another therapy, 9% (5/53) of patients failed the requirement for platelet count. Among those, 40% (2/5) were within a 10% drop in the required threshold. Conclusions: We have presented an exemplar combination of cancer diagnosis with a single laboratory test and found patients who could be considered for trials though are deemed ineligible due to a narrowly-missed requirement. Many such tests vary over time, by cancer type, prior treatment, comorbidities and should be considered in the context of other test results. By using real-world evidence at the time of trial design, clinical trials can be optimized to allow improved patient recruitment and expanded availability to patients while ensuring clinical suitability.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Parameswaran Hari ◽  
Lita Araujo ◽  
Dominick Latremouille-Viau ◽  
Peggy Lin ◽  
Mikhail Davidson ◽  
...  

Background: Renal impairment (RI) is associated with substantial clinical and economic burden in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but real-world data reporting on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and outcomes in these patients are lacking. We assessed treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), HRU and associated costs across lines of therapy (LoT) in patients with MM who had baseline RI. Methods: We identified patients (aged ≥18 years) with continuous Part A, B and D coverage who initiated pharmacologic therapy for MM between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns from first-line to fourth-line (1L-4L) were reported for all eligible patients (main cohort). Within this cohort, a subgroup of patients diagnosed with RI at baseline (RI subgroup) were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes. Treatment regimens were identified during the first 60 days following start of each LoT; stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 1L was considered part of the 1L regimen. The end of each LoT was indicated by treatment augmentation, treatment switching (after &gt;60 days), discontinuation of all agents (for &gt;90 days), or death. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was defined as time from start of each LoT until death or censoring (end of data/Medicare coverage). All-cause HRU categories were identified during each LoT and reported as incidence rate per patient per month (PPPM); associated all-cause healthcare costs during LoT were reported in 2017 US$. Results are presented using standard descriptive statistics. Results: A main cohort of 10,026 patients was identified; of these, a RI subgroup of 714 patients with baseline RI was identified (7.1% of main cohort). At 1L initiation, the RI subgroup was generally younger (71.9 vs. 74.6 years), had a lower proportion of females (47.8% vs. 53.1%) and had a higher proportion of Medicare coverage for end-stage renal disease (62.9% vs. 6.3%) than the main cohort. Patients with RI had a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (excluding MM; 4.8 vs. 3.3) and a higher proportion of patients with comorbidities (anemia: 72.5% vs. 57.9%; diabetes with chronic complications: 38.7% vs. 27.1%; cardiovascular diseases: 97.2% vs. 82.5%) than the main cohort. In the RI subgroup, among patients who received SCT in 1L (n=76), bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd) was the most frequent 1L regimen (39.5%), followed by bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd; 17.1%) and bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCd; 15.8%). In patients who had no SCT in 1L, Vd was the most frequent 1L regimen (59.5%), followed by VCd (12.7%) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd; 12.1%). Among patients in the RI subgroup who progressed to 2L therapy, 61.7% received lenalidomide-based regimens in 1L. Newer MM therapies such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide, ixazomib, daratumumab, and elotuzumab were used more frequently in later LoTs (2L: 25.6%; 3L: 50.0%; 4L: 68.8%). Median OS from start of 1L was shorter in the RI subgroup than in the main cohort (29.9 vs. 46.5 months; Table), and this difference was consistent across each subsequent LoT. Incidence of HRU during 1L (Table) was generally higher in the RI subgroup than the main cohort, particularly for inpatient days (1.3 vs. 0.7 PPPM) and home health services (0.9 vs. 0.5 PPPM); this pattern was consistent between cohorts across each subsequent LoT. Total costs in the 1L RI subgroup vs. main cohort (Table) were $14,782 vs. $12,451; the cost differential was maintained across each subsequent LoT. The key driver of this difference was the additional medical service costs ($12,047 vs. $7,459 in 1L) incurred by patients with RI. Conclusion: Patients with MM who had baseline RI were shown to experience higher clinical and economic burden in real-world clinical practice than the overall MM population. This burden was maintained across LoTs. Efficacious regimens that help improve renal function with minimal toxicity would enable patients with MM and RI to persist with treatment and may help address unmet need in this subgroup of patients. Table Disclosures Hari: BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Araujo:Sanofi Genzyme: Current Employment. Latremouille-Viau:Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Other: Dominique Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme.; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Dominique Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Novartis.. Lin:Sanofi Genzyme: Current Employment. Davidson:Sanofi Genzyme: Other: Mikhail Davidson is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc which received consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme.. Guerin:Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Other: Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme.; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Novartis.. Sasane:Sanofi Genzyme: Current Employment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 204589401881629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Studer ◽  
Michael Hull ◽  
Janis Pruett ◽  
Eleena Koep ◽  
Yuen Tsang ◽  
...  

Several new medications for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have recently been introduced; however, current real-world data regarding US patients with PAH are limited. We conducted a retrospective administrative claims study to examine PAH treatment patterns and summarize healthcare utilization and costs among patients with newly diagnosed PAH treated in US clinical practice. Patients newly treated for PAH from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2015 were followed for ≥12 months. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were described. Adherence (proportion of days covered), persistence (months until therapy discontinuation/modification), and the probability of continuing the index regimen were analyzed by index regimen cohort (monotherapy versus combination therapy). Of 1637 eligible patients, 93.8% initiated treatment with monotherapy and 6.2% with combination therapy. The most common index regimen was phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5I) monotherapy (70.0% of patients). A total of 581 patients (35.5%) modified their index regimen during the study. Most patients (55.4%) who began combination therapy did so on or within six months of the index date. Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) and combination therapies were associated with higher adherence than PDE-5Is and monotherapies, respectively. Healthcare utilization was substantial across the study population, with costs in the combination therapy cohort more than doubling from baseline to follow-up. The majority of patients were treated with monotherapies (most often, PDE-5Is), despite combination therapies and ERAs being associated with higher medication adherence. Index regimen adjustments occurred early and in a substantial proportion of patients, suggesting that inadequate clinical response to monotherapies may not be uncommon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document