The Interaction of Public and Private Incentives in Promoting Food Safety Innovation in the U.S. Meat Industry

2008 ◽  
pp. 159-188
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Meat Industry ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Private Incentives ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Global Welfare Impacts of U.S. Meat Promotion Activities

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 418-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shida Rastegari Henneberry ◽  
Joao E. Mutondo ◽  
B. Wade Brorsen
Keyword(s):  
Imperfect Competition ◽  
Meat Industry ◽  
Supply Source ◽  
Welfare Impacts ◽  
Equilibrium Displacement Model ◽  
Equilibrium Displacement ◽  
Beef Producers ◽  
Global Welfare ◽  
Meat Markets ◽  
The U.S

An equilibrium displacement model of the U.S. meat markets is used to measure the potential impacts of promotion investment, differentiating meats by types and by supply source, taking into account the U.S. participation in global meat markets, and considering imperfect competition in the meat industry. The increase in U.S. producer welfare resulting from a 10 percent increase in promotion ranges from -$1.29 million to $2.60 million for U.S. beef producers and from -$0.96 million to $1.67 million for U.S. pork producers, depending primarily on the advertising elasticity used.

scholarly journals Effects of Country of Origin Labeling in the U.S. Meat Industry with Imperfectly Competitive Processors

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanjin Chung ◽  
Tong Zhang ◽  
Derrell S. Peel
Keyword(s):  
Price Elasticity ◽  
Country Of Origin ◽  
Import Price ◽  
Consumer Welfare ◽  
Domestic Demand ◽  
Meat Industry ◽  
Equilibrium Displacement Model ◽  
Country Of Origin Labeling ◽  
Imperfectly Competitive ◽  
The U.S

The study examines the impacts of implementing mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) on producer and consumer welfare in the U.S. meat industry. The equilibrium displacement model developed in this study includes twenty-nine equations representing retail-, processing-, and farm-level equilibrium conditions for the beef, pork, and chicken industries. Unlike previous studies, the model allows trade between domestic- and foreign-origin products and considers the imperfectly competitive market structure of meat processers. Empirical results show that without a significant increase in domestic meat demand, producers are not expected to benefit from the mandatory COOL implementation. Results of a sensitivity analysis indicate that consumers tend to bear more COOL costs than producers, as the own-price elasticity becomes more inelastic, and that producers’ benefits increase as the elasticity of domestic demand becomes more elastic with respect to the price of imported products. The existence of market power in upstream and downstream markets of processors negatively affects both consumer and producer surplus. One implication of our findings is that U.S. beef and pork producers’ promotion and advertising programs would be successful in expanding domestic demand when the programs make the own-price elasticity of domestic demand more inelastic and the cross-price elasticity of domestic demand more elastic with respect to import price.

Salmonella Enteritidis in Meat, Poultry, and Pasteurized Egg Products Regulated by the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1998 through 2003

2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICIA L. WHITE ◽  
ALECIA L. NAUGLE ◽  
CHARLENE R. JACKSON ◽  
PAULA J. FEDORKA-CRAY ◽  
BONNIE E. ROSE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Salmonella Enteritidis ◽  
Phage Type ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Electrophoretic Pattern ◽  
Electrophoretic Analysis ◽  
Critical Control Point ◽  
Egg Products ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

The U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) tests for Salmonella in meat, poultry, and egg products through three regulatory testing programs: the Pathogen Reduction–Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (PR-HACCP) program, the ready-to-eat program for meat and poultry products, and the pasteurized egg products program. From 1998 through 2003, 293,938 samples collected for these testing programs were analyzed for the presence of Salmonella enterica serotypes. Of these samples, 12,699 (4.3%) were positive for Salmonella, and 167 (1.3%) of the positive samples (0.06% of all samples) contained Salmonella Enteritidis. The highest incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis was observed in ground chicken PR-HACCP samples (8 of 1,722 samples, 0.46%), and the lowest was found in steer-heifer PR-HACCP samples (0 of 12,835 samples). Salmonella Enteritidis isolates were characterized by phage type, pulsed-field gel electrophoretic pattern, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Phage typing of 94 Salmonella Enteritidis isolates identified PT13 (39 isolates) and PT8 (36 isolates) as the most common types. One isolate from a ready-to-eat ham product was characterized as PT4. Electrophoretic analysis of 148 Salmonella Enteritidis isolates indicated genetic diversity among the isolates, with 28 unique XbaI electrophoretic patterns identified. Of these 148 isolates, 136 (92%) were susceptible to each of 16 antimicrobials tested. Two isolates were resistant to ampicillin alone, and 10 isolates were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Isolation of Salmonella Enteritidis from FSIS-regulated products emphasizes the need for continued consumer education on proper food handling and cooking practices and continued work to decrease the prevalence of Salmonella in meat, poultry, and pasteurized egg products.

Microbiological Quality and Food Safety Challenges in the Meat Industry

2020 ◽  
pp. 85-102
Author(s):  
Daniela Sánchez-Aldana ◽  
Tomas Galicia-García ◽  
Martha Yarely Leal-Ramos
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Microbiological Quality ◽  
Meat Industry

scholarly journals Cannabis microbiome sequencing reveals several mycotoxic fungi native to dispensary grade Cannabis flowers

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin McKernan ◽  
Jessica Spangler ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Vasisht Tadigotla ◽  
Yvonne Helbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Food Safety ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Fungal Communities ◽  
Regulatory Requirement ◽  
Safety Testing ◽  
Food Borne ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
The U.S

The Center for Disease Control estimates 128,000 people in the U.S. are hospitalized annually due to food borne illnesses. This has created a demand for food safety testing targeting the detection of pathogenic mold and bacteria on agricultural products. This risk extends to medicalCannabisand is of particular concern with inhaled, vaporized and even concentratedCannabisproducts.As a result, third party microbial testing has become a regulatory requirement in the medical and recreationalCannabismarkets, yet knowledge of theCannabismicrobiome is limited. Here we describe the first next generation sequencing survey of the fungal communities found in dispensary basedCannabisflowers by ITS2 sequencing, and demonstrate the sensitive detection of several toxigenicPenicilliumandAspergillusspecies, includingP. citrinum and P. paxilli,that were not detected by one or more culture-based methods currently in use for safety testing.

scholarly journals Who regulates food? Australians' perceptions of responsibility for food safety

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Henderson ◽  
John Coveney ◽  
Paul Ward
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Food System ◽  
Personal Responsibility ◽  
Consumer Involvement ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Food Governance ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Public And Private Sector

Food scares have diminished trust in public institutions to guarantee food safety. Food governance after the food scare era is concerned with institutional independence and transparency leading to a hybrid of public and private sector management and to mechanisms for consumer involvement in food governance. This paper explores Australian consumers’ perceptions of who is, and should be responsible for food safety. Forty-seven participants were interviewed as part of a larger study on trust in the food system. Participants associate food governance with government, industry, and the individual. While few participants can name the national food regulator, there is a strong belief that the government is responsible for regulating the quality and safety of food. Participants are wary of the role of the food industry in food safety, believing that profit motives will undermine effective food regulation. Personal responsibility for food safety practices was also identified. While there are fewer mechanisms for consumer involvement and transparency built into the food governance system, Australian consumers display considerable trust in government to protect food safety. There is little evidence of the politicisation of food, reflecting a level of trust in the Australian food governance system that may arise from a lack of exposure to major food scares.

scholarly journals Food Safety and Spinach Demand: A Generalized Error Correction Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Arnade ◽  
Fred Kuchler ◽  
Linda Calvin
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
Error Correction Model ◽  
Correction Model ◽  
Policy Impacts ◽  
The U.S

We estimate an error correction model representing demand for leafy green vegetables but generalize the structure to allow for adjustment to one conspicuous shock. We investigate whether the adjustment rate to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) 2006 warning that fresh spinach was contaminated with deadly bacteria was distinct from the overall adjustment rate. Our model allows consumers to correct both for past errors and for any errors in their reaction to the shock. This method yields an estimate of the adjustment rate to the policy shock and points to an improved estimate of the duration of policy impacts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document