scholarly journals Clinical and Radiologic Disease Activity in Pregnancy and Postpartum in MS

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e959
Author(s):  
Annika Anderson ◽  
Kristen M. Krysko ◽  
Alice Rutatangwa ◽  
Tanya Krishnakumar ◽  
Chelsea Chen ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate radiologic and clinical inflammatory activity in women with MS during pregnancy and postpartum.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical and MRI reports for women who became pregnant while followed at the University of California, San Francisco MS Center between 2005 and 2018. Proportion of brain MRIs with new T2-hyperintense or gadolinium enhancing (Gd+) lesions (primary outcome) and annualized relapse rate (ARR; secondary) were compared before and after pregnancy.ResultsWe identified 155 pregnancies in 119 women (median Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 2.0). For the 146 live birth pregnancies, prepregnancy ARR was 0.33; ARR decreased during pregnancy, particularly the third trimester (ARR 0.10, p = 0.017) and increased in the 3 months postpartum (ARR 0.61, p = 0.012); and 16% of women experienced a clinically meaningful increase in EDSS. Among 70 pregnancies with paired brain MRIs available, 53% had new T2 and/or Gd+ lesions postpartum compared with 32% prepregnancy (p < 0.001). Postpartum clinical relapses were associated with Gd+ lesions (p < 0.001). However, even for patients without postpartum relapses, surveillance brain MRIs revealed new T2 and/or Gd+ lesions in 31%. Protective effects of exclusive breastfeeding for ≥3 months (odds ratio = 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1–0.9) were observed for relapses.ConclusionsBuilding on previous reports of increased relapse rate in the first 3 months postpartum, we report a significant association between inflammation on MRI and this clinical activity. We also detected postpartum radiologic activity in the absence of relapses. Both clinical and radiologic reassessment may inform optimal treatment decision-making during the high-risk early postpartum period.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16003-e16003
Author(s):  
Emily Feld ◽  
Joanna Harton ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Blythe J.S. Adamson ◽  
Ravi Bharat Parikh ◽  
...  

e16003 Background: There are limited data comparing first-line (1L) C versus IO in cisplatin-ineligible mUC patients. The primary evidence guiding treatment decisions was a May 2018 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety alert based on early review of two ongoing phase III trials, reporting shorter survival in PD-L1 negative patients receiving IO relative to chemotherapy. Final results from these trials are unknown and may not be applicable to a real-world cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mUC patients receiving 1L C or IO from January 1, 2011 to May 18, 2018 using the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from start of 1L treatment to date of death. We compared 12- and 36-month OS, and hazard ratios before and after 12 months. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address confounding in Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox multivariable regression model estimates of comparative-effectiveness. Results: Of 2,243 patients, 562 received IO and 1,681 received C. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, with few exceptions (Table). In the first 12 months, IO was associated with an increased hazard of death compared to C (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16-1.66). Among patients who survived one year, survival was improved with IO compared to C (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.92). Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, 1L IO was associated with inferior 12-month OS relative to C, but superior OS beyond 12 months. Clinicians and patients should carefully consider how to balance the early benefit of C against the late benefit of IO. Currently pending trial results will contribute additional evidence to inform treatment decision making. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 463-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Krasnow ◽  
Lisa M. Jack ◽  
Christina N. Lessov-Schlaggar ◽  
Andrew W. Bergen ◽  
Gary E. Swan

The Twin Research Registry (TRR) at SRI International is a community-based registry of twins established in 1995 by advertising in local media, mainly on radio stations and in newspapers. As of August 2012, there are 3,120 same- and opposite-sex twins enrolled; 86% are 18 years of age or older (mean age 44.9 years, SD 16.9 years) and 14% less than 18 years of age (mean age 8.9 years, SD 4.5); 67% are female, and 62% are self-reported monozygotic (MZ). More than 1,375 twins have participated in studies over the last 15 years in collaboration with the University of California Medical Center in San Francisco, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the Stanford University School of Medicine. Each twin completes a registration form with basic demographic information either online at the TRR Web site or during a telephone interview. Contact is maintained with members by means of annual newsletters and birthday cards. The managers of the TRR protect the confidentiality of twin data with established policies; no information is given to other researchers without prior permission from the twins; and all methods and procedures are reviewed by an Institutional Review Board. Phenotypes studied thus far include those related to nicotine metabolism, mutagen sensitivity, pain response before and after administration of an opioid, and a variety of immunological responses to environmental exposures, including second-hand smoke and vaccination for seasonal influenza virus and Varicella zoster virus. Twins in the TRR have participated in studies of complex, clinically relevant phenotypes that would not be feasible to measure in larger samples.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
John L. Gore ◽  
Marguerite du Plessis ◽  
Maria Santiago-Jimenez ◽  
Kasra Yousefi ◽  
Darby Thompson ◽  
...  

24 Background: The decision to provide adjuvant therapy to men with high risk pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) is confounded by tremendous uncertainty. We prospectively evaluated the impact of the Decipher test, which predicts metastases after RP, on men and providers decision quality. Methods: 150 adjuvant pts were enrolled by 43 urologists from 19 practices. Pts with pathologic T3 stage or positive surgical margins (SM+) after RP were included. Participating physicians provided a treatment (Tx) recommendation before and after exposure to Decipher test results. Pts completed validated surveys on health-related quality of life, decisional conflict, and PCa-related anxiety. Results: Median patient age at RP was 64 years; 67% and 50% had pT3 and SM+ pathology, respectively. Decipher classified 46%, 22% and 32% of men as low-, intermediate- and high-risk, respectively. Pre-Decipher, observation was recommended for 89%. Post-Decipher, 18% (95% CI 12-25%) of Tx recommendations changed. Men’s Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) scores decreased (indicating higher decision quality) after exposure to Decipher results (median DCS pre-Decipher 25 [IQR 8-44], median DCS post-Decipher 19 [IQR 2-30], p<0.001), with greatest decreases in the subdomains of decision uncertainty and decision support. Low-risk Decipher results experienced a trend toward decreased PCa-specific anxiety (p=0.13) and a significant reduction in fear of PCa recurrence (p=0.02). Physicians’ median DCS scores decreased from 32 [IQR 28-36] to 28 [IQR 12-42] (p<0.001). Decipher results were associated with the decision to pursue ART in an MVA analysis (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.19-1.85, p<0.001). Conclusions: Observation is the predominantly prescribed management strategy for men with high risk features at RP. Knowledge of Decipher results was associated with Tx decision-making: men at low risk for metastasis had higher rates of observation recommendations and men at high risk had higher rates of ART recommendations. Decision quality was improved and PCa-specific anxiety was decreased for men exposed to Decipher results. Clinical trial information: NCT02080689.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6564-6564
Author(s):  
Soudabeh Fazeli ◽  
Bradley Snyder ◽  
Ilana F. Gareen ◽  
Constance Dobbins Lehman ◽  
Seema Ahsan Khan ◽  
...  

6564 Background: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains variable, requiring an understanding of patient preferences and concerns to enhance the treatment decision-making process. Pre-operative MRI and surgeon recommendation can further inform surgery choice. Quality of life (QoL) is also an important consideration in treatment decision-making. The aims of this study were to assess patients’ treatment preferences before and after MRI and surgeon consultation, concordance between treatment preference and surgery received, and trends in health-related QoL (HRQL) among a prospective cohort of women newly diagnosed with DCIS. Methods: A prospective nonrandomized clinical trial by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112) enrolled women diagnosed with unilateral DCIS from 75 institutions between March 2015 and April 2016. Participants underwent either wide local excision (WLE) or mastectomy. Surveys queried patient-reported outcomes (PRO) including treatment preference and concerns, and HRQL before and after surgery. Logistic regression models were used to associate surgery preference and actual surgery received with demographic, clinical and PRO data. Change from baseline in HRQL was assessed using linear regression. Results: At study entry, age (OR 0.39, per 5-year increment, 95%CI, 0.21-0.75; p = 0.005) and treatment goals related to the importance of keeping one’s breast (OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.34-0.76; p = 0.001) and removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.09-1.95; p = 0.01) drove surgery preference for mastectomy vs. WLE. After receipt of MRI and surgeon consultation, surgery preference was primarily mediated by MRI upstaging (OR 11.18, 95%CI 3.19-39.16; p < 0.001). Only 4% of women received a type of surgery that did not match their final treatment preference. The strongest predictors of actual surgery received were MRI upstaging (OR 15.80, 95%CI 4.85-51.46) and surgeon recommendation of mastectomy (OR 4.60, 95%CI 1.52-13.94). Receipt of a single surgery was associated with significantly improved mental health from baseline to one year after definitive surgery (p = 0.02 for mastectomy; p = 0.003 for single WLE). Self-reported Black race was an independent predictor of worsened mental (p = 0.001) and physical (p = 0.04) health at one year after definitive surgery, despite no significant racial differences in baseline HRQL. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of communication between providers and patients regarding treatment preferences and goals, the clinical significance of MRI findings, and the benefits/risks of available treatment options. Future research to identify modifiable factors associated with declining mental and physical health is needed to inform targeted interventions to mitigate racial disparities and enhance HRQL in patients with DCIS.


2014 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Geers ◽  
Jason P. Rose ◽  
Stephanie L. Fowler ◽  
Jill A. Brown

Experiments have found that choosing between placebo analgesics can reduce pain more than being assigned a placebo analgesic. Because earlier research has shown prior experience moderates choice effects in other contexts, we tested whether prior experience with a pain stimulus moderates this placebo-choice association. Before a cold water pain task, participants were either told that an inert cream would reduce their pain or they were not told this information. Additionally, participants chose between one of two inert creams for the task or they were not given choice. Importantly, we also measured prior experience with cold water immersion. Individuals with prior cold water immersion experience tended to display greater placebo analgesia when given choice, whereas participants without this experience tended to display greater placebo analgesia without choice. Prior stimulus experience appears to moderate the effect of choice on placebo analgesia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document