Antagonistic activities of Suppressor of Hairless and Hairless control alternative cell fates in the Drosophila adult epidermis

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1433-1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schweisguth ◽  
J.W. Posakony
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Imaginal Disc ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Suppressor Of Hairless ◽  
Disc Cells ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor ◽  
Fate Decision ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Proneural Cluster

Successive alternative cell fate choices in the imaginal disc epithelium lead to the differentiation of a relatively invariant pattern of multicellular adult sensory organs in Drosophila. We show here that the activity of Suppressor of Hairless is required for both the sensory organ precursor (SOP) versus epidermal cell fate decision, and for the trichogen (shaft) versus tormogen (socket) cell fate choice. Complete loss of Suppressor of Hairless function causes most proneural cluster cells to accumulate high levels of the achaete and Delta proteins and to adopt the SOP fate. Late or partial reduction in Suppressor of Hairless activity leads to the apparent transformation of the tormogen (socket) cell into a second trichogen (shaft) cell, producing a ‘double shaft’ phenotype. We find that overexpression of Suppressor of Hairless has the opposite phenotypic effects. SOP determination is prevented by an early excess of Suppressor of Hairless activity, while at a later stage, the trichogen (shaft) cell is transformed into a second tormogen (socket) cell, resulting in ‘double socket’ bristles. We conclude that, for two different cell fate decisions in adult sensory organ development, decreasing or increasing the level of Suppressor of Hairless function confers mutant phenotypes that closely resemble those associated with gain and loss of Hairless activity, respectively. These results, along with the intermediate SOP phenotype observed in Suppressor of Hairless; Hairless double mutant imaginal discs, suggest that the two genes act antagonistically to commit imaginal disc cells stably to alternative fates.

Subcellular localization of Suppressor of Hairless in Drosophila sense organ cells during Notch signalling

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 1673-1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gho ◽  
M. Lecourtois ◽  
G. Geraud ◽  
J.W. Posakony ◽  
F. Schweisguth
Keyword(s):  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sense Organ ◽  
Wing Disc ◽  
Tissue Polarity ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Suppressor Of Hairless ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Disc Cells ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor

During imaginal development of Drosophila, Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor that mediates intracellular signalling by the Notch (N) receptor, controls successive alternative cell fate decisions leading to the differentiation of multicellular sensory organs. We describe here the distribution of the Su(H) protein in the wing disc epithelium throughout development of adult sense organs. Su(H) was found to be evenly distributed in the nuclei of all imaginal disc cells during sensory organ precursor cells selection. Thus differential expression and/or subcellular localization of Su(H) is not essential for its function. Soon after division of the pIIa secondary precursor cell, Su(H) specifically accumulates in the nucleus of the future socket cell. At the onset of differentiation of the socket cell, Su(H) is also detected in the cytoplasm. In this differentiating cell, N and deltex participate in the cytoplasmic retention of Su(H). Still, Su(H) does not colocalize with N at the apical-lateral membranes. These observations suggest that N regulates in an indirect manner the cytoplasmic localization of Su(H) in the socket cell. Finally, the pIIb, shaft and socket cells are found to adopt invariant positions along the anteroposterior axis of the notum. This raises the possibility that tissue-polarity biases these N-mediated cell fate choices.

scholarly journals Bazooka/Par3 cooperates with Sanpodo for the assembly of Notch signaling clusters following asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursor cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Houssin ◽  
Mathieu Pinot ◽  
Karen Bellec ◽  
Roland Le Borgne
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Delta Activity ◽  
Multiple Cell ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor ◽  
Fate Decision

SummaryIn multiple cell lineages, Delta-Notch signaling regulates cell fate decisions owing to unidirectional signaling between daughter cells. In Drosophila pupal sensory organ lineage, Notch regulates pIIa/pIIb fate decision at cytokinesis. Notch and Delta that localize apically and basally at the pIIa-pIIb interface, are expressed at low levels and their residence time at the plasma membrane is in the order of the minute. How Delta can effectively interact with Notch to trigger signaling from a large plasma membrane remains poorly understood. Here, we report that the signaling interface possesses a unique apicobasal polarity with Par3/Bazooka localizing in the form of nano-clusters at the apical and basal level. Notch is preferentially targeted to the pIIa-pIIb interface where it co-clusters with Bazooka and the Notch cofactor Sanpodo. Clusters whose assembly relies on Bazooka and Sanpodo activities, are also positive for Neuralized, the E3 ligase required for Delta-activity. We propose that the nano-clusters act as snap buttons at the new pIIa-pIIb interface to allow efficient intra-lineage signaling.

scholarly journals Bazooka/Par3 cooperates with Sanpodo for the assembly of Notch clusters following asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursor cells

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Houssin ◽  
Mathieu Pinot ◽  
Karen Bellec ◽  
Roland Le Borgne
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Membrane Area ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Delta Activity ◽  
Multiple Cell ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor ◽  
Fate Decision

In multiple cell lineages, Delta-Notch signalling regulates cell fate decisions owing to unidirectional signalling between daughter cells. In Drosophila pupal sensory organ lineage, Notch regulates the intra-lineage pIIa/pIIb fate decision at cytokinesis. Notch and Delta that localise apically and basally at the pIIa-pIIb interface are expressed at low levels and their residence time at the plasma membrane is in the order of minutes. How Delta can effectively interact with Notch to trigger signalling from a large plasma membrane area remains poorly understood. Here, we report that the signalling interface possesses a unique apicobasal polarity with Par3/Bazooka localising in the form of nano-clusters at the apical and basal level. Notch is preferentially targeted to the pIIa-pIIb interface, where it co-clusters with Bazooka and its cofactor Sanpodo. Clusters whose assembly relies on Bazooka and Sanpodo activities are also positive for Neuralized, the E3 ligase required for Delta-activity. We propose that the nano-clusters act as snap buttons at the new pIIa-pIIb interface to allow efficient intra-lineage signalling.

Role of Notch and achaete-scute complex in the expression of Enhancer of split bHLH proteins

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 3745-3752 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Jennings ◽  
J. de Celis ◽  
C. Delidakis ◽  
A. Preiss ◽  
S. Bray
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Interaction Mechanism ◽  
Cell Interaction ◽  
Precursor Cell ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor ◽  
Enhancer Of Split

The proteins encoded by Notch and the Enhancer of split complex are components of a cell-cell interaction mechanism which is important in many cell fate decisions throughout development. One such decision is the formation of the sensory organ precursor cell during the development of the peripheral nervous system in Drosophila. Cells acquire the potential to be neural through the expression of the proneural genes, and the Notch pathway is required to limit neural fate to a single cell from a proneural cluster. However, despite extensive analysis, the precise pathways linking the proneural with Notch and Enhancer of split gene functions remain obscure. For example, it has been suggested that achaete-scute complex proteins directly activate Enhancer of split genes leaving the action of Notch in the pathway unclear. Using monoclonal antibodies that recognise products of the Enhancer of split complex, we show that these proteins accumulate in the cells surrounding the developing sensory organ precursor cell and that their expression is dependent on the activity of Notch and does not directly correlate with expression of Achaete. We further clarify the pathway by showing that ubiquitous expression of an activated Notch receptor leads to widespread accumulation of Enhancer of split proteins even in the absence of achaete-scute complex proteins. Thus Enhancer of split protein expression in response to Notch activity does not require achaete-scute complex proteins.

Only a subset of the binary cell fate decisions mediated by Numb/Notch signaling in Drosophila sensory organ lineage requires Suppressor of Hairless

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (22) ◽  
pp. 4435-4446 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Wang ◽  
S. Younger-Shepherd ◽  
L.Y. Jan ◽  
Y.N. Jan
Keyword(s):  
Hair Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Transformation ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Precursor Cell ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Sheath Cell ◽  
Suppressor Of Hairless ◽  
Asymmetric Divisions ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor

In Drosophila, an adult external sensory organ (bristle) consists of four distinct cells which arise from a sensory organ precursor cell via two rounds of asymmetric divisions. The sensory organ precursor cell first divides to generate two secondary precursor cells, IIa and IIb. The IIa cell then divides to produce the hair cell and the socket cell. Shortly after, the IIb cell divides to generate the neuron and the sheath cell. The membrane-associated protein Numb has been shown to be required for the first two asymmetric divisions. We now report that a new hypomorphic numb mutant not only displays a double-socket phenotype, due to a hair cell to socket cell transformation, but also a double-sheath phenotype, due to a neuron to sheath cell transformation. This provides direct evidence that numb functions in the neuron/sheath cell lineage as well. Those results, together with our observation from immunofluorescence analysis that Numb forms a crescent in the dividing IIa and IIb cells suggest that asymmetric localization of Numb is important for the cell fate determination in all three asymmetric cell divisions in the sensory organ lineage. Interestingly, we found that in the hair/socket cell lineage but not the neuron/sheath cell lineage, a Suppressor of Hairless mutation acts as a dominant suppressor of numb mutations whereas Hairless mutations act as enhancers of numb. Moreover, epistasis analysis indicates that Suppressor of Hairless acts downstream of numb, and results from in vitro binding analysis suggest that the genetic interaction between numb and Hairless may occur through direct protein-protein interaction. These studies reveal that Suppressor of Hairless is required for only a subset of the asymmetric divisions that depend on the function of numb and Notch.

Hairless is required for the development of adult sensory organ precursor cells in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Bang ◽  
V. Hartenstein ◽  
J.W. Posakony
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Spatial Arrangement ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Precursor Cell ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Sensory Organ Precursor ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes

Reduction of the wild-type activity of the gene Hairless (H) results in two major phenotypic effects on the mechanosensory bristles of adult Drosophila. Bristles are either ‘lost’ (i.e. the shaft and socket fail to appear) or they exhibit a ‘double socket’ phenotype, in which the shaft is apparently transformed into a second socket. Analysis of the phenotypes conferred by a series of H mutant genotypes demonstrates (1) that different sensilla exhibit different patterns of response to decreasing levels of H+ function, and (2) that the ‘bristle loss’ phenotype results from greater loss of H+ function than the ‘double socket’ phenotype. The systematic study of H allelic combinations enabled us to identify genotypes that reliably produce specific mutant defects in particular positions on the bodies of adult flies. This permitted us to investigate the cellular development of sensilla in these same positions in larvae and pupae and thereby establish the developmental basis for the mutant phenotypes. We have found that H is required for at least two steps of adult sensillum development. In positions where ‘double socket’ microchaetes appear on the notum of H mutant flies, sensillum precursor cells are present in the developing pupa and divide normally, but their progeny adopt an aberrant spatial arrangement and fail to differentiate correctly. In regions of the notum exhibiting ‘bristle loss’ in adult H mutants, we were unable at the appropriate stages of development to detect sensillum-specific cell types, the precursor cell divisions that generate them, or the primary precursor cells themselves. Thus, the H ‘bristle loss’ phenotype appears to reflect a very early defect in sensillum development, namely the failure to specify and/or execute the sensory organ precursor cell fate. This finding indicates that H is one of a small number of identified genes for which the loss-of-function phenotype is the failure of sensillum precursor cell development.

scholarly journals Drosophila Notch receptor activity suppresses Hairless function during adult external sensory organ development.

Genetics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 1491-1505
Author(s):  
D F Lyman ◽  
B Yedvobnick
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Daughter Cell ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Sensory Organ ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Gain Of Function ◽  
Over Expression ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Synergistic Enhancement ◽  
Conditional Expression

Abstract The neurogenic Notch locus of Drosophila encodes a receptor necessary for cell fate decisions within equivalence groups, such as proneural clusters. Specification of alternate fates within clusters results from inhibitory communication among cells having comparable neural fate potential. Genetically, Hairless (H) acts as an antagonist of most neurogenic genes and may insulate neural precursor cells from inhibition. H function is required for commitment to the bristle sensory organ precursor (SOP) cell fate and for daughter cell fates. Using Notch gain-of-function alleles and conditional expression of an activated Notch transgene, we show that enhanced signaling produces H-like loss-of-function phenotypes by suppressing bristle SOP cell specification or by causing an H-like transformation of sensillum daughter cell fates. Furthermore, adults carrying Notch gain of function and H alleles exhibit synergistic enhancement of mutant phenotypes. Over-expression of an H+ transgene product suppressed virtually all phenotypes generated by Notch gain-of-function genotypes. Phenotypes resulting from over-expression of the H+ transgene were blocked by the Notch gain-of-function products, indicating a balance between Notch and H activity. The results suggest that H insulates SOP cells from inhibition and indicate that H activity is suppressed by Notch signaling.

scholarly journals SEL-5, A Serine/Threonine Kinase That Facilitates lin-12 Activity in Caenorhabditis elegans

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1641-1654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Fares ◽  
Iva Greenwald
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Intracellular Domain ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Threonine Kinase ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Fate Decision

Abstract Ligands present on neighboring cells activate receptors of the LIN-12/Notch family by inducing a proteolytic cleavage event that releases the intracellular domain. Mutations that appear to eliminate sel-5 activity are able to suppress constitutive activity of lin-12(d) mutations that are point mutations in the extracellular domain of LIN-12, but cannot suppress lin-12(intra), the untethered intracellular domain. These results suggest that sel-5 acts prior to or during ligand-dependent release of the intracellular domain. In addition, sel-5 suppression of lin-12(d) mutations is tissue specific: loss of sel-5 activity can suppress defects in the anchor cell/ventral uterine precursor cell fate decision and a sex myoblast/coelomocyte decision, but cannot suppress defects in two different ventral hypodermal cell fate decisions in hermaphrodites and males. sel-5 encodes at least two proteins, from alternatively spliced mRNAs, that share an amino-terminal region and differ in the carboxy-terminal region. The amino-terminal region contains the hallmarks of a serine/threonine kinase domain, which is most similar to mammalian GAK1 and yeast Pak1p.

scholarly journals Cell fate clusters in ICM organoids arise from cell fate heredity and division: a modelling approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Liebisch ◽  
Armin Drusko ◽  
Biena Mathew ◽  
Ernst H. K. Stelzer ◽  
Sabine C. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Chemical Signalling ◽  
Fate Decision

AbstractDuring the mammalian preimplantation phase, cells undergo two subsequent cell fate decisions. During the first decision, the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass are formed. Subsequently, the inner cell mass segregates into the epiblast and the primitive endoderm. Inner cell mass organoids represent an experimental model system, mimicking the second cell fate decision. It has been shown that cells of the same fate tend to cluster stronger than expected for random cell fate decisions. Three major processes are hypothesised to contribute to the cell fate arrangements: (1) chemical signalling; (2) cell sorting; and (3) cell proliferation. In order to quantify the influence of cell proliferation on the observed cell lineage type clustering, we developed an agent-based model accounting for mechanical cell–cell interaction, i.e. adhesion and repulsion, cell division, stochastic cell fate decision and cell fate heredity. The model supports the hypothesis that initial cell fate acquisition is a stochastically driven process, taking place in the early development of inner cell mass organoids. Further, we show that the observed neighbourhood structures can emerge solely due to cell fate heredity during cell division.

glp-1 can substitute for lin-12 in specifying cell fate decisions in Caenorhabditis elegans

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 1019-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Fitzgerald ◽  
H.A. Wilkinson ◽  
I. Greenwald
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Effector Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Animal Kingdom ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Notch Gene ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Differential Gene ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes

Members of the lin-12/Notch gene family encode receptors for intercellular signals and are found throughout the animal kingdom. In many animals, the presence of at least two lin-12/Notch genes raises the issue of the significance of this duplication and divergence. In Caenorhabditis elegans, two lin-12/Notch genes, lin-12 and glp-1, encode proteins that are 50% identical, with different numbers of epidermal growth factor-like motifs in their extracellular domains. Many of the cell fate decisions mediated by lin-12 and glp-1 are distinct. Here, we express glp-1 protein under the control of lin-12 regulatory sequences in animals lacking endogenous lin-12 activity and find that glp-1 can substitute for lin-12 in mediating cell fate decisions. These results imply that the lin-12 and glp-1 proteins are biochemically interchangeable, sharing common ligand and effector proteins, and that the discrete lin-12 and glp-1 mutant phenotypes result from differential gene expression. In addition, these results suggest that the duplicate lin-12/Notch genes found in vertebrates may also be biochemically interchangeable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document