XIPOU 2, a noggin-inducible gene, has direct neuralizing activity

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 721-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.E. Witta ◽  
V.R. Agarwal ◽  
S.M. Sato
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Neuronal Phenotype ◽  
Pou Domain ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Synthetic Mrna

XIPOU 2, a member of the class III POU domain family, is expressed initially in Spemann's organizer, and later, in discrete regions of the developing nervous system in Xenopus laevis. XIPOU 2 may act downstream from initial neural induction events, since it is activated by the neural inducer, noggin. To determine if XIPOU 2 participates in the early events of neurogenesis, synthetic mRNA was microinjected into specific blastomeres of the 32-cell stage embryo. Misexpression of XIPOU 2 in the epidermis causes a direct switch in cell fate from an epidermal to a neuronal phenotype. In the absence of mesoderm induction, XIPOU 2 has the ability to induce a neuronal phenotype in uncommitted ectoderm. These data demonstrate the potential of XIPOU 2 to act as a master regulator of neurogenesis.

XIPOU 2 is a potential regulator of Spemann's Organizer

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1179-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.E. Witta ◽  
S.M. Sato
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Wnt Pathway ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Domain Family ◽  
Potent Inducer ◽  
Pou Domain ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
Dorsal Mesoderm

XIPOU 2, a member of the class III POU-domain family, is expressed initially at mid-blastula transition (MBT) and during gastrulation in the entire marginal zone mesoderm, including Spemann's Organizer (the Organizer). To identify potential targets of XIPOU 2, the interaction of XIPOU 2 with other genes co-expressed in the Organizer was examined by microinjecting XIPOU 2's mRNA into the lineage of cells that contributes to the Organizer, head mesenchyme and prechordal plate. XIPOU 2 suppresses the expression of a number of dorsal mesoderm-specific genes, including gsc, Xlim-1, Xotx2, noggin and chordin, but not Xnot. As a consequence of the suppression of dorsal mesoderm gene expression, bone morphogenetic factor-4 (Bmp-4), a potent inducer of ventral mesoderm, is activated in the Organizer. Gsc is a potential target of XIPOU 2. XIPOU 2 is capable of binding a class III POU protein binding site (CATTAAT) that is located within the gsc promoter, in the activin-inducible (distal) element. Furthermore, XIPOU 2 suppresses the activation of the gsc promoter by activin signaling. At the neurula and tailbud stages, dorsoanterior structures are affected: embryos displayed micropthalmia and the loss of the first branchial arch, as detected by the expression of pax-6, Xotx2 and en-2. By examining events downstream from the Wnt and chordin pathways, we determined that XIPOU 2, when overexpressed, acts specifically in the Organizer, downstream from GSK-3beta of the Wnt pathway and upstream from chordin. The interference in dorsalizing events caused by XIPOU 2 was rescued by chordin. Thus, in addition to its direct neuralizing ability, in a different context, XIPOU 2 has the potential to antagonize dorsalizing events in the Organizer.

The cleavage stage origin of Spemann's Organizer: analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and during gastrulation in Xenopus

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 1179-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.V. Bauer ◽  
S. Huang ◽  
S.A. Moody
Keyword(s):  
Neural Induction ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Animal Pole ◽  
Genetic Manipulations ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
History Of ◽  
Clonal Origin ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Early Gastrula

Recent investigations into the roles of early regulatory genes, especially those resulting from mesoderm induction or first expressed in the gastrula, reveal a need to elucidate the developmental history of the cells in which their transcripts are expressed. Although fates both of the early blastomeres and of regions of the gastrula have been mapped, the relationship between the two sets of fate maps is not clear and the clonal origin of the regions of the stage 10 embryo are not known. We mapped the positions of each blastomere clone during several late blastula and early gastrula stages to show where and when these clones move. We found that the dorsal animal clone (A1) begins to move away from the animal pole at stage 8, and the dorsal animal marginal clone (B1) leaves the animal cap by stage 9. The ventral animal clones (A4 and B4) spread into the dorsal animal cap region as the dorsal clones recede. At stage 10, the ventral animal clones extend across the entire dorsal animal cap. These changes in the blastomere constituents of the animal cap during epiboly may contribute to the changing capacity of the cap to respond to inductive growth factors. Pregastrulation movements of clones also result in the B1 clone occupying the vegetal marginal zone to become the primary progenitor of the dorsal lip of the blastopore (Spemann's Organizer). This report provides the fundamental descriptions of clone locations during the important periods of axis formation, mesoderm induction and neural induction. These will be useful for the correct targeting of genetic manipulations of early regulatory events.

scholarly journals rRNA Biogenesis Regulates Mouse 2C-like State by 3D Structure Reorganization of Peri-Nucleolar Heterochromatin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Yu ◽  
Zhen Sun ◽  
Tianyu Tan ◽  
Hongru Pan ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Nucleolar Stress ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Mes Cells ◽  
Cell Transition ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Nucleolus is the organelle for ribosome biogenesis and for sensing various types of stress. Its role in regulating stem cell fate is unclear. Here, we present multiple lines of evidence that nucleolar stress induced by interfering rRNA biogenesis can drive 2-cell stage embryo-like (2C-like) transcriptional program and induce an expanded 2C-like cell population in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells. Mechanistically, the nucleolar integrity mediated by rRNA biogenesis maintains the normal liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of nucleolus and the formation of peri-nucleolar heterochromatin (PNH). Upon rRNA biogenesis defect, the natural LLPS of nucleolus is disrupted, causing dissociation of NCL/TRIM28 complex from PNH and changes of epigenetic states and reorganization of the 3D structure of PNH, which leads to Dux, a 2C program transcription factor gene, to be released from the PNH region and activation of 2C-like program. Correspondingly, embryos with rRNA biogenesis defect are incompatible to develop from 2-cell (2C) to 4-cell embryos, with delayed repression of 2C/ERV genes and a transcriptome skewed toward earlier cleavage embryo signatures. Our results highlight that rRNA-mediated nucleolar integrity and 3D structure reshaping of PNH compartment regulates the fate transition of mES cells to 2C-like cells, and that rRNA biogenesis is a critical regulator during the 2-cell-to-4-cell transition of murine pre-implantation embryo development.

scholarly journals rRNA biogenesis regulates mouse 2C-like state by 3D structure reorganization of peri-nucleolar heterochromatin

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Yu ◽  
Zhen Sun ◽  
Tianyu Tan ◽  
Hongru Pan ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Natural State ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Nucleolar Stress ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Mes Cells ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

AbstractThe nucleolus is the organelle for ribosome biogenesis and sensing various types of stress. However, its role in regulating stem cell fate remains unclear. Here, we present evidence that nucleolar stress induced by interfering rRNA biogenesis can drive the 2-cell stage embryo-like (2C-like) program and induce an expanded 2C-like cell population in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells. Mechanistically, nucleolar integrity maintains normal liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of the nucleolus and the formation of peri-nucleolar heterochromatin (PNH). Upon defects in rRNA biogenesis, the natural state of nucleolus LLPS is disrupted, causing dissociation of the NCL/TRIM28 complex from PNH and changes in epigenetic state and reorganization of the 3D structure of PNH, which leads to release of Dux, a 2C program transcription factor, from PNH to activate a 2C-like program. Correspondingly, embryos with rRNA biogenesis defect are unable to develop from 2-cell (2C) to 4-cell embryos, with delayed repression of 2C/ERV genes and a transcriptome skewed toward earlier cleavage embryo signatures. Our results highlight that rRNA-mediated nucleolar integrity and 3D structure reshaping of the PNH compartment regulates the fate transition of mES cells to 2C-like cells, and that rRNA biogenesis is a critical regulator during the 2-cell to 4-cell transition of murine pre-implantation embryo development.

scholarly journals The molecular and cellular features of 2-cell-like cells: a reference guide

Development ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (16) ◽  
pp. dev189688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Genet ◽  
Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Culture Models ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

ABSTRACTCurrently, two main cell culture models predominate pluripotent stem cell research: embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Thanks to their ability to contribute to and form all tissues within the body, ESCs and iPSCs have proven invaluable in understanding pluripotent states, early embryonic development and cell differentiation, as well as in devising strategies for regenerative medicine. Comparatively little is known about totipotency – a cellular state with greater developmental potential. In mice, only the zygote and the blastomeres of the 2-cell-stage embryo are truly totipotent, as they alone can develop to form the embryo and all of its supportive extra-embryonic tissues. However, the discovery of a rare subpopulation of cells in murine ESC cultures, possessing features of 2-cell embryo blastomeres and expanded cell fate potential, has provided a biochemically tractable model to enable the in vitro study of totipotency. Here, we summarize current known features of these 2-cell-like cells (2CLCs) in an effort to provide a reference for the community, and to clarify what we know about their identity so far.

Direct neural induction and selective inhibition of mesoderm and epidermis inducers by Xnr3

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.S. Hansen ◽  
C.D. Marion ◽  
K. Steele ◽  
S. George ◽  
W.C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Family Members ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
Secreted Factors ◽  
C Terminus

During gastrulation in amphibians, secreted factors from Spemann's organizer act on dorsal ectoderm to induce the central nervous system. A number of secreted factors produced by Spemann's organizer have recently been identified. The TGFbeta family member Xnr3 is similar in amino acid sequence to the mouse factor nodal and is expressed in a restricted group of cells in the superficial layer of Spemann's organizer. Xnr3, unlike the related factors nodal, Xnr1 and Xnr2, lacks mesoderm-inducing activity. We report here that Xnr3 can directly induce neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm explants (animal caps). Injection of animal caps with either Xnr3 RNA or plasmids induces the expression of the pan-neural genes NCAM and nrp1, as well as the anterior neural marker Cpl1. A growing body of evidence suggests that neural induction in Xenopus proceeds as the default in the absence of epidermis inducers. The best candidates for the endogenous epidermis inducers are BMP-4 and BMP-7. The neural inducing activity of Xnr3 can be inhibited by overexpression of BMP-4, as has been observed with the neural inducers noggin, chordin and follistatin. Furthermore, Xnr3 can block mesoderm induction by BMP-4 and activin, but not by Xnr2. The structural basis underlying the divergent activities of Xnr2 and Xnr3 was analyzed using site-directed mutagenesis. Mutations introduced to the conserved cysteine residues characteristic of the TGFbeta family were found to inactivate Xnr2, but not Xnr3. The most unique feature of Xnr3 is the absence of a conserved cysteine at the C terminus of the protein. This feature distinguishes Xnr3 from other TGFbeta family members, including Xnr2. However, we observed that changing the C terminus of Xnr3 to more closely resemble other TGFbeta family members did not significantly alter its activity, suggesting that other structural features of Xnr3 distinguish its biological activity from Xnr2.

scholarly journals Origin of cellular asymmetries in the pre-implantation mouse embryo: a hypothesis

2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1657) ◽  
pp. 20130536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyoshi Takaoka ◽  
Hiroshi Hamada
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Fate Decision

The first cell fate decision during mouse development concerns whether a blastomere will contribute to the inner cell mass (ICM; which gives rise to the embryo proper) or to trophectoderm (TE; which gives rise to the placenta). The position of a cell within an 8- to 16-cell-stage embryo correlates with its future fate, with outer cells contributing to TE and inner cells to the ICM. It remains unknown, however, whether an earlier pre-pattern exists. Here, we propose a hypothesis that could account for generation of such a pre-pattern and which is based on epigenetic asymmetry (such as in histone or DNA methylation) between maternal and paternal genomes in the zygote.

Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates. Lessons from the amphibians

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Slack ◽  
D. Tannahill
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathway ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Almost All

Interest in the problem of anteroposterior specification has quickened because of our near understanding of the mechanism in Drosophila and because of the homology of Antennapedia-like homeobox gene expression patterns in Drosophila and vertebrates. But vertebrates differ from Drosophila because of morphogenetic movements and interactions between tissue layers, both intimately associated with anteroposterior specification. The purpose of this article is to review classical findings and to enquire how far these have been confirmed, refuted or extended by modern work. The “pre-molecular” work suggests that there are several steps to the process: (i) Formation of anteroposterior pattern in mesoderm during gastrulation with posterior dominance. (ii) Regional specific induction of ectoderm to form neural plate. (iii) Reciprocal interactions from neural plate to mesoderm. (iv) Interactions within neural plate with posterior dominance. Unfortunately, almost all the observable markers are in the CNS rather than in the mesoderm where the initial specification is thought to occur. This has meant that the specification of the mesoderm has been assayed indirectly by transplantation methods such as the Einsteckung. New molecular markers now supplement morphological ones but they are still mainly in the CNS and not the mesoderm. A particular interest attaches to the genes of the Antp-like HOX clusters since these may not only be markers but actual coding factors for anteroposterior levels. We have a new understanding of mesoderm induction based on the discovery of activins and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) as candidate inducing factors. These factors have later consequences for anteroposterior pattern with activin tending to induce anterior, and FGF posterior structures. Recent work on neural induction has implicated cAMP and protein kinase C (PKC) as elements of the signal transduction pathway and has provided new evidence for the importance of tangential neural induction. The regional specificity of neural induction has been reinvestigated using molecular markers and provides conclusions rather similar to the classical work. Defects in the axial pattern may be produced by retinoic acid but it remains unclear whether its effects are truly coordinate ones or are concentrated in certain regions of high sensitivity. In general the molecular studies have supported and reinforced the “pre-molecular ones”. Important questions still remain: (i) How much pattern is there in the mesoderm (how many states?) (ii) How is this pattern generated by the invaginating organizer? (iii) Is there one-to-one transmission of codings to the neural plate? (iv) What is the nature of the interactions within the neural plate? (v) Are the HOX cluster genes really the anteroposterior codings?

The origins of primitive blood in Xenopus: implications for axial patterning

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Lane ◽  
W.C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Axial Patterning ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
Dorsal Mesoderm

The marginal zone in Xenopus laevis is proposed to be patterned with dorsal mesoderm situated near the upper blastoporal lip and ventral mesoderm near the lower blastoporal lip. We determined the origins of the ventralmost mesoderm, primitive blood, and show it arises from all vegetal blastomeres at the 32-cell stage, including blastomere C1, a progenitor of Spemann's organizer. This demonstrates that cells located at the upper blastoporal lip become ventral mesoderm, not solely dorsal mesoderm as previously believed. Reassessment of extant fate maps shows dorsal mesoderm and dorsal endoderm descend from the animal region of the marginal zone, whereas ventral mesoderm descends from the vegetal region of the marginal zone, and ventral endoderm descends from cells located vegetal of the bottle cells. Thus, the orientation of the dorsal-ventral axis of the mesoderm and endoderm is rotated 90(degrees) from its current portrayal in fate maps. This reassessment leads us to propose revisions in the nomenclature of the marginal zone and the orientation of the axes in pre-gastrula Xenopus embryos.

Abstract 3380: Acetylation-dependent Regulation Of Notch1 Signaling In Endothelial Cells

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Guarani ◽  
Franck Dequiedt ◽  
Andreas M Zeiher ◽  
Stefanie Dimmeler ◽  
Michael Potente
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Knock Down

The Notch signaling pathway is a versatile regulator of cell fate decisions and plays an essential role for embryonic and postnatal vascular development. As only modest differences in Notch pathway activity suffice to determine dramatic differences in blood vessel development, this pathway is tightly regulated by a variety of molecular mechanisms. Reversible acetylation has emerged as an important post-translational modification of several non-histone proteins, which are targeted by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Here, we report that specifically the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) is itself an acetylated protein and that its acetylation level is tightly regulated by the SIRT1 deacetylase, which we have previously identified as a key regulator of endothelial angiogenic functions during vascular growth. Coexpression of NICD with histone acetyltransferases such as p300 or PCAF induced a dose- and time-dependent acetylation of NICD. Blocking HDAC activity using the class III HDAC inhibitor nicotinamid (NAM), but not the class I/II HDAC inhibior trichostatin A, resulted in a significant increase of NICD acetylation suggesting that NICD is targetd by class III HDACs for deacetylation. Among the class III HDACs with deacetylase activity (SIRT1, 2, 3, 5), knock down of specifically SIRT1 resulted in enhanced acetylation of NICD. Moreover, wild type SIRT1, but not a catalytically inactive mutant catalyzed the deacetylation of NICD in a nicotinamid-dependent manner. SIRT1, but SIRT2, SIRT3 or SIRT5, associated with NICD through its catalytic domain demonstrating that SIRT1 is a direct NICD deacetylase. Enhancing NICD acetylation by either overexpression of p300 or inhibition of SIRT1 activity using NAM or RNAi-mediated knock down resulted in enhanced NICD protein stability by blocking its ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Consistent with these results, loss of SIRT1 amplified Notch target gene expression in endothelial cells in response to NICD overexpression or treatment with the Notch ligand Dll4. In summary, our results identify reversible acetylation of NICD as a novel molecular mechanism to control Notch signaling and suggest that deacetylation of NICD by SIRT1 plays a key role in the dynamic regulation of Notch signaling in endothelial cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document