Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor interacts with mouse blastocysts independently of ErbB1: a possible role for heparan sulfate proteoglycans and ErbB4 in blastocyst implantation

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (9) ◽  
pp. 1997-2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.C. Paria ◽  
K. Elenius ◽  
M. Klagsbrun ◽  
S.K. Dey

Blastocyst implantation requires molecular and cellular interactions between the uterine luminal epithelium and blastocyst trophectoderm. We have previously shown that heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) is induced in the mouse luminal epithelium solely at the site of blastocyst apposition at 16:00 hours on day 4 of pregnancy prior to the attachment reaction (22:00-23:00 hours), and that HB-EGF promotes blastocyst growth, zona-hatching and trophoblast outgrowth. To delineate which EGF receptors participate in blastocyst activation, the toxicity of chimeric toxins composed of HB-EGF or TGF-(α) coupled to Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE) were used as measures of receptor expression. TGF-(α) or HB-EGF binds to EGF-receptor (ErbB1), while HB-EGF, in addition, binds to ErbB4. The results indicate that ErbB1 is inefficient in mediating TGF-(α)-PE or HB-EGF-PE toxicity as follows: (i) TGF-(α)-PE was relatively inferior in killing blastocysts, 100-fold less than HB-EGF-PE, (ii) analysis of blastocysts isolated from cross-bred egfr+/− mice demonstrated that HB-EGF-PE, but not TGF-(α)-PE, killed egfr−/− blastocysts, and (iii) blastocysts that survived TGF-(α)-PE were nevertheless killed by HB-EGF-PE. HB-EGF-PE toxicity was partially mediated by cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), since a peptide corresponding to the heparin-binding domain of HB-EGF as well as heparitinase treatment protected the blastocysts from the toxic effects of HB-EGF-PE by about 40%. ErbB4 is a candidate for being an HB-EGF-responsive receptor since RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that day 4 mouse blastocysts express two different erbB4 isoforms and immunostaining with anti-ErbB4 antibodies confirmed that ErbB4 protein is expressed at the apical surface of the trophectoderm cells. It is concluded that (i) HB-EGF interacts with the blastocyst cell surface via high-affinity receptors other than ErbB1, (ii) the HB-EGF interaction with high-affinity blastocysts receptors is regulated by heparan sulfate, and (iii) ErbB4 is a candidate for being a high-affinity receptor for HB-EGF on the surface of implantation-competent blastocysts.

Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 3360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuming Zhang ◽  
Lanhong Zheng ◽  
Shuihong Cheng ◽  
Yanfei Peng ◽  
Li Fu ◽  
...  

Most growth factors are naturally occurring proteins, which are signaling molecules implicated in cellular multiple functions such as proliferation, migration and differentiation under patho/physiological conditions by interacting with cell surface receptors and other ligands in the extracellular microenvironment. Many of the growth factors are heparin-binding proteins (HBPs) that have a high affinity for cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). In the present study, we report the binding kinetics and affinity of heparin interacting with different growth factors, including fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 2,7,10, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF β-1), using a heparin chip. Surface plasmon resonance studies revealed that all the tested growth factors bind to heparin with high affinity (with KD ranging from ~0.1 to 59 nM) and all the interactions are oligosaccharide size dependent except those involving TGF β-1. These heparin-binding growth factors also interact with other glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), as well as various chemically modified heparins. Other GAGs, including heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfates A, B, C, D, E and keratan sulfate, showed different inhibition activities for the growth factor-heparin interactions. FGF2, FGF7, FGF10 and HGF bind heparin but the 2-O-sulfo and 6-O-sulfo groups on heparin have less impact on these interactions than do the N-sulfo groups. All the three sulfo groups (N-, 2-O and 6-O) on heparin are important for TGFβ-1-heparin interaction.


2002 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 1530-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Fleckenstein ◽  
James T. Holland ◽  
David L. Hasty

ABSTRACT We have previously shown that enterotoxigenic invasion protein A (Tia), a 25-kDa outer membrane protein encoded on an apparent pathogenicity island of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strain H10407, mediates attachment to and invasion into cultured human gastrointestinal epithelial cells. The epithelial cell receptor(s) for Tia has not been identified. Here we show that Tia interacts with cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Recombinant E. coli expressing Tia mediated invasion into wild-type epithelial cell lines but not invasion into proteoglycan-deficient cells. Furthermore, wild-type eukaryotic cells, but not proteoglycan-deficient eukaryotic cells, attached to immobilized polyhistidine-tagged recombinant Tia (rTia). Binding of epithelial cells to immobilized rTia was inhibited by exogenous heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans but not by hyaluronic acid, dermatan sulfate, or chondroitin sulfate. Similarly, pretreatment of eukaryotic cells with heparinase I, but not pretreatment of eukaryotic cells with chrondroitinase ABC, inhibited attachment to rTia. In addition, we also observed heparin binding to both immobilized rTia and recombinant E. coli expressing Tia. Heparin binding was inhibited by a synthetic peptide representing a surface loop of Tia, as well as by antibodies directed against this peptide. Additional studies indicated that Tia, as a prokaryotic heparin binding protein, may also interact via sulfated proteoglycan molecular bridges with a number of mammalian heparan sulfate binding proteins. These findings suggest that the binding of Tia to host epithelial cells is mediated at least in part through heparan sulfate proteoglycans and that ETEC belongs on the growing list of pathogens that utilize these ubiquitous cell surface molecules as receptors.


1993 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
D C Love ◽  
J D Esko ◽  
D M Mosser

The intracellular amastigote form of leishmania is responsible for the cell-to-cell spread of leishmania infection in the mammalian host. In this report, we identify a high-affinity, heparin-binding activity on the surface of the amastigote form of leishmania. Amastigotes of Leishmania amazonensis bound approximately 120,000 molecules of heparin per cell, with a Kd of 8.8 x 10(-8) M. This heparin-binding activity mediates the adhesion of amastigotes to mammalian cells via heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which are expressed on the surface of mammalian cells. Amastigotes bound efficiently to a variety of adherent cells which express cell-surface proteoglycans. Unlike wild-type CHO cells, which bound amastigotes avidly, CHO cells with genetic deficiencies in heparan sulfate proteoglycan biosynthesis or cells treated with heparitinase failed to bind amastigotes even at high parasite-input dosages. Cells which express normal levels of undersulfated heparan bound amastigotes nearly as efficiently as did wild-type cells. The adhesion of amastigotes to wild-type nonmyeloid cells was almost completely inhibited by the addition of micromolar amounts of soluble heparin or heparan sulfate but not by the addition of other sulfated polysaccharides.l Binding of amastigotes to macrophages, however, was inhibited by only 60% after pretreatment of amastigotes with heparin, suggesting that macrophages have an additional mechanism for recognizing amastigotes. These results suggest that leishmania amastigotes express a high-affinity, heparin-binding activity on their surface which can interact with heparan sulfate proteoglycans on mammalian cells. This interaction may represent an important first step in the invasion of host cells by amastigotes.


Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (17) ◽  
pp. 4125-4134
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Wang ◽  
Haibin Wang ◽  
Hiromichi Matsumoto ◽  
Shyamal K. Roy ◽  
Sanjoy K. Das ◽  
...  

Heparin binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), encoded by the Hegfl gene, is considered as an important mediator of embryo-uterine interactions during implantation in mice. However, it is unknown whether HB-EGF is important for implantation in species with different steroid hormonal requirements. In mice and rats, maternal ovarian estrogen and progesterone (P4) are essential to implantation. In contrast, blastocyst implantation can occur in hamsters in the presence of P4 alone. To ascertain whether HB-EGF plays any role in implantation in hamsters, we examined the expression, regulation and signaling of HB-EGF in the hamster embryo and uterus during the periimplantation period. We demonstrate that both the blastocyst and uterus express HB-EGF during implantation. Hegfl is expressed solely in the uterine luminal epithelium surrounding the blastocyst prior to and during the initiation of implantation. Hypophysectomized P4-treated pregnant hamsters also showed a similar pattern of implantation-specific Hegfl expression. These results suggest that uterine Hegfl expression at the implantation site is driven by either signals emanating from the blastocyst or maternal P4, but not by maternal estrogen. However, in ovariectomized hamsters, uterine induction of Hegfl requires the presence of estrogen and activation of its nuclear receptor (ER), but not P4. This observation suggests an intriguing possibility that an estrogenic or unidentified signal from the blastocyst is the trigger for uterine HB-EGF expression. An auto-induction of Hegfl in the uterus by blastocyst-derived HB-EGF is also a possibility. We further observed that HB-EGF induces autophosphorylation of ErbB1 and ErbB4 in the uterus and blastocyst. Taken together, we propose that HB-EGF production and signaling by the blastocyst and uterus orchestrate the ‘two-way’ molecular signaling to initiate the process of implantation in hamsters.


1993 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 933-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Higashiyama ◽  
JA Abraham ◽  
M Klagsbrun

Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), but not EGF, binds to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG). This was demonstrated in (a) the binding of 125I-HB-EGF to mutant CHO cells deficient in HS production was diminished by 70% compared to wild-type CHO cells, (b) the binding of 125I-HB-EGF to CHO cells and bovine aortic smooth muscle cells (BASMC) was diminished 80% by heparitinase or chlorate treatment, and (c) 125I-EGF did not bind to CHO cells and its binding to BASMC was not diminished at all by heparitinase and only slightly by chlorate treatment. Accordingly, the role of HB-EGF interactions with HSPG in modulating bioactivity was examined. Heparitinase or chlorate treatment of BASMC diminished the ability of HB-EGF to stimulate BASMC migration by 60-80%. A similar inhibition of migration occurred when BASMC were treated with a synthetic peptide (P21) corresponding to the sequence of the putative heparin-binding domain of HB-EGF. As a control for BASMC viability, and for specificity, it was found that heparitinase and P21 did not inhibit at all and chlorate inhibited only slightly the stimulation of BASMC migration by PDGF AB. Since heparitinase, chlorate, and P21 treatment also diminished by 70-80% the cross-linking of 125I-HB-EGF to the EGF receptor, it was concluded that the interaction of HB-EGF, via its heparin-binding domain, with cell surface HSPG was essential for its optimal binding to the EGF receptor on BASMC and hence for its optimal ability to stimulate migration.


1994 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 2599-2608 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Mesri ◽  
M. Ono ◽  
R.J. Kreitman ◽  
M. Klagsbrun ◽  
I. Pastan

Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) is a smooth muscle cell mitogen composed of both EGF receptor and heparin-binding domains. To better understand the function of its domains, intact HB-EGF or its heparin-binding (HB) domain (amino acids 1–45) were fused to a mutant Pseudomonas exotoxin with an inactivated cell-binding domain. The resulting chimeric toxins, HB-EGF-PE* and HB-PE*, were tested on tumor cells, proliferating smooth muscle cells and a mutant Chinese hamster ovary cell line deficient in heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). Two targets were found for HB-EGF-PE*. Cells were killed mainly through EGF receptors, but the HB domain was responsible for killing via HSPGs. HB-PE* did not bind to the EGF receptor and thus was cytotoxic by interacting exclusively with HSPGs. We conclude that the HB domain of HB-EGF is able to mediate internalization through HSPGs, without requiring the EGF receptor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document